Skip to main content
Log in

UWB Fractal Antennas with Low Group Delay Variation

  • Published:
Wireless Personal Communications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, two Sierpinski carpet UWB fractal antennas are designed and fabricated. The first fractal antenna is an antenna that has not any notch filter. The second one is an antenna with double notch filters. Antenna without notch filter has an operating band of (3.1–10.8) GHz with a gain of 5.3 dB at 10 GHz. This antenna has a low group delay variation. Antenna with double notch filters working at (3.36–12) GHz band shows a gain reduction and higher group delay at the filters operating band. Out of the notch filters operating band, the antenna has a low group delay variation and a gain near to the gain of the antenna without notch filters. The MIMO version of the antenna shows an operating band up to 10.8 GHz and isolation between ports higher than 15 dB.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Federal Communications Commission revision of Part 15 of the commission’s rules regarding ultra-wideband transmission systems. (2002). FCC, Washington, DC, First Report and Order FCC, 02. V 48.

  2. Zhang, J. P., Xu, Y. S., & Wang, W. D. (2008). Microtrip-fed semi-elliptical dipole antennas for ultrawideband communications. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, 56(1), 241–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Li, W. T., Shi, X. W., & Hei, Y. Q. (2009). Novel planar UWB monopole antenna with triple band notched characteristics. IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters, 8, 1094–1098.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Li, X., Yang, L., Gong, S.-X., & Yang, Y.-J. (2009). Ultra-wideband monopole antenna with four-band-notched characteristics. Progress in Electromagnetics Research Letters, 6, 27–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Li, J., Liu, Y. S., & Luo, S. Q. (2014). Four-band-notched UWB antenna using three circular split-rings and a square split-ring. In 2014 IEEE international conference on communication problem-solving (ICCP).

  6. Wang, A., Zhenghe, F., & Luk, K.-M. (2009). Pattern and polarization diversity antenna with high isolation for portable wireless devices. IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters, 8, 209–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Sharma, M., Awasthi, Y. K., Singh, H., Kumar, R., & Kumari, S. (2016). Compact printed high rejection triple band-notch UWB antenna with multiple wireless applications. An International Journal Engineering Science and Technology, 19, 1626–1634.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Bakariya, P. S., Dwari, S., & Sarkar, M. (2015). Triple band notch UWB printed monopole antenna with enhanced bandwidth. AEU—International Journal of Electronics and Communications, 69, 26–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Fallahi, H., & Atlasbaf, Z. (2015). Bandwidth enhancement of a CPW-fed monopole antenna with small fractal elements. AEU—International Journal of Electronics and Communications, 69, 590–595.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Yeganeh, A. N., Najmolhoda, S. H., Sedighyc, S. H., & Ali-Nezhadd, S. M. (2018). Design of a compact planar wide band antenna family. AEU—International Journal of Electronics and Communications, 83, 280–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Mewaraab, H. S., Mahendra, D. J., Jitendra, & Deegwala, K. (2018). A printed monopole ellipzoidal UWB antenna with four band rejection characteristic. AEU—International Journal of Electronics and Communications, 83, 222–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Heydari, S., Pedram, K., Ahmed, Z., & Zarrabi, F. B. (2017). Dual band monopole antenna based on metamaterial structure with narrowband and UWB resonances with reconfigurable quality. AEU—International Journal of Electronics and Communications, 81, 92–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Bing, Y., & Qu, S. (2017). A compact integrated Bluetooth UWB dualband notch antenna for automotive communications. AEU—International Journal of Electronics and Communications, 80, 104–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Ajay, Y., Agrawal, S., & Yadav, R. P. (2017). SRR and S-shape slot loaded triple band notched UWB antenna. AEU—International Journal of Electronics and Communications, 79, 192–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Zarrabi, F. B., Mansouri, Z., Gandji, Navid P., & Kuhestani, H. (2016). Triple-notch UWB monopole antenna with fractal Koch and T-shaped stub. AEU—International Journal of Electronics and Communications, 70, 64–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Mohandoss, Susila, Thipparaju, Rama Rao, Reddy, Bobbili Naga Balarami, Palaniswamy, Sandeep Kumar, & Marudappa, Pushpalatha. (2018). Fractal based ultra-wideband antenna development for wireless personal area communication applications. AEU—International Journal of Electronics and Communications, 93, 95–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Avula, R., Rangarao, M., & Kumari, Y. (2019). Fractal ultra wide band antenna for 5G applications. International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering, 7(5), 215–218.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Tirado-Mendez, J. A., Martinez-Lara, D., Jardon-Aguilar, H., Flores-Leal, R., & Andrade-Gonzalez, E. A. (2019). Inscribed Fibonacci circle fractal in a circular radiator for ultra-wideband antenna operation and size reduction. International Journal of Antennas and Propagation, 2019, 6393401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Manohar Kumar, Ch., & Kumar Muvvala, N. V. S. S. (2019). A compact ultra-wide band rhombus shaped fractal antenna with metamaterial in the ground plane. International Journal of Engineering and Advanced Technology, 8(6), 1349–1354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Ramamurthy, V., & Govindarajan, Y. (2019). High gain ultra wideband fractal antenna. Journal of Computational and Theoretical Nanoscience, 16(4), 1597–1601.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Liu, G., Gu, J., Gao, Z., & Xu, M. (2019). Wideband printed slot antenna using Koch fractal metasurface structure. International Journal of RF and Microwave Computer-Aided Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1002/mmce.22058.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Ahmed, B. T., Olivares, P. S., Campos, J. L. M., & Vázquez, F. M. (2018). (3.1–20) GHz MIMO antennas. AEU—International Journal of Electronics and Communications, 94, 348–358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bazil Taha Ahmed.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix

Appendix

Figure 15 shows the Sierpinski carpet with rectangle recursion at different iterations.

Fig. 15
figure 15

Sierpinski carpet with rectangle recursion at different iterations

Figure 16 shows the Sierpinski carpet with rectangle recursion at fourth iteration. This shape is used to construct the radiating element of the antenna.

Fig. 16
figure 16

Sierpinski carpet with rectangle recursion at fourth iteration

Figure 17 shows the fabricated MIMO antenna without notch filters. The antenna consists of two radiating elements with a metallic barrier between them. This barrier is used to increase the isolation between the two radiating elements. The metallic barrier has a length of 20 mm and a width of 1.25 mm. Separation between the radiating elements is 10 mm.

Fig. 17
figure 17

MIMO antenna

Figure 18 shows a comparison between the simulated and measured S11 of the MIMO antenna. It can be noticed that the fabricated antenna works well within the band (2.9–10.8) GHz, i.e., it has S11 lower than − 10 dB in the above mentioned band.

Fig. 18
figure 18

comparison between the simulated and measured S11 of the MIMO antenna

Figure 19 shows a comparison between the simulated and measured S21 of the MIMO antenna. It can be noticed that the fabricated antenna works well (with an isolation higher than 15 dB) within the band (2.5–15.0) GHz.

Fig. 19
figure 19

Comparison between the simulated and measured S21 of the MIMO antenna

The Envelope Correlation Coefficient of the MIMO antenna is given by:

$${\mathbf{ECC}} = \frac{{\left| {{\mathbf{S}}_{11}^{*} {\mathbf{S}}_{12} + {\mathbf{S}}_{21}^{*} {\mathbf{S}}_{22} } \right|^{2} }}{{\left[ {1 - \left( {\left| {{\mathbf{S}}_{11} } \right|^{2} + \left| {{\mathbf{S}}_{21} } \right|^{2} } \right)} \right]\left[ {\left( {1 - \left| {{\mathbf{S}}_{12} } \right|^{2} \left| {{\mathbf{S}}_{22} } \right|^{2} } \right)} \right]}}$$
(4)

In the band (3.1–10.6) GHz, the Envelope Correlation Coefficient (ECC) is lower than 0.02 and the diversity gain is higher than 9.9 dB.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ahmed, B.T., Hernández, D.B. UWB Fractal Antennas with Low Group Delay Variation. Wireless Pers Commun 114, 1999–2016 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-020-07459-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-020-07459-z

Keywords

Navigation