Abstract
Objectives
This study aimed to establish a difference in mandibular bone density between bruxer and non-bruxer patients, based on panoramic radiographs.
Methods
Panoramic radiographs of bruxer and non-bruxer patients were analyzed with ImageJ®. Several radiological determinants were studied on the patients' panoramic radiographs: gray values of cancellous bone and cortical bone, and bony exostoses at the mandibular angle.
Results
Thirty-seven bruxers and forty-seven non-bruxers were included in the study.
A statistically significant difference (p < 0.05) was noted in the cancellous to cortical bone ratios of bruxers and non-bruxers: the density of cancellous bone was greater in bruxers than in non-bruxers.
The number of bony exostoses at the mandibular angle was significantly higher in bruxers (p < 0.05).
Conclusions
This study obtained radiological determinants of bruxism from panoramic radiographs. Further studies are needed to supplement this preliminary approach, especially via the analysis of three-dimensional imaging to overcome the limitations of panoramic radiography.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Lobbezoo F, Ahlberg J, Raphael KG, Wetselaar P, Glaros AG, Kato T, et al. International consensus on the assessment of bruxism: report of a work in progress. J Oral Rehabil. 2018;45:837–44. https://doi.org/10.1111/joor.12663.
Manfredini D, Ahlberg J, Wetselaar P, Svensson P, Lobbezoo F. The bruxism construct: from cut-off points to a continuum spectrum. J Oral Rehabil. 2019;46:991–7. https://doi.org/10.1111/joor.12833.
Manfredini D, Colonna A, Bracci A, Lobbezoo F. Bruxism: a summary of current knowledge on aetiology, assessment and management. Oral Surg. 2020;13:358–70.
Lumetti S, Ghiacci G, Macaluso GM, Amore M, Galli C, Calciolari E, et al. Tardive dyskinesia, oral parafunction, and implant-supported rehabilitation. Case Rep Dent. 2016. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/7167452.
de Baat C, Verhoeff M, Ahlberg J, Manfredini D, Winocur E, Zweers P, et al. Medications and addictive substances potentially inducing or attenuating sleep bruxism and/or awake bruxism. J Oral Rehabil. 2021;48:343–54. https://doi.org/10.1111/joor.13061.
Melo G, Duarte J, Pauletto P, Porporatti AL, Stuginski-Barbosa J, Winocur E, et al. Bruxism: an umbrella review of systematic reviews. J Oral Rehabil. 2019;46:666–90. https://doi.org/10.1111/joor.12801.
Goldstein G, DeSantis L, Goodacre C. Bruxism: best evidence consensus statement. J Prosthodont. 2021;30:91–101. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.13308.
Newman HN. Attrition, eruption, and the periodontium. J Dent Res. 1999;78:730–4. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345990780030401.
Lang NP, Bartold PM. Periodontal health. J Periodontol. 2018;89(Suppl 1):S9-16. https://doi.org/10.1002/JPER.16-0517.
Ré JP, Orthlieb JD. “Periofunctional” approach [Approche « parofonctionnelle »]. J Parodontol. 2020;39:41–8.
Gross M, Gracis S, Gamborena I, Meyenberg K, Shifman A, Nissan J. The science and art of occlusion and oral rehabilitation. Batavia: Quintessence publishing; 2015.
Wolff JD. The law of transformation of the bones [Das Gesetz der Transformation der Knochen]. Berlin: Verlag von Auguste Hirschwald; 1892.
Botelho J, Machado V, Proença L, Rua J, Martins L, Alves R, et al. Relationship between self-reported bruxism and periodontal status: Findings from a cross-sectional study. J Periodontol. 2020;91:1049–56. https://doi.org/10.1002/JPER.19-0364.
Landa J, Rich A, Finkelman M. Confirming nasal airway dimensions observed on panoramic and posterior-anterior cephalometric radiographs using an acoustic rhinometer. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2010;11:115–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03262726.
Chugh NK, Bhattacharyya J, Das S, Ghosh S, Dutta K, Goel P. Use of digital panoramic radiology in presurgical implant treatment planning to accurately assess bone density. J Prosthet Dent. 2016;116:200-205.e1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.01.017.
Kış HC, Güleryüz GA. Evaluation of the peri-implant bone trabecular microstructure changes in short implants with fractal analysis. Int J Implant Dent. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40729-020-00209-7.
Tosoni GM, Lurie AG, Cowan AE, Burleson JA. Pixel intensity and fractal analyses: detecting osteoporosis in perimenopausal and postmenopausal women by using digital panoramic images. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2006;102:235–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2005.08.020.
Lurie A, Tosoni GM, Tsimikas J, Walker F. Recursive hierarchic segmentation analysis of bone mineral density changes on digital panoramic images. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2012;113:549-558.e1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oooo.2011.10.002.
Alapati S, Reddy RS, Tatapudi R, Kotha R, Bodu NK, Chennoju S. Identifying risk groups for osteoporosis by digital panoramic radiography. Contemp Clin Dent. 2015;6:S253-257. https://doi.org/10.4103/0976-237X.166833.
Ayed MS, Alsharif AF, Divakar DD, Jhugroo C, Alosaimi B, Mustafa M. Evaluating the possible association between systemic osteoporosis and periodontal disease progression in postmenopausal women. Dis Mon. 2019;65(6):193–215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.disamonth.2018.11.001.
HAS. Cone beam computerized tomography [Tomographie volumique à faisceau conique de la face]. 2009. https://www.has-sante.fr/upload/docs/application/pdf/2009-12/texte_court_cone_beam_2009-12-28_17-27-51_224.pdf. Accessed 10 Jan 2022.
Autorité de sûreté nucléaire. Main indications for panoramic radiographs [Principales indications des radiographies panoramiques]. 2021. https://www.asn.fr/Informer/Actualites/Principales-indications-des-radiographies-panoramiques. Accessed 10 Jan 2022.
Isman O. Evaluation of jaw bone density and morphology in bruxers using panoramic radiography. J Dent Sci. 2021;16:676–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jds.2020.09.008.
Antunes JJ, Almeida SA, de Monteiro RMP C, Martins AM. Idiopathic masseter muscle hypertrophy: a case report. Einstein (Sao Paulo). 2019;17(2):eAI4506. https://doi.org/10.31744/einstein_journal/2019AI4506.
Kebede B, Megersa S. Idiopathic masseter muscle hypertrophy. Ethiop J Health Sci. 2011;21:209–12.
Gulec M, Tassoker M, Ozcan S, Orhan K. Evaluation of the mandibular trabecular bone in patients with bruxism using fractal analysis. Oral Radiol. 2021;37(1):36–45. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11282-020-00422-5.
PadmajaSatheeswarakumar L, Elenjickal TJ, Ram SKM, Thangasamy K. Assessment of mandibular surface area changes in bruxers versus controls on panoramic radiographic images: a case control study. Open Dent J. 2018;12:753–61. https://doi.org/10.2174/1745017901814010753.
Funding
Not applicable.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declared that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethics approval
This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by the any of the authors. RGPD-APHM registry #2020-149.
Informed consent
Not applicable.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Casazza, E., Ballester, B., Philip-Alliez, C. et al. Evaluation of mandibular bone density in bruxers: the value of panoramic radiographs. Oral Radiol 39, 117–124 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11282-022-00612-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11282-022-00612-3