Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Narcissism in CEO research: a review and replication of the archival approach

  • Published:
Management Review Quarterly Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Using an unobtrusive archival narcissism measure (Chatterjee and Hambrick in Adm Sci Q 52:351–386, 2007; Adm Sci Q 56:202–237, 2011), CEO narcissism has been linked to important strategic issues: overpayment for acquisitions, risk taking, fraud, etc., but measurement unreliability raises important questions about this research. Six studies (N = 791, comprising 5.3% of CEOs in this review) reported Cronbach’s alphas that met minimum standards (.71 ≤ α ≤ .75) along with other reliability results that were often mixed (e.g. poor test–retest reliability and factor analysis results). However, 37 studies (N = 14,165, 94.7% of CEOs) had unacceptable reliability or failed to report any evidence of reliability at all. Out of 43 studies (total N = 14,956 CEOs), 10 studies (N = 3582) obtained unreported (calculated) Cronbach’s α ≤ .58, 10 studies reported no evidence of reliability or indicator correlations, despite using multiple indicators, and 10 studies justified a measure of narcissism by citing Chatterjee and Hambrick’s (2007) work, but actually relied on only a single archival indicator. Recent studies using the unobtrusive archival approach for CEO narcissism have failed to find acceptable reliability, failed to report low reliability, and have engaged in questionable data transformations. In an operational replication study, data collection procedures were carefully followed, but acceptable results were not obtained in three CEO samples. This article concludes by considering implications for CEO narcissism research and recommendations for future research involving unobtrusive measures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abatecola G, Cristofaro M (2018) Hambrick and Mason’s “Upper Echelons Theory”: evolution and open avenues. J Manag Hist. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMH-02-2018-0016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abernethy MA, Wallis MS (2019) Critique on the ‘manager effects’ research and implications for management accounting research. J Manag Account Res 31:3–40

    Google Scholar 

  • Ackerman RA, Witt EA, Donnellan MB, Trzesniewski KH, Robins RW, Kashy DA (2011) What does the narcissistic personality inventory really measure? Assessment 18:67–87

    Google Scholar 

  • Adiguzel F, Turner K, Sithu J (2018) What if the face of the firm is a narcissist CEO? Corporate reputation and firm performance. In: Global marketing conference proceedings, Tokyo, Japan, July 2018, pp 1253–1257. https://doi.org/10.15444/GMC2018.10.06.03

  • Aguinis H, Vandenberg RJ (2014) An ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure: improving research quality before data collection. Ann Rev Organ Psychol Organ Behav 1:569–595

    Google Scholar 

  • Aguinis H, Cascio WF, Ramani RS (2017) Science’s reproducibility and replicability crisis: international business is not immune. J Int Bus Stud 48:653–663

    Google Scholar 

  • Aktas N, De Bodt E, Bollaert H, Roll R (2016) CEO narcissism and the takeover process: from private initiation to deal completion. J Financ Quant Anal 51:113–137

    Google Scholar 

  • Al-Shammari M (2017) CEO narcissism, prior experience, board prior experience, and corporate social responsibility (CSR): an integrated framework using upper echelons theory, stakeholders’ theory, and a decomposed measure of CSR. Doctoral dissertation. University of Texas at Arlington

  • Al-Shammari M, Rasheed A, Al-Shammari HA (2019) CEO narcissism and corporate social responsibility: Does CEO narcissism affect CSR focus? J Bus Res 104:106–117

    Google Scholar 

  • Ames DR, Rose P, Anderson CP (2006) The NPI-16 as a short measure of narcissism. J Res Personal 40:440–450

    Google Scholar 

  • Antonakis J, Bendahan S, Jacquart P, Lalive R (2010) On making causal claims: a review and recommendations. Leadersh Q 21:1086–1120

    Google Scholar 

  • Arena C, Michelon G, Trojanowski G (2018) Big egos can be green: a study of CEO hubris and environmental innovation. Br J Manag 29:316–336

    Google Scholar 

  • Back MD, Küfner AC, Dufner M, Gerlach TM, Rauthmann JF, Denissen JJ (2013) Narcissistic admiration and rivalry: disentangling the bright and dark sides of narcissism. J Personal Soc Psychol 105:1013–1037

    Google Scholar 

  • Bebchuk L, Fried J (2004) Pay without performance: the unfulfilled promise of executive compensation. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker TE, Robertson MM, Vandenberg RJ (2019) Nonlinear transformations in organizational research: possible problems and potential solutions. Organ Res Methods 22:831–866

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergh DD, Sharp BM, Aguinis H, Li M (2017) Is there a credibility crisis in strategic management research? Evidence on the reproducibility of study findings. Strateg Organ 15:423–436

    Google Scholar 

  • Bollaert H, Petit V (2010) Beyond the dark side of executive psychology: current research and new directions. Eur Manag J 28:362–376

    Google Scholar 

  • Bollen KA (1989) Structural equations with latent variables. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Bouchard TJ (1976) Unobtrusive measures: an inventory of uses. Sociol Methods Res 4:267–300

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyd BK, Gove S, Hitt MA (2005) Construct measurement in strategic management research: illusion or reality? Strateg Manag J 26:239–257

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchholz F, Jaeschke R, Lopatta K, Maas K (2018) The use of optimistic tone by narcissistic CEOs. Account Audit Account J 31:531–562

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchholz F, Lopatta K, Maas K (2019) The deliberate engagement of narcissistic CEOs in earnings management. J Bus Ethics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-019-04176-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buyl T, Boone C, Wade JB (2019) CEO narcissism, risk-taking, and resilience: an empirical analysis in US commercial banks. J Manag 45:1372–1400

    Google Scholar 

  • Camerer CF, Dreber A, Holzmeister F, Ho TH, Huber J, Johannesson M, Kirchler M, Nave G, Nosek BA, Pfeiffer T, Altmejd A, Buttrick N, Chan T, Chen Y, Forsell E, Gampa A, Heikensten E, Hummer L, Imai T, Isaksson S, Manfred D, Rose J, Wagenmakers EJ, Wu H (2018) Evaluating the replicability of social science experiments in Nature and Science between 2010 and 2015. Nat Hum Behav 2:637–644

    Google Scholar 

  • Capalbo F, Frino A, Lim M, Mollica V, Palumbo R (2018) The impact of CEO narcissism on earnings management. Abacus J Account Finance Bus Stud 54:210–226

    Google Scholar 

  • Carey AL, Brucks MS, Küfner AC, Holtzman NS, Große DF, Back MD, Donnellan MB, Pennebaker JW, Mehl MR (2015) Narcissism and the use of personal pronouns revisited. J Personal Soc Psychol 109:e1–e15

    Google Scholar 

  • Chatterjee A, Hambrick DC (2007) It’s all about me: Narcissistic chief executive officers and their effects on company strategy and performance. Adm Sci Q 52:351–386

    Google Scholar 

  • Chatterjee A, Hambrick DC (2011) Executive personality, capability cues, and risk taking how narcissistic CEOs react to their successes and stumbles. Adm Sci Q 56:202–237

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen J, Cohen P (1983) Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences, 2nd edn. Erlbaum Raskin & Hall, Hillsdale, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Cragun OR (2018) Antecedents to the selection of CEOs with higher levels of narcissism and how CEOs with higher levels of narcissism affect the CEO succession process. Doctoral dissertation, University of South Carolina. Retrieved from https://scholarcommons.sc.edu/etd/4637. Accessed 5 Sept 2019

  • Cycyota CS, Harrison DA (2002) Enhancing survey response rates at the executive level: Are employee-or consumer-level techniques effective? J Manag 28:151–176

    Google Scholar 

  • de Bodt E, Bollaert H, Grandin P, Roll RW (2015) The equilibrium assignment of narcissistic CEOs to firms, Paris December 2015 Finance Meeting EUROFIDAI—AFFI. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2566708

  • de Bodt E, Cousin JG, Roll R (2018) Empirical evidence of overbidding in M&A contests. J Financ Quant Anal 53:1547–1579

    Google Scholar 

  • De Vellis RF (2016) Scale development: theory and applications, vol 26. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks

    Google Scholar 

  • Emmons RA (1987) Narcissism: theory and measurement. J Personal Soc Psychol 52:11–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Engelen A, Neumann C, Schmidt S (2016) Should entrepreneurially oriented firms have narcissistic CEOs? J Manag 42:698–721

    Google Scholar 

  • Fanelli A, Misangyi VF, Tosi HL (2009) In charisma we trust: the effects of CEO charismatic visions on securities analysts. Organ Sci 20:1011–1033

    Google Scholar 

  • Finkelstein S (1992) Power in top management teams: dimensions, measurement, and validation. Acad Manag J 35:505–538

    Google Scholar 

  • Finkelstein S, Hambrick DC (1990) Top-management-team tenure and organizational outcomes: the moderating role of managerial discretion. Adm Sci Q 35:484–503

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerstner WC, König A, Enders A, Hambrick DC (2013) CEO narcissism, audience engagement, and organizational adoption of technological discontinuities. Adm Sci Q 58:257–291

    Google Scholar 

  • Gove S, Junkunc M, Boyd B (2019) Into the mind of top managers? Assessing the validity of unobtrusive measures of CEO narcissism. Presentation at Strategic Management Society special conference, Las Vegas

  • Grijalva E, Harms PD, Newman DA, Gaddis BH, Fraley RC (2015) Narcissism and leadership: a meta-analytic review of linear and nonlinear relationships. Pers Psychol 68:1–47

    Google Scholar 

  • Hair JF, Black WC, Babin BJ, Anderson RE (2019) Multivariate data analysis, 8th edn. Cengage Learning, Andover

    Google Scholar 

  • Haleblian J, Finkelstein S (1993) Top management team size, CEO dominance, and firm performance: the moderating roles of environmental turbulence and discretion. Acad Manag J 36:844–863

    Google Scholar 

  • Hambrick DC, Geletkanycz MA, Fredrickson JW (1993) Top executive commitment to the status quo: some tests of its determinants. Strateg Manag J 14:401–418

    Google Scholar 

  • Harms PD, Spain SM (2015) Beyond the bright side: dark personality at work. Appl Psychol Int Rev 64:15–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayward ML, Hambrick DC (1997) Explaining the premiums paid for large acquisitions: evidence of CEO hubris. Adm Sci Q 32:103–127

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill AD, Kern DA, White MA (2014) Are we overconfident in executive overconfidence research? An examination of the convergent and content validity of extant unobtrusive measures. J Bus Res 67:1414–1420

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingersoll AR, Glass C, Cook A, Olsen KJ (2019) Power, status and expectations: how narcissism manifests among women CEOs. J Bus Ethics 158:893–907

    Google Scholar 

  • Jick TD (1979) Mixing qualitative and quantitative methods: triangulation in action. Adm Sci Q 24:602–611

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson SA, Kolasinski AC, Nordlund J (2018) CEO narcissism, human capital, and firm value. Unpublished manuscript. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3209882

  • Josef S, Helena C (2019) Leadership and effectiveness: a content analysis of letters to shareholders during the financial crisis. Int J Bus Commun 1:21. https://doi.org/10.1177/2329488418804044

  • Judd JS, Olsen KJ, Stekelberg J (2017) How do auditors respond to CEO narcissism? Evidence from external audit fees. Account Horiz 31:33–52

    Google Scholar 

  • Kashmiri S, Nicol CD, Arora S (2017) Me, myself, and I: influence of CEO narcissism on firms’ innovation strategy and the likelihood of product-harm crises. J Acad Mark Sci 45:633–656

    Google Scholar 

  • Ketchen DJ, Ireland RD, Baker LT (2013) The use of archival proxies in strategic management studies: castles made of sand? Organ Res Methods 16:32–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim B, Lee S, Kang KH (2018) The moderating role of CEO narcissism on the relationship between uncertainty avoidance and CSR. Tour Manag 67:203–213

    Google Scholar 

  • Koch I, Biemann T (2014) Signs of narcissism of CEOs: validating a widely used measure. Acad Manag Proc 2014:16134

    Google Scholar 

  • Kubarych TS, Deary IJ, Austin EJ (2004) The narcissistic personality inventory: factor structure in a non-clinical sample. Person Individ Differ 36:857–872

    Google Scholar 

  • Lance CE, Butts MM, Michels LC (2006) The sources of four commonly reported cutoff criteria: what did they really say? Organ Res Methods 9:202–220

    Google Scholar 

  • Lykken DT (1968) Statistical significance in psychological research. Psychol Bull 70:151–159

    Google Scholar 

  • Maddala GS (1977) Econometrics. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Malmendier U, Tate G (2005) CEO overconfidence and corporate investment. J Finance 60:2661–2700

    Google Scholar 

  • Malmendier U, Tate G (2008) Who makes acquisitions? CEO overconfidence and the market’s reaction. J Financ Econ 89:20–43

    Google Scholar 

  • Maniadis Z, Tufano F, List JA (2014) One swallow doesn’t make a summer: new evidence on anchoring effects. Am Econ Rev 104:277–290

    Google Scholar 

  • Marquez-Illescas G, Zebedee AA, Zhou L (2019) Hear me write: Does CEO narcissism affect disclosure? J Bus Ethics 159:401–417

    Google Scholar 

  • McManus J (2018) Hubris and unethical decision making: the tragedy of the uncommon. J Bus Ethics 149:169–185

    Google Scholar 

  • Nunnally JC (1978) Psychometric theory, 2nd edn. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Oesterle MJ, Elosge C, Elosge L (2016) Me, myself and I: the role of CEO narcissism in internationalization decisions. Int Bus Rev 25:1114–1123

    Google Scholar 

  • Olsen KJ, Stekelberg J (2016) CEO narcissism and corporate tax sheltering. J Am Tax Assoc 38:1–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Olsen KJ, Dworkis KK, Young SM (2014) CEO narcissism and accounting: a picture of profits. J Manag Account Res 26:243–267

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Reilly CA III, Main BG, Crystal GS (1988) CEO compensation as tournament and social comparison: a tale of two theories. Adm Sci Q 33:257–274

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Reilly CA III, Doerr B, Caldwell DF, Chatman JA (2014) Narcissistic CEOs and executive compensation. Leadersh Q 25:218–231

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Reilly CA III, Doerr B, Chatman JA (2018) “See You in Court”: How CEO narcissism increases firms’ vulnerability to lawsuits. Leadersh Q 29:365–378

    Google Scholar 

  • Patel PC, Cooper D (2014) The harder they fall, the faster they rise: approach and avoidance focus in narcissistic CEOs. Strateg Manag J 35:1528–1540

    Google Scholar 

  • Petrenko OV, Aime F, Ridge J, Hill A (2016) Corporate social responsibility or CEO narcissism? CSR motivations and organizational performance. Strateg Manag J 37:262–279

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips EM (2019) An examination of narcissistic and non-narcissistic CEO’s financial reporting behavior during times of market euphoria and crashes. Unpublished thesis, University of Arizona. https://repository.arizona.edu/handle/10150/632862

  • Popper KR (1959) The logic of scientific discovery. Hutchinson, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Raskin R, Hall CS (1979) A narcissistic personality inventory. Psychol Rep 45:590

    Google Scholar 

  • Raskin R, Shaw R (1988) Narcissism and the use of personal pronouns. J Personal 56:393–404

    Google Scholar 

  • Raskin R, Terry H (1988) A principal-components analysis of the Narcissistic Personality Inventory and further evidence of its construct validity. J Personal Soc Psychol 54:890–902

    Google Scholar 

  • Rijsenbilt JA (2011) CEO Narcissism: measurement and impact. Doctoral dissertation. Erasmus University, Rotterdam

  • Rijsenbilt A, Commandeur H (2013) Narcissus enters the courtroom: CEO narcissism and fraud. J Bus Ethics 117:413–429

    Google Scholar 

  • Robins RW, John OP (1997) The quest for self-insight: theory and research on accuracy and bias in self-perception. In: Hogan R, Johnson J, Briggs S (eds) Handbook of personality psychology. Academic Press, New York, pp 649–679

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogelberg SG, Conway JM, Sederburg ME, Spitzmüller C, Aziz S, Knight WE (2003) Profiling active and passive nonrespondents to an organizational survey. J Appl Psychol 88:1104–1114

    Google Scholar 

  • Salancik GR, Pfeffer J (1980) Effects of ownership and performance on executive tenure in US corporations. Acad Manag J 23:653–664

    Google Scholar 

  • Schrand CM, Zechman SL (2012) Executive overconfidence and the slippery slope to financial misreporting. J Account Econ 53:311–329

    Google Scholar 

  • Sijtsma K (2009) On the use, the misuse, and the very limited usefulness of Cronbach’s alpha. Psychometrika 74:107–120

    Google Scholar 

  • Simmons JP, Nelson LD, Simonsohn U (2011) False-positive psychology: undisclosed flexibility in data collection and analysis allows presenting anything as significant. Psychol Sci 22:1359–1366

    Google Scholar 

  • Tang Y, Mack DZ, Chen G (2018) The differential effects of CEO narcissism and hubris on corporate social responsibility. Strateg Manag J 39:1370–1387

    Google Scholar 

  • Terracciano A, Costa PT Jr, McCrae RR (2006) Personality plasticity after age 30. Pers Soc Psychol Bull 32:999–1009

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson B (1994) The pivotal role of replication in psychological research: empirically evaluating the replicability of sample results. J Personal 62:157–176

    Google Scholar 

  • Tosi HL, Gomez-Mejia LR (1989) The decoupling of CEO pay and performance: an agency theory perspective. Adm Sci Q 34:169–189

    Google Scholar 

  • Tosi HL, Misangyi VF, Fanelli A, Waldman DA, Yammarino FJ (2004) CEO charisma, compensation, and firm performance. Leadersh Q 15:405–420

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Scotter II JR (2014) CEO personality in strategic research: an alternative approach. Doctoral dissertation, University of Florida. Accession No. 2017-10860-242, Retrieved from PsycINFO database

  • Van Scotter JR II, Roglio KDD (2018) CEO bright and dark personality: effects on ethical misconduct. J Bus Ethics 1:25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-018-4061-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner WG, Pfeffer J, O’Reilly CA III (1984) Organizational demography and turnover in top-management group. Adm Sci Q 29:74–92

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang J (2016) The role of CEO personality in company management: examining how CEO narcissism influences and is influenced by individual and organizational characteristics. Doctoral dissertation. Universität Mannheim. https://madoc.bib.uni-mannheim.de/40941/1/Jing%20Wang.pdf

  • Webb E, Weick KE (1979) Unobtrusive measures in organizational theory: a reminder. Adm Sci Q 24:650–659

    Google Scholar 

  • Webb E, Campbell DT, Schwartz RD, Sechrest L (1966) Unobtrusive measures: nonreactive research in the social sciences. Rand McNally College Publishing Co, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • White S (2018) Narcissistic chief executive officers and corporate acquisitions: an upper echelons perspective. Unpublished thesis. http://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:1219094/FULLTEXT01.pdf

  • Wiseman RM (2009) On the use and misuse of ratios in strategic management research. In: Bergh D, Ketchen D (eds) Research methodology in strategy and management, vol 5. Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Bingley, pp 75–110

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu J, Gong M (2018) A study of the effect mechanism of CEO narcissism on corporate strategic change based-on attention-based view. Chin J Manag 15:1638–1646

    Google Scholar 

  • Zajac EJ, Westphal JD (1996) Who shall succeed? How CEO/board preferences and power affect the choice of new CEOs. Acad Manag J 39:64–90

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhu DH, Chen G (2011) Who will appreciate my narcissism? Social inference processes in new director selections. Acad Manag Proc 1:1–6. https://doi.org/10.5465/ambpp.2011.65869644

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu DH, Chen G (2015a) CEO narcissism and the impact of prior board experience on corporate strategy. Adm Sci Q 60:31–65

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhu DH, Chen G (2015b) Narcissism, director selection, and risk-taking spending. Strateg Manag J 36:2075–2098

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Colorado Colorado Springs, 1420 Austin Bluffs Pkwy, Colorado Springs, CO, 80919, USA

    James R. Van Scotter II

Authors
  1. James R. Van Scotter II
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to James R. Van Scotter II.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix

Appendix

See Table 6.

Table 6 List of CEOs and companies in each operational replication sample
Full size table

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Van Scotter, J.R. Narcissism in CEO research: a review and replication of the archival approach. Manag Rev Q 70, 629–674 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11301-019-00178-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11301-019-00178-1

Keywords

JEL Classification

Search

Navigation