Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Response of biochemical biomarkers in the aquatic crustacean Daphnia magna exposed to silver nanoparticles

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Environmental Science and Pollution Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The proliferation of silver nanoparticle (AgNP) production and use owing to their antimicrobial properties justifies the need to examine the resulting environmental impacts. The discharge of biocidal nanoparticles to water bodies may pose a threat to aquatic species. This study evaluated the effects of citrate-coated AgNPs on the standardized test organism Daphnia magna Straus clone MBP996 by means of biochemical biomarker response. AgNP toxicity was compared against the toxic effect of Ag+. The toxicity endpoints were calculated based upon measured Ag concentrations in exposure media. For AgNPs, the NOAEC and LOAEC values at 48 h were 5 and 7 μg Ag/L, respectively, while these values were 0.5 and 1 μg Ag/L, respectively, for Ag+. The EC50 at 48 h was computed to be 12.4 ± 0.6 and 2.6 ± 0.1 μg Ag/L for AgNPs and Ag+, respectively, with 95 % confidence intervals of 12.1–12.8 and 2.3–2.8 μg Ag/L, respectively. These results indicate significant less toxicity of AgNP compared to free Ag+ ions. Five biomarkers were evaluated in Daphnia magna neonates after acute exposure to Ag+ or AgNPs, including glutathione (GSH) level, reactive oxygen species (ROS) content, and catalase (CAT), acetylcholinesterase (AChE), and superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity. AgNPs induced toxicity and oxidative stress responses in D. magna neonates at tenfold higher concentrations than Ag. Biochemical methods revealed a clear increase in AChE activity, decreased ROS level, increased GSH level and CAT activity, but no significant changes in SOD activity. As Ag+ may dissolve from AgNPs, these two types of Ag could act synergistically and produce a greater toxic response. The observed remarkably high toxicity of AgNPs (in the parts-per-billion range) to crustaceans indicates that these organisms are a vulnerable link in the aquatic food chain with regard to contamination by nanosilver.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allen HJ, Impellitteri CA, Macke DA, Heckman JL, Poynton HC, Lazorchak JM, Govindaswamy S, Roose DL, Nadagouda MN (2010) Effects from filtration, capping agents, and presence/absence of food on the toxicity of silver nanoparticles to Daphnia magna. Environ Toxicol Chem 29:2742–2750

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Asghari S, Johari SA, Lee JH, Kim YS, Jeon YB, Choi HJ, Moon MC, Yu IJ (2012) Toxicity of various silver nanoparticles compared to silver ions in Daphnia magna. J Nanobiotechnol 10:14

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Barata C, Varo I, Navarro JC, Arun S, Porte C (2005) Antioxidant enzyme activities and lipid peroxidation in the freshwater cladoceran Daphnia magna exposed to redox cycling compounds. Comp Biochem Physiol C Toxicol Pharmacol 140:175–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baun A, Hartmann NB, Grieger K, Kusk KO (2008) Ecotoxicity of engineered nanoparticles to aquatic invertebrates: a brief review and recommendations for future toxicity testing. Ecotoxicology 17:387–395

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Beauvais SL, Jones SB, Parris JT, Brewer SK, Little EE (2001) Cholinergic and behavioural neurotoxicity of carbaryl and cadmium to larval rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 49:84–90

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Blinova I, Niskanen J, Kajankari P, Kanarbik L, Käkinen A, Tenhu H, Penttinen O-P, Kahru A (2013) Toxicity of two types of silver nanoparticles to aquatic crustaceans Daphnia magna and Thamnocephalus platyurus. Environ Sci Pollut Res 20:3456–3463

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bondarenko O, Juganson K, Ivask A, Kasemets K, Mortimer M, Kahru A (2013) Toxicity of Ag, CuO and ZnO nanoparticles to selected environmentally relevant test organisms and mammalian cells in vitro: a critical review. Arch Toxicol 87:1181–1200

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chen J, Rogers SC, Kavdia M (2013) Analysis of kinetics of dihydroethidium fluorescence with superoxide using xanthine oxidase and hypoxanthine assay. Ann Biomed Eng 41:327–337

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Choi O, Clevenger TE, Deng B, Surampalli RYL, Ross J, Hu Z (2009) Role of sulfide and ligand strength in controlling nanosilver toxicity. Water Res 43:1879–1886

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dalai S, Pakrashi S, Chandrasekaran N, Mukherjee A (2013) Acute toxicity of TiO2 nanoparticles to Ceriodaphnia dubia under visible light and dark conditions in a freshwater system. PLoS ONE 8:e62970

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Devi M, Fingerman M (1995) Inhibition of acetylcholinesterase activity in the central nervous system of red swamp cray fish, Procambarus clarkia by mercury, cadmium and lead. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 55:746–750

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Diamantino TC, Guilhermino L, Almeida E, Soares AMVM (2000) Toxicity of sodium molybdate and sodium dichromate to Daphnia magna Straus evaluated in acute, chronic, and acetylcholinesterase inhibition tests. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 45:253–259

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dominguez GA, Lohse SE, Torelli MD, Murphy CJ, Hamers RJ, Orr G, Klaper RD (2015) Effects of charge and surface ligand properties of nanoparticles on oxidative stress and gene expression within the gut of Daphnia magna. Aquat Toxicol 162:1–9

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ellman GL (1959) Tissue sulfhydryl groups. Arch Biochem Biophys 82:70–77

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • European Parliament and European Council, Directive 2006/121/EC. 2006. Off J Eur Union 561(L396):850.

  • Fabrega J, Luoma SN, Tyler CR, Galloway TS, Lead JR (2011) Silver nanoparticles: behavior and effects in the aquatic environment. Environ Int 37:517–531

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fan WH, Wang XL, Cui M, Zhang D, Zhang Y, Yu T, Guo L (2012) Differential oxidative stress of octahedral and cubic Cu2O micro/nanocrystals to Daphnia magna. Environ Sci Technol 46:10255–10262

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gaiser BK, Biswas A, Rosenkranz P, Jepson MA, Lead JR, Stone V, Tyler CR, Fernandes TF (2011) Effects of silver and cerium dioxide micro- and nano-sized particles on Daphnia magna. J Environ Monit 13:1227–1235

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gallegos MEH, Zannatha MMI, Osornio EG, Sanches AS, Rio FAP (2001) Immediate and delayed effects of lead on AChE, GSH-T and thiols in the substantia nigra, neostriatum and cortex of the rat brain. J App Toxicol 21:397–401

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Griffitt RJ, Luo J, Gao J, Bonzongo JC, Barber DS (2008) Effects of particle composition and species on toxicity of metallic nanomaterials in aquatic organisms. Environ Toxicol Chem 27:1972–1978

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Harris CA, Scott AP, Johnson AC, Panter GH, Sheahan D, Roberts M, Sumpter JP (2014) Principles of sound ecotoxicology. Environ Sci Technol 48:3100–3111

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hoheisel SM, Diamond S, Mount D (2012) Comparison of nanosilver and ionic silver toxicity in Daphnia magna and Pimephales promelas. Environ Toxicol Chem 31:2557–2563

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jemec A, Tišler T, Drobne D, Sepčić K, Jamnik P, Roš M (2008) Biochemical biomarkers in chronically metal-stressed daphnids. Comp Biochem Physiol Part C 147:61–68

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahru A, Dubourguier HC (2010) From ecotoxicology to nanoecotoxicology. Toxicology 269:105–119

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kahru A, Dubourguier HC, Blinova I, Ivask I, Kasemets K (2008) Biotests and biosensors for ecotoxicology of metal oxide nanoparticles: a minireview. Sensors 8:5153–5170

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kilkenny C, Browne WJ, Cuthill IC, Emerson M, Altman DG (2010) Improving bioscience research reporting: the ARRIVE guidelines for reporting animal research. PLoS Biol 8(6):e1000412

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klimisch H-J, Andreae M, Tillmann U (1997) A systematic approach for evaluating the quality of experimental toxicological and ecotoxicological data. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 25:1–5

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Li H, Xia H, Wang D, Tao X (2013) Simple synthesis of monodisperse, quasi-spherical, citrate-stabilized silver nanocrystals in water. Langmuir 29:5074–5079

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Marklund SL, Marklund G (1974) Involvement of the superoxide anion radical in the autoxidation of pyrogallol and a convenient assay for superoxide dismutase. Eur J Biochem 47:469–474

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Matés JM (2000) Effects of antioxidant enzymes in the molecular control of reactive oxygen species toxicology. Toxicology 153:83–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mehlen P, Kretz-Remy C, Préville X, Arrigo AP (1996) Human hsp27, Drosophila hsp27 and human αB-crystallin expression-mediated increase in glutathione is essential for the protective activity of these proteins against TNFα-induced cell death. EMBO J 15:2695–2706

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mwaanga P, Carraway ER, van den Hurk P (2014) The induction of biochemical changes in Daphnia magna by CuO and ZnO nanoparticles. Aquat Toxicol 150:201–209

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Najimi S, Bouhaimi A, Daubèze M, Zekhnini A, Pellerin J, Narbone JF, Moukrim A (1997) Use of acetylcholinesterase in Perna perna and Mytilus galloprovincialis as a biomarker of pollution in Agadir Marine Bay (South of Morocco). Bull Environ Contamin Toxicol 58:901–908

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • OECD Guidelines for the testing of chemicals (2004) Section 2: Effects on Biotic Systems. Test No. 202: Daphnia sp. Acute immobilisation test. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Paris, France

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD Guidelines for the testing of chemicals (2011) Section 2: Effects on Biotic Systems. Test No. 201: Freshwater Alga and Cyanobacteria, growth inhibition test. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Paris, France

    Google Scholar 

  • Pakrashi S, Dalai S, Humayun A, Chakravarty S, Chandrasekaran N, Mukherjee A (2013) Ceriodaphnia dubia as a potential bio-indicator for assessing acute aluminum oxide nanoparticle toxicity in fresh water environment. PLoS ONE 8:e74003

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Romani R, Antognelli C, Baldracchini F, De Santis A, Isani G, Giovannini E, Rosi G (2003) Increased acetylcholinesterase activities in specimens of Sparus auratus exposed to sublethal copper concentrations. Chem-Bio Inter 145:321–329

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Römer I, Gavin AJ, White TA, Merrifield RC, Chipman JK, Viant MR, Lead JR (2013) The critical importance of defined media conditions in Daphnia magna nanotoxicity studies. Toxicol Lett 223:103–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Šinko G, Vinković Vrček I, Goessler W, Leitinger G, Dijanošić A, Miljanić S (2013) Alteration of cholinesterase activity as possible mechanism of silver nanoparticle toxicity. Environ Sci Pollut Res 21:1391–1400

    Google Scholar 

  • Stensberg MC, Madangopal R, Yale G, Wei Q, Ochoa-Acuña H, Wei A, Mclamore ES, Rickus J, Porterfield DM, Sepúlveda MS (2014) Silver nanoparticle-specific mitotoxicity in Daphnia magna. Nanotoxicology 8:833–842

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Strużyński W, Dąbrowska-Bouta B, Grygorowicz T, Ziemińska E, Strużyńska L (2014) Markers of oxidative stress in hepatopancreas of crayfish (Orconectes limosus, raf) experimentally exposed to nanosilver. Environ Toxicol 29:1283–1291

    Google Scholar 

  • Suresh A, Sivaramakrishna B, Victoriamma PC, Radhakrishnaiah K (1992) Comparative study on the inhibition of acetylcholinesterase activity in the freshwater fish Cyprinus carpio by mercury and zinc. Biochem Int 26:367–375

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Toumi H, Boumaiza M, Millet M, Radetski CM, Felten V, Ferard JF (2015) Is acetylcholinesterase a biomarker of susceptibility in Daphnia magna (Crustacea, Cladocera) after deltamethrin exposure? Chemosphere 120:351–356

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zatta P, Ibn-Lkhayat-Idrissi M, Zambenedetti P, Kilyen M, Kiss T (2002) In vivo and in vitro effects of aluminium on the activity of mouse brain acetylcholinesterase. Brain Res Bull 59:41–45

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao CM, Wang WX (2011) Comparison of acute and chronic toxicity of silver nanoparticles and silver nitrate to Daphnia magna. Environ Toxicol Chem 30:885–892

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zou X, Shi J, Zhang H (2014) Coexistence of silver and titanium dioxide nanoparticles: enhancing or reducing environmental risks? Aquat Toxicol 154:168–175

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by the Institute of Public Health “Dr. Andrija Štampar” and the Institute for Medical Research and Occupational Health, Analytical Toxicology and Mineral Metabolism Unit. Special thanks to Doc. Dr. Marija Ćurlin, for providing access to the TEM Analysis Services Lab, for support with NP characterization.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ivana Vinković Vrček.

Additional information

Responsible editor: Thomas Hutchinson

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

ESM 1

Size distribution by volume of citrate-coated AgNPs in ultrapure water (Fig. S1) and standard culture medium used for D. magna (Fig. S2) (DOCX 108 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ulm, L., Krivohlavek, A., Jurašin, D. et al. Response of biochemical biomarkers in the aquatic crustacean Daphnia magna exposed to silver nanoparticles. Environ Sci Pollut Res 22, 19990–19999 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-015-5201-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-015-5201-4

Keywords

Navigation