Abstract
Carbon footprint analysis method was employed to evaluate the ecological benefits of the straw collection, transportation, and storage system based on the case of Laifa Straw Recycling Company, and the emergy-based carbon emission indicator system was also set up to assess the relationship between input resource and carbon emission. In the condition of collecting 2 × 108 kg of straw production, the carbon emission of the artificial model (7.26 × 103 t CO2eq) and mechanical model (6.11 × 103 t CO2eq) was greatly lower than that of the straw burned in the field (2.78 × 105 t CO2eq). According to the emergy-based carbon emission indicator system, the carbon emission of straw recycling system was mainly triggered from labor input, which could be reduced by adjusting the resource structure. The ratio of carbon emission to environmental loading rate (ELRCO2) and ratio of carbon emission to emergy sustainability index (ESICO2) of the artificial model were 90.75E+6 kgCO2eq and 1.52E+6 kgCO2eq, respectively, which were higher than that of the mechanical model, 55.55E+6 kgCO2eq and 1.22E+6 kgCO2eq. It was obviously that the mechanical model had weaker influence on environmental loading than that of the artificial model and presented promising sustainable development ability in the case of mitigating carbon emissions.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
References
Ali M et al (2019) Accounting emergy-based sustainability of crops production in India and Pakistan over first decade of the 21st century. J Clean Prod 207:111–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.09.236
Artuzo FD, Allegretti G, Santos OIB, da Silva LX, Talamini E (2021) Emergy unsustainability index for agricultural systems assessment: a proposal based on the laws of thermodynamics. Sci Total Environ 759. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.143524
Bhattacharyya P et al (2021) Turn the wheel from waste to wealth: economic and environmental gain of sustainable rice straw management practices over field burning in reference to India. Sci Total Environ 775. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.145896
Brown MA, Favero A, Thomas VM, Banboukian A (2019) The economic and environmental performance of biomass as an "intermediate" resource for power production. Utilities Policy 58:52–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jup.2019.04.002
Chen YT, Liu CH, Chen J, Hu NJ, Zhu LQ (2021) Evaluation on environmental consequences and sustainability of three rice-based rotation systems in Quanjiao, China by an integrated analysis of life cycle, emergy and economic assessment. J Clean Prod 310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127493
Cheng J, Zhang CG, Sun JM, Qiu L (2019) Sustainability accounting for the construction and operation of a plant-scale solar-biogas heating system based on emergy analysis. Intl J Energy Res 43:3806–3822. https://doi.org/10.1002/er.4543
Cheng J, Zhang CG, Sun JM, Qiu L (2020) Assessing the sustainable abilities of a pilot hybrid solar-pyrolysis energy system using emergy synthesis. Intl J Energy Res 44:2909–2924. https://doi.org/10.1002/er.5110
Cui W et al (2021) Co-benefits analysis of buildings based on different renewal strategies: the Emergy-Lca approach. Intl J Environ Res Pub Health 18. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18020592
da Silva MG et al (2021) Greenhouse gas emissions of rice straw-to-methanol chain in Southern Brazil. J Environ Chem Eng 9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2021.105202
Ding L, Zhou JJ (2019) Optimum space organisation structure for straw recycling logistics system. J Environ Protect Ecol 20:S494–S501
Du Q et al (2019) Dynamics and scenarios of carbon emissions in China's construction industry. Sustain Cities Soc 48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2019.101556
Fang DL, Chen B, Hayat T, Alsaedi A (2017) Emergy evaluation for a low-carbon industrial park. J Clean Prod 163:S392–S400. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.10.122
Finkbeiner M, Inaba A, Tan RBH, Christiansen K, Kluppel HJ (2006) The new international standards for life cycle assessment: ISO 14040 and ISO 14044. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 11:80–85. https://doi.org/10.1065/lca2006.02.002
Gu L, Zhou Y, Mei T, Zhou G, Xu L (2019) Carbon footprint analysis of bamboo scrimber flooring—implications for carbon sequestration of bamboo forests and its products. Forests 10:51
Hiloidhari M, Haran S, Banerjee R, Rao AB (2021) Life cycle energy-carbon-water footprints of sugar, ethanol and electricity from sugarcane. Biores Technol 330:125012–125012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2021.125012
Jamali-Zghal N, Amponsah NY, Lacarriere B, Le Corre O, Feidt M (2013) Carbon footprint and emergy combination for eco-environmental assessment of cleaner heat production. J Clean Prod 47:446–456. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.09.025
Liu WJ et al (2019a) Sustainability evaluation of soybean-corn rotation systems in the Loess Plateau region of Shaanxi, China. J Clean Prod 210:1229–1237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.121
Liu ZX et al (2019b) Toward sustainable crop production in China: An emergy-based evaluation. J. Clean Prod. 206:11–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.09.183
Liu T, He GJ, Lau AKH (2020) Statistical evidence on the impact of agricultural straw burning on urban air quality in China. Sci Total Environ 711. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.134633
Liu PT et al (2021) Carbon footprint and carbon emission intensity of grassland wind farms in Inner Mongolia. J Clean Prod 313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127878
Mahjoub N, Sahebi H, Mazdeh M, Teymouri A (2020) Optimal design of the second and third generation biofuel supply network by a multi-objective model. J. Clean Prod. 256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120355
Matustik J, Koci V (2021) What is a footprint? A conceptual analysis of environmental footprint indicators. J Clean Prod 285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124833
Ni HY et al (2015) Emission characteristics of carbonaceous particles and trace gases from open burning of crop residues in China. Atmos Environ 123:399–406. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.05.007
Odum, H. T. (1988). Self-organization, transformity, and information. Science.
Plessen MG (2020) GPU-accelerated logistics optimisation for biomass production with multiple simultaneous harvesters tours, fields and plants. Biomass & Bioenergy 141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2020.105650
Popin GV et al (2020) Sugarcane straw management for bioenergy: effects of global warming on greenhouse gas emissions and soil carbon storage. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change 25:559–577. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-019-09880-7
Pourakbari-Kasmaei M, Lehtonen M, Contreras J, Mantovani JRS (2020) Carbon footprint management: a pathway toward smart emission abatement. Ieee Trans Indust Inf 16:935–948. https://doi.org/10.1109/tii.2019.2922394
Qazi A et al (2019) Towards sustainable energy: a systematic review of renewable energy sources, technologies, and public opinions. Ieee Access 7:63837–63851. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2019.2906402
Qi ZQ, Gao CK, Na HM, Ye Z (2018) Using forest area for carbon footprint analysis of typical steel enterprises in China. Resour Conserv Recyc 132:352–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.05.016
Ren JQ, Yu PX, Xu XH (2019) Straw utilization in China-status and recommendations. Sustainability 11. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11061762
Said N, Alblawi A, Hendy I, Daiem MA (2020) Analysis of energy and greenhouse gas emissions of rice straw to energy chain in Egypt. Bioresources 15:1510–1520. https://doi.org/10.15376/biores.15.1.1510-1520
Serrano-Ruiz JC (2020) Biomass: a renewable source of fuels, chemicals and carbon materials. Molecules 25. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25215217
Song D, Lin L, Wu Y (2019) Emergy analysis of a typical New Suspension Preheaters cement plant in China. J. Clean Prod. 222:407–413. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.03.041
Spagnolo S, Chinellato G, Cristiano S, Zucaro A, Gonella F (2020) Sustainability assessment of bioenergy at different scales: an emergy analysis of biogas power production. J. Clean Prod. 277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124038
Sun Y et al (2017) Economic analysis of fuel collection, storage, and transportation in straw power generation in China. Energy 132:194–203
Sun FZ, Sarin SC, Cundiff JS, Sert IO (2020) Design of cost-effective sorghum biomass feedstock logistics-a comparison of different systems. Biomass & Bioenergy 143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2020.105823
Sun YF et al (2021) Emergy evaluation of straw collection, transportation and storage system for power generation in China. Energy 231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2021.120792
Swaney RE, Bird RB (2019) The first and second laws of thermodynamics. Phys Fluids 31. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5120039
Wang ZW et al (2020) Study of synergetic development in straw power supply chain: straw price and government subsidy as incentive. Energy Policy 146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111788
Wang QS et al (2021a) Evaluation and optimization of a circular economy model integrating planting and breeding based on the coupling of emergy analysis and life cycle assessment. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28:62407–62420. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-15101-z
Wang C et al (2021b) Emergy-based ecological efficiency evaluation and optimization method for logistics park. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28:58342–58354. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-14781-x
Wei T, Chen SQ (2020) Dynamic energy and carbon footprints of urban transportation infrastructures: differentiating between existing and newly-built assets. Appl. Energy 277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.115554
Yu JP, Yang JT, Jiang ZG, Zhang H, Wang Y (2020) Emergy based sustainability evaluation of spent lead acid batteries recycling. J Clean Prod 250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119467
Yuan H, Nie KX, Xu XY (2021) Relationship between tourism number and air quality by carbon footprint measurement: a case study of Jiuzhaigou Scenic Area. Environ Sci Polluti Res 28:20894–20902. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-12068-1
Zadgaonkar LA, Mandavgane SA (2020) Framework for calculating ecological footprint of process industries in local hectares using emergy and LCA approach. Clean Technol Environ Policy 22:2207–2221. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-020-01970-4
Zen IS, Al-Amin A, Alam MM, Doberstein B (2021) Magnitudes of households' carbon footprint in Iskandar Malaysia: policy implications for sustainable development. J Clean Prod 315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128042
Zhan CS, Zhao RX, Hu S (2020) Emergy-based sustainability assessment of forest ecosystem with the aid of mountain eco-hydrological model in Huanjiang County, China. J. Clean Prod. 251:14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119638
Zhang SY, Chen N, Song XM, Yang J (2019a) Optimizing decision-making of regional cold chain logistics system in view of low-carbon economy. Trans Res Part a-Policy Pract 130:844–857. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2019.10.004
Zhang SQ et al (2019b) Energy and environmental impact assessment of straw return and substitution of straw briquettes for heating coal in rural China. Energy Policy 128:654–664. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2019.01.038
Zhao XG, Li A (2016) A multi-objective sustainable location model for biomass power plants: case of China. Energy 112:1184–1193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2016.07.011
Zhong HL, Feng KS, Sun LX, Cheng L, Hubacek K (2020) Household carbon and energy inequality in Latin American and Caribbean countries. J Environ Manage 273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110979
Funding
This study was supported from China Scholarship Council (Grant No. 201808410102), Henan Scientific and Technological Research Program (Grant No. 182102110027).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Yufeng Sun and Bin Yang designed the study. Yufeng Sun, Jinwei Wang, and Yaping Yue conducted the field survey. Bin Yang, Yapeng Wang, and Zipeng Zheng helped to analyze data. Yufeng Sun and Bin Yang wrote the initial manuscript. Yufeng Sun, Bin Yang, Yapeng Wang, and Wenlong Mu reviewed and revised the manuscript. All the authors read and approved the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval
Not applicable.
Consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Responsible Editor: Philippe Garrigues
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sun, Y., Yang, B., Wang, Y. et al. Carbon footprint analysis of straw collection, transportation, and storage system for power generation in China based on emergy evaluation. Environ Sci Pollut Res 29, 66922–66934 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-20525-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-20525-2