Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Assessing agricultural soil acidification and nutrient management in life cycle assessment

  • LCA FOR FOOD PRODUCTS
  • Published:
The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

This paper describes part of the first detailed environmental life cycle assessment (LCA) of Australian red meat (beef and sheep meat) production. The study was intended to assist the methodological development of life cycle impact assessment by examining the feasibility of new indicators for natural resource management (NRM) issues relevant to soil management in agricultural LCA. This paper is intended to describe the NRM indicators directly related to agricultural soil chemistry.

Materials and methods

Three nutrient management indicators—nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P) and potassium (K) balances—were estimated on the basis of 1 kg of hot standard carcass weight (HSCW) for three grazing properties in Australia. We also examined a soil acidification indicator based on the effects of agricultural practices.

Results and discussion

The N balance for the grazing properties varied from a loss of 28 g N/kg HSCW to an accumulation of 170 g N/kg HSCW. For comparison, the N content of cattle is about 24 g/kg liveweight. The main contributors to these changes were the growth of N-fixing pastures (or lack thereof) and the application of fertilisers. The P and the K balances showed similar results, varying from a 3.9-g loss to a 19-g accumulation of P and a 4-g loss to a 95-g accumulation of K per kilogram HSCW. Decisions about pasture management were also reflected in the results of the soil acidification indicator. We also identified that soil erosion at the grazing properties is a significant component of nutrient losses.

Conclusions

The results suggest that reducing the leaching of soil N might be the best way to balance the N budget without causing acidification. The NRM indicators developed can be benchmarked against other production systems as the application of these indicators progresses.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson G, Fillery I, Dunin F, Dolling P, Asseng S (1998) Nitrogen and water flows under pasture, wheat and lupin wheat rotations in deep sands in Western Australia. 2. Drainage and nitrate leaching. Aust J Agric Res 49:345–361

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Barlow K, Nash B, Grayson C (2005) Phosphorus export at the paddock, farm-section, and whole farm scale on an irrigated dairy farm in south-eastern Australia. Aust J Agric Res 56:1–9

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Basset-Mens C, van der Werf HMG (2005) Scenario-based environmental assessment of farming systems: the case of pig production in France. Agric Ecosyst Environ 105(1–2):127–144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bolan NS, Hedley MJ, White RE (1991) Processes of soil acidification during nitrogen cycling with emphasis on legume based pastures. Plant Soil 134:53–63

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bouwman A, Van Der Hoek K (1997) Scenarios of animal waste production and fertilizer use and associated ammonia emission for the developing countries. Atmos Environ 31:4095–4102

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Casey JW, Holden NM (2005) The relationship between greenhouse gas emissions and the intensity of milk production in Ireland. J Environ Qual 24:429–436

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cayley J, McCaskill M, Kearney G (2002) Changes in pH and organic carbon were minimal in a long-term field study in the western district of Victoria. Aust J Agric Res 53:115–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cederberg C, Stadig M (2003) System expansion and allocation in life cycle assessment of milk and beef production. Int J LCA 8:350–356

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang C, Sommerfeldt T, Entz T (1990) Rates of soil chemical changes with eleven annual application of cattle feedlot manure. Can J Soil Sci 70:673–681

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • CNMSP (2007) Mass nutrient balance calculator instructions. Cornell University, Cornell Nutrient Management Spear Program, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Costin A (1980) Runoff and soil and nutrient losses from an improved pasture at Ginninderra, Southern Tablelands, New South Wales. Aust J Agric Res 31:533–546

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Crawford D, Baker T, Maheswaran J (1994) Soil pH changes under Victorian pastures. Aust J Soil Res 32:105–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dalal R, Weijin Wang G, Robertson P, Parton W (2003) Nitrous oxide emission from Australian agricultural lands and mitigation options: a review. Aust J Soil Res 41:165–195

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dear BS, Cocks PS, Peoples MB, Swan AD, Smith AB (1999) Nitrogen fixation by subterranean clover (Trifolium subterraneum L.) growing in pure culture and in mixtures with varying densities of lucerne (Medicago sativa L.) or phalaris (Phalaris aquatica L.). Aust J Soil Res 50:1047–1058

    Google Scholar 

  • DPI&F (2003) Beefbal, a nutrient balance model for beef cattle feedlots. Department of Primary Industries and Fisheries, Toowoomba, Queensland

    Google Scholar 

  • Eckard R, Chen D, White R, Chapman D (2003) Gaseous nitrogen loss from temperate perennial grass and clover dairy pastures in south-eastern Australia. Aust J Agric Res 54:561–570

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eckard R, White R, Edis R, Smith A, Chapman D (2004) Nitrate leaching from temperate perennial pastures grazed by dairy cows in south-eastern Australia. Aust J Agric Res 55:911–920

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Eide MH (2002) Life cycle assessment (LCA) of industrial milk production. Int J LCA 7(2):115–126

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Eriksson IS (2005) Environmental systems analysis of pig production—the impact of feed choice. Int J LCA 10(2):143–154

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Helyar K (1976) Nitrogen cycling and soil acidification. J Aust Inst Agric Sci 42:217–221

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hilder E (1964) The distribution of plant nutrients by sheep at pasture. Proc Aust Soc Anim Prod 5:241–247

    Google Scholar 

  • Hospido A, Moreira T, Feijoo G (2003) Simplified life cycle assessment of Galacian milk production. Int Dairy J 13:783–796

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Incitec Pivot (2005a). Nitrogen Factsheet. from http://www.incitec.com/FertFacts.asp accessed Nov 2009

  • Incitec Pivot (2005b). Phosphorus Factsheet. from http://www.incitec.com/FertFacts.asp accessed Nov 2009

  • Incitec Pivot (2005c). Potassium Factsheet. from http://www.incitec.com/FertFacts.asp accessed Nov 2009

  • Khan S, Roser D, Ashbolt N, Davies C, Peters G, Stuetz R, Tucker R, Watts P (2008) Chemical contaminants in feedlot wastes: concentrations, effects and attenuation. Environ Int 34(6):839–859

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lundie S, Feitz AJ, Changsirivathanathamrong A, Jones M, Dennien G, Morian M (2003) Evaluation of the environmental performance of the Australian Dairy Processing Industry using Life Cycle Assessment. Centre for Water and Waste Technology, The University of New South Wales, Sydney

    Google Scholar 

  • Lundie S, Peters G, Ashbolt N, Lai E, Livingston D (2006) A sustainability framework for the Australian water industry. Water 33(7):83–88

    Google Scholar 

  • McKenzie FR, Jacobs J, Riffkin P, Kearney G, McCaskill M (2003) Long-term effects of multiple applications of nitrogen fertiliser on grazed dryland perennial ryegrass/white clover dairy pastures in south-west Victoria. 1. Nitrogen fixation by white clover. Aust J Agric Res 54:461–469

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mila i Canals L, Domenech X, Rieradevall J, Puig R, Fullana P (2002) Use of life cycle assessment in the procedure for the establishment of environmental criteria in the catalan eco-label of leather. Int J LCA 7(1):39–49

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • MLA (2010) About the red meat industry. Retrieved July, 2010, from http://www.mla.com.au/About-the-red-meat-industry/Industry-overview accessed Nov 2009

  • Moody P (2005). Soil Acidity. Queensland Branch, Australian Society of Soil Science Incorporated

  • NLWRA (2001) Australian Agriculture Assessment 2001, Volume 1, Theme report for the National Land and Water Resources Audit. National Land and Water Resources Audit, Canberra

    Google Scholar 

  • Nutri-tech (2006) Humates. Retrieved 18 October, 2006, from http://www.nutri-tech.com.au/products/humates.htm. Accessed Nov 2008

  • Ogino A, Orito H, Shimada K, Hirooka H (2007) Evaluating environmental impacts of the Japanese beef cow-calf system by the life cycle assessment method. Anim Sci J 78:424–432

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paerl H (2008). Nutrient and other environmental controls of harmful cyanobacterial blooms along the freshwater-marine continuum. Cyanobacterial Harmful Algal Blooms: State of the Science Research Needs Series: Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology K. H. Hudnell. 619:217–237

  • Peters G, Rowley HV, Wiedemann S, Tucker R, Short M, Schulz M (2010a) Red meat production in Australia—a life cycle assessment and comparison with overseas studies. Environ Sci Technol 44(4):1327–1332

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Peters G, Wiedemann S, Rowley HV, Tucker R (2010b) Accounting for water use in Australian red meat production. Int J LCA 15(3):311–320

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • QDPI&F (2005) BEEFBAL—A Nutrient Mass Balance Model for Beef Cattle Feedlots. Department of Primary Industries and Fisheries, Brisbane, Queensland

    Google Scholar 

  • Ridley A, Slattery WJ, Helyar KR, Cowling A (1990) Acidification under grazed annual and perennial grass based pastures. Aust J Exp Agric 30:539–544

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ridley A, White R, Helyar K, Morrison G, Heng L, Fisher R (2001) Nitrate leaching loss under annual and perennial pastures with and without lime on a duplex (texture contrast) soil in humid southeastern Australia. Eur J Soil Sci 52:237–252

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ridley A, Christy B, White R, McLean T, Green R (2003) North-east Victoria SGS national experiment site: water and nutrient losses from grazing systems on contrasting soil types and levels of inputs. Aust J Exp Agric 43:799–815

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riffkin P, Quigley P, Cameron F, Peoples M, Thies J (1999) Annual nitrogen fixation in grazed dairy pastures in south-western Victoria. Aust J Agric Res 50:273–282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sandars DL, Audsley E, Canete C, Cumby TR, Scotford IM, Williams AG (2003) Environmental benefits of livestock manure management practices and technology by life cycle assessment. Biosyst Eng 84(3):267–281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanford P, Pate J, Unkovich M, Thompson A (1995) Nitrogen fixation in grazed and ungrazed subterranean clover pasture in south-west Australia assessed by the 15 N natural abundance technique. Aust J Agric Res 46:1427–1443

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schlich EH, Fleissner U (2005) The ecology of scale: assessment of regional energy turnover and comparison with global food. Int J LCA 10:219–223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schoenau J (2005). Impacts of Repeated Manure Additions on Soil Quality. Proc Farm Tech:95–100

  • Slattery W, Ridley AM, Windsor SM (1991) Ash alkalinity of animal and plant products. Aust J Exp Agric 31:321–324

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Unkovich M, Pate JS, Sanford P (1997) Nitrogen fixation by annual legumes in Australian Mediterranean agriculture. Aust J Agric Res 48:267–293

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verge XPC, Dyer JA, Desjardins RL, Worth D (2008) Greenhouse gas emissions from the Canadian beef industry. Agric Syst 98:126–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whalen J, Chang C, Clayton G, Carefoot J (2000) Cattle manure amendments can increase the pH of acid soils. Soil Sci Soc Am J 64:962–966

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Williams AG, Audsley E, Sandars DL (2006) Determining the environmental burden and resource use in the production of agricultural and horticultural commodities. Main Report. Cranfield University and Defra, Bedford

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was funded by Meat and Livestock Australia.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Sustainability Assessment Program, Water Research Centre, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia

    Gregory M. Peters, Hazel V. Rowley, Andrew J. Feitz & Matthias Schulz

  2. Chemical and Biological Engineering, Chalmers University of Technology, 412 96, Göteborg, Sweden

    Gregory M. Peters

  3. FSA Consulting, Toowoomba, QLD, Australia

    Stephen Wiedemann & Robyn Tucker

  4. Geoscience Australia, Canberra, ACT, Australia

    Andrew J. Feitz

Authors
  1. Gregory M. Peters
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Stephen Wiedemann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Hazel V. Rowley
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Robyn Tucker
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Andrew J. Feitz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Matthias Schulz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gregory M. Peters.

Additional information

Responsible editor: Seungdo Kim

Electronic supplementary materials

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

ESM1

(DOC 41 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Peters, G.M., Wiedemann, S., Rowley, H.V. et al. Assessing agricultural soil acidification and nutrient management in life cycle assessment. Int J Life Cycle Assess 16, 431–441 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-011-0279-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-011-0279-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation