Abstract
Purpose
Over the last decade, the rehabilitation/renovation of existing buildings has increasingly attracted the attention of scientific community. Many studies focus intensely on the mechanical and energy performance of retrofitted/renovated existing structures, while few works address the environmental impact of such operations. In the present study, the environmental impact of typical retrofit operations, referred to masonry structures, is assessed. In particular, four different structural options are investigated: local replacement of damaged masonry, mortar injection, steel chain installation, and grid-reinforced mortar application. Each different option is analyzed with reference to proper normalized quantities. Thus, the results of this analysis can be used to compute the environmental impact of real large-scale retrofit operations, once the amount/extension of them is defined in the design stage. The final purpose is to give to designers the opportunity to monitor the environmental impact of different retrofit strategies and, once structural requirements are satisfied, identify for each real case the most suitable retrofit option.
Methods
The environmental impact of the structural retrofit options is assessed by means of a life-cycle assessment (LCA) approach. A cradle to grave system boundary is considered for each retrofit process. The results of the environmental analysis are presented according to the data format of the Environmental Product Declaration (EPD) standard. Indeed, the environmental outcomes are expressed through six impact categories: global warming, ozone depletion, eutrophication, acidification, photochemical oxidation, and nonrenewable energy.
Results and discussion
For each retrofit option, the interpretation analysis is conducted in order to define which element, material, or process mainly influenced the LCA results. In addition, the results revealed that the recycling of waste materials provides environmental benefits in all the categories of the LCA outcomes. It is also pointed out that a comparison between the four investigated options would be meaningful only once the exact amount of each operation is defined for a specific retrofit case.
Conclusions
This paper provides a systematic approach and environmental data to drive the selection and identification of structural retrofit options for existing buildings, in terms of sustainability performance. The final aim of this work is also to provide researchers and practitioners, with a better understanding of the sustainability aspects of retrofit operations. In fact, the environmental impacts of the retrofit options here investigated can be used for future research/practical activities, to monitor and control the environmental impact of structural retrofit operations of existing masonry buildings.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
AFV Beltrame Group (2012) Environmental product declaration of manufacturing plants. Institut Bauen und Umwelt e.V. (IBU) Declaration nr. S-P-00252
Allacker K (2012) Environmental and economic optimization of the floor on grade in residential buildings. Int J Life Cycle Assess 17:813–827
Asadi E, da Silva MG et al (2012) Multi-objective optimization for building retrofit strategies: a model and an application. Energ Build 44:81–87
Ascione F, de Rossi F et al (2011) Energy retrofit of historical buildings: theoretical and experimental investigations for the modelling of reliable performance scenarios. Energ Build 43(8):1925–1936
Biekšaa D, Šiupšinskas G et al (2011) Energy efficiency challenges in multi-apartment building renovation in Lithuania. J Civ Eng Manag 17(4):467–475
Bosiljkov V, Uranjek M et al (2010) An integrated diagnostic approach for the assessment of historic masonry structures. J Cult Herit 11(3):239–249
Boylu M (2005) A benefit/cost analysis for the seismic rehabilitation of existing reinforced concrete buildings in Izmir. İzmir Institute of Technology, İzmir, p 206
Chen MZ, Lin JT et al (2011) Utilization of recycled brick powder as alternative filler in asphalt mixture. Construct Build Mater 25(4):1532–1536
Circolare n. 617 (2009) Istruzioni per l’applicazione delle ‘Nuove norme tecniche per le costruzioni di cui al decreto ministeriale 14 gennaio 2008
CNR-DT 200 (2004) Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, guide for the design and construction of externally bonded FRP system for strengthening existing structures. Rome 13/07/2004
Das S (2011) Life cycle assessment of carbon fiber-reinforced polymer composites. Int J Life Cycle Assess 16(3):268–282
DOCC&EE (2011) Securing a clean energy future - The australian government’s climate change plan. Department of Climate Change and Energy Efficiency, Commonwealth of Australia - ISBN 978-0-642-74723-5
Flourentzou F, Roulet CA (2002) Elaboration of retrofit scenarios. Energ Build 34(2):185–192
Foxon TJ, Mcilkenny G et al (2002) Sustainability criteria for decision support in the UK water industry. J Environ Plann Manag 45(2):285–301
Hedemann J, König U (2007) Technical documentation of the ecoinvent database. Final report ecoinvent data v2.2 No. 4, Swiss Centre for Life Cycle Inventories, Dübendorf, Switzerland
HUD/U.S. (2005) U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Washington, DC 20410–8000 - MORTGAGEE LETTER 2005–50: Enhancements to “Streamlined (k)” Limited Repair Program
ISO:14025 (2006) Environmental labels and declarations—type III environmental declarations—principles and procedures, ISO - International Organization for Standardization
ISO:14040 (2006) Environmental management—life cycle assessment—principles and framework, ISO - International Organization for Standardization
ISO:14044 (2006) Environmental management—life cycle assessment—requirements and guidelines, ISO - International Organization for Standardization
Juan Y-K, Kim JH et al (2009) GA-based decision support system for housing condition assessment and refurbishment strategies. Autom Constr 18(4):394–401
Kanapeckiene L, Kaklauskas A et al (2011) Method and system for multi-attribute market value assessment in analysis of construction and retrofit projects. Expert Syst Appl 38(11):14196–14207
Ma Z, Cooper P, Daly D, Ledo L (2012) Existing building retrofits: methodology and state-of-the-art. Energ Build 55:889–902
Menna C, Asprone D et al (2013) Assessment of ecological sustainability of a building subjected to potential seismic events during its lifetime. Int J Life Cycle Assess 18:504–515
MIT (2014) Ministero delle Infrastrutture e dei Trasporti (Italy) - DECRETO-LEGGE 28 marzo 2014, n. 47 Misure urgenti per l’emergenza abitativa, per il mercato delle costruzioni e per Expo 2015. (14G00059) (GU n.73 del 28-3-2014)
Moliner E, Fabregat J, Cseh M, Vidal R (2013) Life cycle assessment of a fibre-reinforced polymer made of glass fibre phenolic resin with brominated flame retardant. 1st Symposium of the Spanish LCA Network: LCA & Bioenergy, 2013
NTC (2008) NTC, Norme Tecniche per le Costruzioni, D.M 14 gennaio 2008
Perini K (2013) Retrofitting with vegetation recent building heritage applying a design tool—the case study of a school building. Front Architect Res 2(3):267–277
Raslanasa S, Alchimovienėa J et al (2011) Residential areas with apartment houses: analysis of the condition of buildings, planning issues, retrofit strategies and scenarios. Int J Strat Prop Manag 15(2):152–172
ReLuis (2011) (Rete dei Laboratori Universitari di Ingegneria Sismica), linee guida per riparazione e rafforzamento di elementi strutturali, tamponature e partizioni, www.reluis.it/doc/pdf/Linee_guida1.pdf
Rodrigues C, Freire F (2014) Integrated life-cycle assessment and thermal dynamic simulation of alternative scenarios for the roof retrofit of a house. Build Environ 81:204–215
Sahely HR, Kennedy CA, Adams BJ (2005) Developing sustainability criteria for urban infrastructure systems. Can J Civ Eng 32(1):71–85
UNI EN 1015–19 (2008) Methods of test for mortar for masonry—part 19: determination of water vapour permeability of hardened rendering and plastering mortars
UNI EN 13242 (2002) Aggregates for unbound and hydraulically bound materials for use in civil engineering work and road construction
UNI EN 15804 (2012) Sustainability of construction works—environmental product declarations—core rules for the product category of construction products
UNI EN 998–2 (2004) Specification for mortar for masonry—masonry mortar
Užšilaitytea L, Martinaitis V (2010) Search for optimal solution of public building renovation in terms of life cycle. J Environ Eng Landsc 18(2):102–110
Waheed B, Khan F et al (2009) Linkage-based frameworks for sustainability assessment: making a case for driving force-pressure-state-exposure-effect-action (DPSEEA) frameworks. Sustainability 1:441–463
Wu S, Zhu J et al (2011) Experimental investigation on related properties of asphalt mastic containing recycled red brick powder. Construct Build Mater 25(6):2883–288
Xing Y, Hewitt N, Griffiths P (2011) Zero carbon buildings refurbishment—a hierarchical pathway. Renew Sust Energ Rev 15(6):3229–3236
Zhang C, Lin WX et al (2012) Environmental evaluation of FRP in UK highway bridge deck replacement applications based on a comparative LCA study. Adv Mat Res 374:43–48
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Responsible editor: Marzia Traverso
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Napolano, L., Menna, C., Asprone, D. et al. LCA-based study on structural retrofit options for masonry buildings. Int J Life Cycle Assess 20, 23–35 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-014-0807-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-014-0807-1