Abstract
Purpose
This study quantifies the impact of the Dutch cash payment system on the environment and on climate change using a life cycle assessment (LCA). It examines both the impact of coins and of banknotes. In addition, it identifies areas within the cash payment system where the impact on the environment and on the climate can be reduced.
Methods
The ReCiPe endpoint (H) impact method was used for this LCA. The cash payment system has been divided into five subsystems: the production of banknotes, the production of coins, the operation phase, the end of life of banknotes and the end of life of coins. Two functional units were used: (1) cumulative cash payments in the Netherlands in 2015 and (2) the average single cash payment in the Netherlands in 2015. Input data for all processes within each subsystem was collected through interviews and literature study. Ten key companies and authorities in the cash payment chain contributed data, i.e. the Dutch central bank, the Royal Dutch Mint, a commercial bank, a cash logistic service provider, two cash-in-transit companies, two printing works, an ATM manufacturer and a municipal waste incinerator.
Results and discussion
The environmental impact of the Dutch cash payment system in 2015 was 2.42 MPt (expressed in eco points) and its global warming potential (GWP) was 19 million kg CO2 equivalents (CO2e). For an average single cash transaction, the environmental impact was 654 μPt and the GWP was 5.1 g CO2e. The operation phase (e.g. energy use of ATMs, transport of banknotes and coins) (64%) and coin production phase (31%) had the largest impact on the environment, while the operation phase also had the largest impact on climate change human health (89%) and climate change ecosystems (56%). Finally, scenario analysis shows that reductions of the environmental impact (47%) and the impact on climate change (50%) could be achieved by implementing a number of measures, namely reducing the number of ATMs, stimulating the use of renewable energy in ATMs, introducing hybrid trucks for cash transport and matching coins with other countries in the euro area.
Conclusions
This is the first study that investigates the environmental impact and GWP of the cash payment system in the Netherlands, by taking both the impact of banknotes and coins into account. The total environmental impact of cash payments in 2015 was 2.42 MPt and their GWP was 19 million kg CO2e.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
The euro area is a monetary union of 19 countries in the EU which have adopted the euro as their common currency.
The number of banknotes and coins in circulation in the Netherlands is unknown since the introduction of the euro in 2002.
The acceptance of cash, debit card and credit card differs per market segment. Cash, debit card and credit card acceptance is almost universal at POS locations where many transactions take place and where the transaction amounts can be high, i.e. at petrol stations, supermarkets (low credit card acceptance) and in large stores. Almost all small stores, street vendors, bars and restaurants accept cash, but not all of them accept debit card payments and credit card acceptance is rare.
A card payment needs to be authorised by the bank of the payer and processed by the bank of the payer, an automatic clearing house and the bank of the payee in order to transfer the funds from the payer’s account to the payee’s account. In case of a debit card payment, this may take a working day, and in case of a credit card payment, this may take a few weeks.
Note that, although the transfer of cash from payer to payee is immediate, the depositing of cash by payees at the bank or cash-in-transit company in order to have the value of the cash deposit transferred to their current account is not immediate, as it also requires processing activities by the payee’s CiT company and/or bank.
Roos Lindgreen et al. (2018) use one average debit card payment of EUR 28.68 at the POS in the Netherlands in 2015 as functional unit.
Marincovic et al. (2011) use the provision of CAN 2000 of cash value over a time span of 7.5 years as functional unit, Shonfield (2013) uses the provision and use of GBP 1000 of cash value over 10 years and Luján-Ornelas et al. (2018) use the number of banknotes required to provide an average Mexican household with a monthly cash amount of MXN 12,708 in MXN 200 banknotes in HD paper and polymeric substrate over a period of 5 years.
Based on total production of euro coins (4.3 billion euro coins), net matching of euro coins between euro countries (−700 million euro coins) and loss and destruction of euro coins (−1 to 2% of the euro coins in circulation per year). Also confirmed by DNB statistics and expert interviews. In the EU, the same factor (~ 10×) is seen between coins and banknotes.
The following production figures illustrate this: the production of coins before 2002 was over 2 billion euro coins per year, whereas, in the years thereafter, the number of annually produced euro coins declined from around 150 million euro coins to 50 million euro coins (KNM 2015).
Matching does not occur on a large scale in the euro area. Only a handful of euro countries are currently matching euro coins.
Own estimation based on the estimate by Brits and Winder (2005) of 7.1 billion cash payments at the POS in 2002 and by Jonker et al. (2018) of 3.2 billion cash payments at the POS in the Netherlands in 2015. We have estimated cash usage in the years 2003–2014 by linear interpolation. This is a reasonable assumption as debit card usage, the substitute of cash in NL, grew fairly linearly between 2002 and 2014, with an average y-o-y growth rate of 8% (see DNB 2017).
We excluded storage from the analysis as the environmental impact of storage is below the 1% cut-off threshold.
The data provided by CiT companies includes the total number of kilometres driven for the transportation of cash in 2015. Other types of transportation, e.g. matching and transport of unfit cash, are included in the total environmental impact of transportation in the operation phase.
According to one of the CiT companies, the average lifetime of an armoured truck is 675,000 km. As 8.7 million km was driven, 13 armoured vehicles were consumed in 2015.
Unlike Luján-Ornelas et al. (2018) who made an LCA of Mexican banknote in the Netherlands, the impact of the cash payment system on water depletion is negligible, as hydroelectric activities are hardly used to generate electricity.
We reduced the total energy consumption by 25% in this scenario. Note that this may be slightly overestimated, as we did not take into account any change in the ratio of idle/in use time of the remaining ATMs because of intensified usage.
We did not take into account the possible impact of differences in average transaction value of a cash payments and a debit card payment. For debit card payments, the value of the transaction does not affect the environmental impact. With respect to cash, it is not clear a priori whether the number of coins and banknotes used for a transaction, which influence their impact, depends on the transaction value, due to the usage of different denominations.
As the total environmental impact of the Dutch economy is unknown, but its GWP is known, the GWP of the cash payment system is compared with the GWP of the Dutch economy.
We use the Dutch economy’s GDP in 2015 as a proxy of the economic value of all goods and services used in the Netherlands in 2015. A country’s GDP measures the monetary value of final goods and services—that is, those that are bought by the final user—in a country in a given period of time (say a quarter or a year). It counts all of the output generated within the borders of a country (see the definition provided by the IMF) at https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/fandd/basics/gdp.htm. GDP is composed of goods and services produced for sale in the market and it also includes some non-market production, such as defence, healthcare and education provided by the government. There may be a difference between the resource costs for all products sold and the total monetary value according to market prices, i.e. the profit made by sellers which is included in the market prices, but not in resource costs. However, at a country level, the difference between the two is expected to be fairly small due to market competition, as in a perfectly competitive market, the marginal costs of a product equal its market price.
We proxy the economic importance of the cash and debit card payments in 2015 with their resource costs to society. This method has been well established in central bank studies on estimating the cost of the retail payment system (see e.g. Brits and Winder 2005, Schmiedel et al. 2012 or World Bank 2016 for extensive descriptions of the cost methodology). Costs for cash payments to society reflect the costs of the use of resources in the production and issuance of coins and banknotes, cash transportation, labour time costs associated with carrying out cash payments at the POS, capital cost and labour time cost made by market parties such as the central bank, retail banks and CiTs. We have used cost figures for banks and the central bank in the Netherlands in 2009 (Jonker 2013) and cost figures of cash payments for 2014 for retailers (Snoei et al. 2015), which we extrapolated to the year 2015 by taking into account changes in the main cost drivers (i.e. for banks: numbers of ATMs, bank branches delivering cash services, sorted banknotes, bank employees) to estimate the resource costs of the Dutch cash payment system in 2015. A similar approach was taken in Roos Lindgreen et al. (2018) for the debit card payment system.
References
Brits, JH, Winder CCA (2005) Payments are no free lunch. DNB occasional study (vol. 3/no. 2). DNB. Amsterdam
Brander M, Hutchison C, Sherrington C, Ballinger A, Beswick C, Baddeley A, Black M, Woods J, Murphy R (2009) Methodology and evidence base on the indirect greenhouse gas effects of using wastes, residues, and by-products for biofuels and bioenergy. Report PR-091007-A to the UK Renewable Fuels Agency and the Department for Energy and Climate Change. British Standards Institute, London
CBS (2015) Electriciteit in Nederland (Electricity in the Netherlands). Retrieved from https://www.cbs.nl/-/media/imported/documents/2015/05/2015-elektriciteit-in-nederland.pdf. Accessed 30 Apr 2019
CBS (2016a) Greenhouse gas emissions 5 percent higher in 2015. Retrieved from https://www.cbs.nl/en-gb/news/2016/36/greenhouse-gas-emissions-5-percent-higher-in-2015. Accessed 30 Apr 2019
CBS (2016b) Opbouw binnenlands product (bbp); nationale rekeningen, (Composition gross domestic product (GDP); annual accounts). Retrieved from http://statline.cbs.nl/statweb/publication/?dm=slnl&pa=82262ned&d1=0-4,9-17,20-21,88,91,94,97,130-132,135-136,139,142&d2=(l-10)-l&hdr=g1&stb=t&vw=t. Accessed 30 Apr 2019
Cerovsky Z, Mindl P (2008) Hybrid electric cars, combustion engine driven cars and their impact on environment. Conference paper at the 2008 International Symposium on Power Electronics, Electrical Drives, Automation and Motion. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/224321810_Hybrid_Electric_Cars_Combustion_Engine_driven_cars_and_their_Impact_on_Environment. Accessed 30 Apr 2019
Dicou D, Van Ewijk S, Kakes J, Regelink M, Schotten G (2016) Tijd voor transitie. Een verkenning van de overgang naar een klimaatneutrale economie (Time for transition. An exploration of the transition towards a climate neutral economy). DNB Occasional study (vol. 14/ no. 2). DNB. Amsterdam
DNB/DPA (2016) Factsheet point of sale payments 2015., Retrieved from http://www.dnb.nl/en/binaries/Factsheet_betalingsverkeer_uk_tcm47-341312.pdf?2017071016. Accessed 30 Apr 2019
DNB (2017) Payment statistics, Table 5.12 retail payments. Retrieved from http://www.dnb.nl/en/binaries/t5.12ek_tcm47-330678.xls?2017071014. Accessed 30 Apr 2019
DNB (2018) Cash or card? The customer decides. DNBulletin. Retrieved from https://www.dnb.nl/en/news/news-and-archive/DNBulletin2018/dnb379982.jsp. Accessed 30 Apr 2019
ECB (2005) LCA of Euro Banknotes 2003: Final report. Confidential report by E2 Management Consulting AG, in cooperation with PRé Consultants. ECB, Frankfurt am Main
ECB (2017) Banknotes and coins statistics. Table 1.1 and 1.2.Retrieved from the Statistical data Warehouse. http://sdw.ecb.europa.eu/reports.do?node=1000004105, Germany, Frankfurt. Accessed 30 Apr 2019
European Commission (2006). Integrated pollution prevention and control: reference document on the best available techniques for waste incineration. European Commission. Brussels
Fairtrade International (2017) Cotton. Retrieved from https://www.fairtrade.net/products/cotton/. Accessed 30 Apr 2019
Goedkoop M, Heijungs R, Huijbrechts M, Schryber A, Struijs J, Zelm R (2009) ReCiPe 2008: a life cycle assessment method which comprises harmonised category indicators at the midpoint and endpoint level. VROM. The Hague
GOTS (2017) Global Organic Textile Standard (GOTS) Version 5.0. Retrieved from http://www.globa-standard.org/images/GOTS_Documents/GOTS_Standard_5.0.pdf. Accessed 30 Apr 2019
ISO 14044 (2006) Environmental management—life cycle assessment. CEN. Brussels
Hernandez L, Jonker N, Kosse A (2017) Cash versus the debit card: the role of budget control. J Consum Aff 51(1):91–112
Jonker N (2013) Social costs of POS payments in the Netherlands 2002–2012: efficiency gains from increased debit card usage. DNB Occasional Study (vol. 11/ no. 2). DNB. Amsterdam
Jonker N, Hernandez, L, De Vree R, Zwaan P (2018) From cash to cards: how debit card payments overtook cash in the Netherlands. DNB occasional study (vol. 16/ no. 1). DNB. Amsterdam
Luján-Ornelas C, del Mancebo C, Sternenfels U, Güereca LP (2018) Life cycle assessment of Mexican polymer and high-durability cotton paper banknotes. Sci Total Environ 630:409–421
Kanazawa J, Sato N (2001) Makin LCA more efficient. OKI Technical Review 188. Vol 68
KNM (2015) Het complete overzicht: productie- en oplagecijfers 1999 – 2014. Geslagen door de Koninklijke Nederlandse Munt (A complete overview: statistics on the production and issuance 1999 - 2014. Minted by the Koninklijke Nederlandse Munt). Utrecht
Kosse A, Chen H, Felt M-H, Dongmo Jiongo V, Nield K, Welte A (2017) The costs of point-of-sale payments in Canada. Staff discussion paper/document d’analyse du personnel 2017-4. Bank of Canada, Ottawa. Retrieved from https://www.bankofcanada.ca/2017/03/staff-discussion-paper-2017-4/. Accessed 30 Apr 2019
Marincovic C, Pritchard K, Binder M, Silva da N (2011) Life cycle assessment of Canada’s polymer banknotes and cotton-paper banknotes. Final report. Retrieved from https://www.bankofcanada.ca/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/Life-Cycle-Assessment-of-Polymer-and-Cotton-Paper-Bank-Notes_opt.pdf. Accessed 30 Apr 2019
MOB (2014) Tussenrapportage bereikbaarheid van geldautomaten. (Interim report on the accessibility of automatic teller machines). MOB. Amsterdam. Retrieved from https://www.dnb.nl/en/binaries/geldautomaten_tcm47-308950.pdf. Accessed 30 Apr 2019
NVB (2015) Climate Statement Dutch Banking Association (NVB), NVB. Amsterdam. Retrieved from https://www.nvb.nl/media/document/000718_climate-statement-banks.pdf. Accessed 30 Apr 2019
OTA (2014) 2012 and Preliminary 2013 U.S. Organic Cotton Production & Marketing Trends. OTA, Washington DC
Panteia (2018) Omslagpunt in het accepteren van een betaalmiddel. Een onderzoek onder retailers (Turning point in the acceptance of a means of payment. A study among retailers). Study conducted by Panteia and commissioned by DNB. Panteia. Zoetermeer. Retrieved from https://www.dnb.nl/binaries/Eindrapport_tcm46-379981.pdf?2018122915. Accessed 30 Apr 2019
Roos Lindgreen E, Van Schendel M, Jonker N, Kloek J, De Graaf L, Davidson M (2018) Evaluating the environmental impact of debit card payments. Int J Life Cycle Assess 23(9):1847–1861
Schmiedel S, Kostova G, Ruttenberg W (2012) The social and private costs of retail payments—a European perspective. ECB Occasional Paper Series no. 137/September 2012.ECB, Frankfurt am Main
SER (2013) Energieakkoord voor duurzame groei (Energy agreement for sustainable growth). SER. The Hague. Retrieved from https://www.energieakkoordser.nl/energieakkoord.aspx. Accessed 30 Apr 2019
Shonfield P (2013) LCA of paper and polymer bank notes: final study report for the Bank of England. Retrieved from https://www.bankofengland.co.uk/-/media/boe/files/banknotes/polymer/lca%20of%20paper%20and%20polymer%20bank%20notes. Accessed 30 Apr 2019
Snoei J, Hoevenagel R, Wils J, Brammer K (2015) Kosten van het toonbankbetalingsverkeer in 2014 (Costs of POS-payments in 2014). Final report. Panteia. Zoetermeer. Retrieved from https://www.panteia.nl/uploads/sites/2/2015/07/Eindrapport_kostentoonbankbetalingsverkeer_in_2014_01-07-2015.pdf. Accessed 30 Apr 2019
USDA (2018) Cotton: world markets and trade. USDA, Washington D.C Retrieved from https://www.fas.usda.gov/psdonline/circulars/cotton.pdf. Accessed 30 Apr 2019
Van der Cruijsen C, Plooij M (2018) Drivers of payment patterns at the point-of-sale: stable or not? Contemp Econ Policy 36(2):363–380
Von Kalckreuth U, Schmidt T, Stix H (2014) Using cash to monitor liquidity: implications for payments, currency demand, and withdrawal behavior. J Money Credit Bank 46(8):1753–1786
Wettstein F, Lieb H (2000) Life cycle assessment (LCA) of Swiss banknotes. Swiss National Bank. Zürich. Final report (online). Retrieved from https://www.snb.ch/en/mmr/reference/life_cycle_banknottes/source/life_cycle_banknotes.en.pdf. Accessed 30 Apr 2019
World Bank (2016) Retail payments: a practical guide formeasuring retail payment costs. World Bank, Washington DC Retrieved from http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/255851482286959215/Retail-payments-a-practical-guide-for-measuring-retail-payment-costs. Accessed 30 Apr 2019
Acknowledgements
We thank Hans Brits, Erik Roos Lindgreen and Lonneke de Graaff for their valuable comments during this study, two anonymous referees for their valuable comments on an earlier version of the manuscript, Garreth Budden for linguistic services and our colleagues from DNB and other stakeholders in the cash payment system for sharing data with us. The results of this study are mainly based on the master’s theses by Atakan Larçin and Randall Hanegraaf of Utrecht University. The outcomes are slightly different as new information has become available. The views expressed in this paper are our own and do not necessarily reflect those of DNB or the European System of Central Banks.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Responsible editor: Matthias Finkbeiner
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hanegraaf, R., Larçin, A., Jonker, N. et al. Life cycle assessment of cash payments in the Netherlands. Int J Life Cycle Assess 25, 120–140 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-019-01637-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-019-01637-3