Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A review on anthropogenic soils from a worldwide perspective

  • Soils, Sec 5 • Soil and Landscape Ecology • Review Article
  • Published:
Journal of Soils and Sediments Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

This review focuses on what are referred to as “anthropogenic soils” (AS). It investigates and clarifies their descriptions, definitions, and classifications in terms of the following: (i) historical temporal trends in AS research worldwide, (ii) geographic distribution at various scales, (iii) dominant research themes, (iv) main site features, and (v) dominant anthropogenic processes.

Materials and methods

To assess the current status of AS research from an international perspective, an inventory of published studies on AS and related grey literature was prepared and compiled in an annotated bibliography, supported by an electronic database and coupled with a geographic information system. From an initial raw collection of over 3000 issues, 925 references published in the last 70 years (1945–2014) were considered a “representative population” of research focused on AS proper. Analysis of this source of information reveals that AS research is becoming increasingly consolidated. Indeed, it now represents an innovative field among soil sciences, expanding its conceptual scope and scientific production.

Results and discussion

AS research is spread over 64 different countries, mainly in Europe and North America. The USA is the most investigated country, with AS studies becoming extremely popular from 1965 to 1974 and increasing considerably thereafter. In all other countries, AS investigations only became very popular in the decade 1995–2004. On a worldwide scale, the most investigated urban areas (UA) are Berlin, Moscow, and New York City, while several important metropolises have been partially or entirely neglected. Interestingly, the review shows that although humans are able to significantly alter, transform, manipulate, and damage soil, with an incredible number of negative effects, the transformation of “natural” soils into AS may also have unexpected benefits.

Conclusions

It is hypothesized that AS research will become increasingly popular within the international scientific community over the next decades, with particular reference to those characterizing UA (such as Technosols). Finally, it is scientifically recognized worldwide how much AS can deviate from natural soils (in terms of physicochemical features, pedogenic processes, matter and energy fluxes). Therefore, we suggest definitively highlighting such differences, defining those parts of the pedosphere characterized by AS cover as the “anthropedosphere.”

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ammons JT, Shelton PA (1985) Disturbed soil classification. Divide section. Tennessee-Tombigbee Waterway. In: Proceedings, Fifth better reclamation with trees conference. Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, pp 127–143

  • Amuno SA (2013) Environmental legacy of the genocide: an exploration into the contamination potential of mass grave soils in post-genocide Rwanda. Thesis degree. University of Saint Joseph, Macau

  • Amuno SA, Amuno MM (2014) Spatio-temporal variation of trace element contents in Rwanda necrosols. Environ Earth Sci 71(2):659–674

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Antonovic GM (1982) Classification of damaged soils. Soil Plant 31:365–375

    Google Scholar 

  • Avery BW (1980) Soil classification for England and Wales. Soil Survey Technical Monograph No. 14, Harpenden

  • Baize D, Girard MC (eds) (1995) Référentiel Pédologique. Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Beaudet-Vidal L, Fradin V, Rossignol JP (1998) Study of the macroporosity of reconstituted anthropic soils by image analysis. Soil Till Res 47:173–179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bockheim JG (1974) Nature and properties of highly-disturbed urban soils. In: Agronomy abstracts. ASA, CSSA, and SSSA, Madison, WI, p 161

  • Bockheim JG, Gennadiyev AN (2000) The role of soil-forming processes in the definition of taxa in Soil Taxonomy and the World Soil Reference Base. Geoderma 95:53–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braga Bueno Guerra M, Schaefer CEGR, de Freitas Rosa P, Simas FNB, Pereira TTC, Rodrigues Pereira-Filho E (2011) Heavy metals contamination in century-old manmade technosols of Hope Bay, Antarctic Peninsula. Water Air Soil Pollut 222:91–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bretzel F, Hitchmough J (2000) Suitability of urban demolition soils in Sheffield for wild flower meadows. In: Proceedings First Internat. Conf. Soils in Urban, Industrial, Traffic and Mining Areas. ISSS-AISS-SICS, 12-18 July 2000, Essen. http://ticri.inpl-nancy.fr/urban_soils.en/index.php/SUITMA_2000_Essen_-_Suitability_of_urban_demolition_soils_in_Sheffield_for_wild_flower_meadows. Accessed 30 Oct 2014

  • Buondonno A, Colella A, Coppola E, Langella A, Leone AP (2008) Mineralogical, chemical-physical, and mechanical implications of soil contamination. In: Dazzi C, Costantini EAC (eds) The soils of tomorrow. Soils changing in a changing world. Advances in GeoEcolgy, vol 39. Catena Verlag, Reiskirchen, pp 503–518

    Google Scholar 

  • Buondonno A, Grilli E, Capra GF, Glorioso C, Langella A, Leone AP, Leone N, Odierna P, Vacca S, Vigliotti RC (2013) Zeolitized tuffs in Pedotechnique for the reclamation of abandoned quarries. A case study in the Campania region (Italy). J Environ Manag 122:25–30

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Burghardt W (1994) Soils in urban and industrial environments. J Plant Nutr Soil Sci 157:205–214

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Capra GF, Vacca S, Cabula E, Grilli E, Buondonno A (2013) Through the decades: taxonomic proposals for human-altered and human-transported soil classification. Soil Horiz 54:1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Capra GF, Grilli E, Macci C, Vacca S, Masciandaro G, Ceccanti B, Bondi G, Duras MG, Dessena MA, Marras G, Gaviano C, Buondonno A (2015) Lake-dredged material (LDM) in pedotechnique for the restoration of Mediterranean soils affected by erosion/entisolization processes. J Soils Sediments 15:32–46

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Carter S (2001) A reassessment of the origins of the St. Andrews ‘garden soil’. Tayside Fife Archaeol J 7:87–92

    Google Scholar 

  • Cerqueira B, Vega FA, Silva LFO, Andrade L (2012) Effects of vegetation on chemical and mineralogical characteristics of soils developed on a decantation bank from a copper mine. Sci Total Environ 421–422:220–229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Certini G (2014) Fire as a soil-forming factor. Ambio 43(2):191–195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Certini G, Scalenghe R (2011) Anthropogenic soils are the golden spikes for the Anthropocene. The Holocene 21(8):1269–1274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Certini G, Scalenghe R, Woods WI (2013) The impact of warfare on the soil environment. Earth-Sci Rev 217:1–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charzyński P, Bednarek R, Świtoniak M, Żołnowska B (2011) Ekranic Technosols and Urbic Technosols of Toruń necropolis. Geologija 53(4):179–185

    Google Scholar 

  • Charzyński P, Bednarek R, Mendyk Ł, Świtoniak M, Pokojska-Burdziej A, Nowak A (2013) Ekranosols of Toruń airfield. In: Charzyński P, Hulisz P, Bednarek R (eds) Technogenic soils of Poland. Polish Society of Soil Science, Toruń, pp 173–190

    Google Scholar 

  • Charzyński P, Hulisz P, Bednarek R, Piernik A, Winkler M, Chmurzyński M (2014) Edifisols—a new soil unit of technogenic soils. J Soils Sediments. doi:10.1007/s11368-014-0983-4

    Google Scholar 

  • Chiti T, Certini G, Puglisi A, Sanesi G, Capperucci A, Forte C (2007) Effects of associating a N-fixer species to monotypic oak plantations on the quantity and quality of organic matter in minesoils. Geoderma 138:162–169

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Conry MJ (1974) Plaggen soils. A review of man-made raised soils. Soils Fertil 37:319–326

    Google Scholar 

  • SSCRI SPS-Soil Science and Conservation Research Institute, Societas Pedologica Slovaca (2000) Morfogenetický klasifikačný systém pôd Slovenska. Bazálna referenčná taxonómia (The Morphogenetic Soil Classification system. A Basic Reference Taxonomy). Societas Pedologica Slovaca, Bratislava

  • Cooperative Research Group on Chinese Soil Taxonomy (CSTC) (2001) Chinese soil taxonomy. Science Press, Beijing

    Google Scholar 

  • Coppola E, Battaglia G, Bucci M, Ceglie D, Colella A, Langella A, Buondonno A, Colella C (2002) Neapolitan yellow tuff for the recovery of soils polluted by potential toxic elements in illegal dumps of Campania Region. Stud Surf Sci Catal 142B:1759–1766

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Corcoran PL, Moore CJ, Jazvac K (2014) An anthropogenic marker horizon in the future rock record. GSA Today 24(6):4–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Criscuoli I, Alberti G, Baronti S, Favilli F, Martinez C, Calzolari C, Pusceddu E, Rumpel C, Viola R, Miglietta F (2014) Carbon sequestration and fertility after centennial time scale incorporation of charcoal into soil. PLoS One 9(3):e91114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crutzen PJ (2002) Geology of mankind. Nature 415:23

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Darwin C (1890) The formation of vegetable mould through the action of worms with some observations on their habits. D. Appleton & Co, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Davidson DA, Dercon G, Stewart M, Watson F (2006) The legacy of past urban waste disposal on local soils. J Archaeol Sci 33:778–783

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis G (1965) A guide for revegetating bituminous strip-mine spoils in Pennsylvania. Research committee on coal mine spoil revegetation in Pennsylvania. Pennsylvania Dept. of Mines and Mineral Industries, Harrisburg

    Google Scholar 

  • Delgado R, Martin-Garcia JM, Calero J, Casares-Porcel M, Tito-Rojo J, Delgado G (2007) The historic man-made soils of the Generalife garden (La Alhambra, Granada, Spain). Eur J Soil Sci 58:215–228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Demographia (2014) Demographia world urban areas. Built-up urban areas or world agglomerations. 10th Annual Edition, Wendell Cox consultancy, Belleville. http://demographia.com/db-worldua.pdf. Accessed 30 Oct 2014

  • Denisik GJ, Roychenko GI (1982) The rational use of technogenic soils in Podolye. 1st Congress of the Soil Scientists and Agricultural Chemists of the Ukrainian SSR Soil Melioration, Erosion Control and Recultivation, Kharkov

  • Donohue SW, Stolt MH, Gold A, Groffman P (2009) Human-transported material soils of urbanizing estuarine landscapes. Soil Sci Soc Am J 73:1587–1596

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Eckmeier E (2007) Detecting prehistoric fire-based farming using biogeochemical markers. University of Zurich, Faculty of Science, Zurich

    Google Scholar 

  • El Khalil H, Schwartz C, El Hamiani O, Kubiniok J, Morel JM, Boularbah A (2013) Distribution of major elements and trace metals as indicators of technosolisation of urban and suburban soils. J Soils Sediments 13:519–530

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Eswaran H (2002a) Time zero in modern soil classification. In: Galbraith JM, Ditzler C, Scheyer JM (eds) Anthropogenic soils. ICOMANTH Report no. 1, Ver. 1.0. USDA-NRCS, Lincoln. http://clic.cses.vt.edu/icomanth/02-AS_Classification.pdf. Accessed 30 Oct 2014

  • Eswaran H (2002b) Chinese soil taxonomy. Bull Int Uni Soil Sci 101(1):87–88

    Google Scholar 

  • Fanning DS, Stein СE, Patterson JC (1978) Theories of genesis and classification of highly man-influenced soils. In: 11th Proceeding Int Congr Soil Sci, Edmonton, vol. 1, pp 283–284

  • Fedorishchak MRP (1978) Anthropogenic soil changes in the zone of influence of metallurgical plants. Sov Soil Sci 11:133–137

    Google Scholar 

  • Galbraith JM (2012) Proposed revisions to the future 12th edition of Keys to Soil Taxonomy. Circular Letter 7. Int. Committee for Anthropogenic Soils, Balcksburg. http://clic.cses.vt.edu/icomanth/ICOMANTH_Final_Proposals_2-22-12.pdf. Accessed 30 Oct 2014

  • Galbraith JM, Ditzler C (2006) New terms for describing human-altered and -transported soils. In: 18th World Congress of Soil Science, 9–15 July, Philadelphia

  • Galbraith JM, Bryant RB, Russell-Anelli JM (1999) Major kinds of humanly altered soils. In: Kimble JM, Ahrens RJ, Bryant RB (eds) Classification, correlation, and management of anthropogenic soils, proceedings. USDA-NRCS-NSSC, Lincoln, pp 115–119

    Google Scholar 

  • Galbraith JM, Ditzler C, Engel R (2004) ICOMANTH activities and proposed changes to Soil Taxonomy concerning human-altered soils. In: Proceeding 2nd International Conference, Soil Classification 2004, Petrozavodsk, Karelia, 2–8 Aug. 2004, pp 1–24

  • Garcia R, Millan E (1998) Assessment of Cd, Pb and Zn contamination in roadside soils and grasses from Gipuzkoa (Spain). Chemosphere 37(8):1615–1625

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Harrison Matthews L (1985) Great white wilderness. New Sci 1476:58–60

    Google Scholar 

  • Hauser H, Matthies D (2000) Biomutans floris as a substitute for peat and compost in technical soils: soil physical and mechanical characteristics. In: Proceedings First Internat Conf Soils in Urban, Industrial, Traffic and Mining Areas. ISSS-AISS-SICS, 12-18 July 2000, Essen, pp. 315–320

  • Hewitt AE (2010) New Zealand soil classification, 3rd edn. Manaaki Whenua Press, Lincoln

    Google Scholar 

  • Huot H, Simonnot MO, Marion P, Yvon J, De Donato P, Morel JL (2013) Characteristics and potential pedogenetic processes of a Technosol developing on iron industry deposits. J Soils Sediments 13(3):555–568

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hupy JP, Koehler T (2012) Modern warfare as a significant form of zoogeomorphic disturbance upon the landscape. Geomorphology 157–158:169–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hupy JP, Schaetzl RJ (2006) Introducing “bombturbation”, a singular type of soil disturbance and mixing. Soil Sci 171(11):823–836

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • ICOMANTH (1995) Circular letter, Vol. 1. International Committee for Anthropogenic Soils. http://clic.cses.vt.edu/icomanth/03-AS_Circulars.pdf. Accessed 30 Oct 2014

  • ICOMANTH (1997) Circular letter, Vol. 2. International Committee for Anthropogenic Soils. http://clic.cses.vt.edu/icomanth/03-AS_Circulars.pdf. Accessed 30 Oct 2014

  • ICOMANTH (1999) Circular letter, Vol. 3. International Committee for Anthropogenic Soils. http://clic.cses.vt.edu/icomanth/03-AS_Circulars.pdf. Accessed 30 Oct 2014

  • ICOMANTH (2003) Circular letter, Vol. 4. International Committee for Anthropogenic Soils. http://clic.cses.vt.edu/icomanth/circlet4.pdf. Accessed 30 Oct 2014

  • ICOMANTH (2004) Circular letter, Vol. 5. International Committee for Anthropogenic Soils. http://clic.cses.vt.edu/icomanth/circlet5.pdf. Accessed 30 Oct 2014

  • ICOMANTH (2005) Circular letter, Vol. 6. International Committee for Anthropogenic Soils. http://clic.cses.vt.edu/icomanth/circlet6_rev.pdf. Accessed 30 Oct 2014

  • ICOMANTH (2011) Circular letter, Vol. 7. International Committee for Anthropogenic Soils. http://clic.cses.vt.edu/icomanth/2011_Summary_Proposed_Revisions_to_Soil_Taxonomy.pdf. Accessed 30 Oct 2014

  • Isbell RF (1996) The Australian soil classification. Australian soil and land survey handbook. CSIRO, Collingwood

    Google Scholar 

  • IUSS Working Group WRB (2006) World reference base for soil resources 2006. A framework for international classification, correlation and communication. World soil resources reports No. 103. FAO, Rome

  • IUSS Working Group WRB (2014) World reference base for soil resources 2014. International soil classification system for naming soils and creating legends for soil maps. World soil resources reports No. 106. FAO, Rome

  • Karpachevskiy LO (1983) The landscape mirror. Mysl, Moscow (in Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kellogg CE (1952) Our garden soils. The Macmillan Co., New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Killick D, Goldberg P (2009) A quiet crisis in American archaeology. SAA Archaeol Rec 9(1):6–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Komisja V Genezy, Klasyfikacji i Kartografii Gleb PTG (2011) Systematyka Gleb Polski, wyd. 5. Rocz Glebozn 62(3):1–193

    Google Scholar 

  • Koolen AJ, Rossignol JP (1998) Construction and use of artificial soils. Soil Till Res 47:151–155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kosse AD (1980) Anthrosols: proposals for a new soil order. In: Agronomy abstracts. ASA, CSSA, and SSSA, Madison, WI, p 182

  • Kosse AD (1990) Diagnostic horizons in Anthrosols. In: Rozanov BG (ed) Soil classification. Reports on the International Conference on Soil Classification, Centre for International Projects. USSR State Committee for Environmental Protection, Moscow, pp 264–273

  • Lebedeva II, Tonkonogov VD, Shishov LL (1993) Taxonomic position and systematics of anthropogenically changed soils. Pochvovedenie 9:98–106

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehmann A (2006) Technosols and other proposals on urban soils for the WRB (World Reference for Soil Resources). Int Agrophys 20(2):129–134

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehmann A, Stahr K (2007) Nature and significance of anthropogenic urban soils. J Soils Sediments 7(4):247–260

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ling LL, Schneider T, Peoples AJ, Spoering AL, Engels I, Conlon BP, Mueller A, Schäberle TF, Hughes DE, Epstein S, Jones M, Lazarides L, Steadman VA, Cohen DR, Felix CR, Fetterman KA, Millett WP, Nitti AG, Zullo AM, Chen C, Lewis K (2015) A new antibiotic kills pathogens without detectable resistance. Nature 517:455–459

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ljung K (2006) Metals in urban playground soils. Ph.D. Diss. Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala

  • Losche CK, Beverage WW (1967) Soil survey of Tucker county and part of northern Randolph county, West Virginia. Soil Survey Reports. US Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC

  • Madigan MT, Martinko JM, Dunlap PV, Clark DP (2009) Brock biology of microorganisms, 12th edn. Pearson Benjamin-Cummings, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • Maechling P, Cooke H, Bockheim JG (1974) Nature and properties of highly-disturbed urban soils. In: Agronomy abstracts. ASA, CSSA, and SSSA, Madison, WI, p 161

  • Markiewicz M, Bednarek R, Jankowski M, Świtoniak M (2013) ‘Paleotechnosols’ of ancient settlements in Grodno and Kałdus. In: Charzyński P, Hulisz P, Bednarek R (eds) Technogenic soils of Poland. Polish Society of Soil Science, Toruń, pp 111–121

    Google Scholar 

  • Merrill SD, Doering EJ, Power JF (1980) Changes in sodicity and salinity in soils reconstructed on strip-mined land. N Dak Farm Res 37:13–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Murolo M, Pugliano ML, Ermice A (2005) Landfill and natural soils on the Somma-Vesuvius volcanic complex, Italy: differences and similarities in soil morphology and properties. Soil Sci 170:652–668

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Naeth MA, Archibald HA, Nemirsky CL, Leskiw LA, Brierley JA, Bock MD, VandenBygaart AJ, Chanasyk DS (2012) Proposed classification for human modified soils in Canada: Anthroposolic order. Can J Soil Sci 92:7–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NCSS (2002) Soil taxonomy and anthropogenic soils. In: Galbraith JM, Ditzler C, Scheyer JM (eds), Anthropogenic soils. ICOMANTH Report no. 1, Ver. 1.0. USDA-NRCS, Lincoln. http://clic.cses.vt.edu/icomanth/02-AS_Classification.pdf. Accessed 30 Oct 2014

  • Norra S, Fjer N, Li F, Chu X, Xie X, Stüben D (2008) The influence of different land uses on mineralogical and chemical composition and horizonation of urban soil profiles in Qingdao, China. J Soils Sediments 8:4–16

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pandey KD, Buys P, Chomitz K, Wheelers D (2006) Biodiversity conservation indicators: new tools for priority setting at the global environment facility. Catalog sources world development indicators. World Bank Development Working Group Paper, Washington, DC

  • Pape JC (1970) Plaggen soils in the Netherlands. Geoderma 4:229–256

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Patton BJ, Beverage WW, Pohlman GG (1959) Soil survey of Preston county, West Virginia. USDA-SCS. US Govt. Print. Office, Office, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Polone DJ (1976) Soil survey of Wagoner, county, Oklahoma. USDA-SCS. US Govt. Print. Office, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Popowska M, Rzeczycka M, Miernik A, Krawczyk-Balska A, Walsh F, Duffy B (2011) Influence of soil use on prevalence of tetracycline, streptomycin, and erythromycin resistance and associated resistance genes. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 56(3):1434–1443

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Potter KN, Carter FS, Doll EC (1988) Physical properties of constructed and undisturbed soils. Soil Sci Soc Amer J 52:1435–1438

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pouyat RV, Effland WR (1999) The investigation and classification of humanly modified soils in the Baltimore ecosystem study. In: Kimble JM, Ahrens RH, Bryant RB (eds), Proceedings of meeting on classification, correlation, and management of anthropogenic soils. US Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, National Survey Center. 21 September-2 October 1998, Las Vegas, pp 141–154

  • Prokof'eva T, Gerasimova M, Lebedeva I, Martynenko I (2013) An attempt of integrating the systematic of urban soils into the new Russian soil classification system. Soil Sci Ann 64(1):24–29

  • Puskás I, Farsang A (2008) Evaluation of human-impacted soils in Szeged (SE Hungary) with special emphasis on physical, chemical and biological properties. In: Dazzi C, Costantini EAC (eds) The soils of tomorrow. Soils changing in a changing world. Advances in GeoEcolgy. Vol. 39. Catena Verlag, Reiskirchen, pp 117–147

  • Resulović H, Čengić I (2004) Burnt soils—a proposal of classifications. In: Sobocká J (ed) Soil anthropization VIII. Proceedings. Soil Science and Conservation Research Institute Bratislava, Bratislava, pp 15–19

  • Resulović H, Čustović H (2007) Technosols—development, classification and use. Agric Conspec Sci 72(1):13–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Ritchie A, Bauder JR, Christman RL, Reese PW (1978) Soil survey of Portage county, Ohio. USDA-SCS. US Govt. Print. Office, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Rossignol JP (1996) Contrôle et suivi de la qualité des propriétés physiques des Anthroposols reconstitués dans les espaces verts des villes. Exemple de la cité internationale de Lyon. In: Communication et actes de 5 èmes journées nationales de l’étude du sol. AFES, Rennes, 22-25 Avril 96, p 2

  • Rossignol JP (2000) Characterisation, control and follow up of the quality of the physical properties of reconstituted anthrogenic soils for green areas. In: Proceedings First Internat. Conf. Soils in Urban, Industrial, Traffic and Mining Areas. ISSS-AISS-SICS, 12-18 July 2000, Essen

  • Rossiter DG (2007) Classification of urban and industrial soils in the World Reference Base for Soil Resources. J Soils Sediments 7(2):96–100

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rossiter G, Burghardt W (2003) Classification of urban & industrial soils in the World Reference Base for Soil Resources: working document. Second Internat. Conf. Soils in Urban, Industrial, Traffic and Mining Areas. ISSS-AISS-SICS, 9-11 July 2003, Nancy, pp 1–24

  • Rubel N, Jenny PC, Plunkett MK (1981) Soil survey of Belmont county, Ohio. USDA-SCS. US Govt. Print. Office, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanderson EW, Jaiteh M, Levy MA, Redford KH, Wannebo AV, Woolmer G (2002) The human footprint and the last of the wild. Bioscience 52(10):891–904

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sandor JA (2006) Ancient agricultural terraces and soils. In: Warkentin BP (ed) Footprints in the soil. Peoples and ideas in soil history. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 505–534

    Google Scholar 

  • Scalenghe R, Ferraris S (2009) The first forty years of a Technosol. Pedosphere 19(1):40–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schad P (2013) Classification of Technosols and related soils in WRB: from 2006 to 2014. In: Seventh Internat. Conf. Soils in Urban, Industrial, Traffic and Mining Areas. ISSS-AISS-SICS, 16–20 September 2013, Toruń

  • Schaetzl RJ, Anderson S (2005) Soils: genesis and geomorphology. Cambridge University Press, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz C, Lefort C, Ouvrard S, Morel JL (2009) How much human-made material for a Technosol?. In: Proceedings Fifth Internat. Conf. Soils in Urban, Industrial, Traffic and Mining Areas. ISSS-AISS-SICS, 20-25 September 2009, New York. http://www.nycswcd.net/suitma-2009/abstracts/W-01%20SCHWARTZ%20Christophe%201.pdf. Accessed 30 Oct 2014

  • Sencindiver JC (1977) Classification and genesis of minesoils. Ph.D. Diss. West Virginia University, Morgantown

  • Sencindiver JC, Ammons JT (2000) Minesoil genesis and classification. In: Barnhisel RI (ed) Reclamation of drastically disturbed lands. Agron. Mongr. 41. ASA, CSSA, and SSSA, Madison, pp 1–20

  • Sencindiver JC, Ammons JT, Delp CH (1978) Classification of minesoils—a proposed suborder. In: Abstracts of the 11th Int. Congr. Soil Sci. ISSS, Edmonton, p 230

  • Senft F (1847) Lehrbuch der Gebirgs- und Bodenkunde: zunächst für Forst- und Landwirthe. Mauke, Jena

    Google Scholar 

  • Séré G, Schwartz C, Ouvrard S, Renat JC, Watteau F, Villemin G, Morel JL (2010) Early pedogenic evolution of constructed Technosols. J Soils Sediments 10:1246–1254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shishov LL, Tonkonogov VD, Lebedeva II, Gerasimova MI (2004) Classification and diagnostics of soils of Russia (in Russian). Oekumena, Smolensk

    Google Scholar 

  • Simpson IA, Bryant RG, Tveraabak U (1998) Relict soils and early arable land management in Lofoten, Norway. J Archaeol Sci 25:1185–1198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith RM, Tryon EH, Tyner EH (1971) Soil development on mine spoil. Bulletin 604 T. West Virginia Agricultural and Forestry Experiment Station, Morgantown

  • Sobocká J (2004) Necrosol as a new anthropogenic soil type. In: Sobocká J (ed) Soil anthropization VIII. Proceedings. Soil Science and Conservation Research Institute Bratislava, Bratislava, pp 107–112

  • Sobocká J, Tonkonogov V, Lebedeva I, Gerasimova M (2001) A comparative analysis of approaches to anthropogenic soils classification in Slovakia and Russia. In: Sobocká J (ed) Soil anthropization VI. Proceedings. Soil Science and Conservation Research Institute Bratislava, Bratislava, pp 32–38

  • Soil Survey Staff (1960) Soil classification. A comprehensive system, 7th approximation US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC

  • Soil Survey Staff (2014) Keys to soil taxonomy, 12th edn. USDA-NRCS. US Gov. Print. Office, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Stein CE (1978) Mapping, classification, and characterization of highly man-influenced soil in the district of Columbia. M.S. thesis. University of Maryland, College Park

  • Strain MR, Evans CV (1994) Map unit development for sand- and gravel pit soils in New Hampshire. Soil Sci Soc Am J 58:147–155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Surabian D, McVey S (2009) Interpretation of soil for bone preservation and likelihood of cadaver burial. In: Proceedings Fifth Internat. Conf. Soils in Urban, Industrial, Traffic and Mining Areas. ISSS-AISS-SICS, 20-25 September 2009, New York. http://www.nycswcd.net/suitma-2009/abstracts/A%20MCVEY%20Shawn%201.pdf. Accessed 30 Oct 2014

  • Thurman NC, Sencindiver JC (1986) Properties, classification, and interpretations of minesoils at two sites in West Virginia. Soil Sci Soc Am J 50:181–185

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Thurman NC, Sencindiver JC, Ammons JT, Adamo DC (1985) Physical properties of minesoils and their effects on root growth. In: Proceedings of Fifth Better Reclamation with Trees Conference. Southern Illinois Univ., Carbondale, pp 194–208

  • Tyner EH, Smith RM (1945) The reclamation of the strip-mined coal lands of West Virginia with forage species. Soil Sci Soc Am J 10:429–436

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tyner EH, Smith RM, Galpin SL (1948) Reclamation of strip-mined areas in West Virginia. Jour Amer Soc Agron 40:313–323

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • United Nations (2014) World urbanization prospects: the 2014 revision. Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division, CD-ROM Edition, New York

  • Wessolek G, Toland A (2009) SoilArt: introducing a genre. In: Proceedings Fifth Internat. Conf. Soils in Urban, Industrial, Traffic and Mining Areas. ISSS-AISS-SICS, 20-25 September 2009, New York

  • Wilding LP, Ahrens RJ (2002) Soil taxonomy: provisions for anthropogenically-impacted soils. In: International Symposium on Soil Classification. European Soil Bureau, Ispra, pp 35–46. http://eusoils.jrc.ec.europa.eu/events/SoilClassification_2001/PDF%5C202Wilding.pdf. Accessed 30 Oct 2014

  • Winiwater V, Blum WEH (2006) Souls and soils: a survey of worldviews. In: Warkentin BP (ed) Footprints in the soil. Peoples and ideas in soil history. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 107–122

    Google Scholar 

  • Yaalon DH, Yaron B (1966) Framework for man-made soil changes—an outline of metapedogenesis. Soil Sci 102:272–278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zemlyanitskiy LT (1963) Characteristics of the soils in the cities. Sov Soil Sci 5:468–475

    Google Scholar 

  • Zitong G, Ganlin Z (2007) Chinese soil taxonomy: a milestone of soil classification in China. Sci Found China 15(1):41–45

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Dipartimento di Architettura, Design e Urbanistica, Università degli Studi di Sassari, Via Colombo no. 1, 08100, Nuoro, Italy

    Gian Franco Capra, Antonio Ganga & Sergio Vacca

  2. Dipartimento di Scienze e Tecnologie Ambientali, Biologiche e Farmaceutiche, Seconda Università degli Studi di Napoli, Via Vivaldi 43, 81100, Caserta, Italy

    Eleonora Grilli

  3. Dipartimento di Architettura e Disegno Industriale “Luigi Vanvitelli”, Seconda Università degli Studi di Napoli, Borgo S. Lorenzo, Abazia San Lorenzo ad Septimum, 81031, Aversa, CE, Italy

    Andrea Buondonno

  4. Environmental Technologies srl, Spin-off Universitario, Seconda Università degli Studi di Napoli, Via Vivaldi 43, 81100, Caserta, Italy

    Andrea Buondonno

Authors
  1. Gian Franco Capra
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Antonio Ganga
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Eleonora Grilli
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Sergio Vacca
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Andrea Buondonno
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gian Franco Capra.

Additional information

Responsible editor: Claudio Bini

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Electronic Supplementary Material 1

Editorial allocation and temporal trend of investigated studies (PDF 109 kb)

Electronic Supplementary Material 2

Geographic distribution of the studies on AS in the urban areas (UA) of the most investigated countries (PDF 7001 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Capra, G.F., Ganga, A., Grilli, E. et al. A review on anthropogenic soils from a worldwide perspective. J Soils Sediments 15, 1602–1618 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-015-1110-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-015-1110-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation