Abstract
In this paper, the nonlinear distribution of employment across Spanish municipalities is analyzed. Also, we explore new properties of the family of generalized power law (GPL) distributions and explore its hierarchical structure, then we test its adequacy for modeling employment data. A new subfamily of heavy-tailed GPL distributions that is right tail equivalent to a Pareto (power-law) model is derived. Our findings show on the one hand that the distribution of employment across Spanish municipalities follows a power-law behavior in the upper tail and, on the other hand, the adequacy of GPL models for modeling employment data in the whole range of the distribution.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aitchison J, Brown JAC (1957) The lognormal distribution with special reference to its uses in economics. Cambridge University Press, London
Arnold BC (2008) Pareto and generalized Pareto distributions. Modeling income distributions and Lorenz curves. Springer, New York, pp 119–145
Arnold BC (2014) Univariate and multivariate Pareto models. J Stat Distrib Appl 1(1):1–16
Arnold BC (2015) Pareto distributions, 2nd edn. CRC Press, Boca Raton
Axtell RL (2001) Zipf distribution of US firm sizes. Science 293(5536):1818–1820
Axtell R (2018) Endogenous firm dynamics and labor flows via heterogeneous agents. In: Handbook of computational economics, vol 4. Elsevier, pp 157–213
Byrd RH, Lu P, Nocedal J, Zhu CY (1995) A limited memory algorithm for bound constrained optimization. SIAM J Sci Comput 16(5):1190–1208
Bowley AL (1920) Elements of statistics. Charles Scribner’s Sons, New York
Castillo E, Galambos J, Sarabia JM (1989) The selection of the domain of attraction of an extreme value distribution from a set of data. Extreme value theory. Springer, New York, pp 181–190
Castillo E, Hadi AS, Balakrishnan N, Sarabia JM (2005) Extreme value and related models with applications in engineering and science. Wiley, Hoboken
Champernowne DG (1953) A model of income distribution. Econ J 63(250):318–351
Clauset A, Shalizi CR, Newman MEJ (2009) Power-law distributions in empirical data. SIAM Rev 51(4):661–703
Dagum C (1975) A model of income distribution and the conditions of existence of moments of finite order. In: Proceedings of the 40th session of the international statistical institute, vol 46, pp 199–205
Desmet K, Fafchamps M (2005) Changes in the spatial concentration of employment across US counties: a sectoral analysis 1972–2000. J Econ Geogr 5(3):261–284
Eeckhout J (2004) Gibrat’s law for (all) cities. Am Econ Rev 94(5):1429–1451
Efron B (1979) Bootstrap methods: another look at the jackknife. Ann Stat 7:1–26
Fisk PR (1961) The graduation of income distributions. Econometrica 29(2):171–185
Fujiwara Y, Guilmi CD, Aoyama H, Gallegati M, Souma W (2004) Do Pareto–Zipf and Gibrat laws hold true? An analysis with European firms. Physica A 335(1–2):197–216
Gabaix X (2016) Power laws in economics: an introduction. J Econ Perspect 30(1):185–206
Gibrat R (1931) Les Inégalités Économiques. Sirey, Paris
Guillen M, Prieto F, Sarabia JM (2011) Modelling losses and locating the tail with the Pareto Positive Stable distribution. Insur Math Econ 49(3):454–461
Hill BM (1975) A simple general approach to inference about the tail of a distribution. Ann Stat 3(5):1163–1174
Ioannides YM, Overman HG (2003) Zipf’s law for cities: an empirical examination. Reg Sci Urban Econ 33(2):127–137
Kendall M, Stuart A (1983) The advanced theory of statistics, vol 3. Griffin, New York, pp 410–414
Kesten H (1973) Random difference equations and renewal theory for products of random matrices. Acta Math 131:207–248
Kleiber C, Kotz S (2003) Statistical size distributions in economics and actuarial sciences, vol 470. Wiley, New York
Kleijnen JP (1995) Verification and validation of simulation models. Eur J Oper Res 82(1):145–162
Korpi M (2007) Does size of local labour markets affect wage inequality? A rank-size rule of income distribution. J Econ Geogr 8(2):211–237
Kotz S, Balakrishnan N, Johnson NL (2004) Continuous multivariate distributions, models and applications. Wiley, New York
Lomax KS (1954) Business failures; another example of the analysis of failure data. J Am Stat Assoc 49(268):847–852
Lux T, Zwinkels RC (2018) Empirical validation of agent-based models. In: Handbook of computational economics, vol 4. Elsevier, pp 437–488
Lyócsa S, Výrost T (2018) Scale-free distribution of firm-size distribution in emerging economies. Physica A 508:501–505
Mason DM, Schuenemeyer JH (1983) A modified Kolmogorov–Smirnov test sensitive to tail alternatives. Ann Stat 11(3):933–946
Matano A, Naticchioni P (2011) Wage distribution and the spatial sorting of workers. J Econ Geogr 12(2):379–408
Moors JJA (1988) A quantile alternative for kurtosis. J R Stat Soc Ser D (The Statistician) 37(1):25–32
Nash JC, Varadhan R (2011) Unifying optimization algorithms to aid software system users: optimx for R. J Stat Softw 43(9):1–14
Pinto CM, Lopes AM, Machado JT (2012) A review of power laws in real life phenomena. Commun Nonlinear Sci Numer Simul 17(9):3558–3578
Prieto F, Sarabia JM (2017) A generalization of the power law distribution with nonlinear exponent. Commun Nonlinear Sci Numer Simul 42:215–228
Rampellini K, Veenendaal B (2016) Analysing the spatial distribution of changing labour force dynamics in the Pilbara. Labour force mobility in the Australian resources industry. Springer, Singapore, pp 29–58
Resnick SI (2013) Extreme values, regular variation and point processes. Springer, New York
Sarabia JM, Prieto F (2009) The Pareto-positive stable distribution: a new descriptive model for city size data. Physica A 388(19):4179–4191
Schwarz G (1978) Estimating the dimension of a model. Ann Stat 6(2):461–464
Spanish Social Security system (2018) http://www.seg-social.es/wps/portal/wss/internet/EstadisticasPresupuestosEstudios/Estadisticas. Accessed July 2018
Seneta E (2006) Regularly varying functions, vol 508. Springer, New York
Simon HA (1955) On a class of skew distribution functions. Biometrika 44(3/4):425–440
Wójcik D, MacDonald-Korth D (2015) The British and the German financial sectors in the wake of the crisis: size, structure and spatial concentration. J Econ Geogr 15(5):1033–1054
Acknowledgements
The authors are grateful for the constructive suggestions provided by the reviewers, which improved the paper. The authors thankfully acknowledges the computer resources, technical expertise and assistance provided by the Advanced Computing and e-Science Team at IFCA. Faustino Prieto also acknowledges the Faculty of Business and Economics and the Centre for Actuarial Studies at the University of Melbourne for their special support, since part of this paper was written while Faustino Prieto was visiting The University of Melbourne during the period July-September 2018.
Funding
Faustino Prieto acknowledges funding by the José Castillejo Program (Grant number CAS17/00461, Ministerio de Educación, Cultura y Deporte, Programa Estatal de Promoción de Talento y su Empleabilidad en I+D+i, Subprograma Estatal de Movilidad, del Plan Estatal de Investigación Científica y Técnica y de Innovación 2013-2016). José María Sarabia thanks to Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad, project ECO2016-76203-C2-1-P, for partial support of this work. Research partially carried out while Calderin-Ojeda visited University of Cantabria as part of his Special Study Program leave (University of Melbourne).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendix
Appendix
Proof of Theorem 1
Note that any function g, with \(\displaystyle \lim \nolimits _{z \rightarrow \infty }g(z;\varvec{\theta })=\alpha >0\), is slowly varying at infinity: \(\displaystyle \lim _{z \rightarrow \infty }g(tz;\varvec{\theta })/g(z;\varvec{\theta })=1, \forall t>0\); then, we can check that \(\displaystyle \lim _{z \rightarrow \infty }\frac{S_Z(tz;\varvec{\theta })}{S_Z(z;\varvec{\theta })}=\displaystyle \lim \nolimits _{z \rightarrow \infty }\frac{(1+tz)^{-g(tz;\varvec{\theta })}}{(1+z)^{-g(z;\varvec{\theta })}}=t^{-\alpha }, \forall t>0\), where \(S_Z(z;\varvec{\theta })\) is the survival function of the corresponding GPL distribution. \(\square \)
Proof of Remark 1
We can check that (a) \(\displaystyle \lim \nolimits _{z \rightarrow \infty }\frac{S_Z(z;\varvec{\theta })}{G_Z(z)}= \displaystyle \lim \nolimits _{z \rightarrow \infty }\frac{(1+z)^{-g(z;\varvec{\theta })}}{(1+z)^{-\alpha }}=1\), where \(G_Z(z)\) is (in this case) the survival function of the Pareto type II distribution;
(b) \(\displaystyle \lim _{z \rightarrow \infty }\frac{S_Z(z;\varvec{\theta })}{G_Z(z)}= \displaystyle \lim _{z \rightarrow \infty }\frac{(1+z)^{-g(z;\varvec{\theta })}}{e^{-\lambda z}}=\infty \), where \(G_Z(z)\) is (in this case) the survival function of the exponential distribution.
Log-likelihood function, GPL(II) model (Eq. 5) with left-censored data:
where N is the sample size (included the left censored observations), r is the number of left censored observations, \(x_0=4\) is the censoring value, and the maximum likelihood estimates of the unknown parameter vector (\(\alpha \),\(\beta \),\(\sigma \)) is the one that maximizes the log-likelihood function \(\log \ell (\alpha ,\beta ,\sigma )\).
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Prieto, F., Sarabia, J.M. & Calderín-Ojeda, E. The nonlinear distribution of employment across municipalities. J Econ Interact Coord 16, 287–307 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11403-020-00294-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11403-020-00294-2