Abstract
We study the Glosten–Milgrom model and estimate the proportion of informed traders or speculators using bid–ask spread and price range. The GM model is generalized in terms of a key parameter \( \theta \)—the probability of making a correct decision by an agent. Informed traders have \( \theta = 1 \), and uninformed traders have \( \theta = 1/2 \) in the GM model. Speculators are defined to be agents with \( 1/2 < \bar{\theta } < 1 \). We show that bid–ask spread can be generated when speculators and uninformed traders are in the market—the presence of informed traders is unnecessary. We estimate the proportion of informed traders or speculators using the spread-to-range ratio as a proxy, which entails a new estimation method. Using three exchange rate data, we obtain the conditional mean of the proportion of informed traders and speculators over a seven-year period. Speculators can achieve probability \( \bar{\theta } > 1/2 \) using simple trading rules within short trading horizons and net of transaction cost.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
In Hull (2012), speculators are described as “… to bet on the future direction of a market variable”.
P. 87, Chapter 4, Lyons (2001).
Note that speculators may close a position and exit early if sufficient profit has been made on any days in the holding period H.
We also estimate the log-normal model (17), and the results are qualitatively similar.
See, for example, the hidden Markov model (HMM) approach in Yin and Zhao (2015).
References
Aldridge I (2013) High-frequency trading: a practical guide to algorithmic strategies and trading systems, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York
Avery C, Zemsky P (1998) Multidimensional uncertainty and herd behavior in financial markets. Am Econ Rev 88:724–748
Back K, Crotty K, Li T (2018) Identifying information asymmetry in securities markets. Rev Financ Stud 31:2277–2325
Banerjee S, Green B (2015) Signal or noise? Uncertainty and learning about whether other traders are informed. J Financ Econ 117:398–423
Basu K, Varoudakis A (2013) How to move the exchange rate if you must: the diverse practice of foreign exchange intervention by central banks and a proposal for doing it better. The World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 6460
Bouchaud J-P, Bonart J, Donier J, Gould M (2018) Trades, quotes and prices: financial markets under the microscope. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Brandt MW, Jones CS (2006) Volatility forecasting with range-based EGARCH models. J Bus Econ Stat 24:470–486
Brennan MJ, Huh S-W, Subrahmanyam A (2018) High-frequency measures of informed trading and corporate announcements. Rev Financ Stud 31:2326–2376
Brock W, Lakonishok J, LeBaron B (1992) Simple technical trading rules and the stochastic properties of stock returns. J Finance 47:1731–1764
Burnside C, Eichenbaum M, Rebelo S (2009) Understanding the forward premium puzzle: a microstructure approach. Am Econ J Macroecon 1:127–154
Chang SS, Chang LV, Wang FA (2014) A dynamic intraday measure of the probability of informed trading and firm-specific return variation. J Empir Finance 29:80–94
Chou RY (2005) Forecasting financial volatilities with extreme values: the conditional autoregressive range (CARR) model. J Money Credit Bank 37:561–582
Duarte J, Young L (2009) Why is PIN priced? J Financ Econ 91:119–138
Easley D, O’Hara M (1987) Price, trade size, and information in securities markets. J Financ Econ 19:69–90
Easley D, O’Hara M (1992) Time and the process of security price adjustment. J Finance 47:577–604
Easley D, Kiefer NM, O’Hara M, Paperman JB (1996) Liquidity, information, and infrequently traded stocks. J Finance 51:1405–1436
Easley D, Kiefer NM, O’Hara M (1997) One day in the life of a very common stock. Rev Financ Stud 10:805–835
Easley D, Hvidkjaera S, O’Hara M (2002) Is information risk a determinant of asset returns? J Finance 57:2185–2221
Easley D, Engle R, O’Hara M, Wu L (2008) Time-varying arrival rates of informed and uninformed trades. J Financ Econom 6:171–207
Easley D, de Prado ML, O’Hara M (2012) Flow toxicity and liquidity in a high frequency world. Rev Financ Stud 25:1457–1493
Engle RF, Russell JR (1998) Autoregressive conditional duration: a new model for irregularly spaced transaction data. Econometrica 66:1127–1162
Gao F, Song F, Wang J (2013) Rational expectations equilibrium with uncertain proportion of informed traders. J Financ Mark 16:387–413
García D (2015) Asymmetric information in financial markets. UNC, Chapel Hill
Glosten LR, Milgrom MR (1985) Bid, ask and transaction prices in a specialist market with heterogeneously informed traders. J Financ Econ 14:71–100
Gradojevic N (2020) Brexit and foreign exchange market expectations: could it have been predicted? Ann Oper Res. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-020-03582-z
Grossman S, Stiglitz JE (1980) On the impossibility of informationally efficient markets. Am Econ Rev 70:393–408
Hommes CH (2006) Heterogeneous agent models in economics and finance. In: Tesfatsion L, Judd KL (eds) Handbook of computational economics, vol 2. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 1109–1186
Huang RD, Stoll HR (1997) The components of the bid-ask spread: a general approach. Rev Financ Stud 10:995–1034
Hull JC (2012) Options, futures, and other derivatives, 8th edn. Pearson, London
Kacperczyk M, Pagnotta ES (2019) Chasing private information. Rev Financ Stud 32:4997–5047
Koch AK (2007) Adverse selection in financial markets. University of London lecture notes
Kyle AS (1985) Continuous auctions and insider trading. Econometrica 53:1315–1336
Lei Q, Wu G (2005) Time-varying informed and uninformed trading activities. J Financ Mark 8:153–181
Lyons RK (2001) The microstructure approach to exchange rates. The MIT Press, Cambridge
Madrigal V (1996) Non-fundamental speculation. J Finance 51:553–578
Marmora P, Rytchkov O (2018) Learning about noise. J Bank Finance 89:209–224
Nyholm K (2002) Estimating the probability of informed trading. J Financ Res 25:485–505
Peng L (2005) Learning with information capacity constraints. J Financ Quant Anal 40:307–329
Petchey J, Wee M, Yang J (2016) Pinning down an effective measure for probability of informed trading. Pac Basin Finance J 40:456–475
Poon S, Shackleton MB, Taylor SJ, Xu X (2004) Forecasting currency volatility: a comparison of implied volatilities and AR(FI)MA models. J Bank Finance 28:2541–2563
Preve D, Tse Y-K (2013) Estimation of time varying adjusted probability of informed trading and probability of symmetric order-flow shock. J Appl Economet 28:1138–1152
Schwarz K (2011) Are speculators informed? J Futures Mark 32:1–23
Tay AS, Ting C, Tse Y-K, Warachka MC (2009) Using high-frequency transaction data to estimate the probability of informed trading. J Financ Economet 7:288–311
Tsai PC, Dai SH (2020) Estimating the proportion of informed traders in BTC-USD market using spread and range. In: Lukáš P, Eom C, Scalas E, Kaizoji T (eds) Advanced studies of financial technologies and cryptocurrency markets. Springer, Berlin
Vitale P (2000) Speculative noise trading and manipulation in the foreign exchange market. J Int Money Finance 19:689–712
Yin X, Zhao J (2015) A hidden Markov model approach to information-based trading: theory and applications. J Appl Economet 30:1210–1234
Acknowledgements
The authors thank the organizers and participants in the 23rd Annual Workshop on Economic Science with Heterogeneous Interacting Agents (WEHIA 2018) in International Christian University, Tokyo.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendix A: Bid and ask from the GM model with speculators
Appendix A: Bid and ask from the GM model with speculators
We introduce a third type of trader—speculator, denoted by \( S \)—into the GM model. We define speculators in terms of their ability in making a correct trading decision:
In the GM model, uninformed traders \( U \) have 50% probability in making a correct decision and informed traders \( I \) always make a correct decision. A speculator \( S \) has a probability \( \frac{1}{2} < \bar{\theta } < 1 \) in making a correct trading decision.
The probability tree of the GM model with speculators now has 10 scenarios as shown by the additional rows in Table 1. We denote the proportion of informed traders and speculators by \( \mu_{i} \) and \( \mu_{s} \). The bid-and-ask prices can be derived by a similar approach in the GM model in three steps:
Step 1 Find \( E\left[ {V\left| {S, {\text{buy}}} \right.} \right] \) and \( E\left[ {V\left| {S, {\text{sell}}} \right.} \right] \)
First, we have:
where
and \( P\left( {\underline{V} \left| {S,{\text{buy}}} \right.} \right) = 1 - P\left( {\bar{V}\left| {S, {\text{buy}}} \right.} \right) \). For \( E\left[ {V\left| {S, {\text{sell}}} \right.} \right] \) we have:
where
and \( P\left( {\underline{V} \left| {S,{\text{sell}}} \right.} \right) = 1 - P\left( {\bar{V}\left| {S, {\text{sell}}} \right.} \right) \).
Step 2 Calculate \( P\left( {\text{buy}} \right) \) and \( P\left( {\text{sell}} \right) \)
The unconditional probability of seeing a buy order \( P\left( {\text{buy}} \right) \) can be calculated by summing up the probabilities of relevant scenarios in Table 1:
In the same way, the unconditional probability \( P\left( {\text{sell}} \right) \) is given by:
Step 3 Obtain the bid-and-ask formula
Under the assumption that \( E\left[ {{\text{Profit}}\left| {\text{Buy}} \right.} \right] = E\left[ {{\text{Profit}}\left| {\text{Sell}} \right.} \right] = 0 \), the formula for bid-and-ask prices in the GM model with speculators is:
where
and
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Tsai, PC., Tsai, CM. Estimating the proportion of informed and speculative traders in financial markets: evidence from exchange rate. J Econ Interact Coord 16, 443–470 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11403-020-00308-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11403-020-00308-z