Skip to main content
Log in

Estimating the proportion of informed and speculative traders in financial markets: evidence from exchange rate

  • Regular Article
  • Published:
Journal of Economic Interaction and Coordination Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We study the Glosten–Milgrom model and estimate the proportion of informed traders or speculators using bid–ask spread and price range. The GM model is generalized in terms of a key parameter \( \theta \)—the probability of making a correct decision by an agent. Informed traders have \( \theta = 1 \), and uninformed traders have \( \theta = 1/2 \) in the GM model. Speculators are defined to be agents with \( 1/2 < \bar{\theta } < 1 \). We show that bid–ask spread can be generated when speculators and uninformed traders are in the market—the presence of informed traders is unnecessary. We estimate the proportion of informed traders or speculators using the spread-to-range ratio as a proxy, which entails a new estimation method. Using three exchange rate data, we obtain the conditional mean of the proportion of informed traders and speculators over a seven-year period. Speculators can achieve probability \( \bar{\theta } > 1/2 \) using simple trading rules within short trading horizons and net of transaction cost.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. In Hull (2012), speculators are described as “… to bet on the future direction of a market variable”.

  2. https://www.snb.ch/en/mmr/speeches/id/ref_20110906_pmh/source/ref_20110906_pmh.en.pdf.

  3. See the review in Lyons (2001) and García (2015).

  4. P. 87, Chapter 4, Lyons (2001).

  5. The CARR (conditional autoregressive range) model of Chou (2005) can be seen as the range version of the ACD (autoregressive conditional duration) model of Engle and Russell (1998).

  6. Note that speculators may close a position and exit early if sufficient profit has been made on any days in the holding period H.

  7. We also estimate the log-normal model (17), and the results are qualitatively similar.

  8. See, for example, the hidden Markov model (HMM) approach in Yin and Zhao (2015).

References

  • Aldridge I (2013) High-frequency trading: a practical guide to algorithmic strategies and trading systems, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Avery C, Zemsky P (1998) Multidimensional uncertainty and herd behavior in financial markets. Am Econ Rev 88:724–748

    Google Scholar 

  • Back K, Crotty K, Li T (2018) Identifying information asymmetry in securities markets. Rev Financ Stud 31:2277–2325

    Google Scholar 

  • Banerjee S, Green B (2015) Signal or noise? Uncertainty and learning about whether other traders are informed. J Financ Econ 117:398–423

    Google Scholar 

  • Basu K, Varoudakis A (2013) How to move the exchange rate if you must: the diverse practice of foreign exchange intervention by central banks and a proposal for doing it better. The World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 6460

  • Bouchaud J-P, Bonart J, Donier J, Gould M (2018) Trades, quotes and prices: financial markets under the microscope. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Brandt MW, Jones CS (2006) Volatility forecasting with range-based EGARCH models. J Bus Econ Stat 24:470–486

    Google Scholar 

  • Brennan MJ, Huh S-W, Subrahmanyam A (2018) High-frequency measures of informed trading and corporate announcements. Rev Financ Stud 31:2326–2376

    Google Scholar 

  • Brock W, Lakonishok J, LeBaron B (1992) Simple technical trading rules and the stochastic properties of stock returns. J Finance 47:1731–1764

    Google Scholar 

  • Burnside C, Eichenbaum M, Rebelo S (2009) Understanding the forward premium puzzle: a microstructure approach. Am Econ J Macroecon 1:127–154

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang SS, Chang LV, Wang FA (2014) A dynamic intraday measure of the probability of informed trading and firm-specific return variation. J Empir Finance 29:80–94

    Google Scholar 

  • Chou RY (2005) Forecasting financial volatilities with extreme values: the conditional autoregressive range (CARR) model. J Money Credit Bank 37:561–582

    Google Scholar 

  • Duarte J, Young L (2009) Why is PIN priced? J Financ Econ 91:119–138

    Google Scholar 

  • Easley D, O’Hara M (1987) Price, trade size, and information in securities markets. J Financ Econ 19:69–90

    Google Scholar 

  • Easley D, O’Hara M (1992) Time and the process of security price adjustment. J Finance 47:577–604

    Google Scholar 

  • Easley D, Kiefer NM, O’Hara M, Paperman JB (1996) Liquidity, information, and infrequently traded stocks. J Finance 51:1405–1436

    Google Scholar 

  • Easley D, Kiefer NM, O’Hara M (1997) One day in the life of a very common stock. Rev Financ Stud 10:805–835

    Google Scholar 

  • Easley D, Hvidkjaera S, O’Hara M (2002) Is information risk a determinant of asset returns? J Finance 57:2185–2221

    Google Scholar 

  • Easley D, Engle R, O’Hara M, Wu L (2008) Time-varying arrival rates of informed and uninformed trades. J Financ Econom 6:171–207

    Google Scholar 

  • Easley D, de Prado ML, O’Hara M (2012) Flow toxicity and liquidity in a high frequency world. Rev Financ Stud 25:1457–1493

    Google Scholar 

  • Engle RF, Russell JR (1998) Autoregressive conditional duration: a new model for irregularly spaced transaction data. Econometrica 66:1127–1162

    Google Scholar 

  • Gao F, Song F, Wang J (2013) Rational expectations equilibrium with uncertain proportion of informed traders. J Financ Mark 16:387–413

    Google Scholar 

  • García D (2015) Asymmetric information in financial markets. UNC, Chapel Hill

    Google Scholar 

  • Glosten LR, Milgrom MR (1985) Bid, ask and transaction prices in a specialist market with heterogeneously informed traders. J Financ Econ 14:71–100

    Google Scholar 

  • Gradojevic N (2020) Brexit and foreign exchange market expectations: could it have been predicted? Ann Oper Res. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-020-03582-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grossman S, Stiglitz JE (1980) On the impossibility of informationally efficient markets. Am Econ Rev 70:393–408

    Google Scholar 

  • Hommes CH (2006) Heterogeneous agent models in economics and finance. In: Tesfatsion L, Judd KL (eds) Handbook of computational economics, vol 2. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 1109–1186

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang RD, Stoll HR (1997) The components of the bid-ask spread: a general approach. Rev Financ Stud 10:995–1034

    Google Scholar 

  • Hull JC (2012) Options, futures, and other derivatives, 8th edn. Pearson, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Kacperczyk M, Pagnotta ES (2019) Chasing private information. Rev Financ Stud 32:4997–5047

    Google Scholar 

  • Koch AK (2007) Adverse selection in financial markets. University of London lecture notes

  • Kyle AS (1985) Continuous auctions and insider trading. Econometrica 53:1315–1336

    Google Scholar 

  • Lei Q, Wu G (2005) Time-varying informed and uninformed trading activities. J Financ Mark 8:153–181

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyons RK (2001) The microstructure approach to exchange rates. The MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Madrigal V (1996) Non-fundamental speculation. J Finance 51:553–578

    Google Scholar 

  • Marmora P, Rytchkov O (2018) Learning about noise. J Bank Finance 89:209–224

    Google Scholar 

  • Nyholm K (2002) Estimating the probability of informed trading. J Financ Res 25:485–505

    Google Scholar 

  • Peng L (2005) Learning with information capacity constraints. J Financ Quant Anal 40:307–329

    Google Scholar 

  • Petchey J, Wee M, Yang J (2016) Pinning down an effective measure for probability of informed trading. Pac Basin Finance J 40:456–475

    Google Scholar 

  • Poon S, Shackleton MB, Taylor SJ, Xu X (2004) Forecasting currency volatility: a comparison of implied volatilities and AR(FI)MA models. J Bank Finance 28:2541–2563

    Google Scholar 

  • Preve D, Tse Y-K (2013) Estimation of time varying adjusted probability of informed trading and probability of symmetric order-flow shock. J Appl Economet 28:1138–1152

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwarz K (2011) Are speculators informed? J Futures Mark 32:1–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Tay AS, Ting C, Tse Y-K, Warachka MC (2009) Using high-frequency transaction data to estimate the probability of informed trading. J Financ Economet 7:288–311

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsai PC, Dai SH (2020) Estimating the proportion of informed traders in BTC-USD market using spread and range. In: Lukáš P, Eom C, Scalas E, Kaizoji T (eds) Advanced studies of financial technologies and cryptocurrency markets. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Vitale P (2000) Speculative noise trading and manipulation in the foreign exchange market. J Int Money Finance 19:689–712

    Google Scholar 

  • Yin X, Zhao J (2015) A hidden Markov model approach to information-based trading: theory and applications. J Appl Economet 30:1210–1234

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the organizers and participants in the 23rd Annual Workshop on Economic Science with Heterogeneous Interacting Agents (WEHIA 2018) in International Christian University, Tokyo.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ping-Chen Tsai.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix A: Bid and ask from the GM model with speculators

Appendix A: Bid and ask from the GM model with speculators

We introduce a third type of trader—speculator, denoted by \( S \)—into the GM model. We define speculators in terms of their ability in making a correct trading decision:

$$ P\left( {{\text{buy}}\left| {U, \bar{V}} \right.} \right) = P\left( {{\text{buy}}\left| {U, \underline{V} } \right.} \right) = P\left( {{\text{sell}}\left| {U, \bar{V}} \right.} \right) = P\left( {{\text{sell}}\left| {U,\underline{V} } \right.} \right) = 1/2 $$
(A1)
$$ P\left( {{\text{buy}}\left| {I, \bar{V}} \right.} \right) = P\left( {{\text{sell}}\left| {I,\underline{V} } \right.} \right) = 1 $$
(A2)
$$ P\left( {{\text{buy}}\left| {S, \bar{V}} \right.} \right) = P\left( {{\text{sell}}\left| {S,\underline{V} } \right.} \right) = \theta > P\left( {{\text{buy}}\left| {S,\underline{V} } \right.} \right) = P\left( {{\text{sell}}\left| {S, \bar{V}} \right.} \right) = 1 - \theta $$
(A3)

In the GM model, uninformed traders \( U \) have 50% probability in making a correct decision and informed traders \( I \) always make a correct decision. A speculator \( S \) has a probability \( \frac{1}{2} < \bar{\theta } < 1 \) in making a correct trading decision.

The probability tree of the GM model with speculators now has 10 scenarios as shown by the additional rows in Table 1. We denote the proportion of informed traders and speculators by \( \mu_{i} \) and \( \mu_{s} \). The bid-and-ask prices can be derived by a similar approach in the GM model in three steps:

Step 1 Find \( E\left[ {V\left| {S, {\text{buy}}} \right.} \right] \) and \( E\left[ {V\left| {S, {\text{sell}}} \right.} \right] \)

First, we have:

$$ E\left[ {V\left| {S, {\text{buy}}} \right.} \right] = P\left( {\bar{V}\left| {S, {\text{buy}}} \right.} \right)\bar{V} + P\left( {\underline{V} \left| {S,{\text{buy}}} \right.} \right)\underline{V} $$
(A4)

where

$$ P\left( {\bar{V}\left| {S, {\text{buy}}} \right.} \right) = \frac{\pi \theta }{{\pi \theta + \left( {1 - \pi } \right)\left( {1 - \theta } \right)}} $$
(A5)

and \( P\left( {\underline{V} \left| {S,{\text{buy}}} \right.} \right) = 1 - P\left( {\bar{V}\left| {S, {\text{buy}}} \right.} \right) \). For \( E\left[ {V\left| {S, {\text{sell}}} \right.} \right] \) we have:

$$ E\left[ {V\left| {S, {\text{sell}}} \right.} \right] = P\left( {\bar{V}\left| {S, {\text{sell}}} \right.} \right)\bar{V} + P\left( {\underline{V} \left| {S,{\text{sell}}} \right.} \right)\underline{V} $$
(A6)

where

$$ P\left( {\bar{V}\left| {S, {\text{sell}}} \right.} \right) = \frac{{\pi \left( {1 - \theta } \right)}}{{\pi \left( {1 - \theta } \right) + \left( {1 - \pi } \right)\theta }} $$
(A7)

and \( P\left( {\underline{V} \left| {S,{\text{sell}}} \right.} \right) = 1 - P\left( {\bar{V}\left| {S, {\text{sell}}} \right.} \right) \).

Step 2 Calculate \( P\left( {\text{buy}} \right) \) and \( P\left( {\text{sell}} \right) \)

The unconditional probability of seeing a buy order \( P\left( {\text{buy}} \right) \) can be calculated by summing up the probabilities of relevant scenarios in Table 1:

$$ \begin{aligned} P\left( {\text{buy}} \right) & = \pi \mu_{i} + \frac{{\pi \left( {1 - \mu_{i} - \mu_{s} } \right)}}{2} + \pi \mu_{s} \theta \\ &\quad + \frac{{\left( {1 - \pi } \right)\left( {1 - \mu_{i} - \mu_{s} } \right)}}{2} + \left( {1 - \pi } \right)\mu_{s} \left( {1 - \theta } \right) \end{aligned} $$

In the same way, the unconditional probability \( P\left( {\text{sell}} \right) \) is given by:

$$ \begin{aligned} P\left( {\text{sell}} \right) & = \frac{{\pi \left( {1 - \mu_{i} - \mu_{s} } \right)}}{2} + \pi \mu_{s} \left( {1 - \theta } \right) + \left( {1 - \pi } \right)\mu_{i} \\ &\quad + \frac{{\left( {1 - \pi } \right)\left( {1 - \mu_{i} - \mu_{s} } \right)}}{2} + \left( {1 - \pi } \right)\mu_{s} \theta \end{aligned} $$

Step 3 Obtain the bid-and-ask formula

Under the assumption that \( E\left[ {{\text{Profit}}\left| {\text{Buy}} \right.} \right] = E\left[ {{\text{Profit}}\left| {\text{Sell}} \right.} \right] = 0 \), the formula for bid-and-ask prices in the GM model with speculators is:

$$ \left\{ {\begin{array}{*{20}l} {B_{\text{GM}}^{S} = P\left( {I\left| {\text{sell}} \right.} \right)\underline{V} + P\left( {U\left| {\text{sell}} \right.} \right)E\left[ V \right] + P\left( {S\left| {\text{sell}} \right.} \right)E\left[ {V\left| {S, {\text{sell}}} \right.} \right]} \hfill \\ {A_{\text{GM}}^{S} = P\left( {I\left| {\text{buy}} \right.} \right)\bar{V} + P\left( {U\left| {\text{buy}} \right.} \right)E\left[ V \right] + P\left( {S\left| {\text{buy}} \right.} \right)E\left[ {V\left| {S, {\text{buy}}} \right.} \right]} \hfill \\ \end{array} } \right. $$
(A8)

where

$$ \begin{aligned} P\left( {I\left| {\text{sell}} \right.} \right) & = \frac{{\left( {1 - \pi } \right)\mu_{i} }}{{P\left( {\text{sell}} \right)}},\quad P\left( {U\left| {\text{sell}} \right.} \right) = \frac{{\left( {1 - \mu_{i} - \mu_{s} } \right)/2}}{{P\left( {\text{sell}} \right)}},\\ P\left( {S\left| {\text{sell}} \right.} \right) & = \frac{{\mu_{s} \left( {\pi + \theta - 2\pi \theta } \right)}}{{P\left( {\text{sell}} \right)}}, \end{aligned} $$

and

$$ \begin{aligned} P\left( {I\left| {\text{buy}} \right.} \right) & = \frac{{\pi \mu_{i} }}{{P\left( {\text{buy}} \right)}},\quad P\left( {U\left| {\text{buy}} \right.} \right) = \frac{{\left( {1 - \mu_{i} - \mu_{s} } \right)/2}}{{P\left( {\text{buy}} \right)}},\\ P\left( {S\left| {\text{buy}} \right.} \right) & = \frac{{\pi \mu_{s} \theta + \left( {1 - \pi } \right)\mu_{s} \left( {1 - \theta } \right)}}{{P\left( {\text{buy}} \right)}}. \end{aligned} $$

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tsai, PC., Tsai, CM. Estimating the proportion of informed and speculative traders in financial markets: evidence from exchange rate. J Econ Interact Coord 16, 443–470 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11403-020-00308-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11403-020-00308-z

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation