Abstract
In life history methodologies, ‘human’ lives appear to take primacy over other lives. Within science education literature, life history methods often are approached as reflective tools to make meaning out of teachers’ pedagogical practices and commitments. In the present research, we tinker with life history research, to follow its performative work in (re-)producing what counts as life, nature, science and science education. Thinking with life history(ies), bodies and stickiness, we analyze a college instructor’s (Nurul) life with others. Nurul is committed to a science pedagogical approach (‘STEPWISE’) centered on STSE education for social and environmental justice. This paper relays what was (re-)produced when Nurul’s life narrative, and our own encounters with life history methodologies were plugged into one another. Analytically, we discuss stickiness of humanist and meaning-making practices in life history methodologies and how this might have enabled/complicated our analyses of Nurul’s life history. We invite further analyses into productive aspects of life history(ies) and how they might gesture to pedagogical possibilities for being/living differently within nature, science and science education.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Ontario Institute for Studies in Education, teacher education college and research institute at the University of Toronto. All collaborators on this paper are associated with OISE, whether as faculty (Larry) or graduate students (Nurul, Kristen, Minja, Majd and Sarah).
References
Adriansen, H. K. (2012). Timeline interviews: A tool for conducting life history research. Qualitative Studies, 3(1), 40–55. https://doi.org/10.7146/qs.v3i1.6272.
Ahmed, S. (2004). The cultural politics of emotion. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203700372.
Ahmed, S. (2010). Orientations matter. In D. Coole & S. Frost (Eds.), New materialisms: Ontology, agency, and politics (pp. 234–257). Duke: Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822392996-011.
Ahmed, S. (2019). What’s the use?: On the uses of use. Duke: Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.1215/9781478007210.
Alsop, S. (2005). Beyond cartesian dualism: Encountering affect in the teaching and learning of science (Vol. 29). Berlin: Springer.
Alsop, S. (2011). The body bites back! Cultural Studies of Science Education, 6(3), 611–623. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-011-9328-4.
Alsop, S. (2016). Encountering science education’s capacity to affect and be affected. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 11(3), 551–565. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-015-9692-6.
Anderson, B., & Harrison, P. (Eds.). (2010). Taking-place: Non-representational theories and geography. Abingdon: Routledge.
Aoki, T. T. (1993). Legitimating lived curriculum: Towards a curricular landscape of multiplicity. Journal of Curriculum and Supervision, 8(3), 255–268.
Apple, M. W. (2013). Interrupting the right: On doing critical educational work in conservative times. In J. Di Leo & W. Jacobs (Eds.), If classrooms matter: Progressive visions of educational environments (pp. 61–80). Abingdon: Routledge.
Avraamidou, L. (2016). Studying science teacher identity: Theoretical, methodological and empirical explorations. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6300-528-9.
Badley, G. F. (2018). “Manifold creatures”: A response to the posthumanist challenge. Qualitative Inquiry, 24(6), 421–432. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800417729839.
Barad, K. (2001). Re(con)figuring space, time, and matter. In M. DeKoven (Ed.), Feminist locations: Global and local, theory and practice (pp. 75–109). New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.
Barad, K. (2003). Posthumanist performativity: Toward an understanding of how matter comes to matter. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 28(3), 801–831. https://doi.org/10.1086/345321.
Bencze, L. (2017). Science and technology education promoting wellbeing for individuals, societies and environments: Stepwise (Vol. 14). Berlin: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-55505-8.
Biesta, G. (2010). A new logic of emancipation: The methodology of Jacques Rancière. Educational Theory, 60(1), 39–59. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-5446.2009.00345.x.
Carter, L. (2011). Gathering in threads in the insensible global world: The wicked problem of globalisation and science education. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 6(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-010-9307-1.
Cary, L. (1999). Unexpected stories: Life history and the limits of representation. Qualitative Inquiry, 5(3), 411–427. https://doi.org/10.1177/107780049900500307.
Chaudhury, A. (2019). Still life? Musings on vegetal life and inanimate constitutions, and their agencies in the human umwelt. Academia. Retrieved December 1, 2019, from http://www.academia.edu/download/35429184/6149_Critical_Reflections.docx.
Chinn, P. W. (2002). Asian and Pacific Islander women scientists and engineers: A narrative exploration of model minority, gender, and racial stereotypes. Journal of Research in Science Teaching: The Official Journal of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, 39(4), 302–323. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.10026.
Cole, A. L., & Knowles, G. J. (2001). Lives in context: The art of life history research. Lanham: AltaMira Press. https://doi.org/10.1891/1062-8061.13.1.230.
Colombetti, G. (2013). Primordial affectivity. In G. Colombetti (Ed.), The feeling body: Affective science meets the enactive mind (pp. 1–24). Cambridge: MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262019958.001.0001.
Crossley, N. (1995). Merleau-Ponty, the elusive body and carnal sociology. Body and Society, 1(1), 43–63. https://doi.org/10.1177/1357034X95001001004.
Csordas, T. J. (1999). Embodiment and cultural phenomenology. In Perspectives on embodiment: The intersections of nature and culture (pp. 143–162).
Davis, J. P., & Bellocchi, A. (2018). Objectivity, subjectivity, and emotion in school science inquiry. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 55(10), 1419–1447. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21461.
de la Bellacasa, M. P. (2011). Matters of care in technoscience: Assembling neglected things. Social Studies of Science, 41(1), 85–106. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312710380301.
de la Bellacasa, M. P. (2015). Making time for soil: Technoscientific futurity and the pace of care. Social Studies of Science, 45(5), 691–716. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312715599851.
Deleuze, G. (1988). Spinoza: Practical philosophy. San Francisco: City Lights Books.
Denzin, N. K. (1989). Interpretive biography (Vol. 17). Atlanta: Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412984584.
Denzin, N. K. (2003). Performance ethnography: Critical pedagogy and the politics of culture. Atlanta: Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412985390.
Dhunpath, R. (2000). Life history methodology:” Narradigm” regained. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 13(5), 543–551. https://doi.org/10.1080/09518390050156459.
Ekman, P. (1993). Facial expression and emotion. American Psychologist, 48(4), 384. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.48.4.384.
El Halwany, S., Zouda, M., Pouliot, C., & Bencze, L. (2020). Student-teachers’ relationships to knowledge and to their practices for critical and activist STSE education. In K. W. Clausen & G. Black (Eds.), The future of action research in education: A Canadian perspective (pp. 171–193). Ottawa: Canadian Association for Teacher Education/Canadian Society for Studies in Education.
Fenwick, T., Edwards, R., & Sawchuk, P. (2015). Emerging approaches to educational research: Tracing the socio-material. Abingdon: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203817582.
Folkman, S., & Lazarus, R. S. (1988). Coping as a mediator of emotion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(3), 466. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.54.3.466.
Goodson, I., & Sikes, P. (2001). Life history research in educational settings: Learning from lives (doing qualitative research in educational settings). Buckingham: Open University Press.
Gough, A. (2015). STEM policy and science education: Scientistic curriculum and sociopolitical silences. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 10(2), 445–458. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-014-9590-3.
Higgins, M., Wallace, M. F., & Bazzul, J. (2019). Staying with the Trouble in Science Education: Towards thinking with nature—A Manifesto. In Posthumanism and higher education (pp. 155–164). Berlin: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-14672-6_9.
Hoeg, D. G. (2016). Constitutions of nature by teacher practice and discourse in Ontario grade 9 and 10 Academic science (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Toronto: Ontario Institute for Studies in Education.
Hwang, S., & Roth, W.-M. (2011). The (embodied) performance of physics concepts in lectures. Research in Science Education, 41(4), 461–477. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-010-9175-4.
Ihde, D. (2009). Postphenomenology and technoscience: The Peking university lectures. Albany: Suny Press.
Ingold, T. (2011). Being alive: Essays on movement, knowledge and description. Abingdon: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203818336.
Jaber, L. Z., & Hammer, D. (2016). Engaging in science: A feeling for the discipline. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 25(2), 156–202. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2015.1088441.
Jackson, A. Y. (2013). Data-as-machine: A Deleuzian becoming. In Deleuze and Research Methodologies (pp. 111–124).
Jackson, A. Y., & Mazzei, L. (2012). Thinking with theory in qualitative research: Viewing data across multiple perspectives. Abingdon: Routledge.
Jackson, Alecia Y., & Mazzei, L. A. (2013). Plugging one text into another: Thinking with theory in qualitative research. Qualitative Inquiry, 19(4), 261–271. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800412471510.
Kirchgasler, K. L. (2018). Moving the lab into the field: The making of pathologized (non)citizens in US science education. Curriculum Inquiry, 48(1), 115–137. https://doi.org/10.1080/03626784.2017.1409595.
Kress, G. (2009). Multimodality: A social semiotic approach to contemporary communication. Abingdon: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203970034.
Lather, P., Jackson, A. Y., & Mazzei, L. A. (2009). Against empathy, voice and authenticity. Voice in Qualitative Inquiry: Challenging Conventional, Interpretive, and Critical Conceptions in Qualitative Research. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203891889.
Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network-theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lemke, J. (2015). Feeling and meaning: A unitary bio-semiotic account. In P. P. Trifonas (Ed.), International handbook of semiotics (pp. 589–616). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9404-6_27.
Loving, C. C. (1991). The scientific theory profile: A philosophy of science model for science teachers. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28(9), 823–838. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660280908.
Lupton, D. (1998). The emotional self: A sociocultural exploration. Atlanta: Sage.
Maclean, M. (1988). Narrative as performance: The Baudelairean experiment (Vol. 981). Milton Park: Taylor & Francis.
MacLure, M. (2017). Qualitative methodology and the new materialisms. Qualitative Inquiry in Neoliberal Times. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315397788-4.
Malone, K., Truong, S., & Gray, T. (Eds.). (2017). Reimagining sustainability in precarious times. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-2550-1.
Manning, E. (2010). Always more than one: The collectivity of a life. Body and Society, 16(1), 117–127. https://doi.org/10.1177/1357034X09354128.
Manning, E. (2014). Wondering the world directly–or, how movement outruns the subject. Body and Society, 20(3–4), 162–188. https://doi.org/10.1177/1357034X14546357.
Manning, E. (2015). Against method. In P. Vannini (Ed.), Non-representational methodologies (pp. 62–81). Abingdon: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315883540.
Martusewicz, R. A., Lupinacci, J., & Schnakenberg, G. (2010). EcoJustice education for science educators. In Cultural studies and environmentalism (pp. 11–27). Berlin: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-3929-3_3.
Massumi, B. (2015). Politics of affect. Hoboken: Wiley.
Mazzei, L. A., & Jackson, A. Y. (2017). Voice in the agentic assemblage. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 49(11), 1090–1098. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2016.1159176.
Micciche, L. R. (2007). Doing emotion: Rhetoric, writing, teaching. Portsmouth: Boynton/Cook Publishers.
Murphy, M. (2015). Unsettling care: Troubling transnational itineraries of care in feminist health practices. Social Studies of Science, 45(5), 717–737. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312715589136.
Noffke, S. E., & Somekh, B. (2009). The SAGE handbook of educational action research. Atlanta: Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/978085702102.
Nxumalo, F. (2015). Forest stories: Restorying encounters with “natural” places in early childhood education. In Unsettling the colonial places and spaces of early childhood education (pp. 31–52). Abingdon: Routledge.
Pedretti, E., & Nazir, J. (2011). Currents in STSE education: Mapping a complex field, 40 years on. Science Education, 95(4), 601–626. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20435.
Roth, W.-M. (2001). Learning science through technological design. Journal of Research in Science Teaching: The Official Journal of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, 38(7), 768–790. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.1031.
Said, E. W. (1995). Orientalism: Western conceptions of the Orient 1978 (p. 115). Penguin: Harmondsworth, Engineering.
Schaffer, K., Milanovic, M., El Halwany, S., Hassan, N., Zouda, M. & Bencze, L. (2017). Inertial tensions in promoting socio-political actions among future technoscience technicians. In Paper presented at the European science education research association, Dublin, Ireland, August 20–25.
Shume, T. J. (2017). Mapping conceptions of wolf hunting onto an ecological worldview conceptual framework—hunting for a worldview theory. In M. Mueller, D. Tippins, A. Stewart (Eds.), Animals and science education. Environmental discourses in science education (vol. 2, pp. 223–241). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56375-6_16.
Springgay, S., & Truman, S. E. (2017). Stone walks: Inhuman animacies and queer archives of feeling. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 38(6), 851–863. https://doi.org/10.1080/01596306.2016.1226777.
Springgay, S., & Truman, S. E. (2018). On the need for methods beyond proceduralism: Speculative middles,(in) tensions, and response-ability in research. Qualitative Inquiry, 24(3), 203–214. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800417704464.
Tan, E., & Barton, A. C. (2008). Unpacking science for all through the lens of identities-in-practice: The stories of Amelia and Ginny. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 3(1), 43–71. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-007-9076-7.
Tronto, J. C. (1993). Moral boundaries: A political argument for an ethic of care. New York: Psychology Press.
Vannini, P. (2015). Non-representational methodologies: Re-envisioning research (Vol. 12). Abingdon: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315883540.
Wallace, M. F., Higgins, M., & Bazzul, J. (2018). Thinking with nature: Following the contour of minor concepts for ethico-political response-ability in science education. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 18(3), 199–209. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511803932.
Whatmore, S. (2006). Materialist returns: Practising cultural geography in and for a more-than-human world. Cultural Geographies, 13(4), 600–609. https://doi.org/10.1191/1474474006cgj377oa.
Williams, R. (1977). Structures of feeling. In Marxism and literature (pp. 128–135). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Zembylas, M. (2007a). The specters of bodies and affects in the classroom: A rhizo-ethological approach. Pedagogy, Culture and Society, 15(1), 19–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681360601162030.
Zembylas, M. (2007b). Risks and pleasures: A Deleuzo-Guattarian pedagogy of desire in education. British Educational Research Journal, 33(3), 331–347. https://doi.org/10.1080/01411920701243602.
Zembylas, M. (2017). The contribution of non-representational theories in education: Some affective, ethical and political implications. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 36(4), 393–407. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11217-016-9535-2.
Zouda, M. (2018). Issues of power and control in STEM education: A reading through the postmodern condition. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 13(4), 1109–1128. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-017-9820-6.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Lead Editor: L. Avraamidou.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
El Halwany, S., Bencze, L., Hassan, N. et al. Becoming alive within science education (research): thinking with life history(ies), bodies and stickiness. Cult Stud of Sci Educ 16, 85–107 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-020-09994-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-020-09994-4