Abstract
The intelligent tutoring system of structure strategy (ITSS) is a web-based digital tutoring system proven to be effective in helping students recognize and use text structures to comprehend and recall texts. However, little is known about the dynamic learning processes within the ITSS. This study aims to investigate the effects of feedback dosage on lesson mastery throughout the progression of ITSS lessons. We applied a confirmatory factor analysis and extended vector autoregressive model to assess the dynamic relationships among three tasks embedded within the ITSS and found: (1) significant cross-regression effects among the three reading tasks; (2) distinct effects of feedback dosage on the specific reading task; and (3) different effect sizes of feedback across lessons. Results provide helpful insights on ways to design better modules in further development of the ITSS.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
The participants were allowed to make up to 6 attempts in the ITSS system. Only data from the first 4 attempts were included in the analysis because most participants exceeded the minimum threshold (scoring at least 80 out of 100) to proceed to the next item by the 4th attempt, thus generating excessive missingness if we were to include data from all 6 attempts.
References
Baddeley, A., Papagno, C., & Vallar, G. (1988). When long-term learning depends on short-term storage. Journal of Memory and Language, 27(5), 586–595.
Bar-Shalom, Y., Li, X. R., & Kirubarajan, T. (2001). Estimation with applications to tracking and navigation: {T}heory algorithms and software. Wiley.
Bringmann, L. F., Ferrer, E., Hamaker, E. L., Borsboom, D., & Tuerlinckx, F. (2018). Modeling nonstationary emotion dynamics in dyads using a time-varying vector-autoregressive model. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 3171, 1–22.
Chen, M., Chow, S.-M., Hammal, Z., Messinger, D. S., & Cohn, J. F. (2020). A person-and time-varying vector autoregressive model to capture interactive infant-mother head movement dynamics. Multivariate Behavioral Research. https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2020.1762065
Chen, M., Chow, S.-M., & Hunter, M. D. (2018). Stochastic differential equation models with time-varying parameters. Continuous time modeling in the behavioral and related sciences (pp. 205–238). Springer.
Chow, S. M., Grimm, K. J., Filteau, G., Dolan, C. V., & McArdle, J. J. (2013). Regime-switching bivariate dual change score model. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 48(4), 463–502. https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2013.787870
Chow, S.-M., Haltigan, J. D., & Messinger, D. S. (2010). Dynamic patterns of infant-parent interactions during face-to-face and still-face episodes. Emotion, 10(1), 101–114.
Chow, S.-M., Hamagami, F., & Nesselroade, J. R. (2007). Age differences in dynamical cognition-emotion linkages. Psychology and Aging, 22(4), 765–780.
Chow, S. M., Zu, J., Shifren, K., & Zhang, G. (2011). Dynamic factor analysis models with time-varying parameters. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 46(2), 303–339. https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2011.563697
Clarke, B., Baker, S., Smolkowski, K., & Chard, D. J. (2008). An analysis of early numeracy curriculum-based measurement: Examining the role of growth in student outcomes. Remedial and Special Education, 29(1), 46–57. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932507309694
Dalton, B., & Proctor, C. P. (2007). Reading as thinking: Integrating strategy instruction in a universally designed digital literacy environment. In D. S. McNamara (Ed.), Reading comprehension strategies: Theories, interventions, and technologies (pp. 421–440). Erlbaum.
De Bot, K. (2008). Introduction: Second language development as a dynamic process. The Modern Language Journal, 92, 166–178. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2008.00712.x
Du Toit, S. H. C., & Browne, M. W. (2007). Structural equation modeling of multivariate time series. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 42, 67–101.
Fan, J., & Zhang, W. (2008). Statistical methods with varying coefficient models. Statistics and Its Interface, 1, 2.
Goegebeur, Y., De Boeck, P., Wollack, J. A., & Cohen, A. S. (2008). A speeded item response model with gradual process change. Psychometrika, 73(1), 65–87. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-007-9031-2
Hamilton, J. D. (1994). Time series analysis. Princeton University Press.
Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research., 77, 81–112.
Horn, J. L., & Little, K. B. (1966). Isolating change and invariance in patterns of behavior. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 1, 219–222.
Hung, L. F., & Wang, W. C. (2012). The generalized multilevel facets model for longitudinal data. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 37(2), 231–255. https://doi.org/10.3102/1076998611402503
Ji, L., & Chow, S.-M. (2018). Methodological issues and extensions to the latent difference score framework 1. In E. Ferrer, S. M. Boker, & K. J. Grimm (Eds.), Longitudinal multivariate psychology (pp. 9–37). Routledge.
Jöreskog, K. G. (1969). A general approach to confirmatory maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika, 34(2), 183–202. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02289343
Joshi, R. M., & Aaron, P. G. (2000). The component model of reading: Simple view of reading made a little more complex. Reading Psychology, 21(2), 85–97. https://doi.org/10.1080/02702710050084428
Kim, S., & Camilli, G. (2014). An item response theory approach to longitudinal analysis with application to summer setback in preschool language/literacy. Large-Scale Assessments in Education, 2(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1186/2196-0739-2-1
Krause, U., Stark, R., & Mandl, H. (2009). The effects of cooperative learning and feedback on e-learning in statistics. Learning and Instruction, 19(2), 158–170.
Kulik, J. A., & Fletcher, J. D. (2016). Effectiveness of intelligent tutoring systems: A meta-analytic review. Review of Educational Research, 86(1), 42–78. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654315581420
Lemke, J. L. (2002). Language development and identity: Multiple timescales in the social ecology of learning (pp. 68–87). Language Acquisition and Language Socialization.
Lord, F. M., & Novick, M. R. (1968). Statistical theories of mental test scores. Addison-Welsley Publishing Company.
Lütkepohl, H. (2005). Introduction to multiple time series analysis (2nd ed.). Springer-Verlag.
Lysakowski, R. S., & Walberg, H. J. (1982). Instructional effects of cues, participation, and corrective feedback: A quantitative synthesis. American Educational Research Journal, 19(4), 559–572. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312019004559
Mason, L. H. (2013). Teaching students who struggle with learning to think before, while, and after reading: Effects of SRSD instruction. Reading and Writing Quarterly, 29, 124–144.
Maulana, R., Opdenakker, M. C., Stroet, K., & Bosker, R. (2013). Changes in teachers’ involvement versus rejection and links with academic motivation during the first year of secondary education: A multilevel growth curve analysis. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 42(9), 1348–1371. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-013-9921-9
Meyer, B. J. F. (1975). The organization of prose and its effects on memory. North—Holland Press.
Meyer, B. J. F., & Poon, L. W. (2001). Effects of the structure strategy and signaling on recall of text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 141–159.
Meyer, B. J. F., Wijekumar, K., & Lei, P. (2018). Comparative signaling generated for expository texts by 4th–8th graders: Variations by text structure strategy instruction, comprehension skill, and signal word. Reading and Writing, 31(9), 1937–1968. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-018-9871-4
Meyer, B. J. F., Wijekumar, K., Middlemiss, W., Higley, K., Lei, P.-W., Meier, C., & Spielvogel, J. (2010). Web-based tutoring of the structure strategy with or without elaborated feedback or choice for fifth-and seventh-grade readers. Reading Research Quarterly, 45(1), 62–92.
Meyer, B. J. F., Young, C. J., & Bartlett, B. J. (1989). Memory improved: Reading and memory enhancement across the life span through strategic text structures. Erlbaum.
Molenaar, P. C. M. (1994). Dynamic factor analysis of psychophysiological signals. In J. R. Jennings, P. K. Ackles, & M. G. H. Coles (Eds.), Advances in psychophysiology: A research annual (Vol. 5, pp. 229–302). Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
Molenaar, P. C. M., De Gooijer, J. G., & Schmitz, B. (1992). Dynamic factor analysis of nonstationary multivariate time series. Psychometrika, 57(3), 333–349. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02295422
Molenaar, P., Sinclair, K. O., Rovine, M. J., Ram, N., & Corneal, S. E. (2009). Analyzing developmental processes on an individual level using nonstationary time series modeling. Developmental Psychology, 45(1), 260.
Moreno, R. (2004). Decreasing cognitive load for novice students: Effects of explanatory versus corrective feedback in discovery-based multimedia. Instructional Science, 32, 99–113.
Murphy, P. (2007). Reading comprehension exercises online: The effects of feedback, proficiency and interaction. Language Learning & Technology, 11(3), 107–129.
National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP). (2007). Retrieved December 20, 2008, from https://www.nationsreportcard.gov/reading_2007/r0003.asp
Nicol, D. (2010). From monologue to dialogue: Improving written feedback processes in mass higher education. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education., 35, 501–517. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602931003786559
Ou, L., Chow, S.-M., Ji, L., & Molenaar, P. C. M. (2017). (Re)evaluating the implications of the autoregressive latent trajectory model through likelihood ratio tests of its initial conditions. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 52, 178–199.
Ou, L., Hunter, M. D., & Chow, S. M. (2019). What’s for dynr: A package for linear and nonlinear dynamic modeling in R. The R Journal, 11(1), 91–111.
Pagan, A. (1980). Some identification and estimation results for regression models with stochastically varying coefficients. Journal of Econometrics, 13, 341–363. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(80)90084-6
Perfetti, C., & Stafura, J. (2014). Word knowledge in a theory of reading comprehension. Scientific Studies of Reading, 18, 22–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2013.827687
Raphael, T. E., & Kirschner, B. M. (1985). The effects of instruction in compare/contrast text structure on sixth-grade students' reading comprehension and writing products. Research Series No. 161.
Rijmen, F., De Boeck, P., & Van Der Maas, H. L. J. (2005). An IRT model with a parameter-driven process for change. Psychometrika, 70(4), 651–669. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-002-1047-z
Rosseel, Y. (2012). lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48(2), 1–36.
Shevlin, M., & Millar, R. (2006). Career education: An application of latent growth curve modelling to career information-seeking behaviour of school pupils. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 76(1), 141–153. https://doi.org/10.1348/000709904x22386
Stoel, R. D., Peetsma, T. T. D., & Roeleveld, J. (2003). Relations between the development of school investment, self-confidence, and language achievement in elementary education: A multivariate latent growth curve approach. Learning and Individual Differences, 13(4), 313–333. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1041-6080(03)00017-7
Tenenbaum, G., & Goldring, E. (1989). A meta-analysis of the effect of enhanced instruction: Cues, participation, reinforcement and feedback and correctives on motor skill learning. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 22, 53–64.
Van de Gaer, E., De Fraine, B., Pustjens, H., Van Damme, J., De Munter, A., & Onghena, P. (2009). School effects on the development of motivation toward learning tasks and the development of academic self-concept in secondary education: A multivariate latent growth curve approach. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 20(2), 235–253.
Van Dijk, T. A., & Kintsch, W. (1983). Strategies of discourse comprehension. Academic Press.
Vollmeyer, R., & Rheinberg, F. (2005). A surprising effect of feedback on learning. Learning and Instruction, 15, 589–602. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2005.08.001
Wang, Q., Molenaar, P., Harsh, S., Freeman, K., Xie, J., Gold, C., Rovine, M., & Ulbrecht, J. (2014). Personalized state-space modeling of glucose dynamics for type 1 diabetes using continuously monitored glucose, insulin dose, and meal intake: An extended Kalman filter approach. Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology, 8(2), 331–345. https://doi.org/10.1177/1932296814524080
Waninge, F., Dörnyei, Z., & De Bot, K. (2014). Motivational dynamics in language learning: Change, stability, and context. The Modern Language Journal. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2014.12118.x
Wiederholt, J. L., & Blalock, G. (2000). Gray silent reading tests. Pro-Ed.
Wijekumar, K., Meyer, B. J. F., & Lei, P. (2012). Large-scale randomized controlled trial with 4th graders using intelligent tutoring of the structure strategy to improve nonfiction reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Technology Research and Development., 60, 987–1013.
Wijekumar, K., Meyer, B. J. F., & Lei, P. (2017a). Web-based text structure strategy instruction improves seventh graders’ content area reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 109(6), 741–760.
Wijekumar, K., Meyer, B. J. F., Lei, P., Cheng, W., Ji, X., & Joshi, R. M. (2017b). Evidence of an intelligent tutoring system as a mindtool to promote strategic memory of expository texts and comprehension with children in grades 4 and 5. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 55(7), 1022–1048. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633117696909
Wijekumar, K., Meyer, B. J. F., Lei, P., Lin, Y., Johnson, L. A., Spielvogel, J. A., et al. (2014). Multisite randomized controlled trial examining intelligent tutoring of structure strategy for fifth-grade. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 7, 331–357. https://doi.org/10.1080/19345747.2013.853333
Wijekumar, K., Zhang, S., Joshi, R. M., & PetiStantic, A. (2021). Introduction to the special issue: Textbook content and organization—why it matters to reading comprehension in elementary grades? Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 26(2), 243–249.
Williams, J. P., Hall, K. M., Lauer, K. D., DeSisto, L. A., deCani, J. S., & Stafford, K. B. (2005). Expository text comprehension in the primary grade classroom. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97(4), 538–550. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.97.4.538
Woolf, B. P. (2009). Building intelligent interactive tutors: Student centered strategies for revolutionizing e-learning. Elsevier.
Acknowledgements
The research reported here was supported by the Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education [grant number R305A080133] and National Science Foundation [grant number IGE-1806874]. The opinions expressed are those of the authors and do not represent views of the Institutes or the U.S. Department of Education.
Funding
This study was funded by the Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education (grant number R305A080133) and and National Science Foundation [grant number IGE-1806874].
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical approval
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee (Penn State IRB #28763). This was a secondary data analysis with de-identified data from computer log files.
Informed consent
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study. Consent was obtained for the original study under the IRB approval 28763.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lee, J., Chow, SM., Lei, P. et al. Dynamics of learning: time-varying feedback effects within the intelligent tutoring system of structure strategy (ITSS). Education Tech Research Dev 69, 2963–2984 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-021-10049-w
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-021-10049-w