Abstract
This study examines how caring for pets and walking, exercising, or playing with pets is associated with the experiential well-being of older Americans using activity-episode-level data from the 2010, 2012, and 2013 American Time Use Surveys (ATUS) and their associated Well-Being Modules (WBM). Estimating a series of ordered probit models that relate various measures of experiential well-being to different measures of pet-related activities, the results show that caring for pets is associated with greater meaning than other activities, controlling for a standard set of demographic and other person-level characteristics. Walking, exercising, or playing with household pets or animals is associated with greater happiness and meaning and less stress relative to other activities. The results from sensitivity analyses show that the magnitudes of the associations for people who live alone are larger than for those who live with others.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data Availability
This paper uses the publicly available American Time Use Survey data set. It can be found here: https://www.bls.gov/tus/data.htm
Notes
These three years are all similar in terms of the business cycle. They are all expansion years so there should be no business-cycle effects on time-use. However, year controls still are included in the models to control for any changes in macroeconomic conditions across the years and any other year-specific, unobserved factors affecting people’s time use.
The ATUS 2013 lexicon code for this activity is 020601.
The ATUS 2013 lexicon code for this activity is 020602.
Hispanics may be of any race. Because of their large representation in the population and the sample, Hispanic ethnicity is included as a demographic control in our models while other ethnicities are not.
References
Aging in Place (2020). Seniors and pets. https://www.aginginplace.org/seniors-and-pets/. Accessed 14 April 2020.
Allen, K., Blascovich, J., & Mendes, W. B. (2002). Cardiovascular reactivity and the presence of pets, friends, and spouses: the truth about cats and dogs. Psychosomatic Medicine, 64(5), 727–739.
American Pet Products Association (2020). Pet industry market size and ownership statistics. https://www.americanpetproducts.org/press_industrytrends.asp. Accessed 14 April 2020.
Anderson, K. A., Lord, L. K., Hill, L. N., & McCune, S. (2015). Fostering the human-animal bond for older adults: challenges and opportunities. Activities, Adaptation & Aging, 39(1), 32–42. https://doi.org/10.1080/01924788.2015.994447.
Antonacopoulos, N. M. D., & Pychyl, T. A. (2010). An examination of the potential role of pet ownership, human social support and pet attachment in the psychological health of individuals living alone. Anthrozoos, 23(1), 37–54.
Archer, J. (1997). Why do people love their pets? Evolution and Human Behavior, 18(4), 237–259.
Balinger (2020). The healing power of pets for seniors. https://www.agingcare.com/articles/benefits-of-elderly-owning-pets-113294.htm. Accessed 14 April 2020.
Bao, K. J., & Schreer, G. (2016). Pets and happiness: examining the association between pet ownership and wellbeing. Anthrozoös, 29(2), 283–296.
Becker, G. (1965). A theory of the allocation of time. The Economic Journal, 75(299), 493–517.
Bennett, P. C., Godber, T. L., Brown, C., & Trigg, J. (2015). An experience sampling approach to investigating associations between pet presence and indicators of psychological wellbeing and mood in older Australians. Anthrozoös, 28(3), 403–420.
Bradshaw, J. (2017). The real benefits of pet ownership. The Wall Street Journal. https://www.wsj.com/articles/the-real-benefits-of-pet-ownership-1509116398. Accessed 14 April 2020.
Carr, D. C., Taylor, M. G., Gee, N. R., & Sachs-Ericsson, N. (2020). Psychological health benefits of companion animals following a social loss. The Gerontologist, 60(3), 428–438.
Cutt, H. E., Knuiman, M. W., & Giles-Corti, B. (2008). Does getting a dog increase recreational walking? The International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 5(17), 17.
Enders-Slegers, M. J., & Hediger, K. (2019). Pet ownership and human–animal interaction in an aging population: rewards and challenges. Anthrozoös, 32(2), 255–265.
Epley, N., Akalis, S., Waytz, A., & Cacioppo, J. (2008). Creating social connection through inferential reproduction: loneliness and perceived agency in gadgets, gods, and greyhounds. Psychological Science, 19(2), 114–120.
Feldman, S. (2018). Alleviating anxiety, stress, and depression with the pet effect. ADAA. https://adaa.org/learn-from-us/from-the-experts/blog-posts/consumer/alleviating-anxiety-stress-and-depression-pet. Accessed 16 April 2020.
Fine, A. H. (2019). Handbook on animal-assisted therapy: Foundations and guidelines for animal-assisted interventions. San Diego: Elsevier Science & Technology.
Johnson, R. A., Bibbo, J. L. , & Harvey, L. (2019). Human-animal interaction in the aging boom. In Handbook on animal-assisted therapy (pp. 249–260). Elsevier.
Kahneman, D., Krueger, A. B., Schkade, D., Schwarz, N., & Stone, A. A. (2004). Toward national well-being accounts. American Economic Review: Papers and Proceedings, 94(2), 429–434.
Kalenkoski, C. M. (2017). Caregiving by older adults: Gender differences in well-being. In Gender and time use in a global context: The economics of employment and unpaid labor, edited by Connelly, R. & Kongar, E., Palgrave Macmillan, 271–282.
Kalenkoski, C. M., & Oumtrakool, E. (2017). The caregiving responsibilities of retirees: what are they and how do they affect retirees’ well-being? Applied Economics, 49(13), 1298–1310.
Kalenkoski, C. M., López Anuarbe, M., Korankye, T. (2020). Differences in the experiential well-being of Hispanics and non-Hispanics engaged in elder care, unpublished manuscript.
Kanat-Maymon, Y., Antebi, A., & Zilcha-Mano, S. (2016). Basic psychological need fulfillment in human-pet relationships and well-being. Personality and Individual Differences, 92, 69–73.
Krause-Parello, C. A., Gulik, E. E., & Basin, B. (2019). Loneliness, depression, and physical activity in older adults: the therapeutic role of human-animal interactions. Anthrozoös, 32(2), 239–254. https://doi.org/10.1080/08927936.2019.1569906.
Krueger, A. B. (2007). Are we having more fun yet? Categorizing and evaluating changes in time allocation. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 2007(2), 193–215.
Krueger, A. B., & Mueller, A. I. (2012a). The lot of the unemployed: a time use perspective. Journal of the European Economic Association, 10(4), 765–794.
Krueger, A. B., & Mueller, A. I. (2012b). Time use, emotional well-being, and unemployment: evidence from longitudinal data. American Economic Review: Papers and Proceedings, 102(3), 594–599.
Krueger, A. B., Kahneman, D., Fischler, C., Schkade, D., Schwarz, N., & Stone, A. A. (2009). Time use and subjective well-being in France and the U.S. Social Indicators Research, 93, 7–18.
Kurdek, L. A. (2008). Pet dogs as attachment figures. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 25(2), 247–266.
Lucas, R. E., Freedman, V. A., & Carr, D. (2019). Measuring experiential well-being among older adults. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 14(4), 538–547.
McConnell, A. R., Brown, C. M., Shoda, T. M., Stayton, L. E., & Martin, C. E. (2011). Friends with benefits: on the positive consequences of pet ownership. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101(6), 1239.
Mičková, E., Machová, K., Daďová, K., & Svobodová, I. (2019). Does dog ownership affect physical activity, sleep, and self-reported health in older adults? International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16, 3355.
Moeller, P. (2010). 10 Reasons older people need pets. https://money.usnews.com/money/retirement/slideshows/10-reasons-older-people-need-pets. Accessed 16 April 2020.
Pikhartova, J., Bowling, A., & Victor, C. (2014). Does owning a pet protect older people against loneliness? BMC Geriatrics, 14, 106.
Siegel, J. M. (1990). Stressful life events and use of physician services among the elderly: the moderating role of pet ownership. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58(6), 1081.
Stanley, I. H., Conwell, Y., Bowen, C., & Van Orden, K. A. (2014). Pet ownership may attenuate loneliness among older adult primary care patients who live alone. Aging & Mental Health, 18(3), 394–399.
Stone, A. A., Schneider, S., Krueger, A., Schwartz, J. E., & Deaton, A. (2018). Experiential wellbeing data from the American Time Use Survey: comparisons with other methods and analytic illustrations with age and income. Social indicators research, 136(1), 359–378.
Toohey, A. M., McCormack, G. R., Doyle-Baker, P. K., Adams, C. L., & Rock, M. J. (2013). Dog-walking and sense of community in neighborhoods: implications for promoting regular physical activity in adults 50 years and older. Health and Place, 22, 75–81.
Utz, R. L. (2014). Walking the dog: the effect of pet ownership on human health and health behaviors. Social Indicators Research, 116(2), 327–339.
Wang, S. S, (2013). Rise in pets as therapy for mental conditions. The Wall Street Journal. https://www.wsj.com/articles/rise-in-pets-as-therapy-for-mental-conditions-1383609937. Accessed 16 April 2020.
Wells, Y., & Rodi, H. (2000). Effects of pet ownership on the health and well-being of older people. Australasian Journal on Ageing, 19(3), 143–148.
Zasloff, R. L., & Kidd, A. H. (1994). Loneliness and pet ownership among single women. Psychological Reports, 75(2), 747–752.
Acknowledgements
The authors thank Nana Twum Owusu-Peprah for excellent research assistance and Karen S. Hamrick and Sabrina Wulff Pabilonia for their valuable comments and suggestions.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflicts of Interest/Competing Interests
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.
Code Availability
N/A
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kalenkoski, C.M., Korankye, T. Enriching Lives: How Spending Time with Pets is Related to the Experiential Well-Being of Older Americans. Applied Research Quality Life 17, 489–510 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11482-020-09908-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11482-020-09908-0