Skip to main content
Log in

Exocentric compounds

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Morphology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The notion of an exocentricity is explored, and some of the problems with it are mentioned. A range of exocentric types from a number of languages are introduced, and classified into a small number of major groups. Given that exocentric compounds are fundamentally defined by not being endocentric, rather than by having something in common, this cross-linguistic agreement is surprising. It is argued that there is always an analysis for such apparently exocentric compounds which does not involve invoking exocentricity, but involves a figurative reading—just not a consistent figurative reading across all types. It is suggested that exocentric compounding may not provide a productive means of word-formation, even if new exocentric compounds are arising.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aikhenvald A. (1995) Bare. München and Newcastle, Lincom Europa

    Google Scholar 

  • Amaya T.M. (1999) Damana. München and Newcastle, Lincom Europa

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauer L. (1978) The grammar of nominal compounding. Odense University Press, Odense

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauer L. (1983) English Word-formation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauer, L. (2006). Compound. In K. Brown (Ed.), The encyclopedia of language and linguistics (2nd edn., Vol. 2, pp. 719–726). Oxford: Elsevier.

  • Bauer, L. (2007). Apparently exocentric attributives in English. Paper Presented at the Second International Conference on the Linguistics of Contemporary English, Toulouse, July 2007.

  • Bauer L. (2008) Les composés exocentriques de l’anglais. In: Amiot D. (eds) La composition dans une perspective typologique. Artois Presses Université, Arras, pp 35–47

    Google Scholar 

  • Benczes R. (2006) Creative compounding in English. Amsterdam and Philadelphia, Benjamins

    Google Scholar 

  • Bender L.M. (1996) Kunama. München and Newcastle, Lincom Europa

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger H. (1998) Die Burushaski-Sprache von Hunza und Nager. Harrassowitz, Wiesbaden

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhatia T.K. (1993) Punjabi. London and New York, Routledge

    Google Scholar 

  • Bisetto A., Scalise S. (2005) The classification of compounds. Lingue e Linguaggio 4: 319–332

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloomfield L. (1933) Language. Allen and Unwin, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Booij G. (2002) The Morphology of Dutch. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Booij G. (2007) The Grammar of words (2nd edn). Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Carstairs-McCarthy A. (2002) An introduction to English morphology. Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh

    Google Scholar 

  • Chelliah S.L. (1997) A grammar of Meithei. Berlin and New York, Mouton de Gruyter

    Google Scholar 

  • Coseriu E. (1977) Inhaltliche Wortbildungslehre (am Beispiel des Typs coupe-papier). In: Brekle H.E., Kastovsky D. (eds) Perspektiven der Wortbildungsforschung. Grundmann, Bonn, pp 46–61

    Google Scholar 

  • Crowley T. (1982) The Paamese language of Vanuatu. Pacific Linguistics, Canberra

    Google Scholar 

  • Crowley T. (1998) An Erromangan (Sye) grammar. University of Hawai’i Press, Honolulu

    Google Scholar 

  • Cruttenden A. (2001) Gimson’s pronunciation of English (6th edn). Arnold, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Dayley J.P. (1985) Tzutujil grammar. University of California Press, Berkeley

    Google Scholar 

  • Dimmendaal G.J. (1983) The Turkana language. Dordrecht and Cinnaminson, NJ, Foris

    Google Scholar 

  • Di Sciullo A.M., Williams E. (1987) On the definition of word. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Dokulil Miloš (1968) Zur Theorie der Wortbildung. Wissenschaftliche Zeitschrift der Karl-Marx-Universität Lepizig, Gesellschafts-und sprachwissenschaftliche Reihe 17: 203–211

    Google Scholar 

  • Dressler W.U. (2006) Compound types. In: Libben G., Jarema G. (eds) The representation and processing of compound words. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 23–44

    Google Scholar 

  • Ebert K. (1997) A grammar of Athpare. München, Lincom Europa

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans N.D. (1995) A grammar of Kayardild. Berlin and New York, Mouton de Gruyter

    Google Scholar 

  • Fabb N. (1998) Compounding. In: Spencer A., Zwicky A.M. (eds) The handbook of morphology. Blackwell, Oxford and Malden MA, pp 66–83

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleischer W. (1975) Wortbildung der deutschen Gegenwartssprache. 4. Auflage. Tübingen, Niemeyer

    Google Scholar 

  • Foley W.A. (1991) The Yimas Language of New Guinea. Stanford University Press, Stanford

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein M.C. (1991) Essentials of modern literary Tibetan. Munshiram Manoharlal, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, R.G., Jr. (Ed.). (2005). Ethnologue: Languages of the World (15th ed.). Dallas, Tex.: SIL International. Online version: http://www.ethnologue.com/. Accessed 24 November 2008.

  • Gruzdeva E. (1998) Nivkh. München and Newcastle, Lincom Europa

    Google Scholar 

  • Guevara E., Scalise S. (2009) Searching for universals in compounding. In: Scalise S., Magni E., Bisetto A. (eds) Universals of language today. Springer, Berlin, pp 101–128

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, B.P. (1989). Metaphor as a productive process in the formation of nominal compounds: Canadian English. Pacific Coast Philology 62–71. (Available from JSTOR http://www.jstor.org/view/00787469/ap040025/04a00120/. Accessed 19 Sept 2007.)

  • Haspelmath M. (1993) A grammar of Lezgian. Berlin and New York, Mouton de Gruyter

    Google Scholar 

  • Haspelmath M. (2002) Understanding Morphology. Arnold, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinds J. (1986) Japanese. Croom Helm, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffmann C. (1963) A grammar of the Margi language. Oxford University Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoijer H. (1946a) Chiricahua Apache. In: Hoijer H. (eds) Linguistic structures of Native America. Viking Fund, New York, pp 55–84

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoijer H. (1946b) Tonkawa. In: Hoijer H. (eds) Linguistic structures of native America. Viking Fund, New York, pp 289–311

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmer A.J. (1996) A parametric grammar of Seediq. Lund University Press, Lund

    Google Scholar 

  • Iwasaki S., Ingkaphirom P. (2005) A reference grammar of Thai. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackendoff R. (1975) Morphological and semantic regularities in the lexicon. Language 51: 639–671

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jespersen O. (1942) A modern English grammar on Historical Principles: VI: Morphology. Allen & Unwin and Copenhagen: Munksgaard, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Kachru Y. (2006) Hindi. Amsterdam and Philadelphia, Benjamins

    Google Scholar 

  • Katamba F., Stonham J. (2006) Morphology (2nd ed). Basingstoke, Palgrave

    Google Scholar 

  • Kenesei I., Vago R.M., Fenyvesi A. (1998) Hungarian. London and New York, Routledge

    Google Scholar 

  • Killingley S.-Y., Killingley D. (1995) Sanskrit. München and Newcastle, Lincom Europa

    Google Scholar 

  • Kimball, G. D. (1985). A descriptive grammar of Koasati. Unpublished PhD dissertation, Tulane University.

  • Kornfilt J. (1997) Turkish. London and New York, Routledge

    Google Scholar 

  • Kouwenberg S., Murray E. (1994) Papiamentu. München and Newcastle, Lincom Europa

    Google Scholar 

  • Lefebvre C., Brousseau A.-M. (2002) A grammar of Fongbe. Berlin and New York, Mouton de Gruyter

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis G.L. (1967) Turkish grammar. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Li C.N., Thompson S.A. (1981) Mandarin Chinese. University of California Press, Berkeley

    Google Scholar 

  • Lukas, J. (1937). A study of the Kanuri language. Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Reprinted in facsimile by Dawsons, London, 1967).

  • Mackridge P. (1985) The modern Greek language. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahootian S. (1997) Persian. London and New York, Routledge

    Google Scholar 

  • Maiden M., Robustelli C. (2000) A reference grammar of modern Italian. Arnold, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Maina S.J. (1987) Principles adopted for the enrichment of Kiswahili language. New Language Planning Newsletter 2(2): 1–3

    Google Scholar 

  • Marchand H. (1969) The categories and types of present-day English word-formation (2nd ed). Beck, Munich

    Google Scholar 

  • Maslova E. (2003) A grammar of Kolyma Yukaghir. Berlin and New York, Mouton de Gruyter

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthews S., Yip V. (1994) Cantonese: A comprehensive grammar. London and New York, Routledge

    Google Scholar 

  • Mithun M. (1999) The languages of North America. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Mosel U., Hovdhaugen E. (1992) Samoan reference grammar. Scandinavian Universities Press, Oslo

    Google Scholar 

  • Nguyên Đ-H. (1997) Vietnamese. Amsterdam and Philadelphia, Benjamins

    Google Scholar 

  • Noonan M. (2003) Chantyal. In: Thurgood G., LaPolla R.J. (eds) The Sino-Tibetan languages. London and New York, Routledge, pp 315–335

    Google Scholar 

  • Olawsky K.J. (2006) A grammar of Urarina. Berlin and New York, Mouton de Gruyter

    Google Scholar 

  • Ourn N., Haiman J. (2000) Symmetrical compounds in Khmer. Studies in Language 24: 483–514

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pandharipande R.V. (1997) Marathi. London and New York, Routledge

    Google Scholar 

  • Plag I. (2003) Word-formation in English. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Saltarelli M. (1988) Basque. Croom Helm, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Scalise S., Guevara E. (2006) Exocentric compounding in a typological framework. Lingue e Linguaggio 2: 185–206

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaub W. (1985) Babungo. Croom Helm, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Schönefeld D. (2005) Zero-derivation—functional change—metonymy. In: Bauer L., Valera S. (eds) Approaches to Conversion/Zero-Derivation. Münster, Waxmann, pp 131–157

    Google Scholar 

  • Selkirk E.O. (1982) The syntax of words. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Sneddon J.N. (1996) Indonesian reference grammar. St Leonards, NSW, Allen and Unwin

    Google Scholar 

  • Sohn H.-M. (1994) Korean. London and New York, Routledge

    Google Scholar 

  • Søgaard A. (2004) Compounding theories and linguistic diversity. In: Frajzyngier Z., Hodges A., Rood D.S. (eds) Linguistic diversity and linguistic theories. Amsterdam and Philadelphia, Benjamins, pp 319–337

    Google Scholar 

  • Sulkala H., Karjalainen M. (1992) Finnish. London and New York, Routledge

    Google Scholar 

  • Swadesh M. (1946) Chitimacha. In: Hoijer H. (eds) Linguistic structures of native America. Viking Fund, New York, pp 312–336

    Google Scholar 

  • Wälchli B. (2005) Co-compounds and natural coordination. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wali K., Koul O.N. (1997) Kashmiri. Routledge, London and New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Watkins L. (1984) A grammar of Kiowa. University of Nebraska Press, Lincoln and London

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Laurie Bauer.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bauer, L. Exocentric compounds. Morphology 18, 51–74 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11525-008-9122-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11525-008-9122-5

Keywords

Navigation