Skip to main content
Log in

Preface

  • Published:
Morphology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Aissen, J. (1999). Markedness and subject choice in optimality theory. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 17(4), 673–711.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aissen, J. (2003). Differential object marking: iconicity vs. economy. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 23(3), 435–483.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, S. R. (1982). Where’s morphology? Linguistic Inquiry, 13, 571–612.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, S. R. (1992). A-morphous morphology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Arbaoui, N. (2010). Les dix formes de l’arabe classique à l’interface phonologie- syntaxe- pour une déconstruction du gabarit. PhD thesis, Université Paris 7.

  • Aronoff, M. (1976). Word formation in generative grammar. Cambridge: MIT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aronoff, M. (1994). Morphology by itself: stems and inflectional classes. Linguistic Inquiry monographs: Vol. 22. Cambridge: MIT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arregi, K., & Nevins, A. (2012). Morphotactics: Basque auxiliaries and the structure of spellout. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Baerman, M. (2005). Directionality and (un)natural classes in syncretism. Language, 80(4), 807–827.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baerman, M. (2007). Syncretism. Language and Linguistics Compass, 1(5), 539–551.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baerman, M., Brown, D., & Corbett, G. (2005). The syntax-morphology interface: a study of syncretism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bendjaballah, S. (2001). The negative preterite in Kabyle Berber. Folia Linguistica, 34, 185–223.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bendjaballah, S., & Haiden, M. (2003). Templatic architecture. Recherches linguistiques de Vincennes, 32, 157–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bendjaballah, S., & Haiden, M. (2008). A typology of emptiness in templates. In J. Hartmann, V. Hegedüs, & H. van Riemsdijk (Eds.), Sounds of silence (pp. 21–57). Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bermúdez-Otero, R. (2012). The architecture of grammar and the division of labour in exponence. In J. Trommer (Ed.), The morphology and phonology of exponence (pp. 8–83). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bermúdez-Otero, R. Stratal Optimality Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press. In preparation.

  • Bloch, B. (1947). English verb inflection. Language, 23, 399–418.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bobaljik, J. D. (2000). The ins and outs of contextual allomorphy. University of Maryland Working Papers in Linguistics, 10, 35–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bobaljik, J. D. (2008). Paradigms, optimal and otherwise: a case for skepticism. In A. Bachrach & A. I. Nevins (Eds.), Inflectional Identity (pp. 29–44). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonet, E. (1991). Morphology after syntax: pronominal clitics in Romance. PhD thesis, MIT.

  • Booij, G. (2010). Construction morphology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, D., & Hippisley, A. (2012). Network morphology a defaults-based theory of word structure. Cambridge studies in linguistics.: Vol. 133. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, N. (1957). Syntactic structures. Mouton: The Hague.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, N., & Halle, M. (1968). The sound pattern of English. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cysouw, M. (2003). The paradigmatic structure of person marking. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Downing, L. J. (2006). Canonical forms in prosodic morphology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Embick, D. (2010). Localism versus globalism in morphology and phonology. Cambridge: MIT.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Embick, D., & Marantz, A. (2008). Architecture and blocking. Linguistic Inquiry, 39(1), 1–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faust, N. (2011). Forme et fonction dans la morphologie nominale de l’hébreu moderne: études en morpho-syntaxe. PhD thesis, Université Denis Diderot (Paris 7).

  • Faust, N. (2012). Non-concatenative realization in the verbal inflection of Modern Hebrew. Morphology, 22(4), 453–484.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frampton, J. (2010). Distributed reduplication. Cambridge: MIT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldsmith, J. A. (1976). Autosegmental phonology. PhD thesis, MIT.

  • Guerssel, M., & Lowenstamm, J. (1990). The derivational morphology of the Classical Arabic verbal system. Université du Québec à Montréal and Université Paris 7.

  • Guerssel, M., & Lowenstamm, J. (1996). Ablaut in classical Arabic measure I active verbal forms. In J. Lecarme, J. Lowenstamm, & U. Shlonsky (Eds.), Studies in Afroasiatic grammar (pp. 123–134). The Hague: Holland Academic Graphics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gurevich, O. (2006). Constructional morphology: the Georgian version. PhD thesis, University of California, Berkeley.

  • Halle, M. (1973). Prolegomena to a theory of word formation. Linguistic Inquiry, 4(1), 3–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halle, M. (1997). Distributed morphology: impoverishment and fission. In Y. K. Benjamin Bruening & M. McGinnis (Eds.), Papers at the interface. MIT working papers in linguistics: Vol. 30 (pp. 425–449). Cambridge MA: MITWPL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halle, M., & Marantz, A. (1993). Distributed morphology and the pieces of inflection. In K. Hale & S. J. Keyser (Eds.), The view from building 20 (pp. 111–176). Cambridge: MIT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halle, M., & Vaux, B. (1998). Theoretical aspects of Indo-European nominal morphology: the nominal declensions of Latin and Armenian. In J. Jasanoff, H. C. Melchert, & L. Olivier (Eds.), Mi’r Curad: Studies in honor of Clavert Watkins (pp. 223–240). Innsbruck: Innsbrucker Beitraege zur Sprachwissenschaft.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harley, H., & Ritter, E. (2002). A feature-geometric analysis of person and number. Language, 78(3), 482–526.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, Z. S. (1942). Morpheme alternants in linguistic theory. Language, 18(3), 169–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hay, J., & Plag, I. (2004). What constrains possible suffix combinations? on the interaction of grammatical and processing restrictions in derivational morphology. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 22, 565–596.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hay, J. B. (2000). Causes and consequences of word structure. PhD thesis, Northwestern University. available under. http://www.ling.canterbury.ac.nz/jen/pubs.html.

  • Hockett, C. F. (1954). Two models of grammatical description. Word, 10, 210–231.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inkelas, S., & Zoll, C. (2005). Reduplication: doubling in morphology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Jackendoff, R. (1975). Morphological and semantic regularities in the lexicon. Language, 5(3), 639–671.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keine, S. (2012). How complex are complex words? Evidence from linearization. Lingua, 122, 1268–1281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kiparsky, P. (1983). Word-formation and the lexicon. In F. Ingemann (Ed.), Proceedings of the 1982 mid-America linguistics conference (pp. 3–32). University of Kansas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiparsky, P. (2000). Opacity and cyclicity. The Linguistic Review, 17, 351–367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kiparsky, P. (2010). Reduplication in Stratal OT. In L. Uyechi & L. H. Wee (Eds.), Reality exploration and discovery: pattern interaction in language & life. (Festschrift for K.P. Mohanan) (pp. 125–142). Stanford: CSLI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowenstamm, J. (2003). À propos de gabarits. Recherches linguistiques de Vincennes, 32, 7–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luís, A. R. & Bermúdez-Otero, R. (Eds.) The morphome debate: diagnosing and analysing morphomic patterns. Oxford: Oxford University Press. In preparation

  • MacBride, A. (2004). A constraint-based approach to morphology. PhD thesis, UCLA.

  • Maiden, M. (2005). Morphological autonomy and diachrony. Yearbook of Morphology, 2004, 137–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marantz, A. (1982). Re reduplication. Linguistic Inquiry, 13, 483–545.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, P. H. (1972). Inflectional morphology: a theoretical study based on aspects of Latin verb conjugation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy, J. (1979). Formal problems in Semitic phonology and morphology. PhD thesis, MIT.

  • McCarthy, J. (2007). Hidden generalizations: phonological opacity in Optimality Theory. London: Equinox.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy, J. (2008). The gradual path to cluster simplification. Phonology, 25, 271–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy, J. (2010). An introduction to harmonic serialism. Language and Linguistics Compass, 4(10), 1001–1018.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy, J., Kimper, W., & Mullin, K. (2012). Reduplication in harmonic serialism. Morphology, 22, 173–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy, J., & Prince, A. (1994). The emergence of the unmarked: optimality in prosodic morphology. In NELS, Amherst (Vol. 24, pp. 333–379).

    Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy, J., & Prince, A. (1995). Faithfulness and reduplicative identity. University of Massachusetts occasional papers in linguistics, 249–384.

  • Neef, M. (1996). Wortdesign: Eine deklarative Analyse der deutschen Verbflexion. Tübingen: Stauffenburg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neeleman, A., & Szendröi, K. (2007). Radical pro drop and the morphology of pronouns. Linguistic Inquiry, 38(4), 671–714.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nevins, A. I. (2003). Do person/number syncretisms refer to negative values? Handout of a talk at the LSA meeting. Atlanta.

  • Noyer, R. R. (1992). Features, positions and affixes in autonomous morphological structure. PhD thesis, MIT.

  • Rucart, P. (2001). The vocalism of strong verbs in Afar. In A. Simpson (Ed.), Proceedings of BLS 27—special session on Afroasiatic languages. University of California, Berkeley, March 22-25 2001. (pp. 99–108). Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistics Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rucart, P. (2006). Morphologie gabaritique et interface phonosyntaxique. PhD thesis, Paris 7, Sciences du Langage.

  • Russel, K. (1999). MOT: Sketch of an OT approach to morphology. Ms., University of Manitoba, ROA-352-1099.

  • Saffran, J. R., Newport, E., & Aslin, R. N. (1996). Word segmentation: the role of distributional cues. Journal of Memory and Language, 35, 606–621.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steele, S. (1995). Towards a theory of morphological information. Language, 71(2), 260–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stump, G. T. (1993). On rules of referral. Language, 69, 449–479.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stump, G. T. (2001). Inflectional morphology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Stump, G. T. (2012). The formal and functional architecture of inflectional morphology. In A. Ralli, G. Booij, S. Scalise, & A. Karasimos (Eds.), Morphology and the architecture of grammar: online proceedings of the eighth Mediterranean morphology meeting (MMM8), Cagliari, Italy, 14–17 September 2011 (pp. 254–270). See http://morbo.lingue.unibo.it/mmm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stump, G. T., & Stewart, T. (2007). Paradigm function morphology and the morphology/syntax interface. In G. Ramchand & C. Reiss (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of linguistic interfaces (pp. 383–421). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trommer, J. (2003). Feature (non-)insertion in a minimalist approach to spellout. In Proceedings of CLS 39 (pp. 469–480).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wunderlich, D. (1996). A minimalist model of inflectional morphology. In C. Wilder, M. Bierwisch, & H.-M. Gärtner (Eds.), The role of economy principles in linguistic theory (pp. 267–298). Berlin: Akademie.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wunderlich, D. (2003). A minimalist view on inflectional paradigms: the expression of person and number in subjects and objects. Available under http://web.phil-fak.uni-duesseldorf.de/~wdl/min-view2.pdf.

  • Wunderlich, D., & Fabri, R. (1994). Minimalist morphology: An approach to inflection. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft, 20, 236–294.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu, Z., & Aronoff, M. (2011). A realization Optimality Theory approach to blocking and extended morphological exponence. Journal of Linguistics, 47(3), 673–707.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. Trommer.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Trommer, J. Preface. Morphology 23, 95–102 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11525-013-9222-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11525-013-9222-8

Keywords

Navigation