Skip to main content
Log in

It’s all about gender: Hebrew speakers’ judgment of adjective plural agreement

  • Published:
Morphology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The current study investigated the role of morpho-phonological and syntactic factors in judging the marking of Hebrew adjectives in agreement with plural nouns of differing categories of regularity. Participants were 36 literate adult speakers of Hebrew, who were administered a judgment test of 144 sentences (half grammatical and half ungrammatical), each containing a plural adjective in agreement with a nominal head. The task sentences were divided into three different syntactic configurations of the adjective in relation to the noun—predicative adjectives, attributive adjectives in sentence-initial NPs and attributive adjectives in sentence-final NPs. The agreement-assigning nouns were classified according to three morphological criteria: Noun gender (masculine and feminine), Noun suffix (regular, irregular, and ambiguous), and noun stem (changing and non-changing stems). Results showed that gender was the most important factor affecting agreement judgment: adjectives agreeing with ambiguous and opaque feminine nouns taking irregular suffixes yielded the lowest accuracy scores and the longest reaction times. Syntactic position affected judgment scores as well, with predicative and attributive-initial adjectives being more difficult to process than attributive-final adjectives. These results support the view that categories of number and gender emerge from the morpho-phonological properties of words learned in their syntactic and semantic contexts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Spelled by rather than by homophonous , which is not a function letter (Ravid 2012).

  2. Fm = feminine; Pl = plural.

  3. With very few exceptions of animate feminines with masculine phonology such as em ‘mother’ and a number of Capra animals such as ez ‘goat’ or ya’el ‘ibex’.

  4. Irregular phonology invades even morphological patterns (Avineri 1976). For example, the CaCeC pattern denotes masculine nouns, both inanimate (e.g., batsek ‘dough’ and yated ‘stake’) and animate (e.g., xaver ‘friend’, shaxen ‘neighbor’), but it also contains feminine nouns with the same masculine morpho-phonology, such as inanimate gader ‘fence’ and xatser ‘yard’). And the ubiquitous penultimately marked CéCeC, which is inherently masculine (bérez ‘tap’, mélex ‘king’), contains several feminine nouns such as néfesh ‘soul’, régel ‘leg’, or ná’al ‘shoe’.

  5. I am grateful to Zohar Livnat for pointing this out in the current context.

References

  • Avineri, Y. (1976). Heyxal ha-mishkalim. Tel Aviv: Izre’el (in Hebrew).

    Google Scholar 

  • Badecker, W., & Kuminiak, F. (2007). Morphology, agreement and working memory retrieval in sentence production: Evidence from gender and case in Slovak. Journal of Memory and Language, 56, 65–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baker, M. C. (2008). The syntax of agreement and concord. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Barlow, M. (1991). The agreement hierarchy and grammatical theory. In Proceedings of the Seventeenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society: General session and parasession on the grammar of event structure (Vol. 17, pp. 30–40).

    Google Scholar 

  • Behrens, H. (2006). The input-output relationship in first language acquisition. Language and Cognitive Processes, 21, 2–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berman, R. A. (1978). Modern Hebrew structure. Tel Aviv: Tel Aviv University Publishing Projects.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berman, R. A. (1980). The case of an (S)VO language: Subjectless constructions in Modern Hebrew. Language, 56, 759–776.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berman, R. A. (1985). Acquisition of Hebrew. Hillsdale: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brehmer, B., & Rothweiler, M. (2012). The acquisition of gender agreement marking in Polish: A study of bilingual Polish-German-speaking children. In K. Braunmüller & C. Gabriel (Eds.), Multilingual individuals and multilingual societies (pp. 81–100). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bolozky, S. (2007). Israeli Hebrew morphology. In A. S. Kaye (Ed.), Morphologies of Asia and Africa (including the Caucasus) (pp. 283–308). Winona Lake: Eisenbrauns.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bybee, J. (2007). Frequency of use and the organization of language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Chang, F. (2009). Learning to order words: A connectionist model of heavy NP shift and accessibility effects in Japanese and English. Journal of Memory and Language, 61, 374–397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Comrie, B. (1984). Reflections on verb agreement in Hindi and related languages. Linguistics, 22, 857–864.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corbett, G. (1979). The agreement hierarchy. Journal of Linguistics, 15, 203–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corbett, G. (2003). Agreement: the range of the phenomenon and the principles of the Surrey Database of Agreement. Transactions of the Philological Society, 101, 155–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corbett, G. (1998). Morphology and agreement. In A. Spencer & A. M. Zwicky (Eds.), The handbook of morphology (pp. 191–205). London: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corbett, G. (2006). Agreement. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dąbrowska, E. (2008). Questions with long-distance dependencies: A usage-based perspective. Cognitive Linguistics, 19, 391–425.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixon, R. M. W., & Aikhenvald, A. (Eds.) (2004). Adjective classes: a cross-linguistic typology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gillespie, M., & Pearlmutter, N. J. (2011). Hierarchy and scope of planning in subject–verb agreement production. Cognition, 118, 377–397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glinert, L. (2005). Modern Hebrew: An essential grammar (3rd ed.) New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartsuiker, R. J., Schriefers, H. J., Bock, K., & Gerdien, M. K. (2003). Morphophonological influences on the construction of subject–verb agreement. Memory & Cognition, 31, 1316–1326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haskell, T. R., Thornton, R., & MacDonald, M. C. (2010). Experience and grammatical agreement: Statistical learning shapes number agreement production. Cognition, 114, 151–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoff-Ginsberg, E. (1985). Some contribution of mothers’ speech to their children’s syntactic growth. Journal of Child Language, 12, 367–385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krajewski, G., Lieven, E. V. M., & Theakston, A. L. (2012). Productivity of a Polish child’s inflectional noun morphology: a naturalistic study. Morphology, 22, 9–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lew-Williams, C., & Fernald, A. (2007). Young children learning Spanish make rapid use of grammatical gender in spoken word recognition. Psychological Science, 18, 193–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levin, I., Ravid, D., & Rapaport, S. (2001). Morphology and spelling among Hebrew-speaking children: From kindergarten to first grade. Journal of Child Language, 28, 741–769.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levy, Y. (1980). The acquisition of gender. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel (in Hebrew).

  • Malsen, R., Theakston, A., Lieven, E., & Tomasello, M. (2004). A dense corpus study of past tense and plural over-regularization in English. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research, 47, 1319–1333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mirković, J., MacDonald, M. C., & Seidenberg, M. S. (2004). Where does gender come from? Evidence from a complex inflectional system. Language and Cognitive Processes, 20, 139–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mirkovic, J., Seidenberg, M. S., & MacDonald, M. C. (2008). Acquisition and representation of grammatical categories: Grammatical gender in a connectionist network. In B. C. Love, K. McRae, & V. M. Sloutsky (Eds.), Proceedings of the 30th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 1954–1959). Austin: Cognitive Science Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moravcsik, E. A. (1978). Agreement. In J. Greenberg (Ed.), Universals of human language (Vol. 4, pp. 331–374). Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rakhlin, N., Kornilov, S. A., & Grigorenko, E. L. (2014). Gender and agreement processing in children with developmental language disorder. Journal of Child Language, 41, 241–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ravid, D. (1995). Language change in child and adult Hebrew: A psycholinguistic perspective. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ravid, D. (2006a). Word-level morphology: A psycholinguistic perspective on linear formation in Hebrew nominals. Morphology, 16, 127–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ravid, D. (2006b). Semantic development in textual contexts during the school years: Noun Scale analyses. Journal of Child Language, 33, 791–821.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ravid, D. (2012). Spelling morphology: the psycholinguistics of Hebrew spelling. New York: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ravid, D., & Levie, R. (2010). Adjectives in the development of text production: Lexical, morphological and syntactic analyses. First Language, 30, 27–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ravid, D., & Schiff, R. (2009). Morpho-phonological categories of noun plurals in Hebrew: A developmental study. Linguistics, 47, 45–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ravid, D., & Schiff, R. (2012). From dichotomy to divergence: Number/gender marking on Hebrew nouns and adjectives across schoolage. Language Learning, 62, 133–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ravid, D., & Shlesinger, Y. (2001). Vowel reduction in Modern Hebrew: Traces of the past and current variation. Folia Linguistica, 35, 371–397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ravid, D., Dressler, W. U., Nir-Sagiv, B., Korecky-Kröll, K., Souman, A., Rehfeldt, K., Laaha, S., Bertl, J., Basbøll, H., & Gillis, S. (2008). Core morphology in child directed speech: Crosslinguistic corpus analyses of noun plurals. In H. Behrens (Ed.), Finding structure in data (TILAR 6) (pp. 25–60). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schiff, R., & Kahta, S. (2006). Single-word reading test: Vowelized and unvowelized word reading. Ramat-Gan: Haddad Center, Bar-Ilan University (in Hebrew).

    Google Scholar 

  • Schiff, R., & Ravid, D. (2012). Linguistic processing in Hebrew-speaking children from low and high SES backgrounds. Reading & Writing, 25, 1427–1448.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schiff, R., & Ravid, D. (2013). Morphological processing in Hebrew-speaking reading-disabled students. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 46, 220–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schiff, R., Ravid, D., & Levy-Shimon, S. (2011). Children’s command of plural and possessive marking on Hebrew nouns: A comparison of obligatory vs. optional inflections. Journal of Child Language, 38, 433–454.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwarzwald, O. R. (1982). Feminine formation in Modern Hebrew. Hebrew Annual Review, 6, 153–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwarzwald, O. R. (2002). Modern Hebrew morphology. Tel Aviv: The Open University (in Hebrew).

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwarzwald, O. R. (2005). Inflection and derivation, stems and suffixes in Hebrew nouns. HaIvrit Veaxyoteha [Hebrew and its sisters], 5, 229–246 (in Hebrew).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sera, M. D., Elieff, C., Forbes, J., Clark Burch, M., Rodrıguez, W., & Dubois, D. P. (2002). When language affects cognition and when it does not: An analysis of grammatical gender and classification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 131, 377–397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steele, S. (1978). Word order variation: a typological study. In J. H. Greenberg, C. A. Ferguson, & E. A. Moravcsik (Eds.), Universals of human language: IV: Syntax (pp. 585–623). Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tiberius, C., Brown, D., & Corbett, G. (2002). A typological database of agreement. In Proceedings of LREC2002, the Third International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation, Las Palmas, Spain (pp. 1843–1846).

    Google Scholar 

  • Tubul, M. (2003). The distribution of plural morphemes in Biblical and Mishnaic Hebrew. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Bar Ilan University, Israel (in Hebrew).

  • Vigliocco, G., & Franck, J. (2001). When sex affects syntax: Context influences in sentence production. Journal of Memory and Language, 45, 368–390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wechsler, S. (2009). Agreement features. Language and Linguistics Compass, 3, 384–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dorit Ravid.

Additional information

Supported by an Israel Science Foundation grant No. 79/08 to Dorit Ravid and Rachel Schiff.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ravid, D., Schiff, R. It’s all about gender: Hebrew speakers’ judgment of adjective plural agreement. Morphology 25, 327–343 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11525-015-9259-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11525-015-9259-y

Keywords

Navigation