Abstract
The paper offers a critical engagement with Cécile Laborde’s book, Liberalism’s Religion. It elaborates several objections to Laborde’s account of religious accommodations, and sketches an alternative approach.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Laborde (2017: ch. 6). All parenthetical references in the text are to this book.
For a challenge along these lines, see May (2017).
Laborde also says that “if it is a case that is experienced by women as a practice that engages their integrity in ways that a uniform restriction on the practice makes it a particularly severe cost, then it is an obligation-IPC” (223). This formulation begs the key question. The idea that some commitments are experienced as obligatory was supposed to explain why burdens on them were especially severe. One cannot then identify commitments as belonging in the obligation-IPC category, and therefore as particularly severe, on the grounds that burdening them would impose a severe cost.
See Patten (2014: 131–136).
Eisgruber and Sager (2007: 93).
For discussion, see Patten (2014: 137–148).
References
Dworkin, Ronald (2013) Religion Without God (Cambridge: Harvard University Press).
Eisgruber, Christopher and Lawrence Sager (2007) Religious Freedom and the Constitution (Cambridge: Harvard University Press).
Jones, Peter (1994) “Bearing the Consequences of Belief,” Journal of Political Philosophy 2:1, 24–43.
Laborde, Cécile (2017) Liberalism’s Religion (Cambridge: Harvard University Press).
May, Simon Căbulea (2017) “Exemptions for Conscience,” in Religion in Liberal Political Philosophy, ed. Cécile Laborde and Aurélia Bardon (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
Nussbaum, Martha (2008) Liberty of Conscience (New York: Basic Books).
Patten, Alan (2014) Equal Recognition: The Moral Foundations of Minority Rights (Princeton: Princeton University Press).
Patten, Alan (2017a) “The Normative Logic of Religious Liberty,” Journal of Political Philosophy, 25:2, 129–154.
Patten, Alan (2017b) “Religious Exemptions and Fairness,” in Religion in Liberal Political Philosophy, ed. Cécile Laborde and Aurélia Bardon (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
Rawls, John (2005) Political Liberalism (New York: Columbia University Press).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Patten, A. Religious Accommodation and Disproportionate Burden. Criminal Law, Philosophy 15, 61–74 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11572-019-09522-8
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11572-019-09522-8