Abstract
Phenotypic evolutionary rates were measured for 27 craniometric characters in 12 extant OTUs from the bat genus Myotis (Chiroptera, Vespertilionidae). Squared Mahalanobis distance was used as a multivariate measure for amount of divergence, and squared Mahalanobis distance weighted by time was used as a measure for the rate of divergence. Estimates for the rates of divergence were found to be consistent with random walk hypothesis. Thus, the divergence in Myotis could be guided by random drift and mutations. The high dispersion in rate estimates suggests also a possible input of randomly fluctuating selection. The highest rates were recorded for divergence between M. myotis–M. blythii species group and the other OTUs. Rates of divergence between the subspecies of M. blythii occur to be lesser than rates of divergence between the earlier diverged species, their divergence could probably be slowed down by stabilizing selection. Size-adjusted data appeared to be lesser then the initial data, and it can be concluded that both size and shape were involved in divergence of Myotis species. The skeletal characters in bats are known to be extremely conservative during long-term evolution, however, the possibility for random walk at short time interval implies that bat evolution is constrained rather ecologically and biomechanically than genetically or developmentally.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Afifi, A. A., & Azen, S. P. (1982). Statistical analysis: A computer oriented approach. Moscow: Mir. (in Russian).
Alberch, P. (1980). Ontogenesis and morphological diversification. American Zoologist, 20, 653–667.
Anderson, M. J. (2001). Permutation tests for univariate or multivariate analysis of variance and regression. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 58, 626–639.
Anderson, T. W. (1963). Asymptotic theory for principal component analysis. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 34, 122–148.
Arlettaz, R. (1996). Feeding behaviour and foraging strategy of free-living mouse-eared bats, Myotis myotis and Myotis blythii. Animal Behaviour, 51, 1–11.
Arlettaz, R., Ruedi, M., & Hausser, J. (1993). Ecologie trophique de deux espèces jumelles et sympatriques de chauve-souris: Myotis myotis et Myotis blythii (Chiroptera, Vespertilionidae). Premiers resultats. Mammalia, 57, 519–531.
Arlettaz, R., Ruedi, M., Ibañez, C., Palmeirim, J., & Hausser, J. (1997). A new perspective on the zoogeography of the sibling mouse-eared bat species Myotis myotis and Myotis blythii: Morphological, genetical and ecological evidence. Journal of Zoology (London), 242, 45–62.
Arnold, S. J., Bürger, R., Hohenlohe, P. A., Ajie, B. C., & Jones, A. G. (2008). Understanding the evolution and stability of the G-matrix. Evolution, 62, 2451–2461.
Benda, P., & Tsytsulina, K. A. (2000). Taxonomic revision of Myotis mystacinus group (Mammalia: Chiroptera) in the Western Palearctic. Acta Societatis Zoologicae Bohemicae, 64, 331–398.
Berthier, P., Excoffier, L., & Ruedi, M. (2006). Recurrent replacement of mtDNA and cryptic hybridization between two sibling bat species Myotis myotis and Myotis blythii. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 273, 3101–3109.
Bogdanowicz, W., Van Den Bussche, R. A., Gajewska, M., Postawa, T., & Harutyunyan, M. (2009). Ancient and contemporary DNA sheds light on the history of mouse-eared bats in Europe and the Caucasus. Acta Chiropterologica, 11, 289–305.
Carroll, R. L. (1988). Vertebrate paleontology and evolution. New York: W. H. Freeman and Company.
Charlesworth, B., Lande, R., & Slatkin, M. (1982). A neo-Darwinian commentary on macroevolution. Evolution, 36, 474–498.
Clyde, W. C., & Gingerich, P. D. (1994). Rates of evolution in the dentition of early Eocene Cantius: Comparison of size and shape. Paleobiology, 20, 506–522.
Davison, M. L. (1988). Multidimensional scaling. Moscow: Finansy i statistika (in Russian).
Deryabin, V. Y. (1983). Multivariate biometrics for anthropologists. Moscow: Izdatelstvo Moskovskogo universiteta (in Russian).
Dubois, A. (1988). Some comments on the genus concept in zoology. Monitore Zoologico Italiano (N. S.), 22, 27–44.
Dyke, G. J., & van Tuinen, M. (2004). The evolutionary radiation of modern birds (Neornithes): Reconciling molecules, morphology and the fossil record. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 141, 153–177.
Dzeverin, I. I. (1998). A unidimensional model of phenetic diversity of the Palearctic Myotis species. Biological Bulletin, 25, 206–212.
Dzeverin, I. I. (2007). The regressive trend of complex phenotypic structures in neutral evolution. Vestnik Zoologii, 41, 53–69.
Dzeverin, I. (2008). The stasis and possible patterns of selection in evolution of a group of related species from the bat genus Myotis (Chiroptera, Vespertilionidae). Journal of Mammalian Evolution, 15, 123–142.
Dzeverin, I. I., & Lashkova, E. I. (2005). An input of heterochronies to the formation of interspecific differences in wood mice, Sylvaemus (Rodentia). Zhurnal Obshchei Biologii, 66, 258–272. (in Russian, with English summary).
Dzeverin, I. I., & Strelkov, P. P. (2008). Taxonomic status of Myotis blythii (Chiroptera, Vespertilionidae) from the Altai. Zoologicheskii Zhurnal, 87, 973–982. (in Russian with English summary).
Eiting, T. P., & Gunnell, G. F. (2009). Global completeness of the bat fossil record. Journal of Mammalian Evolution, 16, 151–173.
Estes, S., & Arnold, S. J. (2007). Resolving the paradox of stasis: Models with stabilizing selection explain evolutionary divergence on all timescales. American Naturalist, 169, 227–244.
Falconer, D. S. (1985). Introduction to quantitative genetics. Moscow: Agropromizdat. (in Russian).
Fenster, E. J., & Sorhannus, U. (1991). On the measurement of morphological rates of evolution: A review. Evolutionary Biology, 25, 375–410.
Fenton, M. B., & Bogdanowicz, W. (2002). Relationships between external morphology and foraging behaviour: Bats in the genus Myotis. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 80, 1004–1013.
Findley, J. S. (1972). Phenetic relationships among bats of the genus Myotis. Systematic Zoology, 21, 31–52.
Garthwaite, P. H. (1996). Confidence intervals from randomization tests. Biometrics, 52, 1387–1393.
Ghazali, M. A. (2004). Functional interpretation of differences in the structure of masticatory apparatus of the mouse-eared bat species, Myotis myotis and Myotis blythii. Vestnik Zoologii, 38(2), 39–44. (in Ukrainian, with English summary).
Ghazali, M. A. (2009). Identification of Myotis blythii and M. myotis (Chiroptera, Vespertilionidae) from Eastern Europe based on the measurements of lower teeth. Vestnik Zoologii, 43, 403–408.
Ghazali, M. A., & Dzeverin, I. I. (2007). Mechanisms of divergence between the lesser (Myotis blythii) and greater (Myotis myotis) mouse-eared bats (Chiroptera, Vespertilionidae): Assessment by mandibular characters. Plecotus et al., 10, 3–13. (in Russian with English summary).
Gingerich, P. D. (1983). Rates of evolution: Effects of time and temporal scaling. Science, 222, 159–161.
Gingerich, P. D. (1993). Quantification and comparison of evolutionary rates. American Journal of Science, 293-A, 453–478.
Gingerich, P. D. (2001). Rates of evolution on the time scale of the evolutionary process. Genetica, 112–113, 127–144.
Gunnell, G. F., & Simmons, N. B. (2005). Fossil evidence and the origin of bats. Journal of Mammalian Evolution, 12, 209–246.
Hohenlohe, P. A., & Arnold, S. J. (2008). MIPoD: A hypothesis-testing framework for microevolutionary inference from patterns of divergence. American Naturalist, 171, 366–385.
Hoofer, S. R., Van Den Bussche, R. A. (2003). Molecular phylogenetics of the chiropteran family Vespertilionidae. Acta Chiropterologica, 5(Suppl.), 1–63.
Horáček, I. (1985). Population ecology of Myotis myotis in central Bohemia. Acta Universitatis Carolinae-Biologica 1981, 8, 161–267.
Horáček, I., & Hanák, V. (1983–1984). Comments on the systematics and phylogeny of Myotis nattereri (Kuhl, 1818). Myotis, 21–22, 20–29.
Housworth, E. A., Martins, E. P., & Lynch, M. (2004). The phylogenetic mixed model. American Naturalist, 163, 84–96.
Hunt, G. (2007). The relative importance of directional change, random walks, and stasis in the evolution of fossil lineages. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 104, 18404–18408.
Jolicoeur, P. (1963). The multivariate generalization of the allometry equation. Biometrics, 19, 497–499.
Jolicoeur, P. (1984). Principal components, factor analysis, and multivariate allometry: A small-sample direction test. Biometrics, 40, 685–690.
Jones, G., Parsons, S., Zhang, S., Stadelmann, B., Benda, P., & Ruedi, M. (2006). Echolocation calls, wing shape, diet and phylogenetic diagnosis of the endemic Chinese bat Myotis pequinius. Acta Chiropterologica, 8, 451–463.
Kimura, M. (1965). A stochastic model concerning the maintenance of genetic variability in quantitative characters. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 54, 731–736.
Kuzyakin, A. P. (1950). The bats: Systematics, way of life and the utility for agriculture and forestry. Moscow: Sovetskaya nauka. (in Russian).
Lahti, D. C., Johnson, N. A., Ajie, B. C., Otto, S. P., Hendry, A. P., Blumstein, D. T., et al. (2009). Relaxed selection in the wild. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 24, 487–496.
Lande, R. (1976). Natural selection and random genetic drift in phenotypic evolution. Evolution, 30, 314–334.
Lande, R. (1977). Statistical tests for natural selection on quantitative characters. Evolution, 31, 442–444.
Lande, R. (1979). Quantitative genetic analysis of multivariate evolution, applied to brain:body size allometry. Evolution, 33, 402–416.
Lande, R. (1980). The genetic covariance between characters maintained by pleiotropic mutations. Genetics, 94, 203–215.
Lande, R., & Arnold, S. J. (1983). The measurement of selection on correlated characters. Evolution, 37, 1210–1226.
Lapointe, F.-J., & Legendre, P. (1990). A statistical framework to test the consensus of two nested classifications. Systematic Zoology, 39, 1–13.
Legendre, P., Lapointe, F.-J., & Casgrain, P. (1994). Modeling brain evolution from behavior: A permutational regression approach. Evolution, 48, 1487–1499.
Lemen, C. A., & Freeman, P. W. (1984). The genus: A macroevolutionary problem. Evolution, 38, 1219–1237.
Lynch, M. (1990). The rate of morphological evolution in mammals from the standpoint of the neutral expectation. American Naturalist, 136, 727–741.
Lynch, M. (1991). Methods for the analysis of comparative data in evolutionary biology. Evolution, 45, 1065–1080.
Lynch, M., & Hill, W. G. (1986). Phenotypic evolution by neutral mutation. Evolution, 40, 915–935.
Manly, B. F. J. (1985). The statistics of natural selection on animal populations. London; New York: Chapman and Hall.
Marroig, G., & Cheverud, J. M. (2001). A comparison of phenotypic variation and covariation patterns and the role of phylogeny, ecology, and ontogeny during cranial evolution of New World monkeys. Evolution, 55, 2576–2600.
Mayer, F., & von Helversen, O. (2001). Cryptic diversity in European bats. Proceedings of the Royal Society London B, 268, 1825–1832.
Maynard Smith, J., Burian, R., Kauffman, S., Alberch, P., Campbell, J., Goodwin, B., et al. (1985). Developmental constraints and evolution. The Quarterly Review of Biology, 60, 265–287.
Phillips, P. C., & Arnold, S. J. (1989). Visualizing multivariate selection. Evolution, 43, 1209–1222.
Polly, P. D. (2002). Phylogenetic tests for differences in shape and the importance of divergence times: Eldredge’s enigma explored. In N. MacLeod & P. L. Forey (Eds.), Morphology, shape and phylogeny (pp. 220–246). London: Taylor and Francis.
Polly, P. D. (2004). On the simulation of the evolution of morphological shape: Multivariate shape under selection and drift. Palaeontol Electronica 7.2.7A, 28 pp. http://palaeo-electronica.org/paleo/2004_2/evo/issue2_04.htm.
Polly, P. D. (2005). Development and phenotypic correlations: The evolution of tooth shape in Sorex araneus. Evolution & Development, 7, 29–41.
Polly, P. D. (2008). Developmental dynamics and G-matrices: Can morphometric spaces be used to model phenotypic evolution? Evolutionary Biology, 35, 83–96.
Porto, A., Oliveira, F. B., Shirai, L. T., De Conto, V., & Marroig, G. (2009). The evolution of modularity in the mammalian skull I: Morphological integration patterns and magnitudes. Evolutionary Biology, 36, 118–135.
Rohlf, F. J., & Bookstein, F. L. (1987). A comment on shearing as a method for “size correction”. Systematic Zoology, 36, 356–367.
Ruedi, M., & Mayer, F. (2001). Molecular systematics of bats of the genus Myotis (Vespertilionidae) suggests deterministic ecomorphological convergences. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 21, 436–448.
Schmalhausen, I. I. (1939). Trends and regularities in evolutionary process. Moscow; Leningrad: Izdatelstvo AN SSSR. (in Russian).
Simpson, G. G. (1944). Tempo and mode in evolution. New York: Columbia University Press.
Stadelmann, B., Jacobs, D. S., Schoeman, C., & Ruedi, M. (2004). Phylogeny of African Myotis bats (Chiroptera, Vespertilionidae) inferred from cytochrome b sequences. Acta Chiropterologica, 6, 177–192.
Stadelmann, B., Lin, L.-K., Kunz, T. H., & Ruedi, M. (2007). Molecular phylogeny of New World Myotis (Chiroptera, Vespertilionidae) inferred from mitochondrial and nuclear DNA genes. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 43, 32–48.
Strelkov, P. P. (1972). Myotis blythi (Tomes, 1857): Distribution, geographical variability and differences from Myotis myotis (Borkhausen, 1797). Acta Theriologica, 17, 355–380. [In Russian, with English summary].
Strelkov, P. P. (1983). Myotis mystacinus and Myotis brandti in the USSR and interrelations of these species. Part 2. Zoologicheskii Zhurnal, 62, 259–271. [In Russian with English summary].
Tate, G. H. H. (1941). A review of the genus Myotis (Chiroptera) of Eurasia, with special reference to species occuring in the East Indies. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History, 78, 537–565.
Turelli, M., Gillespie, J. H., & Lande, R. (1988). Rate tests for selection on quantitative characters during macroevolution and microevolution. Evolution, 42, 1085–1089.
von Helversen, O., Heller, K.-G., Mayer, F., Nemeth, A., Volleth, M., & Gombkötö, P. (2001). Cryptic mammalian species: A new species of whiskered bat (Myotis alcathoe n. sp.) in Europe. Naturwissenschaften, 88, 217–223.
Willis, J. H., Coyne, J. A., & Kirkpatrick, M. (1991). Can one predict the evolution of quantitative characters without genetics? Evolution, 45, 441–444.
Acknowledgments
We thank the curators and staffs of the zoological museums, who gave an opportunity to work with collections. We are grateful to V. M. Tytar, P. P. Strelkov, and I. K. Rakhmatulina for help in preparation of our research. Thanks also are due to the reviewers for valuable comments, suggestions and criticisms that improved the paper. M. J. Anderson, S. J. Arnold, W. Bogdanowicz, T. P. Eiting, P. H. Gartwaite, S. R. Hoofer, I. Horáček, E. A. Housworth, P. Jolicoeur, R. Lande, M. Macholán, B. F. J. Manly, P. D. Polly kindly presented copies of books and papers hardly accessible in Eastern Europe.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendices
Appendices
Appendix A. List of the Specimens Examined by the Authors
Myotis brandtii
ZINR 35063, 40727, 41669, 69041, 69043; ZMMU 117026.
Myotis emarginatus
NMNH 270/11; ZMMU 21535, 42775, 43760–43762, 43764.
Myotis dasycneme
ZINR 38540; ZMMU 10494, 13756–13759, 13764, 13766–13768, 13770, 13771, 15453, 15459–15463, 15465, 15468, 15611, 15613, 15614, 15621, 15627–15629, 15631, 15633, 15639, 15640, 15642, 15643, 29360, 29371, 29406, 29408–29410, 29412, 29418, 29419, 29421, 29423, 83991, 104484–104487, 104490–104492, 104494–104496, 104798, 135841.
Myotis capaccinii
ZINR 35045, 35048, 48035.
Myotis daubentonii
NMNH 1755/6, 2608/7; VDMU 594; ZINR 33469, 38802, 55691.
Myotis bechsteinii
NMNH 9558/1; ZMKU 2859.
Myotis bombinus
ZINR 5150; ZMMU 104379.
Myotis nattereri
IZA 610; VDMU 199; ZINR 55695, 46638; ZMMU 83995.
Myotis blythii blythii
NMNH 2617/33; ZINR 62131, 62133, 62134, 62136, 62137, 62139–62143, 62145–62148; ZMKU 3842, 3844; ZMMU 71109, 71111, 71113, 83985, 83987, 94711–94714, 94716, 100134–100136, 100139, 100141–100149, 100153, 100155–100158, 100164–100167, 100170–100172, 100174, 100176, 100177, 100179, 100180, 100182, 100184–100188, 100191, 100193, 100408–100410, 100413, 100414, 100416–100419, 100421, 100423, 100425, 100428, 100432, 100434, 100435, 100437–100443, 100445–100449, 100452, 111843, 150329.
Myotis blythii omari
IZA 177–183, 185, 186, 188, 207, 293, 294, 296, 297, 299, 300, 301, 303, 306, 309, 310, 313, 315, 316, 318, 319, 325, 326, 328–331, 333, 334, 339, 351, 361; NMNH 840/2; TCH 1/1, 2/1, 2/2; VDMU 2257, 2260, 2262; ZINR 11227, 11227bis, 11243, 11244, 11257, 11276, 11289, 11293, 11325, 11330, 35055–35057, 59565, 59569, 63906, 63908–63914, 63922, 63925; ZMMU 7818, 7819, 7822, 12534, 12535, 29207, 29212, 29275, 40912, 46603, 46605, 46606, 46893, 83986, 83988, 83989, 101048, 101050–101052, 101054, 102394–102396, 102398–102400, 102402, 102403, 102405, 105054, 135840.
Myotis blythii oxygnathus
NMNH 200/6, 201/7, 204/10, 205/11, 207/13, 208/14, 209/15, 211/17, 213/19, 214/20, 216/22, 220/26, 221/27, 222/28, 839/1, 5668/45, 5670/43, 5672/45; ZINR 35050–35053, 48053, 48055–48057, 55662, 55669, 55672, 55673; ZMKU 1830, 1839, 1844, 1848, 1850, 1873, 1881, 1885, 1890, 1894, 1895, 4888, 4890, 4892–4895; ZMMU 74647, 83984, 100759, 100760, 100762, 100765, 100768, 100773, 100775, 100776, 100782–100786, 100791, 100793, 100795–100797, 100799, 100801–100803, 101031, 101032, 101034, 101035, 101038.
Myotis myotis
NMNH 230/4, 233/7, 243/17, 245/19, 247/21, 249/23, 841/1, 2615/25, 2616/26, 4302/24; ZMKU 1897–1905; ZMMU 49163, 74649, 83990, 103902, 103905, 103910; ZINR 35042, 35043, 35044, 48062–48066.
Collections acronyms: Institute of Zoology of the National Academy of Sciences of Azerbaijan, Baku, Azerbaijan (IZA); National Museum of Natural History of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Kiev, Ukraine (NMNH); Tchernogolovka biological station of Severtsov Institute of Ecology and Evolution of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow region, Russia (TCH); Department of Vertebrate Zoology of Moscow University, Moscow, Russia (VDMU); Zoological Institute of the Russian Academy of Science, St. Petersburg, Russia (ZINR); Zoological Museum of Kiev University, Kiev, Ukraine (ZMKU); Zoological Museum of Moscow University, Moscow, Russia (ZMMU).
Appendix B: Craniometric Characters
Cross-Sectional Measurements
-
1.
Maximum distance between the coronoid processes of the mandible.
-
2.
Maximum distance between the condyloid processes of the mandible.
-
3.
Maximum distance between the angular processes of the mandible.
-
4.
Breadth of the braincase.
-
5.
Zygomatic breadth at the widest point.
-
6.
Minimum interorbital breadth.
-
7.
M3–M3 breadth.
Paired longitudinal measurements
-
8.
Greatest length of the mandible.
-
9.
Length of the mandibular toothrow, C1–M3.
-
10.
Distance between C1 and the tip of the coronoid process.
-
11.
Distance between C1 and the condyloid process.
-
12.
Distance between C1 and the angular process.
-
13.
Coronoid angular distance.
-
14.
General length of the skull.
-
15.
Braincase length.
-
16.
Condylobasal length of the skull.
-
17.
Length of the maxillary toothrow, C1–M3.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Dzeverin, I., Ghazali, M. Evolutionary Mechanisms Affecting the Multivariate Divergence in Some Myotis Species (Chiroptera, Vespertilionidae). Evol Biol 37, 100–112 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11692-010-9086-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11692-010-9086-3