Skip to main content
Log in

Optimization of pulsed-mode ultrasound assisted extraction of bioactive compounds from pomegranate peel using response surface methodology

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Food Measurement and Characterization Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this study, a pulsed mode ultrasound assisted extraction was performed for the extraction of bioactive compounds from Pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) peel. Box-Behnken experimental design combined with response surface methodology, was applied for the optimization of process conditions. The independent variables investigated were ultrasound amplitude (50–80%), sonication time (5–15 min), duty cycle (0.2–0.8), and methanol concentration (30–70%) to maximize the yield of total phenolic content, flavonoid content, total condensed and hydrolysable tannin (TCT and THT respectively), and antioxidant activity (DPPH and FRAP). The experimental results were fitted to quadratic models, and statistical analysis in terms of multiple regression, and analysis of variation was carried out for each response variable. The optimum predicted values of the response variables were obtained at 70% methanol concentration, 12.8 min of sonication treatment at a duty cycle of 0.58, and 80% ultrasound amplitude. A comparative analysis at optimized condition showed better recovery of bioactive compounds in pulsed mode, compared to continuous mode of sonication. Correlation analysis of the response variables was done to find the associations among the variables. Multivariate analysis using principal component analysis, and hierarchical cluster analysis was done for better understanding of interactions among experimental treatments and responses.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. S. Akhtar, T. Ismail, D. Fraternale, P. Sestili, Food Chem. 174, 417 (2015)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. S.E. El-Nemr, I.A. Ismail, M. Ragab, Food/Nahrung 34, 601 (1990)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. R. Tabaraki, E. Heidarizadi, A. Benvidi, Sep. Purif. Technol. 98, 16 (2012)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. S.R. Kanatt, R. Chander, A. Sharma, Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 45, 216 (2010)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. M.N. Clifford, A. Scalbert, J. Sci. Food Agric. 80, 1118 (2000)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. J. Živković, K. Šavikin, T. Janković, N. Ćujić, N. Menković, Sep. Purif. Technol. 194, 40 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. S.L.C. Ferreira, R.E. Bruns, H.S. Ferreira, G.D. Matos, J.M. David, G.C. Brandão, E.G.P. da Silva, L.A. Portugal, P.S. dos Reis, A.S. Souza, W.N.L. dos Santos, Anal. Chim. Acta 597, 179 (2007)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. A.J. Purohit, P.R. Gogate, Sep. Sci. Technol. 50, 1507 (2015)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. V.L. Singleton, J.A.J. Rossi, Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 16, 144 (1965)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Q.V. Vuong, S. Hirun, P.D. Roach, M.C. Bowyer, P.A. Phillips, C.J. Scarlett, J. Herb. Med. 3, 104 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. P. Rani, A. Kumar, S.R. Purohit, P.S. Rao, LWT Food Sci. Technol. 89, 155 (2018)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. I.F.F. Benzie, J.J. Strain, Anal. Biochem. 239, 70 (1996)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. R.B. Broadhurst, W.T. Jones, J. Sci. Food Agric. 29, 788 (1978)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. H. Saad, F. Charrier-El Bouhtoury, A. Pizzi, K. Rode, B. Charrier, N. Ayed, Ind. Crops Prod. 40, 239 (2012)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. J.S. Boeing, É.O. Barizão, B.C. e Silva, P.F. Montanher, V. de Cinque Almeida, J.V. Visentainer, Chem. Cent. J. 8(1), 48 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. A.J.D. Vega, R.-E. Hector, L.-G. Juan Jose, L.-G. Maria, H.-C. Paola, Á.-S. Raúl, O.-V. Carlos Enrique, Czech J. Food Sci. 35, 456 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Y.P. Lim, S.F. Pang, M.M. Yusoff, S.K. Abdul Mudalip, J. Gimbun, J. Appl. Res. Med. Aromat. Plants 14, 100224 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  18. M. Kazemi, R. Karim, H. Mirhosseini, A. Abdul Hamid, Food Chem. 206, 156 (2016)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. G. Aguilar-Hernández, M. De Lourdes García-Magaña, M. De los Ángeles Vivar-Vera, S.G. Sáyago-Ayerdi, J.A. Sánchez-Burgos, J. Morales-Castro, L.M. Anaya-Esparza, E.M. González, Molecules 24, 904 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. A. Tomšik, B. Pavlić, J. Vladić, M. Ramić, J. Brindza, S. Vidović, Ultrason. Sonochem. 29, 502 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. W. Chen, W.-P. Wang, H.-S. Zhang, Q. Huang, Carbohydr. Polym. 87, 614 (2012)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. S.U. Kadam, B.K. Tiwari, T.J. Smyth, C.P. O’Donnell, Ultrason. Sonochem. 23, 308 (2015)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. G. Pan, G. Yu, C. Zhu, J. Qiao, Ultrason. Sonochem. 19, 486 (2012)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. C. Zhu, X. Zhai, L. Li, X. Wu, B. Li, Food Chem. 177, 139 (2015)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. D. Shaterabadi, M. Aboonajmi, Food Sic Nutr. (2020). https://doi.org/10.1002/fsn3.1733

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. S. Chakraborty, R. Uppaluri, C. Das, Food Bioprod. Process. 120, 114 (2020)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. H.T. Vu, C.J. Scarlett, Q.V. Vuong, J. Food Process. Preserv. 41, 1 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. A.D. Sousa, A.I.V. Maia, T.H.S. Rodrigues, K.M. Canuto, P.R.V. Ribeiro, R. de Cassia Alves Pereira, R.F. Vieira, E.S. de Brito, Ind. Crops Prod. 79, 91 (2016)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. H. Liu, T. Zou, J. Gao, L. Gu, Food Chem. 141, 488 (2013)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. J. Prakash Maran, S. Manikandan, C. Vigna Nivetha, R. Dinesh, Arab. J. Chem. 10, S1145 (2017)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. X. Sun, Z. Jin, L. Yang, J. Hao, Y. Zu, W. Wang, W. Liu, J. Chem. (2013). https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/541037

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. P.E. Shay, J.A. Trofymow, C.P. Constabel, Plant Methods 13, 1 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. J.S. Youn, Y.J. Kim, H.J. Na, H.R. Jung, C.K. Song, S.Y. Kang, J.Y. Kim, Food Sci. Biotechnol. 28, 201 (2019)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. A. Floegel, D.-O. Kim, S.-J. Chung, S.I. Koo, O.K. Chun, J. Food Compos. Anal. 24, 1043 (2011)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. A.E. Hagerman, K.M. Riedl, G.A. Jones, K.N. Sovik, N.T. Ritchard, P.W. Hartzfeld, T.L. Riechel, J. Agric. Food Chem. 46, 1887 (1998)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was financially supported by the Science and Engineering Research Board (SERB), Department of Science and Technology (DST), Government of India.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ankit Kumar.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kumar, A., Srinivasa Rao, P. Optimization of pulsed-mode ultrasound assisted extraction of bioactive compounds from pomegranate peel using response surface methodology. Food Measure 14, 3493–3507 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11694-020-00597-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11694-020-00597-9

Keywords

Navigation