Abstract
Background
Laparoscopic bariatric surgery (LBS) in older obese patients remains debated regarding postoperative outcomes.
Objectives
The aim of this case-control study is to evaluate global results of LBS in patients ≥60 years (yr) with a matched case control study.
Methods
All patients ≥60 years who benefited from LBS in our center between January 2009 and January 2014 were included in this retrospective study. They were matched (1:2) to patients <40 and 40–59 years on BMI, surgical procedure and year, and history of previous LBS. Postoperative complications in the first 90 days following LBS, micronutrient and mineral deficiencies, and Bariatric Analysis and Reporting Outcome System (BAROS) were analyzed.
Results
Fifty-five patients ≥60 year (40 sleeve gastrectomy, 14 one anastomosis gastric bypass, 1 gastric bypass revision) were matched to patients <40 year and patients 40–59 year (n = 55 each). Patients ≥60 year presented more obesity-related comorbidities at baseline. Except for bleeding complications (P = 0.01), no difference in major complication rate was observed (P = 0.43). At 24 months, %EWL was lower in older patients compared to others (76.3, 82.2 and 89.7, respectively, P = 0.009). Iron and vitamin B12 deficiencies were less prevalent in patients ≥60 year After a mean follow-up of 27 months, BAROS score (filled in by 82% of patients) was lower in patients ≥60 years (P = 0.01).
Conclusion
Despite less weight loss, postoperative complications rate, and lower BAROS results, LBS keeps an acceptable benefit-risk balance in selected older patients and should not be rejected on the sole argument of age. Additional studies are needed to assess the long-term benefits of LBS in older patients.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- BAROS:
-
Bariatric analysis and reporting outcome system
- BMI:
-
Body mass index
- BS:
-
Bariatric surgery
- GERD:
-
Gastroesophageal reflux disease
- LBS:
-
Laparoscopic bariatric surgery
- LOAGBP:
-
Laparoscopic one anastomosis gastric bypass
- LSG:
-
Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy
- MC:
-
Major complication
- NAFLD:
-
Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease
- %EWL:
-
Percentage of excess weight loss
- QOL:
-
Quality of life
- SD:
-
Standard deviation
- T2D:
-
Type 2 diabetes
- Yr:
-
Years
References
Zamboni M, Mazzali G, Zoico E, et al. Health consequences of obesity in the elderly: a review of four unresolved questions. Int J Obes. 2005;29:1011–29.
Schaap LA, Koster A, Visser M. Adiposity, muscle mass, and muscle strength in relation to functional decline in older persons. Epidemiol Rev. 2013;35:51–65.
Schauer PR, Bhatt DL, Kirwan JP, et al. Bariatric surgery versus intensive medical therapy for diabetes—3-year outcomes. N Engl J Med. 2014;370:2002–13.
Chow A, Switzer NJ, Gill RS, et al. 2015 Roux-en-y gastric bypass in the elderly: a systematic review. Obes. Surg. [Internet]. [cited 2016 Feb 19]; Available from: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11695-015-2007-x
Giordano S, Victorzon M. Bariatric surgery in elderly patients: a systematic review. Clin Interv Aging. 2015;10:1627–35.
Varela JE, Wilson SE, Nguyen NT. Outcomes of bariatric surgery in the elderly. Am Surg. 2006;72:865–9.
Sugerman HJ, DeMaria EJ, Kellum JM, et al. Effects of bariatric surgery in older patients. Ann Surg. 2004;240:243–7.
Flum DR, Salem L, Broeckel Elrod J, et al. Early mortality among medicare beneficiaries undergoing bariatric surgical procedures. JAMA. 2005;294:1903–8.
Baumgartner RN, Koehler KM, Gallagher D, et al. Epidemiology of sarcopenia among the elderly in New Mexico. Am J Epidemiol. 1998;147:755–63.
Heim N, Snijder MB, Heymans MW, et al. Optimal cutoff values for high-risk waist circumference in older adults based on related health outcomes. Am J Epidemiol. 2011;174:479–89.
Laville M, Romon M, Chavrier G, et al. Recommendations regarding obesity surgery. Obes Surg. 2005;15:1476–80.
Moorehead MK, Ardelt-Gattinger E, Lechner H, et al. The validation of the Moorehead-Ardelt quality of life questionnaire II. Obes Surg. 2003;13:684–92.
Sjöström L, Narbro K, Sjöström CD, et al. Effects of bariatric surgery on mortality in Swedish obese subjects. N Engl J Med. 2007;357:741–52.
Dorman RB, Abraham AA, Al-Refaie WB, et al. Bariatric surgery outcomes in the elderly: an ACS NSQIP study. J. Gastrointest. Surg. Off. J. Soc. Surg. Aliment Tract. 2012;16:35–44. discussion 44
Vanommeslaeghe H, Deylgat B, Van Cauwenberge S, et al. Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass in the elderly: feasibility, short-term safety, and impact on comorbidity and weight in 250 cases. Surg Endosc. 2015;29:910–5.
Pequignot A, Prevot F, Dhahri A, et al. Is sleeve gastrectomy still contraindicated for patients aged ≥60 years? A case-matched study with 24 months of follow-up. Surg Obes Relat Dis Off J Am Soc Bariatr Surg. 2015;11:1008–13.
Abbas M, Cumella L, Zhang Y, et al. Outcomes of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass in patients older than 60. Obes Surg. 2015;25:2251–6.
Montastier E, Becouarn G, Bérard E, et al. 2016 Gastric bypass in older patients: Complications, weight loss, and resolution of comorbidities at 2 years in a matched controlled study. Obes. Surg. [Internet]. [cited 2016 Feb 19]; Available from: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11695-015-2024-9
Robert M, Pasquer A, Espalieu P, et al. Gastric bypass for obesity in the elderly: is it as appropriate as for young and middle-aged populations? Obes Surg. 2014;24:1662–9.
Moon RC, Kreimer F, Teixeira AF, et al. Morbidity rates and weight loss after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, sleeve gastrectomy, and adjustable gastric banding in patients older than 60 years old: which procedure to choose? Surg: Obes; 2015.
Spaniolas K, Trus TL, Adrales GL, et al. Early morbidity and mortality of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy and gastric bypass in the elderly: a NSQIP analysis. Surg. Obes. Relat. Dis. Off. J. Am. Soc. Bariatr Surg. 2014;10:584–8.
Peraglie C. Laparoscopic mini-gastric bypass in patients age 60 and older. Surg Endosc. 2016;30:38–43.
Oria HE, Moorehead MK. Bariatric analysis and reporting outcome system (BAROS). Obes Surg. 1998;8:487–99.
Navez J, Dardamanis D, Thissen J-P, et al. Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for morbid obesity: comparison of primary versus Revisional bypass by using the BAROS score. Obes Surg. 2015;25:812–7.
Jr IR, Coelho TH, Ravelli MN, et al. A comparative, prospective and randomized evaluation of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass with and without the silastic ring: a 2-year follow up preliminary report on weight loss and quality of life. Obes Surg. 2015;1–7
Taylor CJ, Layani L. Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding in patients ≥60 years old: is it worthwhile? Obes Surg. 2006;16:1579–83.
Fatima J, Houghton SG, Iqbal CW, et al. Bariatric surgery at the extremes of age. J Gastrointest Surg. 2006;10:1392–6.
Quebbemann B, Engstrom D, Siegfried T, et al. Bariatric surgery in patients older than 65 years is safe and effective. Surg. Obes. Relat. Dis. Off. J. Am. Soc. Bariatr. Surg. 2005;1:389–92. discussion 392–3
Schweiger C, Weiss R, Berry E, et al. Nutritional deficiencies in bariatric surgery candidates. Obes Surg. 2009;20:193–7.
Thibault R, Huber O, Azagury DE, et al. Twelve key nutritional issues in bariatric surgery. Clin Nutr. 2016;35:12–7.
Authors’ Contributions
Study concept and design: VB, DL, DB.
Acquisition of data: VB.
Analysis and interpretation of data: VB, DB, RT.
Drafting of the manuscript: DB, RT.
Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: DL, VB, AG.
Statistical analysis: VB.
Obtained funding: None.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Funding
There was no financial support for this study.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical Approval
For this type of study, formal consent is not required.
Informed Consent
Does not apply.
Electronic supplementary material
.
ESM 1
(DOCX 65 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bergeat, D., Lechaux, D., Ghaina, A. et al. Postoperative Outcomes of Laparoscopic Bariatric Surgery in Older Obese Patients: a Matched Case-Control Study. OBES SURG 27, 1414–1422 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-016-2517-1
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-016-2517-1