Abstract
Within national and international domestic academic circles, there are increasing calls for enhanced involvement of communities in formulating and implementing grassland management arrangements. In contrast to the current national policy of contracting grasslands to households, many scholars call for support for collective grassland use arrangements. Several reasons are given for increased recognition and support for community-based management of grasslands, including lower costs of exclusion and dispute resolution, economies of scale in herding and marketing, mitigation of environmental risk, and ensuring equitable access to grassland resources. One conclusion from this literature is that devolving authority for designing and implementing grassland management systems to communities would lead to more sustainable grassland use, a position that I term as the ‘myth of community.’ This paper presents the results of a study of grazing systems in two communities in Hongyuan County, Sichuan Province. Each community uses its grasslands collectively. However, the study found evidence of severe overgrazing, especially in winter pastures, suggesting that community-based management of grasslands is not necessarily sustainable. The paper discusses three potential policy innovations required to support sustainable grazing systems in China’s grassland areas: overcoming constraints in labor and land markets, and payments for environmental services that reward sustainable stocking levels.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Banks T (1997). Pastoral land tenure reform and resource management in Northern Xinjiang: a new institutional economics approach. Nomadic Peoples, 1(2): 55–76
Banks T (1999). State, community and common property in Xinjiang: Synergy or strife? Development Policy Review, 17: 293–313
Banks T, Doman S (2001). Kazakh nomads, rangeland policy and the environment in Altay: insights from new range ecology. Second International Convention of Asia Scholars, Free University, Berlin, 9–12
Banks T, Richard C, Li P, Yan Z L (2003). Community-based grassland management in western China. Mountain Research and Development, 23(2): 132–140
Gaduo W D, Xie X G, Yaxi D J (2007). Joint livestock management and co-management in Nima county, Naqu, Tibet. In: Li X L, Wilkes A, Yan Z L, eds. Rangeland Co-management: Proceedings of an international workshop held in Diqing, Yunnan China, 13–15 May 2006. Beijing: China Agricultural Science and Technology Press (in Chinese)
Groom B, Grosjean P, Kontoleon A, Swanson T, Zhang S Q (2008). Relaxing rural constraints: a “win-win” policy for poverty and environment in China? Environmental Economy and Policy Research Discussion Paper, Department of Land Economy, University of Cambridge
Li C (2007). Survey report on stocking rate equilibrium and management methods in five provinces of northern China. In: Li X L, Wilkes A, Yan Z L, eds. Rangeland Co-management: Proceedings of an international workshop held in Diqing, Yunnan China, 13–15 May 2006. Beijing: China Agricultural Science and Technology Press (in Chinese)
Li W J, Saleem H A, Qian Z (2007). Property rights and grassland degradation: A study of the Xilingol Pasture, Inner Mongolia, China. Journal of Environmental Management, 85: 461–470
Li X L (2007). A review of China’s institutional arrangements for rangeland management. In: Li X L, Wilkes A, Yan Z L, eds. Rangeland Co-management: Proceedings of an international workshop held in Diqing, Yunnan China, 13–15 May 2006. Beijing: China Agricultural Science and Technology Press (in Chiese)
Liu J W (2007). Several Thoughts on Establishment of Grassland Eco-compensation Mechanism. Beijing: Ministry of Agriculture National Grassland Monitoring Station
Ma G Q (2001). Grassland ecology and Mongolian folk ecological knowledge. Inner Mongolia Social Sciences, (1): 52–57 (in Chinese)
Miller D (2000a). Searching for Grass and Water: Rangeland Ecosystem Sustainability and Herders’ Livelihoods in Western China. Kathmandu: ICIMOD
Miller D (2000b). Tough times for Tibetan nomads in Western China: snowstorms, settling down, fences, and the demise of traditional nomadic pastoralism. Nomadic Peoples, 4(1): 83–109
Richard C, Tan J Z (2004). Resource tenure models for rangeland improvements. In: Richard C, Hoffmann K, eds. Strategic Innovations for Improving Pastoral Livelihoods in the Hindu Kush-Himalayan Highlands. ICIMOD: Kathmandu
Ru J (2007). Case study of grassland co-management in Ruo’ergai County, Sichuan Province. In: Li X L, Wilkes A, Yan Z L, eds. Rangeland Co-management: Proceedings of an International Workshop Held in Diqing, Yunnan China, 13–15 May 2006. Beijing: China Agricultural Science and Technology Press (in Chinese)
State Council (1985). Grassland Law of the People’s Republic of China (in Chinese)
State Council (2007). State Council Document No. 1 (in Chinese)
Wilkes A, Tan J Z (2008). Yak product value chain analysis in Sichuan, China. League for Pastoral People’s workshop on niche product marketing, South Africa, December 2008
Williams D M (2002). Beyond great walls: environment, identity and development on the Chinese grasslands of Inner Mongolia. Stanford: Stanford University Press
World Bank (2001). China: air, land and water. Environmental Priorities for a New Millennium. Washington D C: World Bank
Wu N (1997). Indigenous knowledge and sustainable approaches for the maintenance of biodiversity in nomadic society-experience from Eastern Tibetan Plateau. Die Erde, 128: 67–80
Wu N, Richard C (1999). The privatization process of rangeland and its impacts on pastoral dynamics in the Hindu-Kush Himalaya: The Case of Western Sichuan, China. http://www.icimod.org/home/pub/publications.content.php?puid=61
Xie R Q, Yang P G, Zheng Q Y, Luo G R, Li H D, Jiang S H (2006). Research report of yak timely slaughter technique. Journal of Sichuan Grassland, (4):22–29 (in Chinese)
Xu J T, Tao R, Xu Z G (2004). Sloped farmland conversion: cost effectiveness, structural adjustment impacts and sustainable economies: an empirical analysis of household surveys in three provinces of western China. The Economist, 4(1): 139–162 (in Chinese)
Yan Z L (2007). Introduction to the concepts and procedures of grassland co-management. In: Li X L, Wilkes A, Yan Z L, eds. Rangeland Co-management: Proceedings of an international workshop held in Diqing, Yunnan China, 13–15 May 2006. Beijing: China Agricultural Science and Technology Press (in Chinese)
Yan Z L, Wu N, Yeshi D, Ru J (2005). A review of rangeland privatization and its implications in the Tibetan Plateau, China. Nomadic Peoples, 9(1–2): 31–51
Yeh E (2003). Tibetan range wars: spatial politics and authority on the grasslands of Amdo. Development and Change, 34(3): 499–523
Ze B, Zheng Q Y, Deng Y C (2007). Practice of rangeland co-management in Hongyuan. In: Li X L, Wilkes A, Yan Z L, eds. Rangeland Co-management: Proceedings of an International Workshop Held in Diqing, Yunnan China, 13–15 May 2006. Beijing: China Agricultural Science and Technology Press (in Chinese)
Zhao C Z, Long R J (2007). The impact of property rights on overgrazing of grasslands: a case study in Hongshiwo, Sunan County, Gansu Province. In: Li X L, Wilkes A, Yan Z L, eds. Rangeland Comanagement: Proceedings of an International Workshop Held in Diqing, Yunnan China, 13–15 May 2006. Beijing: China Agricultural Science and Technology Press (in Chinese)
World Bank (2001). China: air, land and water. Environmental Priorities for a New Millennium. Washington D C: World Bank
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wilkes, A., Tan, J. & Mandula The myth of community and sustainable grassland management in China. Front. Earth Sci. China 4, 59–66 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11707-010-0009-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11707-010-0009-5