Abstract
When engaging with classical Chinese ethics, we might end up wondering what kind of moral theorizing we ultimately are confronted with. The accounts and answers to specific practical problems are dispersed throughout the texts and expressed via various codes of composition, ranging from sayings to theoretical reflections to poems. However, what exactly the aim of these theories consists in is not explicitly addressed by systematic second-order reflections. In this article I try to shed some light on the understanding of moral theorizing that underlies the transmitted texts. For this, I adopt an issue-centered approach that attempts to indirectly address the understanding of moral theorizing via the question about the source of normativity. That approach will be tested by drawing on the accounts of Mengzi 孟子 and Cheng Yi 程頤. First conclusions will show that moral theorizing can be understood as the simultaneous business of a moral anatomist and a moral painter.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abramson, Kate. 2007. “Hume’s Distinction between Philosophical Anatomy and Painting.” Philosophy Compass 2.5: 680–698.
Ames, Roger T., and David L. Hall. 1998. Thinking from the Han: Self, Truth, and Transcendence in Chinese and Western Culture. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Ames, Roger T., and Henry Rosemont Jr. 2016. Confucian Role Ethics: A Moral Vision for the 21st Century? Taipei and Göttingen: National Taiwan University Press and V&R University Press.
Angle, Stephen C. 2009. Sagehood: The Contemporary Significance of Neo-Confucian Philosophy. New York: Oxford University Press.
Broome, John. 1999. “Normative Requirements.” Ratio 12.4: 398–419.
______. 2007. “Is Rationality Normative?” Disputatio 23.2: 161–178.
Carroll, Noël. 2002. “Wheel of Virtue: Art, Literature, and Moral Knowledge.” The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 60.1: 3–26.
Chen, Lai 陳來. 2003. Song-Ming Learning of Li 宋明理學. Shanghai 上海: Huadong Shifan Daxue Chubanshe 華東師範大學出版社.
Cheng, Hao 程顥, and Cheng Yi 程頤. 1981. Complete Works of the Cheng Brothers 二程集. Edited by Wang Xiaoyu 王孝魚. Beijing 北京: Zhonghua Shuju 中華書局.
Elberfeld, Rolf. 2012. Sprache und Sprachen: Eine philosophische Grundorientierung. Freiburg a. B.: Alber Verlag.
Fraser, Chris. 2012. “Truth in Moist Dialectics.” Journal of Chinese Philosophy 39.3: 351–368.
______. 2016. The Philosophy of the Mòzǐ: The First Consequentialists. New York: Columbia University Press.
Graham, Angus C. 1992. Two Chinese Philosophers. La Salle: Open Court.
Habermas, Jürgen. 1990. “Discourse Ethics: Notes on a Program of Philosophical Justification.” In Moral Consciousness and Communicative Action, trans. by Christian Lenhardt and Shierry Weber Nicholsen. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Hansen, Chad. 1985. “Chinese Language, Chinese Philosophy, and ‘Truth’.” Journal of Asian Studies 44.3: 491–519.
Hare, Richard M. 1981. Moral Thinking: Its Levels, Method and Point. New York: Oxford University Press.
He, Huaihong 何懷宏. 2011. The Distress of China 中國的憂傷. Beijing 北京: Falü Chubanshe 法律出版社.
Huang, Yong. 2014. Why Be Moral? Learning from the Neo-Confucian Cheng Brothers. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Hume, David. 2010. Enquiries Concerning Human Understanding and Concerning The Principles of the Morals. Edited by L. A. Selby-Bigge and P. H. Nidditch. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Im, Manyul. 2004. “Moral Knowledge and Self Control in Mengzi: Rectitude, Courage, and Qi.” Asian Philosophy 14.1: 59–77.
Kant, Immanuel. 1997. Foundations of the Metaphysics of Morals. Trans. by Lewis White Beck. Upper Saddle River: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
Korsgaard, Christine M. 1996. The Sources of Normativity. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Li, Minghui 李明輝. 1990. Confucianism and Kant 儒家與康德. Taipei 台北: Lianjing 聯經.
Little, Margaret Olivia. 2001. “On Knowing the ‘Why’: Particularism and Moral Theory.” Hastings Center Report 31.4: 32–40.
Liu, Jeeloo. 2017. Neo-Confucianism: Metaphysics, Mind, and Morality. Newark: Wiley.
Mou, Zongsan 牟宗三. 1997. Nineteen Lectures on Chinese Philosophy 中國哲學十九講. Shanghai 上海: Shanghai Guji Chubanshe 上海古籍出版社.
Rawls, John. 1999. “The Independence of Moral Theory.” In John Rawls: Collected Papers, edited by Samuel Freeman. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Raz, Joseph. 1999. Engaging Reason. New York: Oxford University Press.
Ricoeur, Paul. 1986. Du texte à l’action. Essais d’herméneutique II. Paris: Éditions du Seuil.
Roetz, Heiner. 1993. “Validity in Chou Thought: On Chad Hansen and the Pragmatic Turn in Sinology.” In Epistemological Issues in Classical Chinese Philosophy, edited by Hans Lenk and Gregor Paul. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Ross, David. 2002. The Right and the Good. New York: Oxford University Press.
Scanlon, Thomas. 1998. What We Owe to Each Other. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Shun, Kwong-loi. 1997. Mencius and Early Chinese Thought. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Stemmer, Peter. 2008. Normativität. Eine ontologische Untersuchung. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
Street, Sharon. 2017. “Nothing ‘Really’ Matters, but That’s Not What Matters.” In Does Anything Really Matter?: Essays on Parfit on Objectivity, edited by Peter Singer. New York: Oxford University Press.
Van Norden, Bryan. 2007. Virtue Ethics and Consequentialism in Early Chinese Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Velleman, David. 2009. How We Get Along. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Williams, Bernard. 2006. Ethics and the Limits of Philosophy. London: Routledge.
Wedgewood, Ralph. 2018. “The Unity of Normativity.” In The Oxford Handbook of Reasons and Normativity, edited by Daniel Star. New York: Oxford University Press.
Wong, David. 2002. “Reasons and Analogical Reasoning in Mengzi.” In Essays on the Moral Philosophy of Mengzi, edited by Liu Xiusheng and Philip J. Ivanhoe. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company.
Yang, Bojun 楊伯峻, trans. and ed. 1960. Translation and Interpretation of the Mengzi 孟子譯注. Beijing 北京: Zhonghua Shuju 中華書局.
Yu, Jiyuan. 2007. The Ethics of Confucius and Aristotle: Mirrors of Virtue. New York: Routledge.
Zhou, Lian 周濂. 2015. The Possibility of Justice 正義的可能. Beijing 北京: Zhongguo Wenshi Chubanshe 中國文史出版社.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Brunozzi, P. Moral Theorizing and the Source of Normativity in Classical Chinese Philosophy: An Outline. Dao 19, 335–351 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11712-020-09730-3
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11712-020-09730-3