Skip to main content
Log in

Transient dehydration of pollen carried by hot bees impedes fertilization

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Arthropod-Plant Interactions Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the intense solar radiation of an alpine climate, small black bees often experience extremely high thoracic temperatures when they are foraging on flowers, but flies forage at lower temperatures. To explore the hypothesis that seed set could be depressed by transient dehydration of pollen at the high temperatures reached by hot bees foraging in sunshine, we compared the effectiveness of single visits by different pollinators to a bowl-shaped flower Potentilla lancinata in alpine meadows, SW China. The ratio of seed set to pollen transferred in individual flowers was monitored over 2 years, indicating that pollen deposited on stigmas by halictid bees produced lower seed set than pollen carried by flies. Scopal pollen applied to stigmas by hand gave good seed set, but in germination tests it burst more frequently than pollen from anthers, implying dehydration. Pollen grains freshly taken from the scopae of solitary bees foraging in sunshine were smaller than those taken from anthers or foraging bees in early-morning overcast conditions, implying dehydration. The effect was reversible: hand pollination showed that scopal pollen was no less effective than fly pollen after removal from the bee. Pollen carried by such bees foraging in intense sunlight in flowers became dehydrated, causing an osmotic mismatch between the pollen and the stigmas. Transient heat-induced dehydration of pollen represents a novel pathway by which climate warming may disrupt plant reproduction, and helps us understand why flies could be more effective pollinators than bees in cool, high-radiation arctic or high-altitude sites.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ballantyne G, Baldock K, Willmer P (2015) Constructing more informative plant-pollinator networks: visitation and pollen deposition networks in a heathland plant community. Proc R Soc B 282(1814):20151130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bassani M, Pacini E, Franchi GG (1994) Humidity stress reponse in pollen of anemophilous and entomophilous species. Grana 33:146–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bolten AB, Feinsinger P, Baker HG, Baker I (1979) On the calculation of sugar concentration in flower nectar. Oecologia 41:301–304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corbet SA (1990) Pollination and the weather. Israel J Bot 39:13–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Corbet SA, Huang SQ (2016) Small bees overheat in sunlit flowers: do they make cooling flights? Ecol Entomol 41:344–350

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corbet SA, Plumridge JR (1985) Hydrodynamics and the germination of oil-seed rape pollen. J Agric Sci (Cambridge) 104:445–451

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grubb PJ (1977) The maintenance of species richness in plant communities: the importance of the regeneration niche. Biol Rev 52:107–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haverkamp A, Li X, Hansson BS, Baldwin IT, Knaden M, Yon F (2018) Flower movement balances pollinator needs and pollen protection. Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1002/ecy.2553

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Herrera CM (1997) Thermal biology and foraging responses of insect pollinators to the forest floor irradiance mosaic. Oikos 78:601–611

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herrera CM (2000) Flower-to-seedling consequences of different pollination regimes in an insect-pollinated shrub. Ecology 81:15–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inouye DW (2015) Flies and flowers III: ecology of foraging and pollination. J Pollinat Ecol 16:115–133

    Google Scholar 

  • Kevan PG (1975) Suntracking solar furnaces in high arctic flowers: significance for pollination and insects. Science 189:723–726

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Keys RN, Buchmann SL, Smith S (1995) Pollination effectiveness and pollination efficiency of insects foraging Prosopis velutina in south-eastern Arizona. J Appl Ecol 32:519–527

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King C, Ballantyne G, Willmer PG (2013) Why flower visitation is a poor proxy for pollination: measuring single-visit pollen deposition, with implications for pollination networks and conservation. Methods Ecol Evol 4:811–818

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loupassaki M, Vasilakakis M, Androulakis I (1997) Effect of pre-incubation humidity and temperature treatment on the in vitro germination of avocado pollen grains. Euphytica 94:247–251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luza J, Polito VS (1987) Effects of desiccation and controlled rehydration on germination in vitro of pollen of walnut (Juglans spp.). Plant Cell Environ 10:487–492

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mao YY, Huang SQ (2009) Pollen resistance to water in 80 angiosperm species: flower structures protect rain-susceptible pollen. New Phytol 183:892–899

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michener C (2000) The bees of the world. The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore

    Google Scholar 

  • Ne’eman G, Jurgens A, Newstrom-Lloyd L, Potts S, Dafni A (2010) A framework for comparing pollinator performance: effectiveness and efficiency. Biol Rev 85:435–451

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nepi M, Franchi G, Pacini E (2001) Pollen hydration status at dispersal: cytophysiological features and strategies. Protoplasma 216:171–180

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pisanty G, Afik O, Wajnberg E, Mandelik YD (2016) Watermelon pollinators exhibit complementarity in both visitation rate and single-visit pollination efficiency. J Appl Ecol 53:360–370

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds R, Fenster C (2008) Point and interval estimation of pollinator importance: a study using pollination data of Silene caroliniana. Oecologia 156:325–332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodriguez-Riano T, Dafni A (2000) A new procedure to assess pollen viability. Sex Plant Reprod 12:241–244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosbakh S, Pacini E, Nepi M, Poschlod P (2018) An unexplored side of regeneration niche: seed quantity and quality are determined by the effect of temperature on pollen performance. Front Plant Sci 9:1036

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Song B, Chen G, Stöcklin J, Peng DL, Niu Y, Li ZM, Sun H (2014) A new pollinating seed-consuming mutualism between Rheum nobile and a fly fungus gnat, Bradysia sp., involving pollinator attraction by a specific floral compound. New Phytol 203:1109–1118

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tiusanen M, Hebert PDN, Schmidt NM, Roslin T (2016) One fly to rule them all—muscid flies are the key pollinators in the Arctic. Proc R Soc B 283:20161271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Totland Ø (1994) Intraseasonal variation in pollination intensity and seed set in an alpine population of Ranunculus acris in Southwestern Norway. Ecography 17:159–165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Totland Ø (1996) Flower heliotropism in an alpine population of Ranunculus acris (Ranunculaceae): effects on flower temperature, insect visitation, and seed production. Am J Bot 83:452–458

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson P, Thomson JD (1991) Heterogeneity among floral visitors leads to discordance between removal and deposition of pollen. Ecology 72:1503–1507

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yates I, Sparks D (1989) Hydration and temperature influence in vitro germination of pecan pollen. J Am Soc Hortic Sci 114:599–605

    Google Scholar 

  • Zinn K, Tunc-Ozdemir M, Harper J (2010) Temperature stress and plant sexual reproduction: uncovering the weakest links. J Exper Bot 61:1959–1968

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Director Z.-D. Fang for making available the facilities of the Shangri-La Alpine Botanic Garden, and Jim Cane, John Hobart and two referees for valued comments. This work was supported by the National Science Foundation of China (Grants Nos. U1402267, 31730012).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shuang-Quan Huang.

Additional information

Handling Editor: Stanislav Gorb.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOC 1450 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Corbet, S.A., Chen, FF., Chang, FF. et al. Transient dehydration of pollen carried by hot bees impedes fertilization. Arthropod-Plant Interactions 14, 207–214 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11829-019-09726-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11829-019-09726-8

Keywords

Navigation