Abstract
In this study, the information needs of non-industrial private forest owners in Finland, after logging operations, were investigated. The study was carried out as an online survey in 2017. The survey was targeted at non-industrial private forest owners who had sold their timber during the previous 10 years (2008–2017) and whose email addresses were in the customer relationship management system of a large wood procurement company in Finland. A response link for the survey was successfully sent to 31,988 forest owners, of whom 3323 replied (response rate: 10.4%). The final study data included 3284 non-industrial private forest owners. The results of the study, which need to be interpreted cautiously due to the low response rate, showed that the forest owners want better-quality reporting after logging operations. Furthermore, the results suggested that gender, age, education, occupational status, place of living, size of, and access to, forest property, and length of, and objectives for, forest ownership have a significant effect on their information needs. Younger, highly-educated, female, urban-living and multi-objective forest owners with larger forest holdings and short forest ownership tenures desired more information. Particularly, the respondents conveyed that they would like more and better information about thinning harvesting result. The results also indicated that when different groups of forest owners call for certain information, there is a need for producing different types of reports after logging operations for different forest owner segments.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bobik M (2008) Damages to residual stand in commercial thinnings. Master thesis 127, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences
Butler BJ, Leatherberry EC (2004) America’s family forest owners. J For 102(7):4–9
Butler BJ, Tyrrell M, Feinberg G, Van Manen S, Wiseman L, Wallinger S (2007) Understanding and reaching family forest owners: lessons from social marketing research. J For 105(7):348–357
Butler BJ, Hewes JH, Dickinson BJ, Andrejczyk K, Butler SM, Markowski-Lindsay M (2016) Family forest ownerships of the United States, 2013: findings from the USDA Forest Service’s national woodland owner survey. J For 114(6):638–647
Butler SM, Butler BJ, Markowski-Lindsay M (2017) Family forest owner characteristics shaped by life cycle, cohort, and period effects. Small-Scale For 16(1):1–18
Camp A (2002) Damage to residual trees by four mechanized harvest systems operating in small-diameter, mixed-conifer forests on steep slopes in Northeastern Washington: a case study. West J Appl For 17(1):14–22
Câmpu VR, Borz SA (2017) Amount and structure of tree damage when using cut-to-length system. Environ Eng Manag J 16(9):2053–2061
Cook C, Heath F, Thompson RL (2000) A meta-analysis of response rates in web- or internet-based surveys. Educ Psychol Meas 60(6):821–836
Côté M-A, Généreux-Tremblay A, Gilbert D, Gélinas N (2017) Comparing the profiles, objectives and behaviours of new and longstanding non-industrial private forest owners in Quebec, Canada. For Policy Econ 78:116–121
Couper MP (2000) Web surveys: a review of issues and approaches. Public Opin Q 64(4):464–494
Crim SD, Dubois M, Bailey C, Schelhas J (2003) Female forestland owners: characterization of assistance needs. In: Moffat SO (ed) Proceedings of the 2003 Southern Forest Economics Workers annual meeting, bugs, budgets, mergers, and fire: disturbance economics, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA, 17–18 March 2003, pp 129–139
Cudzik A, Brennensthul M, Białczyk W, Czarnecki J (2017) Damage to soil and residual trees caused by different logging systems applied to late thinning. Croat J For Eng 38(1):83–95
Dillman DA (2000) Mail and internet surveys: the tailored design method. Wiley, New York
Eronen J, Palander T, Kärhä K, Ovaskainen H (2016) Puunkorjuun laaturaportoinnin automatisointi ja tehostaminen (Automation and enhancement of quality reporting in wood harvesting). In: Metsätieteen päivä 2016: Tutkimuksesta tuotteiksi ja päätöksiksi, Suomen Metsätieteellinen Seura, Helsinki, Finland, 19 October 2016, p 25
European Union (2016) Directive 2016/680 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32016L0680&from=fi. Accessed 6 Dec 2018
Favada IM, Karppinen H, Kuuluvainen J, Mikkola J, Stavness C (2009) Effects of timber prices, ownership objectives, and owner characteristics on timber supply. For Sci 55(6):512–523
Ficko A, Lidestav G, Ní Dhubháin Á, Karppinen H, Zivojinovic I, Westin K (2017) European private forest owner typologies: a review of methods and use. For Policy Econ 99:21–31
Finnish Forest Centre (2019) Korjuujäljen tarkastusten tulokset vuodelta 2018 (Harvesting result in thinning stands in Finland, 2018). https://www.metsakeskus.fi/sites/default/files/tiedote-liite-korjuujalki-tarkastukset.pdf. Accessed 21 Apr 2019
Follo G, Lidestav G, Ludvig A, Vilkriste L, Hujala T, Karppinen H, Didolot F, Mizaraite D (2017) Gender in European forest ownership and management: reflections on women as “New forest owners”. Scand J For Res 32(2):174–184
Froese K, Han H-S (2006) Residual stand damage from cut-to-length thinning of a mixed conifer stand in Northern Idaho. West J Appl For 21(3):142–148
Granhus A, Fjeld D (2001) Spatial distribution of injuries to Norway spruce advance growth after selection harvesting. Can J For Res 31(11):1903–1913
Griffin A (2013) Obtaining customer needs for product development. In: Kahn KB, Kay S, Slotegraaf R, Uban S (eds) The PDMA handbook of new product development. Wiley, New York, pp 213–230
Haltia E, Rämö A-K (2017) Miksi metsien taloudellisia mahdollisuuksia jätetään käyttämättä?—Metsänomistajakyselyn tuloksia (Why do the economic opportunities of forests remain untapped?—Forest owner survey results). PTT Reports 256
Haltia E, Rämö A-K, Pynnönen S, Valonen M, Horne P (2017) Miksi metsien taloudellisia mahdollisuuksia jätetään käyttämättä?—Metsänomistajien aktiivisuus ja siihen vaikuttaminen (Why do the economic opportunities of forests remain untapped?—Forest owner activity and means to influence it). PTT Reports 255
Han H-S, Kellogg LD (2000) Damage characteristics in young Douglas-fir stands from commercial thinning with four timber harvesting systems. West J Appl For 15(1):27–33
Hänninen H, Ripatti P (2007) Uudet metsänomistajat (New forest owners). TTS Tutkimuksen Tiedote, Luonnonvara-ala: Metsä 1/2007 (707)
Hänninen H, Karppinen H, Leppänen J (2011) Suomalainen metsänomistaja 2010 (Finnish forest owner 2010). Working papers of the Finnish Forest Research Institute 208
Häyrinen L, Mattila O, Berghäll S, Toppinen A (2014) Changing objectives of non-industrial private forest ownership: a confirmatory approach to measurement model testing. Can J For Res 44(4):290–300
Häyrinen L, Mattila O, Berghäll S, Toppinen A (2015) Forest owners’ socio-demographic characteristics as predictors of customer value: evidence from Finland. Small-Scale For 14(1):19–37
Häyrinen L, Mattila O, Berghäll S, Närhi M, Toppinen A (2017) Exploring the future use of forests: perceptions from non-industrial private forest owners in Finland. Scand J For Res 32(4):327–337
Hujala T, Tikkanen J (2008) Boosters of and barriers to smooth communication in family forest owners’ decision making. Scand J For Res 23(5):466–477
Hujala T, Tikkanen J, Hänninen H, Virkkula O (2009) Family forest owners’ perception of decision support. Scand J For Res 24(5):448–460
Hujala T, Kurttila M, Karppinen H (2013) Customer segments among family forest owners: combining ownership objectives and decision-making styles. Small-Scale For 12(3):335–351
Hwang K, Han H-S, Marshall SE, Page-Dumroese DS (2018) Amount and location of damage to residual trees from cut-to-length thinning operations in a young redwood forest in Northern California. Forests 9(6):352
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) (2018) Summary for policymakers. In: Masson-Delmotte V, Zhai P, Pörtner HO, Roberts D, Skea J, Shukla PR, Pirani A, Moufouma-Okia W, Péan C, Pidcock R, Connors S, Matthews JBR, Chen Y, Zhou X, Gomis MI, Lonnoy E, Maycock T, Tignor M, Waterfield T (eds) Global warming of 1.5 °C. An IPCC special report on the impacts of global warming of 1.5 °C above pre-industrial levels and related global greenhouse gas emission pathways, in the context of strengthening the global response to the threat of climate change, sustainable development, and efforts to eradicate poverty. World Meteorological Organization, Geneva
Kaplowitz MD, Hadlock TD, Levine R (2004) A comparison of web and mail survey response rates. Public Opin Q 68(1):94–101
Kärhä K, Oinas S (1998) Satisfaction and company loyalty as expressed by non-industrial private forest owners towards timber procurement organizations in Finland. Silva Fenn 32(1):27–42
Kärhä K, Tammiruusu V (2003) Metsänomistajien puukauppatyytyväisyys ja siitä viestiminen (Customer satisfaction and word-of-mouth communication of Finnish forest owners in their timber-sales transactions). Metsätieteen aikakauskirja 4(2003):465–486
Karppinen H (2012) New forest owners and owners-to-be: apples and oranges? Small-Scale For 11(1):15–26
Karppinen H, Ahlberg M (2008) Metsänomistajakunnan rakenne 2020: yleiseen väestönmuutokseen perustuvat ennustemallit (Finnish forest ownership structure 2020: predictive models based on the general population change). Metsätieteen aikakauskirja 1:17–32
Karppinen H, Hänninen H (2006) Monitoring Finnish family forestry. For Chron 82(5):657–661
Karppinen H, Hänninen H, Ripatti P (2002) Suomalainen metsänomistaja 2000 (Finnish forest owner 2000). Finnish Forest Research Institute, Research Papers 852
Kendra A, Hull RB (2005) Motivations and behaviors of new forest owners in Virginia. For Sci 51(2):142–154
Korhonen K, Hujala T, Kurttila M (2012) Reaching forest owners through their social networks in timber sales. Scand J For Res 27(1):88–99
Korhonen KT, Ihalainen A, Ahola A, Heikkinen J, Henttonen HM, Hotanen J-P, Nevalainen S, Pitkänen J, Strandström M, Viiri H (2017) Suomen metsät 2009–2013 ja niiden kehitys 1921–2013 (Finnish forests 2009–2013 and their development in 1921–2013). Natural Resources Institute Finland, Natural resources and bioeconomy studies 59/2017
Kwak N, Radler B (2002) A comparison between mail and web surveys: response pattern, respondent profile, and data quality. J Off Stat 18(2):257–273
Leivo J, Partanen J, Nousiainen M, Junttila R, Kuoppala H, Partamies M, Pirkonen J (2018) Suomen metsäkeskuksen maastotarkastusohje (Field audit manual by Finnish Forest Centre). Finnish Forest Centre, Handout. https://www.metsakeskus.fi/sites/default/files/maastotarkastusohje.pdf. Accessed 6 Dec 2018
Leppänen J (2010) Finnish family forest owner 2010 survey. In: Helles F, Steen Nielsen P (eds) Proceedings of the biennial meeting of the Scandinavian Society of Forest Economics, Gilleleje, Denmark, 19–22 May 2010, Scandinavian Forest Economics, vol 43, pp 184–195
Leppänen J, Torvelainen J (2015) Metsämaan omistus 2013 (Ownership of productive forest land area in Finland, 2013). Natural Resources Institute Finland, Natural resources and bioeconomy studies 5/2015
Lönnstedt L (1997) Non-industrial private forest owners’ decision process: a qualitative study about goals, time perspective, opportunities and alternatives. Scand J For Res 12(3):302–310
Majumdar I, Teeter L, Butler B (2008) Characterizing family forest owners: a cluster analysis approach. For Sci 54(2):176–184
Mäkinen H, Hallaksela A-M, Isomäki A (2007) Increment and decay in Norway spruce and Scots pine after artificial logging damage. Can J For Res 37(11):2130–2141
Mäki-Simola E, Torvelainen J (2018) Roundwood removals and drain. In: Vaahtera E, Aarne M, Ihalainen A, Mäki-Simola E, Peltola A, Torvelainen J, Uotila E, Ylitalo E (eds) Finnish forest statistics. Official Statistics of Finland: Natural Resources Institute Finland, Helsinki, pp 81–92
Marchi E, Picchio R, Spinelli R, Verani S, Venanzi R, Certini G (2014) Environmental impact assessment of different logging methods in pine forests thinning. Ecol Eng 70:429–436
Mattila O, Toppinen A, Tervo M, Berghäll S (2013) Non-industrial private forestry service markets in flux: results from a qualitative analysis on Finland. Small-Scale For 12(4):559–578
Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry (2015) National Forest Strategy 2025. Government resolution of 12 February 2015. Publications of the Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry 6b/2015
Nordlund A, Westin K (2011) Forest values and forest management attitudes among private forest owners in Sweden. Forests 2(1):30–50
Official Statistics of Finland (2018) Väestön tieto- ja viestintätekniikan käyttö 2018 (Utilization of information and communication technology by the Finnish population in 2018). Official Statistics of Finland: Science, Technology and Information Society 2018. https://www.stat.fi/til/sutivi/2018/sutivi_2018_2018-12-04_fi.pdf. Accessed 10 July 2019
Ovaskainen H (ed) (2019) Kohti automaattista puunkorjuun laadun mittaamista (Towards automatic quality measurement in wood harvesting). Metsätehon Raportti 251
Palander T, Ovaskainen H, Tikkanen L (2009) Profiles of private forest owners and the importance of landscape-scale management in the timber trade process of Finnish wood procurement. Forestry 82(2):227–239
Palander T, Eronen J, Kärhä K, Ovaskainen H (2018) Development of a wood damage monitoring system for mechanized harvesting. Ann For Res 61(2):1–16
Palander TS, Eronen JP, Peltoniemi NP, Aarnio AI, Kärhä K, Ovaskainen HK (2019) Improving a stem-damage monitoring system for a single-grip harvester using a logistic regression model in image processing. Biosyst Eng 180:36–49
Peltola A (2018) Silviculture. In: Vaahtera E, Aarne M, Ihalainen A, Mäki-Simola E, Peltola A, Torvelainen J, Uotila E, Ylitalo E (eds) Finnish forest statistics. Official Statistics of Finland: Natural Resources Institute Finland, Helsinki, pp 49–66
Picchio R, Neri F, Maesano M, Savelli S, Sirna A, Blasi S, Baldini S, Marchi E (2011) Growth effects of thinning damage in a Corsican pine (Pinus laricio Poiret) stand in central Italy. For Ecol Manag 262(2):237–243
Picchio R, Tavankar F, Bonyad A, Mederski PS, Venanzi R, Nikooy M (2019) Detailed analysis of residual stand damage due to winching on steep terrains. Small-Scale For 18:255–277
Pöyry Management Consulting (2016) Suomen metsäteollisuus 2015–2035 (Finnish forest industries in 2015–2035). Loppuraportti (X304203) työ- ja elinkeinoministeriölle 19.1.2016. https://tem.fi/documents/1410877/2772829/P%C3%B6yry_Suomen+mets%C3%A4teollisuus+2015-2035.pdf/ac9395f8-8aea-4180-9642-c917e8c23ab2. Accessed 6 Dec 2018
Rämö A-K, Toivonen R (2007) Metsä- ja puukauppapalveluiden laatu ja sen ulottuvuudet metsänomistajien näkökulmasta (Quality factors and dimensions of services on forestry and wood transactions—forest owners’ view). Pellervo Economic Research Institute, Reports 203
Rämö A-K, Mäkijärvi L, Toivonen R, Horne P (2009) Suomalaisen metsänomistajan profiili vuonna 2030 (Finnish forest owners’ profile in 2030). Pellervo Economic Research Institute, Reports 221
Sirén M (2001) Tree damage in single-grip harvester thinning operations. Int J For Eng 12(1):29–38
Staal Wästerlund D, Kronholm T (2014) Market analysis of the harvesting services engaged by private forest owners in Sweden. In: Roos A, Lönnstedt L, Nord T, Gong P, Stendahl M (eds) Proceedings of the biennial meeting of the Scandinavian Society of Forest Economics, Uppsala, Sweden, 22–24 May 2014, Scandinavian Forest Economics, vol 45, pp 111–119
Vaahtera E, Ihalainen A (2018) Forest resources. In: Vaahtera E, Aarne M, Ihalainen A, Mäki-Simola E, Peltola A, Torvelainen J, Uotila E, Ylitalo E (eds) Finnish forest statistics. Official Statistics of Finland: Natural Resources Institute Finland, Helsinki, pp 15–32
Vasiliauskas R (2001) Damage to trees due to forestry operations and its pathological significance in temperate forests: a literature review. Forestry 74(4):319–336
Ylitalo E (2018) Forest industries’ wood consumption. In: Vaahtera E, Aarne M, Ihalainen A, Mäki-Simola E, Peltola A, Torvelainen J, Uotila E, Ylitalo E (eds) Finnish forest statistics. Official Statistics of Finland: Natural Resources Institute Finland, Helsinki, pp 115–122
Young RR (2004) The requirements engineering handbook. Artech House Technology management and professional development library. Artech House, Boston
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kärhä, K., Eronen, J., Palander, T. et al. Information Needs of Non-industrial Private Forest Owners After Logging Operations in Finland: A Case Study. Small-scale Forestry 19, 205–230 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11842-019-09431-7
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11842-019-09431-7