Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Implementing Schwartz Rounds in an Irish maternity hospital

  • Brief Report
  • Published:
Irish Journal of Medical Science (1971 -) Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Working in maternity hospital is usually a rewarding experience for staff. However, it can also be stressful and emotionally difficult work. Schwartz Rounds are a multidisciplinary forum which provides staff with an opportunity to reflect on the emotional impact of their work and support each other.

Aims

This paper will discuss the implementation of Schwartz Rounds in a maternity hospital and gives details of a pilot study to evaluate the initiative.

Methods

Schwartz Rounds were commenced in the hospital in September 2019, and an evaluation is in progress. A pilot study which evaluated 2 rounds has been completed. Staff who attended Schwartz Rounds were asked to complete an anonymous feedback form immediately following the Round. The data from feedback forms were analysed using descriptive statistics.

Results

Seventy-eight members of staff from almost all departments attended the rounds. Feedback forms were completed by 55 members of staff. Overall, the rounds were very positively evaluated by those who participated in the study.

Conclusions

Schwartz Rounds are an effective way to support staff working in a maternity hospital.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Hayes B, Walsh G and Prihodova L (2017) National study of wellbeing of hospital doctors in Ireland. Royal College of Physicians Ireland. Available online: https://rcpi-live-cdn.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/Wellbeing-Report-web.pdf

  2. O’Connor O, Lydon S, O’Dea A et al (2017) Longitudinal and multicentre study of burnout and error in Irish junior doctors. Postgrad Med J 93(1105):660–664 Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28600343

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Maben J, Taylor C, Dawson J et al (2018) A realist informed mixed-methods evaluation of Schwartz Center Rounds® in England. Health Services and Delivery Research 6(37):2050–4349. https://doi.org/10.3310/hsdr06370

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Goodrich J, Cornwell J (2018) The contribution of Schwartz Centre Rounds to hospital culture. Available online https://www.kingsfund.org.uk/sites/default/files/field/field_publication_file/contribution-schwartz-center-rounds-goodrich-cornwell-may12.pdf. Accessed March 2020

  5. Dixon-Woods M, Baker R, Charles K et al (2014) Culture of behaviour in the English National Health Service: overview of lessons from a large multi method study. BMj Qual Saf 23:106–115. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2013-002471

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Lowe G (2012) How employee engagement matters for hospital performance. Healthcare Quarterly (Toronto, Ont.) 15(2). https://doi.org/10.12927/hcq.2012.22915

  7. Lown BA, Manning CF (2010) (2010) The Schwartz Center Rounds: evaluation of an interdisciplinary approach to enhancing patient-centered communication, teamwork, and provider support. Acad Med 85(6):1073–1081. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181dbf741

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Reed E, Cullen A, Gannon C, Knight A, Todd J (2015) Use of Schwartz Centre Rounds in a UK hospice: findings from a longitudinal evaluation. Journal of inter professional care 29(4):365–366. https://doi.org/10.3109/13561820.2014.983594

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Goodrich J (2012) Supporting hospital staff to provide compassionate care: do Schwartz Center Rounds work in English hospitals? Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine 105(3):117–122. https://doi.org/10.1258/jrsm.2011.110183

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Brady V, May P, Lombard-Vance R, Hynes G, Corry M (2019) Evaluation of the introduction of Schwartz Rounds in Ireland. Health Services Executive, Dublin

    Google Scholar 

  11. Silke A, Rushe H, Keating K et al (2019) Caring for caregivers: an evaluation of Schwartz Rounds in a paediatric setting. IMJ. 112(6):951

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sarah Cullen.

Ethics declarations

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Conflict of interest

The author declares that she has no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

Ethical approval was granted for this project.

Informed consent

Participation in the study was completely voluntary and informed consent was received.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cullen, S. Implementing Schwartz Rounds in an Irish maternity hospital. Ir J Med Sci 190, 205–208 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11845-020-02268-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11845-020-02268-6

Keywords

Navigation