Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

A Systematic Literature Review of US Engineering Ethics Interventions

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Science and Engineering Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Promoting the ethical formation of engineering students through the cultivation of their discipline-specific knowledge, sensitivity, imagination, and reasoning skills has become a goal for many engineering education programs throughout the United States. However, there is neither a consensus throughout the engineering education community regarding which strategies are most effective towards which ends, nor which ends are most important. This study provides an overview of engineering ethics interventions within the U.S. through the systematic analysis of articles that featured ethical interventions in engineering, published in select peer-reviewed journals, and published between 2000 and 2015. As a core criterion, each journal article reviewed must have provided an overview of the course as well as how the authors evaluated course-learning goals. In sum, 26 articles were analyzed with a coding scheme that included 56 binary items. The results indicate that the most common methods for integrating ethics into engineering involved exposing students to codes/standards, utilizing case studies, and discussion activities. Nearly half of the articles had students engage with ethical heuristics or philosophical ethics. Following the presentation of the results, this study describes in detail four articles to highlight less common but intriguing pedagogical methods and evaluation techniques. The findings indicate that there is limited empirical work on ethics education within engineering across the United States. Furthermore, due to the large variation in goals, approaches, and evaluation methods described across interventions, this study does not detail “best” practices for integrating ethics into engineering. The science and engineering education community should continue exploring the relative merits of different approaches to ethics education in engineering.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abaté, C. (2011). Should engineering ethics be taught? Science and Engineering Ethics, 17(3), 583–596.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ABET. (2016). Rationale for revising criteria 3. Retrieved March 7, 2017 from http://www.abet.org/accreditation/accreditation-criteria/accreditation-alerts/rationale-for-revising-criteria-3/.

  • Alfred, M., & Chung, C. A. (2012). Design, development, and evaluation of a second generation interactive simulator for engineering ethics dducation (SEEE2). Science and Engineering Ethics, 18(4), 689–697.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baillie, C., & Douglas, E. P. (2014). Confusions and conventions: Qualitative research in engineering education. Journal of Engineering Education, 103(1), 1–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barry, B. E., & Ohland, M. W. (2012). ABET Criterion 3.f: How much curriculum content is enough? Science and Engineering Ethics, 18(2), 369–392.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beever, J., & Brightman, A. O. (2016). Reflexive principlism as an effective approach for developing ethical reasoning in engineering. Science and Engineering Ethics, 22(1), 275–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benzley, S. E. (2006). The small helm project: An academic activity addressing international corruption for undergraduate civil engineering and construction management students. Science and Engineering Ethics, 12(2), 355–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bero, K., & Kuhlman, A. (2011). Teaching ethics to engineers: Ethical decision making parallels the engineering design process. Science and Engineering Ethics, 17(3), 597–605.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berry, R. M., Borenstein, J., & Butera, R. J. (2013). Contentious problems in bioscience and biotechnology: A pilot study of an approach to ethics education. Science and Engineering Ethics, 19(2), 653–668.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Billington, D. P. (2006). Teaching ethics in engineering education through historical analysis. Science and Engineering Ethics, 12(2), 205–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borenstein, J., Drake, M. J., Kirkman, R., & Swann, J. L. (2010). The Engineering and Science Issues Test (ESIT): A discipline-specific approach to assessing moral judgment. Science and Engineering Ethics, 16(2), 387–407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borrego, M., Foster, M. J., & Froyd, J. E. (2014). Systematic literature reviews in engineering education and other developing interdisciplinary fields. Journal of Engineering Education, 103(1), 45–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boss, J. A. (1994). The effect of community service work on the moral development of college ethics students. Journal of Moral Education, 23(2), 183–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brummel, B. J., Gunsalus, C. K., Anderson, K. L., & Loui, M. C. (2010). Development of role-play scenarios for teaching responsible conduct of research. Science and Engineering Ethics, 16(3), 573–589.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bucciarelli, L. L. (2008). Ethics and engineering education. European Journal of Engineering Education, 33(2), 141–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Canary, H. E., & Herkert, J. R. (2013). Assessing ethics education in programs and centers: Challenges and strategies. In F. F. Benya, C. H. Fletcher, & R. D. Hollander (Eds.), Practical guidance on science and engineering ethics education for instructors and administrators: Papers and summary from a workshop December 12, 2012. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cao, G. H. (2015). Comparison of China-US engineering ethics educations in Sino-Western philosophies of technology. Science and Engineering Ethics, 21(6), 1609–1635.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Catalano, G. D. (2004). Senior capstone design and ethics: A bridge to the professional world. Science and Engineering Ethics, 10(2), 409–415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chung, C. A. (2015). Comparison of cross culture engineering ethics training using the simulator for engineering ethics education. Science and Engineering Ethics, 21(2), 471–478.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chung, C. A., & Alfred, M. (2009). Design, development, and evaluation of an interactive simulator for engineering ethics education (SEEE). Science and Engineering Ethics, 15(2), 189–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colby, A., & Sullivan, W. M. (2008). Ethics teaching in undergraduate engineering education. Journal of Engineering Education, 97(3), 327–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conlon, E., & Zandvoort, H. (2011). Broadening ethics teaching in engineering: Beyond the individualistic approach. Science and Engineering Ethics, 17(2), 217–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cruz, J. A., & Frey, W. J. (2003). An effective strategy for integrating ethics across the curriculum in engineering: An ABET 2000 challenge. Science and Engineering Ethics, 9(4), 543–568.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cruz, J. A., Frey, W. J., & Sanchez, H. D. (2004). The Ethics Bowl in engineering ethics at the University of Puerto Rico-Mayagüez. Teaching Ethics, 4(2), 15–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, M. (1991). Thinking like an engineer: The place of a code of ethics in the practice of a profession. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 20(2) 150–167.

  • Davis, M. (2006a). Engineering ethics, individuals, and organizations. Science and Engineering Ethics, 12(2), 223–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, M. (2006b). Integrating ethics into technical courses: Micro-insertion. Science and Engineering Ethics, 12(4), 717–730.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, M., & Feinerman, A. (2012). Assessing graduate student progress in engineering ethics. Science and Engineering Ethics, 18(2), 351–367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, M., & Riley, K. (2008). Ethics across the graduate engineering curriculum: An experiment in teaching and assessment. Teaching Ethics, 9(1), 25–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Devon, R., & van de Poel, I. (2004). Design ethics: The social ethics paradigm. International Journal of Engineering Education, 20(3), 461–469.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doorn, N. (2012). Responsibility ascriptions in technology development and engineering: Three perspectives. Science and Engineering Ethics, 18(1), 69–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Downey, G. L., Lucena, J. C., & Mitcham, C. (2007). Engineering ethics and identity: Emerging initiatives in comparative perspective. Science and Engineering Ethics, 13(4), 463–487.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drake, M. J., Griffin, P. M., Kirkman, R., & Swann, J. L. (2005). Engineering ethical curricula: Assessment and comparison of two approaches. Journal of Engineering Education, 94(2), 223–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ermer, G. E. (2004). Using case studies to teach engineering ethics and professionalism. Teaching Ethics, 4(2), 33–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eyler, J., Giles Jr., D. E., Stenson, C. M., & Gray, C. J. (2001). At a glance: What we know about the effects of service-learning on college students, faculty, institutions and communities, 1993–2000: Third Edition. Higher Education.

  • Feldhaus, C. R., & Fox, P. L. (2004). Effectiveness of an ethics course delivered in traditional and non-traditional formats. Science and Engineering Ethics, 10(2), 389–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fleddermann, C. B. (2011). Engineering ethics (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleischmann, S. T. (2004). Essential ethics—Embedding ethics into an engineering curriculum. Science and Engineering Ethics, 10(2), 369–381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Furco, A., & Root, S. (2010). Research demonstrates the value of service learning. Phi Delta Kappan, 91(5), 16–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garcia, O. N., Varanasi, M. R., Acevedo, M. F., & Guturu, P. (2011). An innovative project and design oriented electrical engineering curriculum at the University of North Texas. Advances in Engineering Education, 2(4), 1–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilligan, C. (1982). In a different voice: Pyschological theory and women’s development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gorman, M., Duffy, J., & Heffernan, M. (1994). Service experience and the moral development of college students. Religious Education, 89(3), 422–431.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gorman, M., Hertz, M., Garrick, L., Magpili, L., Mauss, M., Mehalik, M., & Tuttle, J. B. (2000). Integrating ethics & engineering: A graduate option in systems engineering, ethics, and technology studies. Journal of Engineering Education, 89(4), 461–469.

  • Graber, G. C., & Pionke, C. D. (2006). A team-taught interdisciplinary approach to engineering ethics. Science and Engineering Ethics, 12(2), 313–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, A. (2015). Foundations for value education in engineering: The Indian experience. Science and Engineering Ethics, 21(2), 479–504.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haase, S. (2013). An engineering dilemma: Sustainability in the eyes of future technology professionals. Science and Engineering Ethics, 19(3), 893–911.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, K. D. (2004). Student development and ownership of ethical and professional standards. Science and Engineering Ethics, 10(2), 383–387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, C. E. (2008). The good engineer: Giving virtue its due in engineering ethics. Science and Engineering Ethics, 14(2), 153–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, C. E., Davis, M., Pritchard, M. S., & Rabins, M. J. (1996). Engineering ethics: What? why? how? and when? Journal of Engineering Education, 85, 93–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hashemian, G., & Loui, M. C. (2010). Can instruction in engineering ethics change students’ feelings about professional responsibility? Science and Engineering Ethics, 16(1), 201–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haws, D. R. (2001). Ethics instruction in engineering education: A (mini) meta-analysis. Journal of Engineering Education, 90(2), 223–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haws, D. R. (2004). The importance of meta-ethics in engineering education. Science and Engineering Ethics, 10(2), 204–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haws, D. R. (2006). Engineering the just war: Examination of an approach to teaching engineering ethics. Science and Engineering Ethics, 12(2), 365–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herkert, J. R. (2000). Engineering ethics education in the USA: Content, pedagogy and curriculum. European Journal of Engineering Education, 25(4), 303–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herkert, J. R. (2005). Ways of thinking about and teaching ethical problem solving: Microethics and macroethics in engineering. Science and Engineering Ethics, 11(3), 373–385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herkert, J. R., Benya, F., Ellison, K., Hollander, R. D., Laas, K., & Raghavan, S. L. (2015). The Online Resource Center for ethics education in engineering and science. Paper presented at the 122nd ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Seattle, WA.

  • Hess, J. L., Strobel, J., & Pan, R. (2016). Voices from the workplace: Practitioners’ perspectives on the role of empathy and care within engineering. Engineering Studies, 8(3), 212–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirsch, P. L., Linsenmeier, J. A. W., Smith, H. D., & Walker, J. M. T. (2005). Enhancing core competency learning in an integrated summer research experience for bioengineers. Journal of Engineering Education, 94(4), 391–401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffmann, M., & Borenstein, J. (2014). Understanding ill-structured engineering ethics problems through a collaborative learning and argument visualization approach. Science and Engineering Ethics, 20(1), 261–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holsapple, M. A., Sutkus, J., Carpenter, D. D., Finelli, C. J., Burt, B. A., Ra, E., Harding, T. S., & Bielby, R. M. (2011). We can’t get no satisfaction!: The relationship between students’ ethical reasoning and their satisfaction with engineering ethics education. Paper presented at the American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference, Vancouver, B.C.

  • Huff, C., & Frey, W. (2005). Moral pedagogy and practical ethics. Science and Engineering Ethics, 11(3), 389–408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jesson, J., Matheson, L., & Lacey, F. M. (2011). Doing your literature review: Traditional and systematic techniques. London: SAGE Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jonassen, D. H., & Cho, Y. H. (2011). Fostering argumentation while solving engineering ethics problems. Journal of Engineering Education, 100(4), 680–702.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jonassen, D. H., Shen, D., Marra, R. M., Cho, Y. H., Lo, J. L., & Lohani, V. K. (2009). Engaging and supporting problem solving in engineering ethics. Journal of Engineering Education, 98(3), 235–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keefer, M. W., Wilson, S. E., Dankowicz, H., & Loui, M. C. (2014). The importance of formative assessment in science and engineering ethics education: Some evidence and practical advice. Science and Engineering Ethics, 20(1), 249–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kisselburgh, L., Hess, J. L., Zoltowski, C. B., Beever, J., & Brightman, A. O. (2016). Assessing a scaffolded, interactive, and reflective analysis framework for developing ethical reasoning in engineering students. Paper presented at the American Society for Engineering Education, New Orleans, LA.

  • Kligyte, V., Marcy, R. T., Waples, E. P., Sevier, S. T., Godfrey, E. S., Mumford, M. D., & Hougen, D. F. (2008). Application of a sensemaking approach to ethics training in the physical sciences and engineering. Science and Engineering Ethics, 14(2), 251–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krippendorff, K. (2012). Content analysis. In E. Barnouw, G. Gerbner, W. Schramm, T. L. Worth, & L. Gross (Eds.), International encyclopedia of communications (Vol. 1, pp. 403–407). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lambek, Michael. (2010). Ordinary ethics: Anthropology, language, and action. New York, NY: Fordham University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lambek, M., Das, V., Fassin, D., & Keane, W. (2015). Four lectures on ethics: Anthropological perspectives. Chicago, IL: HAU.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lau, A. S. (2004). Teaching engineering ethics to first-year college students. Science and Engineering Ethics, 10(2), 359–368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd, P., & Busby, J. (2003). “Things that went well—No serious injuries or deaths”: Ethical reasoning in a normal engineering design process. Science and Engineering Ethics, 9(4), 503–516.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lohani, V. K., Wolfe, M. L., Wildman, T., Mallikarjunan, K., & Connor, J. (2011). Reformulating general engineering and biological systems engineering programs at Virginia Tech. Advances in Engineering Education, 2(4), 1–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loui, M. C. (2005). Ethics and the development of professional identities of engineering students. Journal of Engineering Education, 94(4), 383–390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loui, M. C. (2006). Assessment of an engineering ethics video: Incident at Morales. Journal of Engineering Education, 95(1), 85–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, T., Rayne, K., Kemp, N. J., Hart, J., & Diller, K. R. (2005). Teaching for adaptive expertise in biomedical engineering ethics. Science and Engineering Ethics, 11(2), 257–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mikic, B., & Grasso, D. (2002). Socially-relevant design: The TOYtech project at Smith College. Journal of Engineering Education, 91(3), 319–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Monk, J. (2009). Ethics, engineers and drama. Science and Engineering Ethics, 15(1), 111–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore, C., Hart, H., Randall, D., & Nichols, S. P. (2006). PRiME: Integrating professional responsibility into the engineering curriculum. Science and Engineering Ethics, 12(2), 273–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Academy of Engineering. (2004). The Engineer of 2020: Visions of engineering in the new century. Washington DC: National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Academy of Engineering. (2009). Engineering in K-12 education: Understanding the status and improving the prosects. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Academy of Engineering. (2016). Infusing ethics into the development of engineers: Exemplary education activities and programs. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Society of Professional Engineers. (2017). NSPE Code of Ethics for Engineers. Retrieved March 7, 2017 from http://www.nspe.org/Ethics/CodeofEthics/index.html.

  • Newberry, B. (2004). The dilemma of ethics in engineering education. Science and Engineering Ethics, 10(2), 343–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newberry, B. (2010). Katrina: Macro-ethical issues for engineers. Science and Engineering Ethics, 16(3), 535–571.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newberry, B., Austin, K., Lawson, W., Gorsuch, G., & Darwin, T. (2011). Acclimating international graduate students to professional engineering ethics. Science and Engineering Ethics, 17(1), 171–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pantazidou, M., & Nair, I. (1999). Ethic of care: Guiding principles for engineering teaching and practice. Journal of Engineering Education, 88(2), 205–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pappas, E. C., Kampe, S. L., Hendricks, R. W., & Kander, R. G. (2004). An assessment analysis methodology and its application to an advanced engineering communications program. Journal of Engineering Education, 93(3), 233–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Passino, K. M. (2009). Educating the humanitarian engineering. Science and Engineering Ethics, 15(4), 577–600.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pimmel, R. (2001). Cooperative learning instructional activities in a capstone design course. Journal of Engineering Education, 90(3), 413–421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prince, R. (2006). Teaching engineering ethics using role-playing in a culturally diverse student group. Science and Engineering Ethics, 12(2), 321–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rayne, K., Martin, T., Brophy, S., Kemp, N. J., Hart, J. D., & Diller, K. R. (2006). The development of adaptive expertise in biomedical engineering ethics. Journal of Engineering Education, 95(2), 165–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rest, J. R., Bebeau, M. J., & Thoma, S. J. (2014). Postconventional moral thinking: A neo-Kohlbergian approach. Mahwah, NJ: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rest, J. R., Narvaez, D., Thoma, S. J., & Bebeau, M. J. (1999). DIT2: Devising and testing a revised instrument of moral judgment. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91(4), 644–659.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rest, J. R., Narvaez, D., Thoma, S. J., & Bebeau, M. J. (2000). A neo-Kohlbergian approach to morality research. Journal of Moral Education, 29(4), 381–395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riley, D. (2013). Hidden in plain view: Feminists doing engineering ethics, engineers doing feminist ethics. Science and Engineering Ethics, 19(1), 189–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Safferman, S. I., Zoghi, M., & Farhey, D. N. (2001). First year civil and environmental engineering design experience. Journal of Engineering Education, 90(4), 645–651.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Santi, P. M. (2000). Ethics exercises for civil, environmental and geological engineers. Journal of Engineering Education, 89(2), 151–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Segall, A. E. (2002). Science fiction in the engineering classroom to help teach basic concepts and promote the profession. Journal of Engineering Education, 91(4), 419–423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sevier, C., Chyung, S. Y., Callahan, J., & Schrader, C. (2012). What value does service learning have on introductory engineering students’ motivation and ABET program outcomes? Journal of STEM Education, 13(4), 55–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spier, R., & Bird, S. J. (2007). Science and Engineering Ethics at Springer. Science and Engineering Ethics, 13(1), 1–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spier, R., & Bird, S. J. (2014). Science and Engineering Ethics enters its third decade. Science and Engineering Ethics, 20(1), 1–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steele, L., Johnson, J., Watts, L., MacDougall, A., Mumford, M., Connelly, S., & Williams, T. H. L. (2016). A comparison of the effects of ethics training on international and US students. Science and Engineering Ethics, 22(4), 1217–1244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steinberg, K. S., Hatcher, J. A., & Bringle, R. G. (2011). Civic-minded graduate: A north star. Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning, 18(1), 19–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Streveler, R. A., Smith, K. A., & Pilotte, M. (2012). Aligning course content, assessment, and delivery: Creating a context for outcome-based education. In K. M. Yusof, S. Mohammad, N. A. Azli, M. N. Hassan, A. Kosnin & S. Yusof (Eds.), Outcome-based education and engineering curriculum: Evaluation, assessment and accreditation. Hershey, PA: IGI Global.

  • Strobel, J., Hess, J. L., Pan, R. C., & Wachter Morris, C. A. (2013). Empathy and care within engineering: Qualitative perspectives from engineering faculty and practicing engineers. Engineering Studies, 5(3), 137–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sunderland, M. E. (2014). Taking emotion seriously: Meeting students where they are. Science and Engineering Ethics, 20(1), 183–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verharen, C., Tharakan, J., Middendorf, G., Castro-Sitiriche, M., & Kadoda, G. (2013). Introducing survival ethics into engineering education and practice. Science and Engineering Ethics, 19(2), 599–623.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walther, J., Miller, S., & Sochacka, N. W. (2017). A model of empathy in engineering as a core skill, practice orientation, and professional way of being. Journal of Engineering Education, 106(1), 123–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, W. R. (2013). Using the Chernobyl incident to teach engineering ethics. Science and Engineering Ethics, 19(2), 625–640.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wittig, A. (2013). Implementing problem based learning through Engineers Without Borders student projects. Advances in Engineering Education, 3(4), 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yadav, A., & Barry, B. E. (2009). Using case-based instruction to increase ethical understanding in engineering: What do we know? What do we need? International Journal of Engineering Education, 25(1), 138–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zoltowski, C. B., Oakes, W. C., & Cardella, M. E. (2012). Students’ ways of experiencing human-centered design. Journal of Engineering Education, 101(1), 28–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. STEM Education Innovation and Research Institute, Indiana University Purdue University Indianapolis, Indianapolis, IN, USA

    Justin L. Hess & Grant Fore

  2. Department of Anthropology, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, Western Cape, South Africa

    Grant Fore

Authors
  1. Justin L. Hess
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Grant Fore
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Justin L. Hess.

Appendix

Appendix

See Table 10.

Table 10 List of coded literature
Full size table

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hess, J.L., Fore, G. A Systematic Literature Review of US Engineering Ethics Interventions. Sci Eng Ethics 24, 551–583 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-017-9910-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-017-9910-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation