Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Tit for tat—Europe’s revenge for the Canadian and US-American PNR systems? The envisaged European model of analyzing flight passenger data

  • Article
  • Published:
ERA Forum Aims and scope

Abstract

After 9/11 the United States of America as well as other countries discovered the collection and evaluation of flight passenger data, so called passenger name records (PNR), as a new tool to track terrorists and other criminals. The use of the PNR was meant to help to identify potential terrorists before they reach American territory. Despite being criticized for fundamental rights violations, the EU is on the threshold of imitating the American PNR system. This paper analyses the current state of play of the proposed EU-PNR system by taking into account its scope and its compliance with basic European data protection rules.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Brouwer, E.: Towards a European PNR system? Questions on the added value and the protection of fundamental rights. Study requested by the European Parliament’s Committee on civil liberties, justice and home affairs (LIBE) (2008)

  2. De Hert, P., Bellanova, R.: Data protection from a transatlantic perspective: the EU and US move towards an international data protection agreement? Study requested by the European Parliament’s Committee on civil liberties, justice and home affairs (LIBE) (2008)

  3. Mendez, M.: Passenger name record agreement, European court of justice. Eur. Const. Law Rev. 3, 127–147 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Papakonstantinou, V., de Hert, P.: The PNR Agreement and Transatlantic anti-terrorism cooperation: no firm human rights framework on either side of the Atlantic. Common Mark. Law Rev. 46(3), 885–919 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Pawlak, P.: Made in USA? The influence of the US on the EU’s data protection regime, publication of the Centre of European Policy Studies, Liberty and Security in Europe, Justice and Home Affairs section (2009)

  6. Peers, S.: The Third Pillar acquis after the Treaty of Lisbon enters into force. Statewatch analysis. Available at http://www.statewatch.org/analyses/86-third-pillar-acquis-post-lisbon.pdf (2009)

  7. Simitis, S.: Der EuGH und die Vorratsdatenspeicherung oder die verfehlte Kehrtwende bei der Kompetenzregelung. Neue Jurist. Wochenzeitschr. 25, 782–1786 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculté de Droit, d’Economie et de Finance, Université du Luxembourg, Campus Limpertsberg, 148 av. de la Faïencerie, 1511, Luxembourg, Luxembourg

    Franziska Boehm

Authors
  1. Franziska Boehm
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Franziska Boehm.

Additional information

Franziska Boehm is a research assistant at the University of Luxembourg where she is also preparing her PhD thesis.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Boehm, F. Tit for tat—Europe’s revenge for the Canadian and US-American PNR systems? The envisaged European model of analyzing flight passenger data. ERA Forum 11, 251–261 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12027-010-0159-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12027-010-0159-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation