Skip to main content
Log in

A hybrid physics-assisted machine-learning-based damage detection using Lamb wave

  • Published:
Sādhanā Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This research presents a hybrid physics-aided multi-layer feed forward neural network (MLFFNN) model to improve damage detection under Lamb wave responses. Here, a damage parameter database (DPD) is created from the complex responses of a thin aluminum plate generated using finite-element (FE) simulations. A double pulse-echo transducer configuration is implemented over the 1.6 mm thick aluminum plate with notch-like defect, which generates only A\(_{0}\) mode in the plate structure and records damage-specific S\(_{0}\) mode. Sixty-six FE simulations are conducted, each representing a distinct damage scenario in terms of damage location and Lamb wave frequency. Artificial noise is added to compensate environmental interference. Orthogonal matching pursuit was performed to improve the sparsity of the signal. Thereafter, the damage-specific features are extracted from the sparsed S\(_{0}\) signal to construct DPD for all 66 FE simulations. The fully developed DPD is deployed to train an MLFFNN supervised by a robust Levenberg–Marquardt algorithm. A set of initial tests are conducted for higher damage-depth to plate-thickness ratio with 1.0 mm notch depth, and the fully trained MLFFNN predicts the damage location with 99.94% accuracy. The proposed algorithm achieves a good level of generalization, including the cases of overlapping echoes and cluttered responses due to multiple reflections for the given damage scenarios.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8
Figure 9
Figure 10
Figure 11
Figure 12
Figure 13
Figure 14
Figure 15
Figure 16
Figure 17

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Zhang G M, Zhang C Z and Harvey D M 2012 Sparse signal representation and its application in ultrasonic NDE. Ultrasonics 52: 351–363

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Mitra M and Gopalakrishnan S 2016 Guided wave based structural health monitoring: A review. Smart Mater. Struct. 25: 053001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Mallat G and Zang Z 1993 Matching pursuits with time–frequency dictionaries. IEEE Trans. Signal Process. 41: 3397–3415

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Agarwal S and Mitra M 2014 Lamb wave based automatic damage detection using matching pursuit and machine learning. Smart Mater. Struct. 23: 085012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Hong J C, Sun K H and Kim Y Y 2005 The matching pursuit approach based on the modulated Gaussian pulse for efficient guided-wave damage inspection. Smart Mater. Struct. 14: 548–560

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Li F, Su Z, Ye L and Meng G 2006 A correlation filtering-based matching pursuit (CF-MP) for damage identification using Lamb waves. Smart Mater. Struct. 15: 1585–1594

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Xu B, Giurgiutiu V and Yu L 2009 Lamb Wave decomposition and mode identification using matching pursuit method. Proc. SPIE 7292: 72920

  8. An D, Kima N H and Choi J H 2015 Practical options for selecting data-driven or physics-based prognostics algorithms with reviews. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 133: 223–236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Sen D and Nagarajaiah S 2018 Data-driven approach to structural health monitoring using statistical learning algorithms. In: Ottaviano E, Pelliccio A and Gattulli V (Eds.) Mechatronics for Cultural Heritage and Civil Engineering. Intelligent Systems, Control and Automation: Science and Engineering. Cham: Springer, pp. 295–305

  10. Khan S and Yairi T 2018 A review on the application of deep learning in system health Management. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 107: 241–265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Melville J, Kishan S A, Chris D and Joel H 2017 Structural damage detection using deep learning of ultrasonic guided waves. AIP Conf. Proc. 1949: 230004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Su Z and Ye L 2005 Lamb wave propagation-based damage identification for quasi-isotropic CF/EP composite laminates using artificial neural algorithm: part I—methodology and database development. J. Intell. Mater. Syst. Struct. 16: 97–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Rizzo P, Bartoli I, Marzani A and di-Scalea F L 2005 Defect classification in pipes by neural networks using multiple guided ultrasonic wave features extracted after wavelet processing. ASME J. Press. Vessel Technol. 127: 294–303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Lu Y, Ye L, Su Z, Zhou L and Cheng L 2009 Artificial Neural Network (ANN)-based crack identification in aluminum plates with Lamb wave signals. J. Intell. Mater. Syst. Struct. 20: 39–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Atashipour S A, Mirdamadi H R, Hemasian-Etefagh M H, Amirfattahi R and Ziaei-Rad S 2013 An effective damage identification approach in thick steel beams based on guided ultrasonic waves for structural health monitoring applications. J. Intell. Mater. Syst. Struct. 24: 584–597

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Lim H J, Sohn H and Kim Y 2018 Data-driven fatigue crack quantification and prognosis using nonlinear ultrasonic modulation. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 109: 185–195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Zhao Y, Li F, Cao P, Liu Y, Zhang Z, Fu S, Zhang J and Hu N 2017 Generation mechanism of nonlinear ultrasonic Lamb waves in thin plates with randomly distributed micro-cracks. Ultrasonics 79: 60–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Russell J, Cawley P, Drozdz M, Lowe M and Habgood N 2008 Finite element modeling of elastic wave propagation and defect interaction in large, complex components. AIP Conf. Proc. 975: 99–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Rizvi H 2020 Lamb wave dispersion curve. https://www.mathworks.com/matlabcentral/fileexchange/73050-lamb-wave-dispersion-curve, MATLAB Central File Exchange

  20. Ramadas C, Balasubramaniam K, Joshi M and Krishnamurthy C V 2011 Interaction of Lamb mode with structural discontinuity and generation of turning modes in a T-joint. Ultrasonics 51: 586–595

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Abdeljaber O, Avci O, Kiranyaz S, Gabbouj M and Inman D J 2017 Real-time vibration-based structural damage detection using one-dimensional convolutional neural networks. J. Sound Vib. 388: 154–170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Cai T T and Wang L 2011 Orthogonal matching pursuit for sparse signal recovery with noise. IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 57: 4680–4688

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  23. Sahoo S K and Makur A 2015 Signal recovery from random measurements via extended orthogonal matching pursuit. IEEE Trans. Signal Process. 63: 2572–2581

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  24. Goodfellow I, Bengio Y and Courville A 2016 Deep learning. MIT Press, Cambridge

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. Pasupa K and Sunhem W 2016 A comparison between shallow and deep architecture classifiers on small dataset. In: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Information Technology and Electrical Engineering (ICITEE), IEEE, pp. 1–6

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mira Mitra.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rai, A., Mitra, M. A hybrid physics-assisted machine-learning-based damage detection using Lamb wave. Sādhanā 46, 64 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12046-021-01582-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12046-021-01582-8

Keywords

Navigation