Abstract
Social groups, and the social identities which people develop as part of them, are often experienced as stable and continuous over time. Thus, countries experiencing rapid socio-political change often face the challenge of re-constructing the meaning of the social group to adapt to the demands of the present, while simultaneously making this re-construction appear as a natural progression of ‘our’ historical journey. In the present paper, I ask the question of how, in times of socio-political change, the past is used in the present, and the implications this has for how individuals represent their nation’s future. Drawing on Serbia and its political movement towards EU integration, the present article illustrates how developed and legitimized historical narratives, linked to the myth of origin of a nation, become utilized to frame present challenges. In doing so, it allows for uncertainties in the present to become anchored in established historical narratives, which in turn have consequences for which political actions are deemed acceptable and legitimate for the future.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alonso, A. M. (1988). The effects of truth: Re-presentations of the past and the imagining of community. Journal of Historical Sociology, 1(1), 33–57.
Barbour, R. S., & Kitzinger, J. (1999). Developing focus group research. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications.
Bieber, F. (2002). Nationalist mobilization and stories of Serb suffering: The Kosovo myth from 600th anniversary to the present. Rethinking History, 6(1), 95–110.
Billig, M. (1995). Banal Nationalism. London: Sage.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.
ĆirkoviĆ, S. (2004). The Serbs (the peoples of Europe). Malden: Blackwell Pub.
Holton, G. (1975). On the Role of Themata in Scientific Thought. Science, 188(4186), 328–334.
Hopkins, N., & Dixon, J. (2006). Space, place and identity: Issues for political psychology. Political Psychology, 27(2), 173–185.
Howarth, C. (2006). A social representation is not a quiet thing: Exploring the critical potential of social representations theory. British Journal of Social Psychology, 45(1), 65–86.
Jetten, J., & Hutchison, P. (2011). When groups have a lot to lose: Historical continuity enhances resistance to a merger. European Journal of Social Psychology, 41(1), 335–343.
Jovchelovitch, S. (2012). Narrative, memory and social representations: A conversation between history and social psychology. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 46(4), 440–456.
Ker-Lindsay, J. (2009). Kosovo: The path to contested statehood in the Balkans (library of European studies). London: I. B. Tauris.
Liu, L. (2004). Sensitising concept, themata and shareness: A dialogical perspective of social representations. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 34(3), 249–264.
Liu, J. H., & Hilton, D. J. (2005). How the past weighs on the present: Social representations of history and their role in identity politics. British Journal of Social Psychology, 44, 537–556.
Malinowski, B. (1926). Myth in primitive psychology. London: Kegan Paul, Trench, Trubner.
Markova, I. (2000). Amedee or how to get rid of it: Social representations from a dialogical perspective. Culture & Psychology, 6(4), 419–460.
Markova, I. (2003). Dialogicality and social representations: The dynamics of mind. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Moscovici, S. (2000). Social representations: Explorations in social psychology. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Obradović, S., & Howarth, C. (2017). The power of politics: how political leaders in Serbia discursively manage identity continuity and political change to shape the future of a nation. European Journal of Social Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2277.
Penic, S., Elcheroth, G., & Reicher, S. (2016). Can patriots be critical after a nationalist war? The struggle between recognition and marginalization of dissenting voices. Political Psychology, 37(4), 481–496.
Reicher, S. (2008). Making a past fit for the future: the political and ontological dimensions of historical continuity. In F. Sani (Ed.), Self continuity: individual and collective perspectives (pp. 145–158). New York: Psychology Press.
Reicher, S., & Hopkins, N. (2001). Psychology and the end of history: A critique and a proposal for the psychology of social categorization. Political Psychology, 22(1), 383–407.
Sani, F., Bowe, M., Herrera, M., Manna, C., Cossa, T., Miao, X., & Zhou, Y. (2007). Perceived collective continuity: Seeing groups as entities that move through time. European Journal of Social Psychology, 37(6), 1118–1134.
Sindic, D., & Reicher, S. (2009). ‘Our way of life is worth defending’: Testing a model of attitudes towards superordinate group membership through a study of scots’ attitudes towards Britain. European Journal of Social Psychology, 39(1), 114–129.
Smith, A. D. (1995). Gastronomy or geology? The role of nationalism in the reconstruction of nations. Nations and Nationalism, 1(1), 3–23.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
Author declares that she has no conflict of interest.
Human Participants
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed Consent
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Obradović, S. Who are we and where are we Going: from Past Myths to Present Politics. Integr. psych. behav. 53, 57–75 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-017-9410-x
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-017-9410-x