Abstract
While various strategic business issues related to product design have been explored by academicians and practitioners, one issue has largely been ignored: how do financial markets assess and evaluate companies’ product design? The purpose of this article is to examine this issue, especially when it comes to the assessments and evaluations made by the most essential actors of contemporary financial markets: investment analysts and institutional investors. I develop propositions concerning the product design-related evaluative schemes and heuristics used by the financial market actors in evaluating companies as investment opportunities. I illustrate my propositions with examples from, e.g., the mobile phone industry as well as with interview excerpts from interviews with investment analysts and institutional investors. Propositions are provided both for assessments of companies’ individual end products (‘design as the end product’ perspective) and for assessments of companies’ design capabilities (‘design as a capability’ perspective). In essence, the propositions highlight that the evaluative schemes used by financial market actors are partly rational, yet involve biases and are likely to lead to overvaluation and undervaluation of certain kinds of product designs by certain kinds of companies. Thus, even from the perspective of profit-maximization, many of the evaluative schemes of the financial market actors are, at most, quasi-rational. Moreover, the evaluative schemes of the financial market actors may motivate company managers to pursue certain kinds of product design rather than others—and may even lead to self-reinforcing (vicious or virtuous) circles of certain kinds of product designs being advocated.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
The expected earnings or profits (as “discounted” to their present value) determine the price that the investors are willing to pay for the company’s stock, which, if bought, essentially gives its holder-investor a right to a share of the company’s future earnings and hence, also determine the stock’s market valuation/price.
When announcing new products, companies indeed imply—in their customer and/or investor communication—some of their features as the most important ones, relative to existing products in the market. This can be done explicitly by pointing out “the most important new features” of the new product, or implicitly by listing or mentioning certain features while not mentioning others.
References
Adner, R., & Zemsky, P. (2006). A demand-based perspective on sustainable competitive advantage. Strategic Management Journal, 27(3), 215-239.
Anderson, J. C., & Narus, J. A. (1999). Business market management: understanding, creating, and delivering value. Prentice Hall: Upper Saddle River, NJ.
Aspara, Jaakko (2008), “Creating and capturing design value”. In T. Keinonen (Ed.), Design connections—knowledge, value and involvement through design. Working paper F34, University of Art and Design, Helsinki, Finland (pp. 28-37). Available at http://www.taik.fi/images/stories/Tutkimusinstituutti/WorkingPapers/34.pdf
Benner, M. J. (2007). The incumbent discount: stock market categories and response to radical technological change. Academy of Management Review, 32(3), 703-720.
Beunza, D., & Garud, R. (2005). Securities analysts as frame makers. Working paper, New York University, New York.
Boni, L., & Womack, K. L. (2006) Analysts, industries and price momentum. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 41(1), 85-110.
Booz, Allen, & Hamilton. (1982). New product management for the 1980s. New York, NY: Booz, Allen, and Hamilton.
Borja de Mozota, B. (2002). Design and competitive edge: a model for design management excellence in European SMEs. Design Management Journal, Academic Review, 2, 88-103.
Borja de Mozota, B. (2003). Design management: using design to build brand value and corporate innovation. New York, NY: Allworth Press.
Borja de Mozota, B. (2006). The four powers of design: a value model in design management. Design Management Review, 17(2), 44-53.
Borja de Mozota, B., & Clipson, C. (1990). Design as a strategic management tool. In M. Oakley, B. Borja de Mozota & C. Clipson (Eds.), Design management: a handbook of issues and methods (pp. 73-84). Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.
Bowman, C., & Ambrosini, V. (2000). Value creation versus value capture: towards a coherent definition of value in strategy. British Journal of Management, 11(1), 1-15.
Boztepe, S. (2007). User value: competing theories and models. International Journal of Design, 1(2), 57-65.
Bradshaw, M. T. (2004). How do analysts use their earnings forecasts in generating stock recommendations? Accounting Review, 79, 25-50.
Brusoni, S., Prencipe, A., & Pavitt, K. (2001). Knowledge specialization, organizational coupling, and the boundaries of the firm: why do firms know more than they make. Administrative Science Quarterly, 46(4), 597-621.
Buchanan, R. (2001). Design research and the new learning. Design Issues, 17(4), 3-23.
Buchanan, R. (2008). Introduction: design and organizational change. Design Issues, 24(1), 2-9.
Bushee, B. J. (2004). Identifying and attracting the" right" investors: evidence on the behavior of institutional investors. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 16(4), 28-35.
Chaney, P. K., Devinney, T. M., & Winer, R. S. (1991). The impact of new product introductions on the market value of firms. Journal of Business, 64(4), 573-610.
Clark, G. L. (2007). Governing finance: Reconciling functional imperatives with stakeholder representation in financial institutions. Working paper, Oxford University and Harvard University.
Creusen, M. E. H., & Schoormans, J. P. L. (2005). The different roles of product appearance in consumer choice. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 22(1), 63-81.
Damasio, A. R. (1994). Descartes' error: emotion, reason, and the human brain. New York, NY: G.P. Putnam & Sons.
Davis, E. P. (2002). Institutional investors, corporate governance and the performance of the corporate sector. Economic Systems, 26(3), 203-229.
Davis, G. F., Diekmann, K. A., & Tinsley, C. H. (1994). The decline and fall of the conglomerate firm in the 1980s: the deinstitutionalization of an organizational form. American Sociological Review, 59, 547-570.
Davis, G., & Useem, M. (2002). Top management, company directors, and corporate control. In A. M. Pettigrew, H. Thomas & R. Whittington (Eds.), Handbook of strategy and management (pp. 233-259). London, UK: Sage.
DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147-160.
Edwards, F. R., & Hubbard, R. G. (2000). The growth of institutional stock ownership: a promise unfulfilled. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 13(3), 92-104.
Fanelli, A. (2003). Securities analyst responses to CEO charismatic images: a symbolic perspective. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, University of Florida, University of Florida.
Fanelli, A., & Grasselli, N. I. (2006). Defeating the Minotaur: The Construction of CEO Charisma on the US Stock Market. Organization Studies, 27(6), 811-832.
Fligstein, N., & Shin, T. (2004). Shareholder value and the transformation of the American economy, 1984-2001. Working paper 19, Center for the Study of Economy and Society, Cornell University.
Folkman, P., Froud, J., Johal, S., & Williams, K. (2007). Working for themselves? Capital market intermediaries and present day capitalism. Business History, 49(4), 552-572.
Fombrun, C. J. (2001). Corporate reputations as economic assets. In M. A. Hitt, R. E. Freeman & J. S. Harrison (Eds.), The Blackwell handbook of strategic management (pp. 289-312). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
Frieder, L., & Subrahmanyam, A. (2005). Brand perceptions and the market for common stock. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 40(1), 57-85.
Froot, K. A., Perold, A. F., & Stein, J. C. (1992). Shareholder trading practices and corporate investment horizons. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 5, 42-58.
Garcia, R., & Calantone, R. (2002). A critical look at technological innovation typology and innovativeness terminology: a literature review. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 19(2), 110-132.
Garner, S. (2004). An introduction to design and designing, Block 1, T211 Design and Designing Open University Worldwide.
Gigerenzer, G., Todd, P. M., & ABC Research Group (Eds.). (1999). Simple heuristics that make us smart. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Grewal, R., Kayande, U., & Roberts, P. W. (2005). Reputation, reputation coherence and performance reliability. Working Paper, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia. Available at: http://goizueta.Emory.edu/faculty/PeterRoberts/documents/WP-ReputationandCoherence.Pdf
Grinstein, Y., & Michaely, R. (2005). Institutional holdings and payout policy. Journal of Finance, 60(3), 1389-1426.
Hamel, G., & Prahalad, C. K. (1994). Competing for the future. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
Hawley, J. P., & Williams, A. T. (2000). The rise of fiduciary capitalism: how institutional investors can make corporate america more democratic. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Hertenstein, J. H., & Platt, M. B. (1997). Developing a strategic design culture. Design Management Journal, 8(2), 10-19.
Heskett, J. (2001). Past, present, and future in design for industry. Design Issues, 17(1), 18-26.
Hotchkiss, E. S., & Strickland, D. (2003). Does shareholder composition matter? Evidence from the market reaction to corporate earnings announcements. Journal of Finance, 58(4), 1469-1498.
Jevnaker, B. H. (2000). Championing design: perspectives on design capabilities. Design Management Journal, 11(4; SUPP/1), 25-39.
Jevnaker, B. H. (2005). Vita activa: on relationships between design (ers) and business. Design Issues, 21(3), 25-48.
Johansson, U., & Holm, L. S. (2006). Brand management and design management. In J. E. Schroeder, & M. Salzer-Mörling (Eds.), Brand Culture (pp. 136-152). New York, NY: Routledge.
Johansson, U., & Woodilla, J. (2008). Designers dancing within hierarchies: the importance of non-hierarchical power for design integration and implementation. The Design Journal, 11(2), 95-117.
Kotler, P. (2000). Marketing management (10th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Krippner, G. R. (2005). The financialization of the American economy. Socio-Economic Review, 3(2), 173-208.
Kuran, T., & Sunstein, C. R. (1999). Availability cascades and risk regulation. Stanford Law Review, 51(4), 683-768.
Lakonishok, J., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1994). Contrarian investment, extrapolation, and risk. Journal of Finance, 49(5), 1541-1578.
Lane, V., & Jacobson, R. (1995). Stock market reactions to brand extension announcements: the effects of brand attitude and familiarity. Journal of Marketing, 59(1), 63-77.
March, A. (1994). Usability: the new dimension of product design. Harvard Business Review, 72(5), 144-149.
Martin, R., Casson, P., & Nisar, T. M. (2007). Investor engagement: investors and management practice under shareholder value. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Minsky, H. P. (1993). Schumpeter and finance. In S. Biasco, A. Roncaglia & M. Salvati (Eds.), Market and Institutions in Economic Development: Essays in Honor of Sylos Labini (pp. 70-88). New York, NY: St. Martin's Press.
Mol, J. M., Wijnberg, N. M., & Carroll, C. (2005). Value chain envy: explaining new entry and vertical integration in popular music. Journal of Management Studies, 42(2), 251-276.
Moreton, P., & Zenger, T. R. (2005). Corporate strategy, analyst coverage, and the uniqueness discount. Working paper, Olin School of Business, Washington University in St. Louis.
Nelson, H. G., & Stolterman, E. (2003). The design way: intentional change in an unpredictable world: foundations and fundamentals of design competence. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.
Nicolai, A., Schulz, A., & Thomas, T. W. (2009). What Wall Street wants—exploring the role of security analysts in the evolution and spread of management concepts. Journal of Management Studies, forthcoming
Norman, D. A. (2004). Emotional Design: Why We Love (Or Hate) Everyday Things. New York, NY: Basic Books.
Olson, E. M., Cooper, R., & Slater, S. F. (1998). Design strategy and competitive advantage. Business Horizons, 41(2), 55-61.
Pauwels, K., Silva-Risso, J., Srinivasan, S., & Hanssens, D. M. (2004). New products, sales promotions, and firm value: the case of the automobile industry. Journal of Marketing, 68(4), 142-156.
Porac, J. F., Ventresca, M. J., & Mishina, Y. (2002). Interorganizational cognition and interpretation. In J. A. C. Baum (Ed.), Companion to Organizations (pp. 579-598). Oxford: Blackwell.
Prahalad, C. K., & Hamel, G. (1990). The core competence of the corporation. Harvard Business Review, 68(3), 79-91.
Priem, R. L. (2007). A consumer perspective on value creation. Academy of Management Review, 32(1), 219-235.
Priem, R. L., & Butler, J. E. (2001). Is the resource-based" view" a useful perspective for strategic management research? Academy of Management Review, 26(1), 22-40.
Rao, H., & Sivakumar, K. (1999). Institutional sources of boundary-spanning structures: the establishment of investor relations departments in the Fortune 500 industrials. Organization Science, 10(1), 27-42.
Rao, H., Greve, H. R., & Davis, G. F. (2001). Fool's gold: social proof in the initiation and abandonment of coverage by Wall Street analysts. Administrative Science Quarterly, 46(3), 502-526.
Raub, W., & Weesie, J. (1990). Reputation and efficiency in social interactions: an example of network effects. The American Journal of Sociology, 96(3), 626-654.
Rhodes-Kropf, M., Fisman, R., & Khurana, R. (2005). Governance and CEO turnover: do something or do the right thing. Working Paper, Columbia Business School, 2005.,
Rindova, V. P., Williamson, I. O., Petkova, A. P., & Sever, J. M. (2005). Being good or being known: an empirical examination of the dimensions, antecedents, and consequences of organizational reputation. Academy of Management Journal, 48, 1033-1049.
Schipper, K. (1991). Analysts’forecasts. Accounting Horizons, 5(4), 105-121.
Shapiro, C. (1983). Premiums for high quality products as returns to reputations. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 98(4), 659-680.
Shefrin, H. (2001). Editorial commentary: do investors expect higher returns from safer stocks than from riskier stocks? Journal of Behavioral Finance, 2(4), 176-181.
Shefrin, H., & Statman, M. (1995). Making sense of beta, size, and book-to-market. Journal of Portfolio Management, 21(2), 26-34.
Srinivasan, S., Pauwels, K., Silva-Risso, J., & Hanssens, D. M. (2009). Product innovations, advertising, and stock returns. Journal of Marketing, 73(1), 24-43.
Tainio, R. (2003). Financialization of key Finnish companies. Nordiske Organisasjons-Studier, 5(2), 61-86.
Terrey, N. A Complex organisation: discovering design. International DMI Education Conference, Design Thinking: New Challenges for Designers, Managers and Organizations,14-15 April 2008. ESSEC Business School, Cergy-Pointoise, France.
Useem, M. (1996). Investor capitalism. New York, NY: Basic Books.
Weigelt, K., & Camerer, C. (1988). Reputation and corporate strategy: a review of recent theory and applications. Strategic Management Journal, 9(5), 443-454.
Whalen, C. J. (2002). Money manager capitalism: still here, but not quite as expected. Journal of Economic Issues, 36(2), 401.
Zeithaml, V. A., Rust, R. T., & Lemon, K. N. (2001). The customer pyramid: creating and serving profitable customers. California Management Review, 43(4), 118-142.
Zorn, D., Dobbin, F., Dierkes, J., & Kwok, M. (2004). Managing investors: how financial markets shaped the American firm. In K. Knorr Cetina, & A. Preda (Eds.), The Sociology of Financial Markets. London: Oxford University Press:
Zorn, D., Dobbin, F., Dierkes, J., & Kwok, M. (2005). Cui bono: institutional investors, securities analysts, agents, and the shareholder value myth. New public and private models of management: sensemaking and institutions, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Zuckerman, E. W. (1999). The categorical imperative: securities analysts and the illegitimacy discount. American Journal of Sociology, 104(5), 1398-1438.
Zuckerman, E. W. (2000). Focusing the corporate product: securities analysts and de-diversification. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45(3), 591-619.
Zuckerman, E. W. (2004). Structural incoherence and stock market activity. American Sociological Review, 69(3), 405-432.
Zuckerman, E. W., Kim, T. Y., Ukanwa, K., & von Rittmann, J. (2003). robust identities or nonentities? Typecasting in the feature-film labor market 1. American Journal of Sociology, 108(5), 1018-1074.
Acknowledgement
The author is indebted to research assistant Bo-Axel Blomberg for conducting interviews quoted in the article. The author also wishes to thank Jenny and Antti Wihuri Foundation for obtaining a grant for research related to the topic of the article.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Aspara, J. How Do Institutional Actors in the Financial Market Assess Companies’ Product Design? The Quasi-rational Evaluative Schemes. Know Techn Pol 22, 241–258 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12130-009-9093-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12130-009-9093-9