Abstract
Difference is foundational to urban governance and urban life. This article—and the special issue—focuses analytically on the juxtaposition of multiple urban differences, and what happens especially in relation to urban authority and citizenship when such differences articulate with each other. This analytical work is based on a conceptual lens we call juxtacity, which is used to examine the origins, dynamics, and effects of urban divides, where urban divides are seen as active, situated domains in themselves that provide key opportunities for understanding and theorizing complex urban dynamics. The juxtacity approach emphasizes three key elements of difference and division—relationality, articulation, and productive co-constitution—and their differentiated effects. The focus is especially on but not limited to more overt, visible structures of urban domination, but consciously counters the ways in which more common sense hierarchies of power leave out a wide range of subtler forms of inequality, domination, exclusion, and violence. These latter are crucial for understanding differences and divisions in cities around the world. The juxtacity approach counters EuroAmerican-as-universal urban theory. Including cases from Africa and Asia, the special issue employs a form of openly comparative southern urbanism that contributes to the wider project of theorizing from the south/southeast.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
The focus here is on a broader set of inter-related social, cultural, political, and structural dimensions of difference captured through a combination of political economy and cultural politics sensibilities, rather than on the more agentive and affective dimensions of what Valentine and Sadgrove (2012), situated within the ‘geographies of encounter’ literature, refer to as ‘lived difference’. Thanks to Oren Yiftachel for flagging some of this literature. See also Aceska et al. (2019) on entanglements of urban diversity.
Originally, the planned collection also included several Latin American cases, but at a later stage, the respective authors were unable to participate. The intention was never to attempt a comprehensive ‘representation’ of south/southeastern urban experiences. Indeed, almost any context of urban division could have served as a relevant case to which a juxtacity approach could be applied. Both co-editors of this special issue are Africanist scholars, but at the outset, we saw great advantages in including a spectrum of geographical and conceptual positions, so generating our own productive ‘juxtaposition of differences’.
Both historically persistent and newer divides within cities of the global north have been critiqued in recent times through a wave of interconnected, popular global activisms. Examples include the Occupy movements that arose during the late 2000s to confront the brutal exigencies of capitalism; and, in mid-2020, the mass demonstrations across the USA and globally in the wake of the police killing of George Floyd in Minneapolis, to protest sustained structural racism and its relationship to violent forms of governance.
This was initially very briefly conceived in the Concept Note for a collaborative conference on ‘Urban Property, Governance and Citizenship in the Global South’ in Copenhagen in June 2015 funded by the Danish Research Council. It was developed further during a small, focused writeshop in Copenhagen in May 2016. The authors of the present paper were key co-conveners of both events.
References
Aceska, A., Heer, B., & Kaiser-Grolimund, A. (2019). Doing the city from the margins: critical perspectives on urban marginality. Anthropological Forum, 29(1), 1–11.
Alves, J. A. (2018). The Anti-Black City: police terror and black urban life in Brazil. Minneapolis: Minnesota University Press.
Angelo, H. (2017). From the city lens toward urbanisation as a way of seeing: country/city binaries on an urbanising planet. Urban Studies, 54(1), 158–178.
Appadurai, A. (2002). Deep democracy: urban governmentality and the horizon of politics. Public Culture, 14(1), 21–47.
Beall, J. (2001). Valuing social resources or capitalizing on them? Limits to pro-poor urban governance in nine cities of the South. International Planning Studies, 6(4), 357–375.
Bezabeh, S. A. (2011). Citizenship and the logic of sovereignty in Djibouti. African Affairs, 101(441), 587–606.
Bryceson, D., & MacKinnon, D. (2012). Eureka and beyond: mining’s impact on African urbanisation. Journal of Contemporary African Studies, 30(4), 513–537.
Büscher, K. (2015). Reading urban landscapes of war and peace: the case of Goma, DRC. In A. Björkdahl & S. Buckley-Zitsel (Eds.), Spatializing peace and conflict: mapping the production of places, sites and scales of violence (pp. 79–97). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Caldeira, T. (2014). Gender is still the battleground. Youth, cultural production and the remaking of public space in São Paulo. In S. Parnell & S. Oldfield (Eds.), The Routledge handbook on cities of the global south (pp. 413–427). Abingdon and New York: Routledge.
Collins, E. (2016). Postsocialist informality: the making of owners, squatters and state rule in Phnom Penh, Cambodia (1989–1993). Environment and Planning A, 48(12), 2367–2382.
Comaroff, J., & Comaroff, J. (2012). Theory from the south: or, how Euro-America is evolving toward Africa. Boulder, CO.: Paradigm Publishers.
Das, V. (2011). State, citizenship, and the urban poor. Citizenship Studies, 15(3-4), 319–333.
De Boeck, F. (2011). Inhabiting occular ground: Kinshasa’s future in the light of Congo’s spectral urban politics. Cultural Anthropology, 26(2), 263–286.
De Boeck, F., & Plissart, M.-F. (2004). Kinshasa: tales of the invisible city. Leuven: Leuven University Press.
De Satgé, R., & Watson, V. (2018). Urban planning in the global south. Conflicting rationalities in contested urban space. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Doshi, S. (2013). The politics of the evicted: redevelopment, subjectivity, and difference in Mumbai’s slum frontier. Antipode, 45(4), 844–865.
Ferguson, J. (2007). Power topographies. In D. Nugent & J. Vincent (Eds.), A companion to the anthropology of politics (pp. 383–399). Malden, Oxford and Carlton: Blackwell Publishing.
Gaffikin, F., & Morrissey, M. (2011). Planning in divided cities: collaborative shaping of contested space. Oxford, Chichester and Ames: Blackwell.
Gandy, M. (2006). Planning, anti-planning and the infrastructure crisis facing metropolitan Lagos. Urban Studies, 43(2), 371–396.
Gastrow, C. (2017). Cement citizens: housing, demolition and political belonging in Luanda, Angola. Citizenship Studies, 21(2), 224–239.
Hammar, A. (2007). The day of burning: land, authority and belonging in Zimbabwe’s agrarian margins. Unpublished PhD Dissertation. Roskilde: Roskilde University.
Hammar, A. (2014). The paradoxes of class: crisis, displacement and repositioning in post-2000 Zimbabwe. In A. Hammar (Ed.), Displacement economies in Africa: paradoxes of crisis and creativity (pp. 79–104). London and New York: Zed Books.
Hammar, A. (2017). Urban displacement and resettlement in Zimbabwe: the paradoxes of propertied citizenship. African Studies Review, 60(3), 81–104.
Hammett, D. (2017). Introduction: exploring the contested terrain of urban citizenship. International Development Planning Review, 39(1), 1–13.
Holston, J. (2011). Contesting privilege with right: the transformation of differentiated citizenship in Brazil. Citizenship Studies, 15(3–4), 335–352.
Jensen, S. (2004). Claiming community. Local politics on the Cape Flats, South Africa. Critique of Anthropology, 24(2), 179–207.
Koonings, K., & Kruijt, D. (Eds.). (2007). Fractured cities: social exclusion, urban violence and contested spaces in Latin America. London: Zed Books.
Lemanski, C. (2017). Unequal citizenship in unequal cities: participatory urban governance in contemporary South Africa. International Development and Planning Review, 39(1), 15–35.
Lemanski, C., & Oldfield, S. (2009). The parallel claims of gated communities and land invasions in a Southern city: polarised state responses. Environment and Planning A, 41(3), 634–648.
Lund, C. (2002). Negotiating Property Institutions: On the Symbiosis of Property and Authority in Africa’. In K. Juul & C. Lund (Eds.), Negotiating property in Africa (pp.11–43). Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
Lutzoni, L. (2016). In-formalised urban space design. Rethinking the relationship between formal and informal. City Territory Architecture, 3(20), 1–14.
McFarlane, C. (2010). The comparative city. Knowledge, learning, urbanism. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 34(4), 725–742.
Millstein, M. (2011). Urban governance transformations and the first two years of the N2 Gateway project in Cape Town. Transformation: Critical Perspectives on Southern Africa, 76, 22–43.
Millstein, M. (2017). Rights, identities and belonging: reflections on the everyday politics of urban citizenship in Delft, Cape Town. Norsk Geografisk Tidsskrift/Norwegian Journal of Geography, 71(4), 253–267.
Miraftab, F. (2009). Insurgent planning: situating radical planning in the Global South. Planning Theory, 8(1), 32–50.
Miraftab, F., & Wills, S. (2005). Insurgency and spaces of active citizenship: the story of Western Cape Anti-Eviction Campaign in South Africa. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 25, 200–217.
Moore, D. S. (2005). Suffering for territory. Race, place and power in Zimbabwe. Durham and London: Duke University Press; Harare: Weaver Press.
Neveu, C., Clarke, J., Colland, K., & Dagnino, E. (2011). Introduction: questioning citizenships/ questions de citoyennetés. Citizenship Studies, 15(8), 945–964.
Nuttall, S., & Mbembe, A. (Eds.). (2008). Johannesburg: the elusive metropolis. Durham NC: Duke University Press.
Oldfield, S. (2015). Between activism and the academy: the urban as political terrain. Urban Studies, 52(11), 2072–2086.
Parnell, S., & Oldfield, S. (Eds.). (2014). The Routledge handbook on cities of the global south. Abingdon and New York: Routledge.
Parnell, S., & Robinson, J. (2012). (Re)theorizing cities from the global south: looking beyond neoliberalism. Urban Geography, 33(4), 593–617.
Patel, K. (2016). Sowing the seeds of conflict? Low income housing delivery, community participation and inclusive citizenship in South Africa. Urban Studies, 53(13), 2738–2757.
Perlman, J. E. (2010). Favela: four decades of living on the edge in Rio de Janeiro. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.
Robinson, J. (2016). Thinking cities through elsewhere: comparative tactics for a more global urban studies. Progress in Human Geography, 40(1), 3–29.
Rodgers, D., & O’Neill, B. (2012). Infrastructural violence: introduction to the special issue. Ethnography, 13(4), 401–412.
Roitman, J. (2005). Fiscal disobedience. An anthropology of economic regulation in Central Africa. Princeton NJ and Oxford: Princeton University Press.
Roy, A. (2011). Slumdog cities: rethinking subaltern urbanism. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 35(2), 223–238.
Roy, A. (2014). Worlding the south: towards a post-colonial urban theory. In S. Parnell & S. Oldfield (Eds.), The Routledge handbook on cities of the Global South (pp. 9–20). Abingdon and New York: Routledge.
Roy, A. (2016). Whose afraid of postcolonial theory. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 40(1), 200–209.
Sheppard, E., Gidwani, V., Goldman, M., Leitner, H., Roy, A., & Maringanti, A. (2015). Introduction: urban revolutions in the age of global urbanism. Urban Studies, 52(11), 1947–1961.
Simone, A. (2014). Jakarta. Drawing the city near. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Simone, A., & Pieterse, E. (2017). New urban worlds. Inhabiting dissonant times. Cambridge: Policy Press.
Stacey, P., & Lund, C. (2016). In a state of slum: governance in an informal urban settlement in Ghana. Journal of Modern African Studies, 54(4), 591–615.
Stockmans, J., & Büscher, K. (2017). A spatial reading of urban political-religious conflict: contested urban landscapes in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Journal of Modern African Studies, 55(1), 79–104.
Tadiar, N. (2007). Metropolitan life and uncivil death. Proceedings of the Modern Language Association, Special topic: Cities, 122(1), 316–320.
Trefon, T. (2009). Hinges and fringes: conceptualising the peri-urban in Central Africa. In F. Locatelli & P. Nugent (Eds.), African cities. Competing claims on urban spaces (pp. 15–36). Brill: Leiden and Boston.
Tsing, A. L. (1993). In the realm of the diamond queen. Marginality in an out-of-the-way place. Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press
Valentine, G., & Sadgrove, J. (2012). Lived difference: a narrative account of spatiotemporal processes of social differentiation. Environment and Planning A, 44(9), 2049–2063.
Vlassenroot, K., & Büscher, K. (2009). The city as frontier: urban development and identity processes in Goma. Crisis States Research Centre Working Papers Series 2 (61). London, UK: Crisis States Research Centre, London School of Economics and Political Science.
Watson, V. (2009). Seeing from the south: refocusing urban planning on the globe’s central urban issues. Urban Studies, 46(11), 2259–2275.
Watson, V. (2013). African urban fantasies: dreams or nightmares. Environment & Urbanization, 26(1), 1–17.
Yiftachel, O. (2009). Theoretical notes on ‘gray cities’: the coming of urban apartheid. Planning Theory, 8(1), 88–100.
Yiftachel, O. (2016). Aleph: Jerusalem as critical learning. City, 20(3), 483–494.
Acknowledgements
The authors wish to express our sincere appreciation for the commitment, hard work and invaluable insights of all the contributors to this special issue, all the anonymous reviewers, and the editors at Urban Forum, especially Sophie Oldfield and Saskia Greyling. The long labour in arriving at the final publication of this special issue has been a truly rich collective experience.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hammar, A., Millstein, M. Juxtacity: an Approach to Urban Difference, Divide, Authority, and Citizenship. Urban Forum 31, 273–288 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12132-020-09402-8
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12132-020-09402-8