Abstract
In “Sideways Music”, Ned Markosian presents the aesthetic value variance of sideways music as a case against what the Spacetime Thesis—the thesis that time is one of four similar dimensions that make up spacetime. Critics have already raised worries about the premises of his argument. In this paper, I focus on Markosian’s assumed aesthetic realism. I argue that there is a version of aesthetic realism—a version that admits aesthetic value gluts—that is consistent with both the Spacetime Thesis and the aesthetic variance of sideways music. If this is right, then sideways music may simply be a non-issue for proponents of the Spacetime Thesis.
Notes
What does affect an object’s intrinsic aesthetic value, according to Markosian, is distorting its spatiotemporal dimensions or rearranging its very structure. For example, if one folds The Starry Night in half, then its spatial dimensions are destroyed, thus may no longer be beautiful. Likewise, rearranging a pile of trash might result in a beautiful piece of avant-garde. As such, distorting an object’s dimensions or rearranging its structure is not the same as simply reorienting it in the spacetime manifold (Markosian, 2020: 53).
My thanks to the referee of this journal for pointing this out.
Image is from the Public Domain: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Duck-Rabbit_illusion.jpg.
Image is from the Public Domain: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Kanisza_Triangle.jpg.
Wittgenstein (1954: Part II, §xi) offers a different, albeit still a realist, explanation of the ambiguous images.
My thanks to the referee of this journal for raising this issue.
References
Aggelopoulos, N. C. (2015). Perceptual inference. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 55, 375–392. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2015.05.001
Bnefsi, S. R. (2020). The argument from sideways music. Thought: A Journal of Philosophy, 9, 64–69. https://doi.org/10.1002/tht3.439
Ferguson, Z. (2020). A song turned sideways would sound as sweet. Analysis, 81, 14–18. https://doi.org/10.1093/analys/anaa026
Le Bihan, B. (2020). From spacetime to space and time: A reply to Markosian. Analysis, 80, 456–462. https://doi.org/10.1093/analys/anz098
Liao, S. (2019). Spatially-rotated paintings: A reply to Markosian’s “Sideways Music”. Unpublished manuscript. https://philpapers.org/rec/LIASPA. Accessed Mar 2021
Markosian, N. (2020). Sideways music. Analysis, 80, 51–59. https://doi.org/10.1093/analys/anz039
Priest, G. (2006). In Contradiction (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.
Priest, G. & Young, D. (2016). It is and it isn’t. Aeon. https://aeon.co/essays/how-can-duchamp-s-fountain-be-both-art-and-not-art. Accessed Jul 2021
Priest, G., Berto, F. & Weber Z. (2018). Dialetheism. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2018 Edition), E.N. Zalta (ed.), URL = https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2018/entries/dialetheism/. Accessed Jul 2021
Wittgenstein, L. (1954). Philosophical Investigations. G.E.M. Anscombe and R. Rhees (eds.), G.E.M. Anscombe (trans.), Blackwell.
Acknowledgements
My thanks to Hazel T. Biana, Ben Blumson, Mark Anthony Dacela, Peter Eldridge-Smith, Brian Garrett, Graham Priest, my 2021 Symbolic Logic students, and the two referees of this journal for their comments and suggestions.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics Approval
Ethics approval was not required for this research.
Conflict of Interest
The author has no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Joaquin, J.J.B. Markosian’s Sideways Music and Aesthetic Value Gluts. Acta Anal 37, 431–439 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12136-021-00494-w
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12136-021-00494-w