Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Emotional, cultural and cognitive variables of prosocial behaviour

  • Published:
Current Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In order to promote wellbeing in current society, it is necessary to understand which variables predict prosocial behaviour. The objectives of this research were: 1) To establish prosociality as a phenomenon which is related to emotional, contextual and cognitive factors. 2) To establish a model for emotional intelligence which explains prosocial behaviour in Spanish university students. 3) To determine which factors in individual culture explain, to a larger extent, prosocial behaviour. The sample was composed of 180 Spanish college students aged 18 to 25 (135 women; mean of age = 21.17; standard deviation = 1.53). Correlation analysis showed a positive relationship in emotional intelligence, individual culture and criminal thinking. The regression analyses showed that the mixed model of emotional intelligence is the best predictor of prosocial behaviours. Regarding individual culture, high levels in collectivism and long term orientation, and low levels in distance to power, were the best predictors of these behaviours. These findings confirm the importance of understanding prosocial behaviour as a multidimensional phenomenon.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Afolabi, O. (2013). Roles of personality types, emotional intelligence and gender differences on prosocial behavior. Psychological Thought, 6(1), 124–139. https://doi.org/10.5964/psyct.v6i1.53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andrews, D., Bonta, J., & Wormith, J. S. (2006). The recent past and near future of risk and/or need assessment. Crime & Delinquency, 52(1), 7–27. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011128705281756.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arias, W. (2015). Conducta prosocial y psicología positiva. Avances en psicología, 23(1), 37–47 Recuperado de http://www.unife.edu.pe/publicaciones/revistas/psicologia/2015_1/Walter_Arias.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arregui, J. L. (2013). Variables cognitivas y motivacionales relacionadas con el nivel de riesgo y el comportamiento de delincuentes juveniles y adultos. Universidad de La Laguna, Servicio de Publicaciones.

  • Ashton, M., Paunonen, S. V., Helmes, E., & Douglas, N. (1998). Kin altruism, reciprocal altruism, and the Big Five personality factors. Evolution and Human Behavior, 19(4), 243–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Auné, S. F., Blum, D., Abal, J. P., Lozzia, G. S., & Horacio, F. A. (2014). La conducta prosocial: Estado actual de la investigación. Perspectivas en Psicologia, 11(2), 21–33. http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=483547666003.

  • Bar-On, R. (2000). Emotional and social intelligence: Insights from the emotional quotient inventory. In R. Bar-On & J. D. A. Parker (dirs.), The handbook of emotional intelligence (pp. 363–388). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

  • Bar-On, R. (2006). The Bar-On model of emotional-social intelligence (ESI). Psicothema, 18, 13–25.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Beck, A., Hasting, R. P., Daley, D., & Stevenson, J. (2004). Prosocial behavior and behavior problems independently predict maternal stress. Journal of Intellectual and Developmental Disability, 29(4), 339–349. https://doi.org/10.1080/13668250400014509.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bekkers, R., & Wiepking, P. (2011). A literature review of empirical studies of philanthropy: Eight mechanisms that drive charitable giving. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 40, 924–973.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boyatzis, R. E., Goleman, D., & Rhee, K. (2000). Clustering competence in emotional intelligence: Insights from the emotional competence inventory (ECI). In R. Bar-On y D. A. Parker (dirs.), Handbook of emotional intelligence (pp. 343–362). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

  • Caprara, G. V., & Pastorelli, C. (1993). Early emotional instability, prosocial behavior, and aggression: Some methodological aspects. European Journal of Personality, 7(1), 19–36. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.2410070103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caprara, G. V., Steca, P., Zelli, A., & Capanna, C. (2005). A new scale for measuring adults Prosocialness. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 21(2), 77–89. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759.21.2.77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chandrakumara, A., Glynn, J., Gunathilake, H. W., & Senevirathne, S. P. (2010). Cultural values and demographic correlates of citizenship performance. International Employment Relations Review, 16, 28–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Company, V., & Andrés-Pueyo, A. (2015). The Spanish version of the criminal sentiment scale modified(CSS-M): Factor structure, reliability and validity. The European Journal of Psychology, 7(2), 67–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpal.2015.03.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diazgranados, S. (2014). Asociación entre los ambientes escolares y las actitudes de apoyo hacia la violencia en estudiantes colombianos. Revista Colombiana de Educación, 66, 175–202. doi: https://doi.org/10.17227/01203916.66rce173.200, 1, 173, 200.

  • Eisenberg, N., & Fabes, R. A. (1998). Prosocial development. In W Damon y N Eisenberg (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology, Vol. 3. Social, emotional, and personality development (pp. 701–778). NewYork: Wiley.

  • Fernández-Berrocal, P., Pérez, J. C., Repetto, E., & Extremera, N. (2004). Una comparación empírica entre cinco medidas breves de inteligencia emocional percibida. In ) (Ed.), Proceedings of VII European Conference on Psychological Assessment. Málaga: European Association of Psychological Assessment.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fock, H., Hui, M. K., Au, K., & Bond, M. H. (2013). Moderation effects of power distance on the relationship between types of empowerment and employee satisfaction. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 44, 281–298. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022112443415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garaigordobil, M., Aliri, J., Martínez-Valderrey, V., Maganto, C., Bernaras, E., & Jaureguizar, J. (2013). Conducta antisocial: conexión con emociones positivas y variables predictoras. Apuntes de Psicología, 31(2), 123–133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gázquez, J. J., Pérez-Fuentes, M. C., Díaz-Herrero, A., García-Fernández, J. M., & Inglés, C. J. (2015). Perfiles de inteligencia emocional y conducta social en adolescentes españoles. Behavioral Psychology, 23(1), 141–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goleman, D. (1995). Emotional intelligence. New York: Bantam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guo, Q., Sun, P., & Li, L. (2018). Why neurotic individuals are less prosocial? A multiple mediation analysis regarding related mechanisms. Personality and Individual Differences, 128, 55–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2018.02.026.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hernán-Rodríguez, R. (2011). Estudio Relacional entre Dimensiones de Calidad en el Servicio Dimensiones Culturales de Hofstede para Estudiantes de Intercambio. Nuevo León: Tecnológico de Monterrey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede, G. (1991). Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede, G., Hofstede, G. J., & Minkov, M. (2010). Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaltwasser, L., Hildebrandt, A., Wilhelm, O., & Sommer, W. (2017). On the relationship of emotional abilities and prosocial behavior. Evolution and Human Behavior, 38, 298–308. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2016.10.011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kemmelmeier, M., Jambor, E. J., & Letner, J. (2006). Individualism and good works: Cultural variation in giving and volunteering across the United States. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 37, 327–344. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022106286927.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kesari, L., Bhattacharya, P., Hati, L., Ghosh, D., & Panda, M. (2014). Emotional intelligence & prosocial behaviour: Multidimensional trait analysis of technical students. Journal of Strategic Human Resource Management, 3(2), 38–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lampridis, E., & Papastylianou, D. (2014). Prosocial behavioural tendencies and orientation towards individualism–collectivism of Greek young adults. International Journal of Adolescence and Youth, 22(3), 268–282. https://doi.org/10.1080/02673843.2014.890114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Llorca, A., Malonda, E., & Samper, P. (2016). Prosocial reasoning and emotions in young offenders and non-offenders. The European Journal of Psychology Applied to Legal Context, 9(2), 65–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpal.2017.01.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • López-Zafra, E., Pulido, M., & Berrios, P. (2014). EQ-i versión corta (EQ-ic): adaptación y validación al español del EQ-i en universitarios. Boletín de Psicología, 110, 21–36. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Esther_Lopez-Zafra/publication/260426103.

  • Luria, G., Cnaan, R., & Boehm, A. (2015). National culture and prosocial behaviors: Results from 66 countries. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 44(5), 1041–1065. http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0899764014554456.

  • Mariano, M., Chiara, M., Peretti, S., Valenti, M., & Mazza, M. (2016). Understanding criminal behavior: Empathic impairment in criminal offenders. Social Neuroscience, 12(4), 379–385. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470919.2016.1179670.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Martí-Vilar, M. (2010). Razonamiento moral y prosocialidad. Madrid: CCS.

  • Matsumoto, Y., Yamagishi, T., Li, Y., & Kiyonari, T. (2016). Prosocial behavior increases with age across five economic games. PLoS ONE, 11(7), e0158671. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0158671.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, J. D., & Salovey, P. (1997). What is emotional intelligence? In P. Salovey y D. J. Sluyter (Eds.), Emotional development and emotional intelligence: Educational implications. New York: Basic Books. pp. 3–31.

  • Mayer, J. D., Salovey, P., & Caruso, D. (2000). Models of emotional intelligence. In R. J. Sternberg (dir.), Handbook of human intelligence (pp. 396–420). Nueva York: Cambridge University Press.

  • McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (1999). A five-factor theory of personality. In L. A. Pervin & O. P. John (Eds.), Handbook of personality (2nd ed., pp. 139–153). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Onder, M. (2011). A preliminary cross-national test of competing theories of nonprofits: Does culture matter? International Review of Public Administration, 16, 71–90. https://doi.org/10.1080/12264431.2011.10805186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parboteeah, K. P., Cullen, J. B., & Lim, L. (2004). Formal volunteering: A cross-national test. Journal of World Business, 39(4), 431–441. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2004.08.007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Redondo, J. & Inglés, C. (2010). Diferencias de género y curso académico en la conducta prosocial en estudiantes de educación secundaria. Revista Investigium: Ciencias Sociales y Humanas, 1(1), 10–23. Recuperado de http://investigiumire.iucesmag.edu.co/ire/index.php/ire/article/view/14.

  • Redondo, J., Inglés, C., Parra, L., Nieto, L., & Navarro, M. L. (2016). Prosocial behaviour: Theoretical perspectives. International Journal of Psychology Research, 11, 300–320.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ringov, D., & Zollo, M. (2007). The impact of national culture on corporate social performance. Corporate Governance, 7, 476–485. https://doi.org/10.1108/14720700710820551.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruckmani, V., & Balachandra, A. (2015). A study on emotional intelligence, family environment, mental health problems & pro-social behavior. Journal of Psychosocial Research, 10, 305–317.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruvalcaba-Romero, N., Gallegos-Guajardo, J., & Fuerte, J. M. (2017). Competencias socioemocionales como predictoras de conductas prosociales y clima escolar positivo en adolescentes. Revista Interuniversitaria de Formación del Profesorado, 88, 77–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salguero, J. M., Fernández-Berrocal, P., Ruiz-Aranda, D., Castillo, R., & Palomera, R. (2011). Inteligencia emocional y ajuste psicosocial en la adolescencia: El papel de la percepción emocional. European Journal of Education and Psychology, 4(2), 143–152. https://doi.org/10.30552/ejep.v4i2.71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shahrier, S., Kotani, K., & Kakinaka, M. (2016). Social value orientation and capitalism in societies. PLoS ONE, 11(10), e0165067. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0165067.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Simourd, D. J., & Olver, M. E. (2002). The future of criminal attitudes research and practice. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 29(4), 427–446 10.1177%2F0093854802029004005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Lange, P. A. M., & Joireman, J. A. (2008). How can we promote behaviour that serves all of us in the future. Social Issue and Policy Review, 2, 127–157. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-2409.2008.00013.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Lange, P. A. M., Klapwijk, A., & Van Munster, L. (2011). How the shadow of the future might promote cooperation. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 14, 857–870. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430211402102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walters, G. (2009). Criminal thinking. In E. M. McMurran & R. Howard (Eds.), Personality, personality disorder and violence (pp. 281–296). Nottingham: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wong, C. S., & Law, K. S. (2002). The effects of leader and follower emotional intelligence on performance and attitude:An exploratory study. The Leadership Quarterly, 13(3), 243–274. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1048984302000991.

  • Yoo, B., & Donthu, N. (2002). The effeets of marketing education and individual cultural valúes on marketing ethics of students. Journal of Marketing Education, 24(2), 92–103. https://doi.org/10.1177/0273475302242002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Departamento de Psicología Básica, Facultad de Psicología, Universitat de València, Av. Blasco Ibáñez, 21. 46010, València, Spain

    Manuel Martí-Vilar & Lucas Serrano-Pastor

  2. Departamento de Psicología Evolutiva y de la Educación, Facultad de Psicología, Universitat de València, Av. Blasco Ibáñez, 21. 46010, València, Spain

    Francisco González Sala

Authors
  1. Manuel Martí-Vilar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Lucas Serrano-Pastor
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Francisco González Sala
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Francisco González Sala.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

ESM 1

(DOCX 22 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Martí-Vilar, M., Serrano-Pastor, L. & Sala, F.G. Emotional, cultural and cognitive variables of prosocial behaviour. Curr Psychol 38, 912–919 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-019-0168-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-019-0168-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation