Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

From family to work: The mediating role of family-work enrichment and conflict between communication and well-being for dual-earner couples

  • Published:
Current Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Based on the Conservation of Resources (COR) theory and Spillover-Crossover Model (SCM), this study examined the mediating role of family-to-work enrichment (FWE) and family-work conflict (FWC) in the relationship between communication quality and life satisfaction among members of dual-earner couples. Drawing on data from 149 Romanian couples, we employed structural equation modeling (SEM) analysis to test the proposed model. We explored the mediating role of FWC and FWE between communication quality and life satisfaction for both partners. Results indicate that FWE mediates the relationship between communication and life satisfaction for men (spillover), and FWC mediates the relationship between communication and life satisfaction for each partner (spillover). Also, the FWC of men mediates the relationship between women's communication quality and life satisfaction (crossover). These findings indicate that the positive effects of women's communication quality expand beyond the family life of individuals, showing an association with increased life satisfaction of the spouses through FWC.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allis, P., & O'Driscoll, M. (2008). Positive effects of non-work-to-work facilitation on well-being in work, family and personal domains. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 23, 273–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amstad, F. T., Meier, L. L., Fasel, U., Elfering, A., & Semmer, N. K. (2011). A meta-analysis of work-family conflict and various outcomes with a special emphasis on cross-domain versus matching-domain relations. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 16, 151–169.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2013). The spillover-crossover model. In J. G. Grzywacz & E. Demerouti (Eds.), Current issues in work and organizational psychology. New frontiers in work and family research (p. 55–70). Psychology Press.

  • Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2017). The job demands-resources model: State of the art. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 22, 309–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bakker, A. B., Demerouti, E., & Burke, R. (2009). Workaholism and relationship quality: A spillover-crossover perspective. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 14(1), 23–33.

  • Bakker, A. B., Shimazu, A., Demerouti, E., Shimada, K., & Kawakami, N. (2011). Crossover of work engagement among Japanese couples: Perspective taking by both partners. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 16, 112–125.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, R. C., & Hyde, J. S. (2001). Women, men, work, and family: An expansionist theory. American Psychologist, 56, 781–796.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Beham, B. (2008). Satisfaction with work-family balance among German office workers. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 25, 669–689.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braunstein-Bercovitz, H., Frish-Burstein, S., & Benjamin, B. A. (2012). The role of personal resources in work-family conflict: implications for young mothers' well-being. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 80, 317–325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlson, D. S., Ferguson, M., Kacmar, K. M., Grzywacz, J. G., & Whitten, D. (2011). Pay it forward: The positive crossover effects of supervisor work-family enrichment. Journal of Management, 37, 770–789.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlson, D. S., Kacmar, K. M., Wayne, J. H., & Grzywacz, J. G. (2006). Measuring the positive side of the work-family interface: Development and validation of a work-family enrichment scale. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 68, 131–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, S. J., Hill, E. J., Yorgason, J. B., Larson, J. H., & Sandberg, J. G. (2013). Couple communication as a mediator between work–family conflict and marital satisfaction. Contemporary Family Therapy, 35(3), 530–545.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carvalho, V. S., & Chambel, M. J. (2014). Work-to-family enrichment and 'employees' well-being: High-performance work system and job characteristics. Social Indicators Research, 119, 373–387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Casper, W. J., Eby, L. T., Bordeaux, C., Lockwood, A., & Lambert, D. (2007). A review of research methods in IO/OB work-family research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 28–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cook, W. L., & Kenny, D. A. (2005). The actor–partner interdependence model: A model of bidirectional effects in developmental studies. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 29, 101–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, S. C. (2002). Communicating across the work/home border. Community, Work & Family, 5(1), 23–48.

  • Crain, T. L., & Hammer, L. B. (2013). Work-family enrichment: A systematic review of antecedents, outcomes, and mechanisms. In A. B. Bakker (Ed.), Advances in positive organizational psychology: Vol. 1. Advances in positive organizational psychology (pp. 303-328).

  • Crossfield, S., Kinman, G., & Jones, F. (2005). Crossover of occupational stress in dual-career couples: The role of work demands and supports, job commitment and marital communication. Community, Work, and Family, 8, 211–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49(1), 71–75.

  • Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Buchner, A., & Lang, A. G. (2009). Statistical power analyses using G* Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41, 1149–1160.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Geurts, S. A., Taris, T. W., Kompier, M. A., Dikkers, J. S., Van Hooff, M. L., & Kinnunen, U. M. (2005). Work-home interaction from a work psychological perspective: Development and validation of a new questionnaire, the SWING. Work & Stress, 19, 319–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenhaus, J. H., & Allen, T. D. (2011). Work-family balance: A review and extension of the literature. In J. C. Quick & L. E. Tetrick (Eds.), Handbook of Occupational Health Psychology (pp. 165–183). American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenhaus, J. H., & Beutell, N. J. (1985). Sources of conflict between work and family roles. Academy of Management Review, 10, 76–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenhaus, J. H., & Powell, G. N. (2006). When work and family are allies: A theory of work-family enrichment. Academy of Management Review, 31, 72–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hammer, L. B., Bauer, T. N., & Grandey, A. A. (2003). Work-family conflict and work-related withdrawal behaviors. Journal of Business and Psychology, 17, 419–436.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hammer, L. B., Cullen, J. C., Neal, M. B., Sinclair, R. R., & Shafiro, M. V. (2005). The longitudinal effects of work-family conflict and positive spillover on depressive symptoms among dual-earner couples. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 10, 138–154.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • He, G., An, R., & Zhang, F. (2019). Cultural intelligence and work-family conflict: A moderated mediation model based on conservation of resources theory. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16, 2406–2428.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Hertz, R. (1986). More equal than others: Women and men in dual-career marriages. University of California Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hill, E. J., Fellows, K. J., Chiu, H-.Y., & Hawkins, A. J. (2011, August). Work–family conflict and couple relationship quality: A meta-analytic study. Poster session presented at the meeting of the American Psychological Association, Washington, D.C.

  • Ho, M. Y., Chen, X., Cheung, F. M., Liu, H., & Worthington Jr., E. L. (2013). A dyadic model of the work-family interface: A study of dual-earner couples in China. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 18, 53–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hobfoll, S. E. (2011). Conservation of resource caravans and engaged settings. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 84, 116–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunter, E. M., Perry, S. J., Carlson, D. S., & Smith, S. A. (2010). Linking team resources to work-family enrichment and satisfaction. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 77, 304–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ineson, E. M., & Berechet, G. (2011). Employee loyalty in hotels: Romanian experiences. Journal of Human Resources in Hospitality & Tourism., 10, 129–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ispas, S. A., & Iliescu, D. (2019). The Romanian Adaptation of the Survey Work–Home Interaction, NijmeGen. Evaluation & The Health Professions, 42, 196–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, D. C., Malmstadt, J. R., Larson, C. L., & Davidson, R. J. (2000). Suppression and enhancement of emotional responses to unpleasant pictures. Psychophysiology, 37, 515–522.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • James, L., & Mathew, L. (2012). Employee retention strategies: IT Industry. SCMS Journal of Indian Management, 9, 79–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kashyap, S., Joseph, S., & Deshmukh, G. K. (2016). Employee well-being, life satisfaction and the need for work-life balance. Journal of Ravishankar University, Part-A, 22, 11–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, E. L., Kossek, E. E., Hammer, L. B., Durham, M., Bray, J., Chermack, K., et al. (2008). 7 getting there from here: research on the effects of work–family initiatives on work–family conflict and business outcomes. Academy of Management Annals, 2, 305–349.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kenny, D. A., Kashy, D. A., & Cook, W. L. (2006). Dyadic data analysis. Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lapierre, L. M., Li, Y., Kwan, H. K., Greenhaus, J. H., DiRenzo, M. S., & Shao, P. (2018). A meta-analysis of the antecedents of work-family enrichment. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 39, 385–401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ledermann, T., Bodenmann, G., Rudaz, M., & Bradbury, T. N. (2010). Stress, communication, and marital quality in couples. Family Relations, 59, 195–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Linton, M. J., Dieppe, P., & Medina-Lara, A. (2016). Review of 99 self-report measures for assessing well-being in adults: exploring dimensions of well-being and developments over time. BMJ Open, 6, 10641–10657.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lu, J. F., Siu, O. L., Spector, P. E., & Shi, K. (2009). Antecedents and outcomes of a fourfold taxonomy of work-family balance in Chinese employed parents. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 14, 182–199.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Matei, A., Maricuțoiu, L. P., & Vîrgă, D. (2021). For better or for worse family-related well-being: A meta-analysis of crossover effects in dyadic studies. Applied Psychology: Health and Well-Being, 13, 357–376.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Matei, A., & Vîrgă, D. (2020). Work-family enrichment of dual-earner couples: a longitudinal study on the effects of personal resources. Psihologia Resurselor Umane, 18, 77–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matias, M., & Fontaine, A. M. (2015). Coping with work and family: How do dual-earners interact? Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 56, 212–222.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, R. A., Del Priore, R. E., Acitelli, L. K., & Barnes-Farrell, J. L. (2006). Work-to-relationship conflict: Crossover effects in dual-earner couples. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 11, 228–240.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McNall, L. A., Nicklin, J. M., & Masuda, A. D. (2010). A meta-analytic review of the consequences associated with work-family enrichment. Journal of Business and Psychology, 25, 381–396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neff, L. A., & Karney, B. R. (2007). Stress crossover in newlywed marriage: A longitudinal and dyadic perspective. Journal of Marriage and Family, 69, 594–607.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2012). Sources of method bias in social science research and recommendations on how to control it. Annual Review of Psychology, 63, 539–569.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Powell, G. N., & Greenhaus, J. H. (2010). Sex, gender, and decisions at the family→ work interface. Journal of Management, 36, 1011–1039.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2004). SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36, 717–731.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Presti, A. L., Molino, M., Emanuel, F., Landolfi, A., & Ghislieri, C. (2020). Work-family organizational support as a predictor of work-family conflict, enrichment, and balance: Crossover and spillover effects in dual-income couples. Europe's Journal of Psychology, 16(1), 62–81.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Rahman, M. M., Ali, N. A., Jantan, A. H., Dato'Mansor, Z., & Rahaman, M. S. (2020). Work to family, family to work conflicts and work family balance as predictors of job satisfaction of Malaysian academic community. Journal of Enterprising Communities: People and Places in the Global Economy, 14, 621–642.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rahman, M. M., Abdul, M., Ali, N. A., Uddin, M. J., & Rahman, M. S. (2017). Employees’ Retention Strategy on Quality of Work Life (QWL) Dimensions of Private Commercial Banks in Bangladesh. Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences & Humanities, 25, 647–662.

    Google Scholar 

  • Risch, G. S., Riley, L. A., & Lawler, M. G. (2003). Problematic issues in the early years of marriage: Content for premarital education. Journal of Psychology and Theology, 31, 253–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • RStudio Team. (2015). RStudio: Integrated Development for R. RStudio, Inc..

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandberg, J. G., Harper, J. M., Jeffrey Hill, E., Miller, R. B., Yorgason, J. B., & Day, R. D. (2013). “What happens at home does not necessarily stay at home”: The relationship of observed negative couple interaction with physical health, mental health, and work satisfaction. Journal of Marriage and Family, 75, 808–821.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schaufeli, W. B., & Taris, T. W. (2014). A critical review of the job demands-resources model: Implications for improving work and health. In Bauer, G. and Hämmig, O. (Eds): Bridging Occupational, Organizational and Public Health, (pp. 43-68), Springer, Dordrecht.

  • Shumway, S., Wampler, R., Dersch, C., & Arredondo, R. (2004). A place for marriage and family services in employee assistance programs (EAPs): A survey of EAP client problems and needs. Journal of Marital & Family Therapy, 30, 71–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siffert, A., & Schwarz, B. (2011). Parental conflict resolution styles and children's adjustment: Children's appraisals and emotion regulation as mediators. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 172, 21–39.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stanley, S. M., Blumberg, S. L., & Markman, H. J. (1999). Helping couples fight for their marriages: The PREP approach. In R. Berger & M. T. Hannah (Eds.), Preventive approaches in couples therapy (pp. 279–303). Philadelphia, PA, US: Brunner/Mazel.

  • Steiner, R. S., & Krings, F. (2016). How was your day, darling? A literature review of positive and negative crossover at the work-family interface in couples. European Psychologist, 21, 296–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taasoobshirazi, G., & Wang, S. (2016). The performance of the SRMR, RMSEA, CFI, and TLI: An examination of sample size, path size, and degrees of freedom. Journal of Applied Applied Quantitative Methods, 11, 31–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Theunissen, B., Visser, D., & Van Vuuren, L. J. (2003). Communication of job-related information and work-family conflict in dual-career couples. SA Journal of Industrial Psychology, 29, 18–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turliuc, M. N., Milek, A., & Trillingsgaard, T. (2021). Individual versus Dyadic Processes: Health and Relationship Outcomes. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 1–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Veenhoven, R. (1996). The study of life-satisfaction. in Saris, W.E., Veenhoven, R., Scherpenzeel, A.C. & Bunting B. (eds) A comparative study of satisfaction with life in Europe, (pp. 11-48), Eötvös University Press.

  • van Steenbergen, E. F., Kluwer, E. S., & Karney, B. R. (2014). Work–family enrichment, work–family conflict, and marital satisfaction: A dyadic analysis. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 19, 182–194.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Voydanoff, P. (2001). Incorporating community into work and family research: A review of basic relationships. Human Relations, 54, 1609–1637.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weigel, D. J., & Ballard-Reisch, D. S. (2008). Relational maintenance, satisfaction and commitment in marriages: An actor-partner analysis. Journal of Family Communication, 8, 212–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Westman, M. (2001). Stress and strain crossover. Human Relations, 54, 717–751.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yucel, D., & Fan, W. (2019). Work–family conflict and well-being among German couples: A longitudinal and dyadic approach. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 60, 377–395.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zemp, M., Nussbeck, F. W., Cummings, E. M., & Bodenmann, G. (2017). The spillover of child-related stress into parents' relationship mediated by couple communication. Family Relations, 66(2), 317–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, Y., Xu, S., Jin, J., & Ford, M. T. (2018). The within and cross domain effects of work-family enrichment: A meta-analysis. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 104, 210–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Žnidaršič, J., & Marič, M. (2021). Relationships between Work-Family Balance, Job Satisfaction, Life Satisfaction and Work Engagement among Higher Education Lecturers. Organizacija, 54, 227–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, West University of Timișoara, Bv. Vasile Parvan, no. 4, 300223, Timisoara, Romania

    Alina Matei & Delia Vîrgă

Authors
  1. Alina Matei
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Delia Vîrgă
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Delia Vîrgă.

Ethics declarations

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the institutional and/or national research committee's ethical standards and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Conflict of Interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Matei, A., Vîrgă, D. From family to work: The mediating role of family-work enrichment and conflict between communication and well-being for dual-earner couples. Curr Psychol 42, 14555–14568 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-022-02747-2

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-022-02747-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation