Skip to main content
Log in

Physical appearance, attractiveness, and the mediating role of emotions

  • Published:
Current Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Determinants of physical attractiveness were investigated in a study employing U.S. college students of both genders. Five factors were derived from a study of 37 stable and changeable physical features: Masculinity (strength, larger body and chest, broader chin), Femininity (longer hair, make-up, larger and rounder eyes), Self-care (overall grooming, shapely figure, flat stomach, erect posture, fitted clothes), Pleasantness (friendly, happy, babyish face), and Ethnicity. Factor analytic results did not support a priori (and nonstatistical) groupings of babyish facial features by investigators who use this concept. Self-care, Masculinity (Femininity), and Pleasantness were positive correlates of male (female) attractiveness. Attractiveness was described parsimoniously in terms of emotions: more attractive targets elicited more pleasure, more arousal, and less dominance (or more submissiveness) from others. Men and women reacted in essentially similar ways in rating others’ attractiveness. Statistical tests showed that emotional reactions mediated relations of the independent variables (physical features) to the dependent variables (judgments of attractiveness).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alicke, M.D., Smith, R.H., & Klotz, M.L. (1986). Judgments of physical attractiveness: The role of faces and bodies. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 12: 381–389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allen, J.B., Kenrick, D.T., Linder, D.E., & McCall, M.A. (1989). Arousal and attraction: A response-facilitation alternative to misattribution and negative-reinforcement models. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57: 261–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alley, T.R., & Cunningham, M.R. (1991). Averaged faces are attractive, but very attractive faces are not average. Psychological Science, 2: 123–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baron, R.M., & Kenny, D.A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51: 1173–1182.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Berry, D.S., & McArthur, L.Z. (1985). Some components and consequences of a babyface. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48: 312–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berry, D.S., & McArthur, L.Z. (1986). Perceiving character in faces: The impact of age-related craniofacial changes on social perception. Psychological Bulletin, 100: 3–18.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, T.A., Cash, T.F., & Noles, S.W. (1986). Perceptions of physical attractiveness among college students: Selected determinants and methodological matters. The Journal of Social Psychology, 126: 305–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Byrne, D., & Clore, G.L. (1970). A reinforcement model of evaluative responses. Personality: An International Journal, 1.103–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cash, T.F., Dawson, K., Davis, P., Bowen, M., & Galumbeck, C. (1988). Effects of cosmetics use on the physical attractiveness and body image of American college women. The Journal of Social Psychology, 129: 349–355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clayson, D.E., & Klassen, M.L. (1989). Perception of attractiveness by obesity and hair color. Perceptual and Motor Skills. 68: 199–202.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Clayson, D.E., & Maughan, M.R.C. (1986). Redheads and blonds: Stereotypie images. Psychological Reports, 59:811–816.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clore, G.L., & Byrne, D. (1974). A reinforcement-affect model of attraction. In T. L. Huston (Ed.), Foundations of interpersonal attraction (pp. 143–170). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cronbach, L.J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika. 16: 297–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cunningham, M.R. (1986). Measuring the physical in physical attractiveness: Quasi-experiments on the sociobiology of female facial beauty. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50: 925–935.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cunningham, M.R., Barbee, A.P., & Pike, C.L. (1990). What do women want? Facialmetric assessment of multiple motives in the perception of male facial physical attractiveness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59: 61–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cunningham, M.R., Roberts, A.R., Barbee, A.P., Druen, P.B., & Wu, C. (1995). “Their ideas of beauty are, on the whole, the same as ours”: Consistency and variability in the cross-cultural perception of female physical attractiveness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68: 261–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, K, (1987). Effects of sex and glasses on attitudes toward intelligence and attractiveness. Psychological Reports, 60: 590.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franzoi, S.L., & Herzog, M.E. (1987). Judging physical attractiveness: What body aspects do we use? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 13: 19–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Furham, A., & Radley, S. (1989). Sex differences in the perceptions of male and female body shapes. Personality and Individual Differences, 10: 653–662.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gitter, G., Lomranz, J., & Saxe, L. (1982). Factors affecting perceived attractiveness of male physiques by American and Israeli students. The Journal of Social Psychology, 118: 167–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gitter, A.G., Lomranz, J., Saxe, L., & Bar-Tal, Y. (1983). Perceptions of female physique characteristics by American and Israeli students. The Journal of Social Psychology, 121: 7–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gouaux, C. (1971). Induced affective states and interpersonal attraction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 20: 37–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hewitt, J., & German, K. (1987). Attire and attractiveness. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 64: 558.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keating, C.F. (1985). Gender and the physiognomy of dominance and attractiveness, Social Psychology Quarterly, 48: 61–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Langlois, J.H., & Roggman, L.A. (1990). Attractive faces are only average. Psychological Science, 1: 115–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lavrakas, P. J. (1975). Female preferences for male physiques. Journal of Research in Personality, 9:324–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mehrabian, A. (1972). Nonverbal communication. In J.K. Cole (Ed.), Nebraska symposium on motivation. 1971: Vol. 19. (pp. 107–161). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mehrabian, A. (1981). Silent messages: Implicit communication of emotions and attitudes (2nd ed.). Belmont, California: Wadsworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mehrabian, A. (1992). Interrelationships among name desirability, name uniqueness, emotion characteristics connoted by names, and temperament. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 22: 1797–1808.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mehrabian, A. (1995). Framework for a comprehensive description and measurement of emotional states. Genetic, Social and General Psychology Monographs, 121: 339–361.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mehrabian, A., & Ksionzky, S. (1970). Models for affiliative and conformity behavior. Psychological Bulletin, 74: 110–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mehrabian, A., & Russell, J.A. (1974). A verbal measure of information rate for studies in environmental psychology. Environment and Behavior, 6: 233–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mueser, K.T., Grau, B.W., Sussman, S., & Rosen, A.J. (1984). You’re only as pretty as you feel: Facial expression as a determinant of physical attractiveness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46: 469–478.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osgood, CE., Suci, G.J., & Tannenbaum, P.H. (1957). The measurement of meaning. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, K., & Curran, J. P. (1976). Trait attribution as a function of hair length and correlates of subjects’ preferences for hair style. The Journal of Psychology, 93: 331–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sadalla, E.K., Kenrick, D.T., & Vershure, B. (1987). Dominance and heterosexual attraction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52: 730–738.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shepperd, J.A., & Strathman, A.J. (1989). Attractiveness and height: The role of stature in dating preference, frequency of dating, and perceptions of attractiveness. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 15: 617–627.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Terry, R.L., & Davis, J.S. (1976). Components of facial attractiveness. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 42: 918.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valdez, P., & Mehrabian, A. (1994). Effects of color on emotions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. 123: 394–409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Veitch, R. (1976). Physiological arousal, affect and interpersonal attraction. Psychological Reports, 35:43–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zebrowitz, L.A., & Montepare, J.M. (1992). Impressions of babyfaced individuals across the life span. Developmental Psychology, 28: 1143–1152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mehrabian, A., Blum, J.S. Physical appearance, attractiveness, and the mediating role of emotions. Curr Psychol 16, 20–42 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-997-1013-0

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-997-1013-0

Keywords

Navigation