Abstract
Recent research in computational neuroscience has demonstrated that we now possess the ability to simulate neural systems in significant detail and on a large scale. Simulations on the scale of a human brain have recently been reported. The ability to simulate entire brains (or significant portions thereof) would be a revolutionary scientific advance, with substantial benefits for brain science. However, the prospect of whole-brain simulation comes with a set of new and unique ethical questions. In the present paper, we briefly outline certain of those problems and emphasize the need to begin considering the ethical aspects of computational neuroscience.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
References
Izhikevich, E.M., and G.M. Edelman. 2008. Large-scale model of mammalian thalamocortical systems. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 105: 3593–3598.
Block, N. 1997. On a confusion about a function of consciousness. In The nature of consciousness: Philosophical debates, ed. N. Block, O. Flanagan, and G. Guzeldere. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Searle, J. 1980. Minds, brains, and programs. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3: 417–457.
Searle, J. 1999. Mind, language, and society. New York: Basic Books.
Turing, A. 1950. Computing machinery and intelligence. Mind 59: 455–460.
Chalmers, D.J. 1995. Absent qualia, fading qualia, dancing qualia. In Conscious experience, ed. Thomas Metzinger, 309–328. Exeter: Imprint Academic.
Moravec, H. 1988. Mind children. Cambridge: Harvard University.
Singer, W. 1998. Consciousness and the structure of neuronal representations. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B 353: 1829–1840.
Singer, W. 2001. Consciousness and the binding problem. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 929: 123–146.
Pakkenberg, B., and H.J.G. Gundersen. 1997. Neocortical neuron number in humans: Effect of sex and age. The Journal of Comparative Neurology 384: 312–320.
Izhikevich, E.M. 2004. Which model to use for spiking neurons. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks 15: 1063–1070.
Izhikevich, E.M. 2003. Simple model of spiking neurons. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks 14: 1569–1572.
Schnitzler, A., and M. Ploner. 2000. Neurophysiology and functional neuroanatomy of pain perception. Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology 17: 592–603.
Treede, R.-D., D.R. Kenshalo, R.H. Gracely, and A.K.P. Jones. 1999. The cortical representation of pain. Pain 79: 105–111.
Kozlov, A., M. Huss, A. Lansner, J.H. Kotaleski, and S. Grillner. 2009. Simple cellular and network control principles govern complex patterns of motor behavior. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 106: 20027–20032.
Burd, L., J.M. Gregory, and J. Kerbeshian. 1998. The brain-mind quiddity: Ethical issues in the use of human brain tissue for therapeutic and scientific purposes. Journal of Medical Ethics 24: 118–122.
Acknowledgments
I thank J. R. Caldwell and two reviewers for their helpful comments and suggestions.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bancroft, T.D. Ethical Aspects of Computational Neuroscience. Neuroethics 6, 415–418 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12152-012-9163-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12152-012-9163-7