Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Is Addiction a Brain Disease?

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Neuroethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Letter to this article was published on 01 April 2017

Abstract

Where does normal brain or psychological function end, and pathology begin? The line can be hard to discern, making disease sometimes a tricky word. In addiction, normal ‘wanting’ processes become distorted and excessive, according to the incentive-sensitization theory. Excessive ‘wanting’ results from drug-induced neural sensitization changes in underlying brain mesolimbic systems of incentive. ‘Brain disease’ was never used by the theory, but neural sensitization changes are arguably extreme enough and problematic enough to be called pathological. This implies that ‘brain disease’ can be a legitimate description of addiction, though caveats are needed to acknowledge roles for choice and active agency by the addict. Finally, arguments over ‘brain disease’ should be put behind us. Our real challenge is to understand addiction and devise better ways to help. Arguments over descriptive words only distract from that challenge.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lewis, Marc. 2011. Memoirs of an addicted brain. New York: Public Affairs Perseus Books.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Lewis, Marc. 2015. The biology of desire. Philadelphia: Perseus books.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Lewis, Marc. 2017. Addiction and the brain: development, not disease. Neuroethics (this issue)

  4. Robinson, T.E., and K.C. Berridge. 1993. The neural basis of drug craving: an incentive-sensitization theory of addiction. Brain Research. Brain Research Reviews 18(3): 247–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Robinson, Terry E., and Kent C. Berridge. 2003. Addiction. Annual Review of Psychology 54(1): 25–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Leyton, M., and P. Vezina. 2013. Striatal ups and downs: their roles in vulnerability to addictions in humans. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 37(9 Pt A): 1999–2014. doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2013.01.018.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Volkow, N.D., G.F. Koob, and A.T. McLellan. 2016. Neurobiologic advances from the brain disease model of addiction. The New England Journal of Medicine 374(4): 363–371. doi:10.1056/NEJMra1511480.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Steketee, J.D., and P.W. Kalivas. 2011. Drug wanting: behavioral sensitization and relapse to drug-seeking behavior. Pharmacological Reviews 63(2): 348–365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Wolf, M.E. 2010. The Bermuda triangle of cocaine-induced neuroadaptations. Trends in Neurosciences 33(9): 391–398. doi:10.1016/j.tins.2010.06.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Bossert, J.M., N.J. Marchant, D.J. Calu, and Y. Shaham. 2013. The reinstatement model of drug relapse: recent neurobiological findings, emerging research topics, and translational research. Psychopharmacology 229(3): 453–476. doi:10.1007/s00213-013-3120-y.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Berridge, Kent C. 2012. From prediction error to incentive salience: mesolimbic computation of reward motivation. European Journal of Neuroscience 35(7): 1124–1143. doi:10.1111/j.1460-9568.2012.07990.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kent C. Berridge.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Berridge, K.C. Is Addiction a Brain Disease?. Neuroethics 10, 29–33 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12152-016-9286-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12152-016-9286-3

Keywords

Navigation