Abstract
This study of internal migration at the state level empirically investigates the Tiebout hypothesis (as extended by Tullock) of “voting with one’s feet.” In addition to its adoption of more current data (net migration from July, 2000 through July, 2008) than other related studies to date, the model differs from most previous comparable studies by including a separate cost of living variable and a measure of per capita state income tax burdens. We also test the hypothesis using two alternative specifications: one linear and the other semi-log. Finally, the analysis also provides both OLS and 2SLS estimates. The advantage of this multi-faceted approach is that it permits an assessment of how sensitive the results are to specification changes and to different estimation procedures. After controlling for economic factors and a quality of life/climate variable, migrants (consumer-voters) appear to prefer lower state income tax burdens, lower state plus local property tax burdens, and higher per pupil outlays on primary and secondary public education.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
ACCRA (2001) The council for community and economic research.
Barsby SL, Cox DR (1975) Interstate migration of the elderly. Lexington Books, Lexington
Buchanan JM (1950) Federalism and fiscal equity. Am Econ Rev 54(5):583–589
Carrington W, Detragiache E, Vishwanath T (1996) Migration and Endogenous moving costs. Am Econ Rev 86(4):909–930
Cebula RJ (1979) The determinants of human migration. Lexington Books, Lexington
Cebula RJ (2010) The effect of state and local taxes and spending in migration. State Tax Notes 56(13):1029–1035
Cebula RJ, Alexander G (2006) Determinants of net interstate migration, 2000–2004. J Reg Anal Policy 27(2):116–123
Cebula RJ, Belton WJ (1994) Voting with one’s feet: an analysis of public welfare and migration of the American Indian. Am J Econ Sociol 53(3):273–280
Census Bureau US (2002) Statistical abstract of the United States, 2002. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C
Census Bureau US (2005) Statistical abstract of the United States, 2004–2005. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C
Census Bureau US (2009) Statistical abstract of the United States, 2009. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C
Census Bureau US (2010) Statistical abstract of the United States, 2010. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C
Chi G, Voss PR (2005) Migration decision-making: a hierarchical regression approach. J Reg Anal Policy 35(2):11–22
Clark DE, Hunter WJ (1992) The impact of economic opportunity, amenities, and fiscal factors in age-specific migration rates. J Reg Sci 32(3):349–365
Conway KS, Houtenvile AJ (2003) Out with the old, in with the old: a closer look at younger versus older elderly migration. Soc Sci Q 84(2):309–328
Conway KS, Houtenville AJ (1998) Do the elderly ‘vote with their feet’? Public Choice 97(1):63–85
Conway KS, Houtenville AJ (2001) Elderly migration and state fiscal policy: evidence from the 1990 census migration flows. Natl Tax J 54(1):103–123
Davies PS, Greenwood MJ, Li H (2001) A conditional logit approach to U.S. state-to-state migration. J Reg Sci 41(2):337–357
DeJong GJ, Donnelly WL (1973) Public welfare and migration of the poor. Soc Sci Q 16(1):329–344
Francis J (2007) Asymmetries in regional labor markets, migration, and economic geography. Ann Reg Sci 41(1):124–144
Gale LR, Heath WC (2000) Elderly internal migration in the U.S. revisited. Public Finance Rev 28(2):153–157
Greene KV (1977) Spillovers, migration, and public school expenditures: the repetition of an experiment. Public Choice 29(1):85–93
Hinze KE (1977) Net migration to metropolitan areas. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Knapp TA, White NE, Clark DE (2001) A nested logit approach to household mobility. J Reg Sci 41(1):1–22
Landry CE, Bin O, Hindsley P, Whitehead JC, Wilson K (2007) Going home: evacuation migration decisions of hurricane katrina Survivors. South Econ J 74(2):326–343
Liu BC (1977) Local government finance and metropolitan employment growth: a simultaneous-equations model. South Econ J 43(4):1379–1385
Milligan J (2000) Migration and age: the effects of age on sensitivity to migration stimuli. Reg Stud 34(4):521–533
Nechyba T (2000) Mobility, targeting, and private-school vouchers. Am Econ Rev 90(1):130–146
Pack JR (1973) Determinants of migration to central cities. J Reg Sci 13(2):249–260
Partridge MD, Rickman DS (2006) An SVAR model of fluctuations in U.S. migration flows and state labor markets. South Econ J 72(4):958–980
Percy SL, Hawhins BW, Maier PE (1995) Revisiting Tiebout: moving rationales and interjurisdictional relocation. Publius J Federalism 25(2):1–17
Renas SM (1978) The cost of living, labor market opportunities, and the migration decision. Ann Reg Sci 15(1):95–104
Renas SM (1980) An empirical note on the Tiebout-tullock hypothesis: comment. Q J Econ 94(3):619–623
Renas SM (1983) The cost of living, labor market opportunities, and the migration decision: more on problems of misspecification and Aggregation Bias. Ann Reg Sci 17(1):98–110
Rhode PW, Strumpf KS (2003) Assessing the importance of Tiebout sorting: local heterogeneity from 1950 to 1990. Am Econ Rev 93(5):1648–1677
Riew J (1973) Migration and public policy. J Reg Sci 12(2):65–73
Saltz IS (1998) State income taxation and geographic labor force mobility in the United States. Appl Econ Lett 5(5):599–604
Sommers PM, Suits DB (1973) An analysis of net interstate migration. South Econ J 40(2):193–201
Tiebout CM (1956) A pure theory of local expenditures. J Polit Econ 64(1):416–424
Tullock G (1971) Public expenditures as public goods. J Polit Econ 79(5):913–918
Vedder RK (1976) The American economy in historical perspective. Wadsworth, Belmont
Vedder RK, Gallaway LE, Graves PE, Sexton R (1986) An historical perspective in interregional migration in the U.S. In: Krumm RJ (ed) Housing and migration. Blackstone Books, Mount Pleasant, MI, pp 101–124
West DA, Hamilton JR, Loomis RA (1976) A conceptual framework for guiding policy-related research on migration. Land Econ 52(1):66–76
White H (1980) A heteroskedasticity-consistent covariance matrix and a direct test for heteroskedasticity. Econometrica 48(4):817–838
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cebula, R.J., Nair-Reichert, U. Migration and public policies: a further empirical analysis. J Econ Finan 36, 238–248 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12197-011-9181-z
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12197-011-9181-z