Skip to main content
Log in

Durability Study of Silica Fume-mortar exposed to the Combined Sulfate and Chloride-rich Solution

  • Structural Engineering
  • Published:
KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The present article investigates the mechanism behind the sulfate attack of the Ordinary Portland Cement (OPC) and the Silica Fume (SF) based mortar exposed to the combined sulfate and chloride-rich solution. In this study, the control mortar sample was fabricated using OPC. Additionally, the silica fume based mortar composites were fabricated using SF replacing the 5, 10, and 15% of OPC. The 28 days cured control and silica fume based mortar samples were exposed to a sodium sulfate (5%) solution and a mixture of sodium sulfate (5%) and sodium chloride (3.5%) solution for 510 days to examine the deterioration of mortar samples by the sulfate attack. The results reveal that a less extent of deterioration takes place in the silica fume based mortar as compared to that of the OPC mortar exposed to both solutions. The retarded deterioration of silica fume based mortar is primarily governed by the formation of a less extent of expansive ettringite and gypsum due to the consumption of portlandite in producing secondary Calcium Silicate Hydrate (CSH). Based on the analytical analyses, a model has been proposed to explain the overall performances of the silica fume based cement mortar composites exposed to different aggressive environments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aït-Mokhtar, A. and Millet, O. (2015). Structure design and degradation mechanisms in coastal environments, Aït-Mokhtar, A., Millet, O. Eds., John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, N. J., USA.

  • Al-Amoudi, O. S. B., Maslehuddin, M., and Abdul-Al, Y. A. B. (1995). “Role of chlorideions on expansion and strength reduction in plain and blended cements in sulfate environments.” Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 9, No. 1, pp. 25–33, DOI: 10.1016/0950-0618(95)92857-D.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Al-Dulaijan, S. U. (2007). “Sulfate resistance of plain and blended cements exposed to magnesium sulfate solutions.” Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 21, No. 8, pp. 1792–1802, DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2006.05.017.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ASTM C 109/C 109M (2004). Standard test method for compressive strength of hydraulic cement mortars, American Society for Testing and Materials, West Conshohocken, Pennsylvania, USA: ASTM International.

  • ASTM C1012 (2004). Standard test method for length change of hydraulic-cement mortars exposed to a sulfate solution, American Society for Testing and Materials, West Conshohocken, Pennsylvania, USA: ASTM International.

  • ASTM C150 (2015). Standard specification for portland cement, American Society for Testing and Materials, West Conshohocken, Pennsylvania, USA: ASTM International.

  • Bonakdar, A., Mobasher, B., and Chawla, N. (2012). “Diffsivity and micro-hardness of blended cement materials exposed to external sulfate attack.” Cement and Concrete Composites, Vol. 34, No. 1, pp. 76–85, DOI: 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2011.08.016.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, W. and Taylor, H. (1999). “The role of ettringite in external sulfate attack.” Materials Science of Concrete: Sulfate Attack Mechanisms, Marchand, J, and Skalny, J., Eds., The American Ceramic Society, pp. 73–98, Westerville (OH).

    Google Scholar 

  • Chakraborty, S., Kundu, S. P., Roy, A., Adhikari, B., and Majumder, S. B. (2013). “Effect of jute as fiber reinforcement controlling the hydration characteristics of cement matrix.” Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research, Vol. 52, pp. 1252–1260, DOI: 10.1021/ie300607r.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collepardi, M. (2001). “Ettringite formation and sulfate attack on concrete.” ACI materials Journal, Vol. 200, pp. 21–38. Available at: http://www.encosrl.it/OLDSITE/pubblicazioni-scientifiche/pdf/degrado/63.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duana, P., Shuia, Z., Chena, W., and Shen, C. (2013). “Enhancing microstructure and durability of concrete from ground granulated blast furnace slag and metakaolin as cement replacement materials.” Journal of Materials Research and Technology, Vol. 2, No. 1, pp. 52–59, DOI: 10.1016/j.jmrt.2013.03.010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frias, M., Goñi, S., García, R., and Vigil de La Villa, R. (2013). “Seawater effect on durability of ternary cements. Synergy of chloride and sulphate ions.” Composites: Part B, Vol. 46, pp. 173–178, DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2012.09.089.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hartshorn, S. A., Sharp, J. H., and Swamy, R. N. (2002). “The thaumasite form of sulfate attack in portland-limestone cement mortars stored in magnesium sulfate solution.” Cement and Concrete Composites, Vol. 24, pp. 351–359, DOI: 10.1016/S0958-9465(01)00087-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Idiart, A. E., Lopez, C. M., and Carol, I. (2011). “Chemo-mechanical analysis of concrete cracking and degradation due to external sulfate attack: A meso-scale model.” Cement and Concrete Composites, Vol. 33, No. 3, pp. 411–423, DOI: 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2010.12.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Irassar, E. F., Bonavetti, V. L., and González, M. (2003). “Microstructural study of sulfate attack on ordinary and limestone Portland cements at ambient temperature.” Cement and Concrete Research, Vol. 33, pp. 31–41, DOI: 10.1016/S0008-8846(02)00914-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jo, B. W. and Chakraborty, S. (2015). “A mild alkali treated jute fibre controlling the hydration behaviour of greener cement paste.” Scientific Reports, Vol. 5, No. 7837, pp. 1–9, DOI: 10.1038/srep07837.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jo, B. W., Chakraborty, S., Kim, K. H., and Lee, Y. S. (2014). “Effectiveness of the top-down nanotechnology in the production of ultrafine cement (220 nm).” Journal of Nanomaterials, Vol. 2014, No. 131627, pp. 1–9, DOI: 10.1155/2014/131627.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jo, B. W., Sikandar, M. A., Chakraborty, S., and Baloch, Z. (2017). “Investigation of the acid and sulfate resistance performances of hydrogen-rich water based mortars.” Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 137, pp. 1–11, DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.01.074.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lea, F. M. (1970). The chemistry of cement and concrete, 3rd Edition, Edward Arnold Publishers, London, pp. 442.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, S. T. (2012). “Performance of mortars exposed to different sulfate concentrations.” KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, Vol. 16, No. 4, pp. 601–609, DOI: 10.1007/s12205-012-1054-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, S. T., Moon, H. Y., and Swamy, R. N. (2005). “Sulfate attack and role of silica fume in resisting strength loss.” Cement & Concrete Composites, Vol. 27, pp. 65–76, DOI: 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2003.11.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leklou, N., Nguyen, V. H., and Mounanga, P. (2017). “The effect of the partial cement substitution with fly ash on delayed ettringite formation in heat-cured mortars.” KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, Vol. 21, No. 4, pp. 1359–1366, DOI: 10.1007/s12205-016-0778-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lorente, S., Yssorche-Cubaynes, M. P., and Auger, J. (2011). “Sulfate transfer through concrete: Migration and diffsion results.” Cement and Concrete Composites, Vol. 33, No. 7, pp. 735–741, DOI: 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2011.05.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maes, M. and Belie, N. D. (2014). “Resistance of concrete and mortar against combined attack of chloride and sodium sulphate.” Cement & Concrete Composites, Vol. 53, pp. 59–72, DOI: 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2014.06.013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naik, N. N., Jupe, A. C., Stock, S. R., Wilkinson, A. P., Lee, P. L., and Kurtis, K. E. (2006). “Sulfate attack monitored by microCT and EDXRD: Inflence of cement type, water-to-cement ratio, and aggregate.” Cement and Concrete Research, Vol. 36, No. 1, pp. 144–159, DOI: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2005.06.004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neville, A. (2004). “The confused world of sulfate attack on concrete.” Cement and Concrete Research, Vol. 34, pp. 1275–1296, DOI: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2004.04.004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neville, A. M. and Brooks, J. J. (2010). Concrete technology [2nd edition], Pearson Education limited, England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ogawa, K. and Roy, D. M. (1982). “C4A3S hydration, ettringite formation, and its expansion mechanism: III. Effect of CaO, NaOH and NaCl; conclusions.” Cement and Concrete Research, Vol. 12, No. 2, pp. 247–256, DOI: 10.1016/0008-8846(82)90011-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pommersheim, J. M. and Cliftn, J. R. (1994). “Expansion of cementitious materials exposed to sulfate solutions, scientifi basis for nuclear waste management.” Materials Research Society, Vol. 333, pp. 363–368, DOI: 10.1557/PROC-333-363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rapin, J. P., Renaudin, G., Elkaim, E., and Francois, M. (2002). “Structural transition of Friedel’s salt 3CaO Al2O3 CaCl2 10H2O studied by synchrotron powder diffraction.” Cement and Concrete Research, Vol. 32, pp. 513–519, DOI: 10.1016/S0008-8846(01)00716-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryou, J., Lee, S., Park, D., Kim, S., and Jung, H. (2015). “Durability of cement mortars incorporating limestone filler exposed to sodium sulfate solution.” KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, Vol. 19, No. 5, pp. 1347–1358, DOI: 10.1007/s12205-012-0457-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Santhanam, M., Cohen, M. D., and Olek, J. (2001). “Sulfate attack research–whither now?.” Cement Concrete Research, Vol. 31, pp. 845–851, DOI: 10.1016/S0008-8846(01)00510-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Santhanam, M., Cohen, M. D., and Olek, J. (2002). “Modeling the effects of solution temperature and concentration during sulfate attack on cement mortars.” Cement and Concrete Research, Vol. 32, No. 4, pp. 585–592, DOI: 10.1016/S0008-8846(01)00727-X.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siddique, R. and Khan, M. I. (2011). “Silica fume.” Supplementary cementing materials, R. Siddique and M. I. Khan, Eds., CH. 2, Springer, Heidelberg, p. 110.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Sun, C., Chen, J., Zhu, J., Zhang, M., and Ye, J. (2013). “A new diffusion model of sulfate ions in concrete.” Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 39, pp. 39–45, DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.05.022.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tixier, R. and Mobasher, B. (2003a). “Modeling of damage in cement based materials subjected to external sulfate attack. I. Formulation.” Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, Vol. 15, No. 4, pp. 305–313, DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2003)15:4(305).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tixier, R. and Mobasher, B. (2003b). “Modeling of damage in cementbased materials subjected to external sulfate attack II: Comparison with experiments sulfate attack mechanisms.” Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, Vol. 15, No. 4, pp. 314–322, DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2003)15:4(314).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, S., Zhongzi, Z., and Mingsu, T. (1996). “The process of sulfate attack on cement mortars.” Advanced Cement Based Materials, Vol. 4, pp. 1–5, DOI: 10.1016/S1065-7355(96)90057-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yildirim, K. and Sümer, M. (2013). “Effects of sodium chloride and magnesium sulfate concentration on the durability of cement mortar with and without fly ash.” Composites: Part B, Vol. 52, pp. 56–61, DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2013.03.040.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, M. H., Chen, J. K., Lv, Y. F., Wang, D. J., and Ye, J. (2013). “Study on the expansion of concrete under attack of sulfate and sulfate chloride ions.” Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 39, pp. 26–32, DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.05.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, Y., Tian, H., Sui, L., Xing, F., and Han, N. (2015). “Strength Deterioration of Concrete in Sulfate Environment: An Experimental Study and Theoretical Modeling.” Advances in Materials Science and Engineering, Vol. 2015, No. 951209, pp. 1–13, DOI: 10.1155/2015/951209.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sumit Chakraborty.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jo, B.W., Chakraborty, S., Lee, ST. et al. Durability Study of Silica Fume-mortar exposed to the Combined Sulfate and Chloride-rich Solution. KSCE J Civ Eng 23, 356–366 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-018-5809-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-018-5809-2

Keywords

Navigation