Skip to main content
Log in

Optimized geometric error sensitivity analysis approach based on stream-of-variation theory in multi-axis precise motion platform

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, an optimized error sensitivity analysis (ESA) approach based on stream-of-variation (SOV) theory in multi-axis precise motion platform (MPMP) is introduced. Unlike the conventional ESA method, this approach utilizes stream-of-variation theory to establish error model firstly. By regarding each axis as a station, the error propagation and deviation accumulation processes are clear station by station. Through obtaining the deviations after each station, the sensitive stations can be developed, and corresponding error terms are collected. Thus, by analyzing the appearance frequency of the errors, a precise sensitive order can be developed, and a sensitivity results with different steps is given. Through ignoring the insensitive and irrelevant errors, the computational volume of error model can be saved, and the efficiency can be improved. A case study about a typical MPMP used in laser welding system (LWS) is carried out, and the results indicate that the optimized ESA approach is more efficient and accurate, and it is flexible as well. This ESA approach is not only accurate in developing sensitive levels, but also balancing the systematic accuracy and working efficiency, which is helpful to provide informative guide to engineers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

MPMP :

Multi-axis precise motion platform

HTM :

Homogeneous transformation matrix

X, Y, Z, A, B, C :

Axis in multi-axis system

x, y, z, u, v, w :

Geometric error

xk, yk, zk :

Kinematic error

αs, βs, γs :

Location error

Si/Sa :

Ideal state/actual state

F :

Coordinate offset matrix

T mov :

Movement matrix

E s :

Location error matrix

E k :

Kinematic error matrix

P j :

Initial state in system j

OPS:

Optoelectronic packaging system

Yo, Zo :

Coordinate offset between two adjacent systems

References

  1. L. R. Kumar, K. P. Padmanaban and S. G. Kumar, Nonlinear robust control of a hydraulic elevator design and optimization of concurrent tolerance in mechanical assemblies using bat algorithm, Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology, 30(6) (2016) 2601–2614.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. H. Tang, J. A. Duan and S. H. Lan, A new geometric error modeling approach for multi-axis system based on stream of variation theory, International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture, 92 (2015) 41–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. W. J. Tian, W. G. Gao and D. W. Zhang, A general approach for error modeling of machine tools, International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture, 79 (2014) 17–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. B. Weglowski and M. Pilarczyk, Experimental and numerical verification of transient spatial temperature distribution in thick-walled pressure components, Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology, 32(3) (2018) 1087–1098.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. R. J. Bhatt and H. K. Raval, In situ investigations on forces and power consumption during flow forming process, Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology, 32(3) (2018) 1307–1315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. H. Tang, J. A. Duan and Q. C. Zhao, A new geometric error modeling approach for multi-axis system based on stream of variation theory, International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture, 92 (2015) 41–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. C. Z. Li, W. Wang and Y. F. Jiang, A sensitivity method to analyze the volumetric error of five-axis machine tool, International Journal of Advanced Manufacture Technology, 98 (2018) 1791–1805.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. S. K. Kang, K. F. Ehmann and C. Lin, A CAD approach to helical groove machining. Part 2: Numerical evaluation and sensitivity analysis, International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture, 37(1) (1997) 101–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. S. M. Wang and K. F. Ehmann, Measurement methods for the position errors of a multi-axis machine. Part 1: principles and sensitivity analysis, International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture, 39(1) (1999) 951–964.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. I. S. Kim, K. J. Son and Y. S. Yang, Sensitivity analysis for process parameters in GMA welding processes using a factorial design method, International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture, 43 (2003) 763–769.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. K. C. Fan, H. Wang and J. W. Zhao, Sensitivity analysis of the 3-PRS parallel kinematic spindle platform of a serial-parallel machine tool, International Journal of Machine tools and Manufacture, 43 (2003) 1561–1569.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. J. F. Hsieh, Mathematical model and sensitivity analysis for helical groove machining, International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture, 46 (2006) 1087–1096.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. E. Omidi, A. H. Korayem and M. H. Korayem, Sensitivity analysis of nanoparticles pushing manipulation by AFM in a robust controlled process, Precision Engineering, 37 (2013) 658–670.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. G. D. Chen, Y. C. Liang and Y. Z. Sun, Volumetric error modeling and sensitivity analysis for designing a five-axis ultra-precision machine tool, International Journal of Advanced Manufacture Technology, 68 (2013) 2525–2534.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. B. Zi, H. F. Ding and X. Wu, Error modeling and sensitivity analysis of a hybrid-driven based cable parallel manipulator, Precision Engineering, 38 (2014) 197–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. X. Y. Zuo, B. Z. Li and J. G. Yang, Error sensitivity analysis and precision distribution for multi-operation machining processes based on error propagation model, International Journal of Advanced Manufacture Technology, 86 (2016) 269–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Q. Cheng, Q. N. Feng and Z. F. Liu, Sensitivity analysis of machining accuracy of multi-axis machine tool based on POE screw theory and Morris method, International Journal of Advanced Manufacture Technology, 84 (2016) 2301–2318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. W. F. Wei and G. P. Zhang, Tool path modeling and error sensitivity analysis of crankshaft pin CNC grinding, International Journal of Advanced Manufacture Technology, 86 (2016) 2485–2502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. L. P. Zhao, H. R. Chen and Y. Y. Yao, A new approach to improving the machining precision based on dynamic sensitivity analysis, International Journal of Machine tools and Manufacture, 102 (2016) 9–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. S. J. Guo, G. D. Jiang and X. S. Mei, Investigation of sensitivity analysis and compensation parameter optimization of geometric error five-axis machine tool, International Journal of Advanced Manufacture Technology, 93 (2017) 3229–3243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. X. C. Zou, X. S. Zhao and G. Li, Sensitivity analysis using a variance-based method for a three-axis diamond turning machine, International Journal of Advanced Manufacture Technology, 92 (2017) 4429–4443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. J. Li, F. G. Xie and X. J. Liu, A spatial vector projection based error sensitivity analysis method for industrial robots, Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology, 32(6) (2018) 2839–2850.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. S. Ibaraki, G. Shunsuke and T. Keisuke, Kinematic modeling and error sensitivity analysis for on-machine five-axis laser scanning measurement under machine geometric errors and workpiece setup errors, International Journal of Advanced Manufacture Technology, 96 (2018) 4051–4062.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. T. Jaravel, H. Wu and M. Ihme, Error-controlled kinetics reduction based on non-linear optimization and sensitivity analysis, Combust Flame, 200 (2019) 192–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. J. Shi and S. Zhou, Quality control and improvement for multistage systems: a survey, IIE Transcations, 41 (2009) 744–753.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. J. Abellan-Nebot, F. Subiron and J. Mira, Manufacturing variation models in multi-station machining systems, International Journal of Advanced Manufacture Technology, 96 (2013) 63–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. H. Tang, J. A. Duan and S. Q. Lu, Stream-of-variation (SOV) theory applied in geometric error modeling for six-axis motion platform, IEEE Transaction of System: Man and Cyber-System, 99 (2017) 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 51705149 and No. 51875198) and the Natural Science Foundation of Hunan province (Grant No.2018JJ3168).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hao Tang.

Additional information

Hao Tang was born in Changsha, Hunan, China, in 1988. He graduated from Dong Hua University, Shanghai, China, and started the M.S. degree in mechanical engineering in Central South University, Changsha, China, in 2009, and transferred into Ph.D. student in 2011. His research interests include error analysis, error modeling and precision transferring in complicated multi-axis motion system, and applications of optoelectronic packaging system and laser welding system. He, as a visiting student, went to University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, US, from Sept. 2013 to Mar. 2015, and worked in S.M. Wu Manufacture Center.

Chang Ping Li is an Assistant Professor of Mechanical Engineering at Hunan University of Science & Technology, China. He received his bachelor’s from Kumoh National Institute of Technology, South Korea. He received master’s degrees and Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering from Yeungnam University, South Korea. His research interests include the development of machine tools; hybrid machining; nontraditional machining; the deburring process of CFRP composites.

Jia Chen is an undergraduate student of Mechanical Engineering at Hunan University of Science & Technology, China. Her research interests include error analysis, error modeling and error parameters transferring law in complicated multi-axis motion system, and the relation of Monte-Carlo method and mathematical derivation.

Huimin Kang is a Professor of Mechanical Engineering at Hunan University of Science & Technology, China. He received his bachelor’s from Shenyang Aerospace University, China. He received master’s degrees and Ph.D. from The State Key Laboratory of Mechanical Transmission, Chongqing University, China. His research interests include the dynamic evolution mechanism analysis of high speed motorized spindle’s turning accuracy under complex working conditions, dynamic stiffness analysis and active control of high speed motorized spindle.

Tae Jo Ko is a Professor of Mechanical Engineering at Yeungnam University, South Korea. He received his bachelor’s and master’s degrees from Pusan National University, South Korea. He received a Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering from POSTECH, South Korea. His research interests include the development of machine tools; micro-cutting processes; nontraditional machining; surface texturing using piezoelectric actuators; surface texturing using grinding, bio-machining, and textured surfaces on cutting tools; and the deburring process of CFRP composites.

Mianke Du was born in Beijing of China in 1984. He graduate from Harbin Engineering University, in 2008. He has been the R & D manager of ZOLIX Instruments CO., LTD since 2008. He is mainly responsible for the research and development of precision machinery and its motion control system. He has applied for 2 invention patents and 8 utility model patents.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tang, H., Li, C., Chen, J. et al. Optimized geometric error sensitivity analysis approach based on stream-of-variation theory in multi-axis precise motion platform. J Mech Sci Technol 34, 4229–4237 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12206-020-0915-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12206-020-0915-8

Keywords

Navigation