Abstract
The recent advancements in nanoscale 3D printing and microfabrication techniques have reinvigorated research on microscale robots (microrobots). However, precise motion control of microrobots using compact actuation/control setups remains challenging to date. This work presents a novel motion direction control mechanism and contact design that enables bidirectional steering and object pushing. This is done via biasing the tilt position of the microrobot during stick–slip motion with an out-of-plane magnetic field generated by a single, compact coil. Equipped with rockers to contact the substrate, the microrobot—hence microrocker bot—is capable of well-controlled, selectable, forward, and backward movement given a set orientation. These 100 μm × 113 μm × 36 μm robots were 3D printed via two-photon lithography and subsequently deposited with a 300 nm layer of nickel, which determined their magnetization directions based on thin film magnetoelastic anisotropy. Under a static magnetic field, the bot tilts either forward or backward to align its magnetization vectors with the magnetic field lines. Combined with an oscillating magnetic field, the robot undergoes stick–slip motion in the predisposed direction, dictated by the tilt. Experimentally, the robot can travel up to 100 μm/s (1 body length per second) forward and backward and demonstrate micromanipulation capabilities. Finally, the robot dynamics is theoretically modeled and validated to analyze the present forces and the stick–slip motion.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability statement
All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this published article (and its supplementary information files).
Change history
09 April 2022
A Correction to this paper has been published: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12213-022-00150-5
References
Leong T, Randall C, Benson B, Bassik N, Stern G, Gracias D (2009) Tetherless thermobiochemically actuated microgrippers. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106(3):703–708. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0807698106
Yim S, Gultepe E, Gracias D, Sitti M (2014) Biopsy using a magnetic capsule endoscope carrying, releasing, and retrieving untethered microgrippers. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 61(2):513–521. https://doi.org/10.1109/TBME.2013.2283369
Lee S, Kim J, Kim J, Hoshiar AK, Park J, Lee S, Kim J, Pane S, Nelson BJ, Choi H (2020) A needle-type microrobot for targeted drug delivery by affixing to a microtissue. Adv Healthc Mater 9(7):1–6. https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.201901697
Yim S, Goyal K, Sitti M (2013) Magnetically actuated soft capsule with the multimodal drug release function. IEEE ASME Trans Mechatron 18(4):1413–1418. https://doi.org/10.1109/TMECH.2012.2235077
Kratochvil B, Kummer MP, Abbott J, Borer R, Ergeneman O (2010) Nelson BJ (2010) Octomag: An electromagnetic system for 5-dof wireless micromanipulation. IEEE Int Conf Robot Autom 26(6):1006–1017. https://doi.org/10.1109/TRO.2010.2073030
Aghakhani A, Yasa O, Wrede P, Sitti M (2020) Acoustically powered surface-slipping mobile microrobots. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 117(7):3469–3477. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1920099117
Li D, Liu C, Yang Y, Wang L, Shen Y (2020) Micro-rocket robot with all-optic actuating and tracking in blood. Light Sci Appl 9:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41377-020-0323-y
Donald B, Levey C, Megray C, Paprotny I, Rus D (2006) An untethered electrostatic globally controllable MEMS micro-robot. J Microelectromechanical Syst 15(1):1–15. https://doi.org/10.1109/JMEMS.2005.863697
Kim S, Lee S, Lee J, Nelson BJ, Zhang L, Choi H (2016) Fabrication and manipulation of ciliary microrobots with non-reciprocal magnetic actuation. Sci Rep 6:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep30713
Palagi S, Mark AG, Reigh SY, Melde K, Qiu T, Zeng H, Parmeggiani C, Martella D, Sanchez-Castillo A, Kapernaum N, Giesselmann F, Wiersma DS, Lauga E, Fischer P (2016) Structured light enables biomimetic swimming and versatile locomotion of photoresponsive soft microrobots. Nat Mater 15:647–653. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat4569
Kim D, Hao Z, Ueda J, Ansari A (2019) A 5mg micro-bristle-bot fabricated by two-photon lithography. J Micromech Microeng 29(10):1–6
Ahmed D, Baasch T, Jang B, Pane S, Dual J, Nelson BJ (2016) Artificial swimmers propelled by acoustically activated flagella. ACS Nano Lett 16(8):4968–4974. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.6b01601
Pawashe C, Floyd S, Sitti M (2008) Dynamic modeling of stick slip motion in an untethered magnetic microrobot. Robot.: Sci. Syst. IV:286–293
Giltinan J, Katsamba P, Wang W, Lauga E, Sitti M (2020) Selectively controlled magnetic microrobots with opposing helices. Appl Phys Lett 116(13):1–5. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5143007
Gu H, Boehler Q, Cui H, Secchi E, Savorana G, Marco CD, Gervasoni S, Peyron Q, Huang TY, Pane S, Hirt AM, Ahmed D, Nelson BJ (2020) Magnetic cilia carpets with programmable metachronal waves. Nat Commun 11:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-16458-4
Yim S, Sitti M (2012) Design and rolling locomotion of a magnetically actuated soft capsule endoscope. IEEE Trans Robot 28(1):183–194. https://doi.org/10.1109/TRO.2011.2163861
Diller E, Sitti M (2013) Micro-scale mobile robotics. Found Trends Robot 2(3):143–259. https://doi.org/10.1561/2300000023
Jeon S, Kim S, Ha S, Lee S, Kim E, Kim SY, Park SH, Jeon JH, Kim SW, Moon C, Nelson BJ, Kim JY, Yu SW, Choi H (2019) Magnetically actuated microrobots as a platform for stem cell transplantation. Sci. Robot 4(30):1–11. https://doi.org/10.1126/scirobotics.aav4317
Choi H, Choi J, Jeong S, Yu C, Park JO, Park S (2009) Two-dimensional locomotion of a microrobot with a novel stationary electromagnetic actuation system. Smart Mater Struct 18(11):1–6
Frutiger DR, Vollmers K, Kratochvil BE, Nelson BJ (2009) Small, fast, and under control: wireless resonant magnetic micro-agents. Int J Rob Res 29(5):613–636. https://doi.org/10.1177/0278364909353351
(2018) Ip-S. Nanoscribe GmbH. https://support.nanoscribe.com/hc/en-gb/articles/360001750353-IP-S. Accessed 20 Oct 2021
Sato M, Mukasa K, Maeda M (1969) Uniaxial magnetic anisotropy in nickel-iron thin films electrodeposited on scratched surfaces. Jpn J Appl Phys 8(4):468–472. https://doi.org/10.1143/jjap.8.468
Pawashe C, Floyd S, Sitti M (2009) Modeling and experimental characterization of an untethered magnetic micro-robot. Int J Rob Res 28(8):1077–1094. https://doi.org/10.1177/0278364909341413
Kim D, Hao Z, Mohazab AR, Ansari A (2020) On the forward and backward motion of milli-bristle-bots. Int J Non Linear Mech 127:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnonlinmec.2020.103551
Hao Z, Kim D, Mohazab AR, Ansari A (2020) Maneuver at microscale: steering by actuation frequency control in micro bristle robots. 2020 IEEE Int Conf Robot Autom. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICRA40945.2020.9196694
Parlak U, Akpz ME, Pzturk ST, Erkovan M (2015) Thickness dependent magnetic properties of polycrystalline nickel thin films. Acta Phys Pol A 127(4):995–997. https://doi.org/10.12693/APhysPolA.127.995
Jake A, Olgac E, Michael K, Ann H, Brad N (2007) Modeling magnetic torque and force for controlled manipulation of soft-magnetic bodies. IEEE Trans Robot 23(6):1247–1252. https://doi.org/10.1109/TRO.2007.910775
Speliotis DE, Bate G, Alstad JK, Morrison JR (1965) Hard magnetic films of iron, cobalt, and nickel. J Appl Phys 36(3):972–974. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1714283
O’Handley R (2003) Magnetic materials. In: Meyers RA (ed) Encyclopedia of Physical Science and Technology, 3rd edn. Academic Press, New York, pp 919–944
Krause RF, Cullity BD (1968) Formation of uniaxial magnetic anisotropy in nickel by plastic deformation. J Appl Phys 39(12):5532–5537. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1656008
Szpunar J (1989) Anisotropy of magnetic properties in textured materials. Texture Stress Microstruct 11:93–105. https://doi.org/10.1155/TSM.11.93
Munson B (2012) Fundamentals of fluid mechanics, 7th Edition. Wiley, Hoboken, NJ
Senturia S (2000) Microsystem design. Springer, Switzerland
Kim D, Hao Z, Wang T, Ansari A (2020) Magnetically actuated microscale bristle-bots. 2020 International Conference on Manipulation, Automation and Robotics at Small Scales. https://doi.org/10.1109/MARSS49294.2020.9307902
(2013) Photonic professional GT. Nanoscribe GmbH
Hedrick TL (2008) Software techniques for two- and three-dimensional kinematic measurements of biological and biomimetic systems. Bioinspir Biomim 3(3):1–6. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-3182/3/3/034001
Kumar P (2010) Magnetic behavior of surface nanostructured 50-nm nickel thin films. Nanoscale Res Lett 5:1596–1602. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11671-010-9682-2
Haliyo DS, Rollot Y, Rhgnier S (2002) Manipulation of micro-objects using adhesion forces and dynamical effects. 2002 IEEE Int Conf Robot Autom:1949–1954. https://doi.org/10.1109/ROBOT.2002.1014826
Fan Y, Tan X (2006) A dynamic jkr model with application to vibrational release in micromanipulation. Proceedings of the 2006 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems:1341–1346. https://doi.org/10.1109/IROS.2006.281920
Arai F, Andou D, Nonoda Y, Fukuda T, Iwata H, Itoigawa K (1998) Integrated microendeffector for micromanipulation. IEEE ASME Trans Mechatron 3(1):647–653. https://doi.org/10.1109/3516.662864
Driesen W, Varidel T, Regnier S, Breguet JM (2005) Micro manipulation by adhesion with two collaborating mobile micro robots. J Micromech Microeng 15(10):259–267. https://doi.org/10.1088/0960-1317/15/10/S02
Mahoney AW, Nelson ND, Peyer KE, Nelson BJ, Abbott JJ (2014) Behavior of rotating magnetic microrobots above the step-out frequency with application to control of multi-microrobot systems. Appl Phys Lett 104(14):1–4. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4870768
Acknowledgements
This work is supported by Georgia Tech Institute for Electronics and Nanotechnology (IEN) and the National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship under Grant No. DGE-1650044. The device fabrication was performed at the Georgia Tech Institute for Electronics and Nanotechnology clean room facilities, a member of the National Nanotechnology Coordinated Infrastructure (NNCI), which is supported by the National Science Foundation (Grant ECCS-1542174). The authors acknowledge Prof. Saad Bhamla for the helpful discussions and insight and thank Prof. Martin Mourigal for magnetic characterization. Additionally, the authors thank Prof. Yuhang Hu for supplying polystyrene beads used for micromanipulation experiments and Dr. Chytra Pawashe for providing insights on simulation coding.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
T.W. and D.K. fabricated microrobots, designed experiments, and collected data under the guidance of A.A. Y.F. processed videos for motion tracking. C.H. helped generate images for figures.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
The original online version of this article was revised: the correct Supplementary Materials has been uploaded and replaces the incorrect materials.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Movie S1: Microrocker Bot Bidirectional Travel. Under a magnetic sawtooth wave of amplitude 2.82mTpp and frequency 10Hz, the microrocker bot is able to move bidirectionally on a glass substrate at approximately 100μm/s for a total of 1.6mm. The static magnetic offsets for forward and backward motions are 307μT and -77μT respectively. A slight deviation in trajectory may be attributed to surface irregularities (MP4 1.21 MB).
Movie S2: Two Microrocker Bots Moving in Opposite Directions. Since the magnetic field is approximately out-of-plane to the microrobots, it serves more as a disruptive and restorative mechanism for generating oscillatory, stick-slip motion. As a result, two microrocker bots facing opposite to one another will move in opposite directions, demonstrating negligible influence from in-plane gradients. Here, the field amplitude is 2.82mTpp, the offset is -77μT, and the frequency is 2Hz (MP4 2.49 MB).
Movie S3: Micromanipulation of a 50μm Polystyrene Bead. Since the microrocker bot is restricted to bidirectional motion, the polystyrene bead is placed in its line of sight. The adhesive forces then allow the microrocker bot to pick up the bead and deliver it to a location, where a static magnetic field of amplitude ±5mT is alternatively switched. In response, the microrocker bot undergoes mechanical acceleration to remove the bead. Afterwards, the microrobot returns to close to its original position. The parameters found sufficient to push the bead were a field amplitude of 5.54mTpp, static magnetic offsets of 180/-90μT for forward/backward motion, and a frequency of 14Hz (MP4 1.24 MB).
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Wang, T., Kim, D., Shi, Y. et al. Bidirectional microscale rocker robots controlled via neutral position offset. J Micro-Bio Robot 17, 103–114 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12213-022-00149-y
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12213-022-00149-y