Abstract
Background
We investigated the barriers to and promoters of taking BRCA testing, after the start of national healthcare insurance coverage for non-metastatic breast cancer patients in Japan.
Patients and Methods
This was a multi-center, retrospective, cohort study. We included stage 0 to III breast cancer patients who were diagnosed and met the criteria for insurance coverage of BRCA testing between April 2020 and December 2021. We examined the association between BRCA testing and possible exposures: breast cancer diagnosis at 45 years or younger, triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) diagnosis at the age of 60 or younger, two or more primary breast cancers, family history of breast cancer or ovarian cancer in the third degree of relatives, male breast cancer, medical expense limits, and parity. We used logistic regression analysis.
Results
We included 222 patients and 123 (55.4%) of them underwent the test. In univariate analysis, a family history of ovarian cancer (odds ratio (OR) 10.59; 95% CI 1.35–82.96, p = 0.025), diagnosis of breast cancer at the age of 45 or younger (OR 2.78; 95% CI 1.52–5.14, p = 0.0009), and diagnosis of TNBC at the age of 60 or younger (OR 3.95; 95% CI 1.55–10.07, p = 0.004) were associated with taking the test. After multivariate logistic regression analysis, a family history of ovarian cancer (adjusted OR 12.80; 95% CI 1.51–108.80, p = 0.0195), diagnosis of breast cancer at the age of 45 or younger (adjusted OR 4.43; 95% CI 1.98–9.90, p = 0.0003), and TNBC at the age of 60 or younger (adjusted OR 5.28; 95% CI 1.90–14.66, p = 0.0014) were consistently associated.
Conclusion
For non-metastatic breast cancer patients whose BRCA testing is covered by insurance, costs would no longer be a definite barrier. Physicians should keep in mind that a family history of ovarian cancer, breast cancer diagnosis at 45 years of age or younger and TNBC diagnosis at 60 years of age or younger are strong promoters.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability statement
The data that support the findings of this study are available on request to the corresponding author.
References
Chen S, Parmigiani G. Meta-analysis of BRCA1 and BRCA2 penetrance. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25(11):1329–33. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2006.09.1066.
Evans DG, Harkness EF, Howell A, et al. Intensive breast screening in BRCA2 mutation carriers is associated with reduced breast cancer specific and all cause mortality. Hered Cancer Clin Pract. 2016;14(1):1–8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13053-016-0048-3.
Xu L, Zhao Y, Chen Z, Wang Y, Chen L, Wang S. Tamoxifen and risk of contralateral breast cancer among women with inherited mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2: a meta-analysis. Breast Cancer. 2015;22(4):327–34. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12282-015-0619-6.
Moorman PG, Havrilesky LJ, Gierisch JM, et al. Oral contraceptives and risk of ovarian cancer and breast cancer among high-risk women: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31(33):4188–98. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2013.48.9021.
Domchek SM. Association of risk-reducing surgery in BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation carriers with cancer risk and mortality. JAMA. 2010;304(9):967–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.breastdis.2011.06.001.
Chen Z, Kolor K, Grosse SD, et al. Trends in utilization and costs of BRCA testing among women aged 18–64 years in the United States, 2003–2014. Genet Med. 2018;20(4):428–34. https://doi.org/10.1038/gim.2017.118.
Nakamura S, Kwong A, Kim SW, et al. Current status of the management of hereditary breast and ovarian cancer in asia: first report by the asian BRCA consortium. Public Health Genomics. 2016;19(1):53–60. https://doi.org/10.1159/000441714.
Hayashi S, Kubo M, Kaneshiro K, et al. Genetic medicine is accelerating in Japan. Breast Cancer. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12282-022-01342-4.
Nakagomi H, Sakamoto I, Hirotsu Y, et al. Willingness of Japanese patients with breast cancer to have genetic testing of BRCA without burden of expenses. Breast Cancer. 2016;23(4):649–53. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12282-015-0618-7.
Brierley JD, Gospodarowicz MK, Wittekind C. TNM Classification of Malignant Tumours. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons; 2017.
Hayden S, Mange S, Duquette D, Petrucelli N, Raymond VM. Large, Prospective analysis of the reasons patients do not pursue brca genetic testing following genetic counseling. J Genet Couns. 2017;26(4):859–65. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10897-016-0064-5.
Sussner KM, Jandorf L, Thompson HS, Valdimarsdottir HB. Interest and beliefs about BRCA genetic counseling among at-risk latinas in New York City. J Genet Couns. 2010;19(3):255–68. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10897-010-9282-4.
Fostira F, Tsitlaidou M, Papadimitriou C, et al. Prevalence of BRCA1 mutations among 403 women with triple-negative breast cancer: Implications for genetic screening selection criteria: a hellenic cooperative oncology group study. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2012;134(1):353–62. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-012-2021-9.
Okano M, Nomizu T, Tachibana K, et al. The relationship between BRCA-associated breast cancer and age factors: an analysis of the Japanese HBOC consortium database. J Hum Genet. 2021;66(3):307–14. https://doi.org/10.1038/s10038-020-00849-y.
Sekine M, Nagata H, Tsuji S, et al. Localization of a novel susceptibility gene for familial ovarian cancer to chromosome 3p22-p25. Hum Mol Genet. 2001;10(13):1421–9. https://doi.org/10.1093/hmg/10.13.1421.
Lebert JM, Lester R, Powell E, Seal M, McCarthy J. Advances in the systemic treatment of triple-negative breast cancer. Curr Oncol. 2018;25(June):S142–50. https://doi.org/10.3747/co.25.3954.
Robson M, Im S-A, Senkus E, et al. Olaparib for metastatic breast cancer in patients with a germline BRCA mutation. N Engl J Med. 2017;377(6):523–33. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa1706450.
Tutt ANJ, Garber JE, Kaufman B, et al. Adjuvant Olaparib for Patients with BRCA1 - or BRCA2 -mutated breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa2105215.
Williams CD, Bullard AJ, Goldstein K. Racial/Ethnic disparities in brca counseling and testing : a narrative review. J Racial Ethnic Health Dispar. 2020;6(3):570–83.
Srour MK, Amersi F, Mirocha J, Giuliano AE, Chung A. Male breast cancer : 13-year single institution experience. Am Surg. 2020;86(10):1345–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003134820964444.
Nakamura S, Takahashi M, Tozaki M, et al. Prevalence and differentiation of hereditary breast and ovarian cancers in Japan. Breast Cancer. 2015;22(5):462–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12282-013-0503-1.
Kurian AW, Ward KC, Abrahamse P, et al. Time trends in receipt of germline genetic testing and results for women diagnosed with breast cancer or ovarian cancer, 2012–2019. J Clin Oncol. 2021;39(15):1631–40. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.20.02785.
Acknowledgements
We thank Nobutaka Hayashi, Marina Kiso, Ai Izumi, and Megumi Syoji for their assistance and Matthew Kaste for his English editing.
Funding
Self-funding.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors of this work have nothing to disclose.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
About this article
Cite this article
Taji, T., Odan, N., Kataoka, Y. et al. Promoters of BRCA testing under insurance coverage for non-metastatic breast cancer patients in Japan: a retrospective cohort study. Breast Cancer 30, 309–314 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12282-022-01424-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12282-022-01424-3