Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Real-World Treatment Patterns, Adverse Events, Resource Use, and Costs Among Commercially Insured, Younger Patients with Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia in the USA: A Retrospective Cohort Study

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Advances in Therapy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Correction to this article was published on 13 June 2020

This article has been updated

Abstract

Introduction

Amidst a changing treatment landscape, real-world evidence on the burden of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is limited. The purpose of this study was to describe treatment patterns, adverse events (AEs), and economic burden among treated patients with CLL.

Methods

A retrospective cohort study was conducted with IQVIA PharMetrics® Plus. Patients at least 18 years old with CLL treatment between November 1, 2013 and May 31, 2018 were identified; index date was first observed CLL treatment. Patients had at least one CLL diagnosis pre-index and a second diagnosis anytime during the study period, at least 1-year pre- and at least 30-day post-index continuous enrollment and no pre-index CLL treatment. Analyses focused on patients receiving one of the four most common regimens observed. Outcomes included treatment patterns, frequency of incident AEs, and healthcare resource use and costs. Multivariable logistic regression and generalized linear modelling were used to evaluate risk of hospitalization and all-cause costs per patient per month (PPPM).

Results

A total of 1706 patients were included in the study (median [interquartile range] age 58 [55–62] years, 66% male, median Charlson Comorbidity Index 2 [2–3], median follow-up 16 [8–28] months). Common regimens, irrespective of treatment line, were bendamustine–rituximab (B-R, 27%), ibrutinib monotherapy (I, 27%), rituximab monotherapy (R, 19%), and fludarabine combined with cyclophosphamide and rituximab (FCR, 16%); 59% had at least one incident AE (B-R, 62%; I, 60%; R, 25%; FCR, 79%). Mean total all-cause healthcare cost over follow-up was $13,858 ± 14,626 PPPM. Increased number of AEs was associated with increased odds of hospitalization (odds ratio = 2.9; 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.5–3.4) and increased mean cost PPPM (cost ratio = 1.2; 95% CI 1.1–1.2).

Conclusion

This study highlights the treatment toxicity and associated economic burden among patients with CLL in the USA. As novel therapies are increasingly used, further research examining outcomes will inform the risks, benefits, and value of novel agents to prescribers and patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Change history

  • 13 June 2020

    In the original article, it has been noticed that the abbreviation ‘‘CLL’’ is incorrectly published throughout the paper as the abbreviation “CCL”. The correct abbreviation is “CLL”.

References

  1. American Cancer Society. Cancer facts & figures 2019. Atlanta: American Cancer Society; 2019.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Seymour EK, Ruterbusch JJ, Beebe-Dimmer JL, Schiffer CA. Real-world testing and treatment patterns in chronic lymphocytic leukemia: a SEER patterns of care analysis. Cancer. 2019;125(1):135–43.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Brenner H, Gondos A, Pulte D. Trends in long-term survival of patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia from the 1980s to the early 21st century. Blood. 1980s;111(10):4916–21.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. National Cancer Institute. Cancer stat facts: leukemia-chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). 2020. https://seer.cancer.gov/statfacts/html/clyl.html. Accessed 10 Apr 2020.

  5. Mato A, Jahnke J, Li P, et al. Real-world treatment and outcomes among older adults with chronic lymphocytic leukemia before the novel agents era. Haematologica. 2018;103:e0462.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Wierda WG, Zelenetz AD, Gordon LI, et al. NCCN guidelines insights: chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma, version 1.2017. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2017;15(3):293–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Zelenetz AD, Gordon LI, Wierda WG, et al. Chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma, version 1.2015. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2015;13(3):326–62.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. FDA. Ibrutinib prescribing information. 2017. https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2017/205552s020lbl.pdf. Accessed 10 Apr 2020.

  9. FDA. Venetoclax prescribing information. 2018. https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2018/208573s009lbl.pdf. Accessed 10 Apr 2020.

  10. Mato AR, Nabhan C, Barr PM, et al. Outcomes of CLL patients treated with sequential kinase inhibitor therapy: a real world experience. Blood. 2016;128(18):2199–205.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Mato AR, Allan JN, Pagel JM, et al. Front-line ibrutinib therapy for chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) in the real world: responses, toxicity, outcomes and subsequent therapies. Blood. 2017;130(Suppl 1):3011.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Byrd JC, Brown JR, O'Brien S, et al. Ibrutinib versus ofatumumab in previously treated chronic lymphoid leukemia. N Engl J Med. 2014;371(3):213–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Woyach JA, Ruppert AS, Heerema NA, et al. Ibrutinib regimens versus chemoimmunotherapy in older patients with untreated CLL. N Engl J Med. 2018;379(26):2517–28.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Burger JA, Tedeschi A, Barr PM, et al. Ibrutinib as initial therapy for patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia. N Engl J Med. 2015;373(25):2425–37.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Shanafelt TD, Wang V, Kay NE, et al. A randomized phase III study of ibrutinib (PCI-32765)-based therapy vs. standard fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, and rituximab (FCR) chemoimmunotherapy in untreated younger patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL): a trial of the ECOG-ACRIN cancer research group (E1912). Blood. 2018;132(Suppl. 1):LBA-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. NCCN. Chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma (version 5.2019). National Comprehensive Cancer Network. 2019. https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/cll.pdf. Accessed 10 Apr 2020.

  17. Byfield SD, Korrer S, Ellis L, Schenkel B. Real world treatment patterns and healthcare resource utilization (HRU) among chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) patients by regimen. J Clin Oncol. 2015;34:15.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Schenkel B, Ellis L, Korrer S, Byfield SD. Real-world treatment patterns and health care resource utilization (HRU) among patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) by regimen. J Clin Oncol. 2016;34(7_suppl):15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. To TM, Yeh W-S, Biondo J, Masaquel AS. Patterns of ibrutinib use, discontinuation, and hospitalization among patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) in a US healthcare claims database. Blood. 2018;132(Suppl_1):5909.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Nordstrom BL, Knopf KB, Teltsch DY, Engle R, Beygi H, Sterchele JA. The safety of bendamustine in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia or non-Hodgkin lymphoma and concomitant renal impairment: a retrospective electronic medical record database analysis. Leuk Lymphoma. 2014;55(6):1266–73.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Kabadi S, Goyal RK, Nagar SP, Kaye JA, Davis KL, Mato AR. Treatment patterns, adverse events, and economic burden in a privately insured population of newly diagnosed patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia in the United States. Blood. 2018;132(Suppl 1):3557.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Fowler NH. Role of maintenance rituximab (rituxan) therapy in the treatment of follicular lymphoma. Pharm Ther. 2011;36(9):590–8.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Inoue N, Nishimura N, Takahashi A, et al. Rituximab maintenance therapy is an effective therapy in over-sixties with mantle cell lymphoma. Am Soc Hematol. 2015;126(23):5081.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Kenkre VP, Long WL, Eickhoff JC, et al. Maintenance rituximab following induction chemo-immunotherapy for mantle cell lymphoma: long-term follow-up of a pilot study from the Wisconsin Oncology Network. Leuk Lymphoma. 2011;52(9):1675–80.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Romano PS, Roos LL, Jollis JG. Presentation adapting a clinical comorbidity index for use with ICD-9-CM administrative data: differing perspectives. J Clin Epidemiol. 1993;46:1075–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Chyou JY, Hunter TD, Mollenkopf SA, Turakhia MP, Reynolds MR. Individual and combined risk factors for incident atrial fibrillation and incident stroke: an analysis of 3 million at-risk US patients. J Am Heart Assoc. 2015;4(7):e001723.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Chanan-Khan A, Cramer P, Demirkan F, et al. Ibrutinib combined with bendamustine and rituximab compared with placebo, bendamustine, and rituximab for previously treated chronic lymphocytic leukaemia or small lymphocytic lymphoma (HELIOS): a randomised, double-blind, phase 3 study. Lancet Oncol. 2016;17(2):200–11.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Shanafelt TD, Wang V, Kay NE, et al. A randomized phase III study of ibrutinib (PCI-32765)-based therapy vs. standard fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, and rituximab (FCR) chemoimmunotherapy in untreated younger patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL): a trial of the ECOG-ACRIN cancer research group (E1912). Blood. 2018;132(Suppl 1):LBA-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Tedeschi A, Greil R, Demirkan F, et al. Single-agent ibrutinib versus chlorambucil-obinutuzumab as first-line treatment in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia or small lymphocytic lymphoma (CLL/SLL): results of a cross-trial comparison. Blood. 2018;132(Suppl 1):5565.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Woyach JA, Ruppert AS, Heerema NA, et al. Ibrutinib alone or in combination with rituximab produces superior progression free survival (PFS) compared with bendamustine plus rituximab in untreated older patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL): results of alliance North American intergroup study A041202. Blood. 2018;132(Suppl 1):6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Mato AR, Barrientos JC, Brander DM, et al. Prognostic testing and treatment approaches in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia: clinical experience from an interim analysis of the inform CLL™ real-world registry. Blood. 2018;132(Suppl 1):4425.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Tang B, Szabo E, Zhou J, Wu J, Brander DM. Real-world characteristics of CLL patients receiving front-line therapy, using the Flatiron Health Database. Blood. 2017;130(Suppl 1):4671.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Kasi PM, Tawbi HA, Oddis CV, Kulkarni HS. Clinical review: serious adverse events associated with the use of rituximab-a critical care perspective. Crit Care. 2012;16(4):231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Stephens DM, Byrd JC. How we manage ibrutinib intolerance and complications in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Blood. 2019;133(12):1298–301.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Matasar MJ, Dacosta Byfield S, Blauer-Peterson C, Montez M, Reyes C, Masaquel A. Real-world health care utilization and costs among patients newly initiating systemic therapy for chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) in the United States. Blood. 2016;128(22):5928.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Goyal RK, Nagar SP, Kabadi SM, Kaye JA, Seal B, Mato AR. Adverse events, resource use, and economic burden associated with mantle cell lymphoma: a real-world assessment of privately insured patients in the United States. Leuk Lymphoms. 2018;60:1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Chen Q, Jain N, Ayer T, et al. Economic burden of chronic lymphocytic leukemia in the era of oral targeted therapies in the United States. J Clin Oncol. 2017;35(2):166.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Pfeil AM, Imfeld P, Pettengell R, et al. Trends in incidence and medical resource utilisation in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukaemia: insights from the UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD). Ann Hematol. 2015;94(3):421–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Wong W, Yim YM, Kim A, et al. Assessment of costs associated with adverse events in patients with cancer. PLoS One. 2018;13(4):e0196007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Funding

Sponsorship for this study and the journal's Rapid Service Fee were funded by AstraZeneca.

Authorship

All named authors meet the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) criteria for authorship for this article, take responsibility for the integrity of the work as a whole, and have given their approval for this version to be published.

Disclosures

Shaum Kabadi is an employee of AstraZeneca. Aimee Near and Keiko Wada are employees of IQVIA, which received funding from AstraZeneca to conduct this research study. Chakkarin Burudpakdee was an employee of IQVIA at the time of the analysis and manuscript preparation.

Compliance with Ethics Guidelines

This study was based on secondary, de-identified data which comply with the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA). Institutional review board approval was not required for this study.

Data Availability

The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are not publicly available but are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request. The data will not be deposited.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. AstraZeneca, Gaithersburg, MD, USA

    Shaum M. Kabadi

  2. IQVIA, Falls Church, VA, USA

    Aimee Near, Keiko Wada & Chakkarin Burudpakdee

Authors
  1. Shaum M. Kabadi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Aimee Near
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Keiko Wada
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Chakkarin Burudpakdee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Keiko Wada.

Additional information

Digital Features

To view enhanced digital features for this article go to https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.12130014.

Electronic Supplementary Material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 49 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kabadi, S.M., Near, A., Wada, K. et al. Real-World Treatment Patterns, Adverse Events, Resource Use, and Costs Among Commercially Insured, Younger Patients with Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia in the USA: A Retrospective Cohort Study. Adv Ther 37, 3129–3148 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12325-020-01350-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12325-020-01350-w

Keywords

Search

Navigation