Samenvatting
Ondanks dat theoretisch en empirisch bewijs aantoont dat Amerikaanse en Australische adolescenten risicogedrag vertonen om sociale status te verwerven, is er weinig bekend over de relatie tussen risicogedrag en sociale status bij Europese adolescenten. De huidige studie onderzocht deze relatie daarom bij 253 Nederlandse adolescenten (M leeftijd = 16,83 jaar, 52 % jongens). De deelnemers beantwoordden sociometrische vragen over populariteit en geliefdheid van hun klasgenoten, en rapporteerden over hun eigen risicogedrag (het gebruik van alcohol, tabak en marihuana, alsmede het aantal seksuele partners). Structurele vergelijkingsmodellen lieten zien dat risicogedrag sterk gerelateerd was aan populariteit, maar niet aan geliefdheid. Uit deze studie blijkt dat de relatie tussen risicogedrag en sociale status in Nederland in overeenstemming is met bevindingen buiten Europa.
Abstract
Even though both theoretical and empirical evidence show that American and Australian adolescents engage in risk behavior to gain social status, evidence is lacking on the link between risk behavior and social status in European adolescents. The current study therefore examined this association among 253 Dutch adolescents (M age = 16.83 years, 52% boys). Participants completed peer nominations of popularity and likeability and self-reports of risk behaviors (alcohol, tobacco and marijuana use, and number of sexual partners). Structural equation modeling showed that risk behavior was strongly associated with popularity, but not with likeability. This study indicates that the association between risk behavior and social status in the Netherlands is in line with findings from outside Europe.
Literatuur
Agan, M.L., Costin, A.S., Deutz, M.H.F., Edelsbrunner, P.A., Záliš, L., & Franken, A. (2015). Associations between risk behaviour and social status in European adolescents. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 12, 189–203.
Anderson, P., De Bruijn, A., Angus, K., Gordon, R., & Hastings, G. (2009). Impact of alcohol advertising and media exposure on adolescent alcohol use: a systematic review of longitudinal studies. Alcohol and Alcoholism, 44, 229–243.
Balsa, A.I., Homer, J.F., French, M.T., & Norton, E.C. (2011). Alcohol use and popularity: social payoffs from conforming to peers’ behavior. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 21, 559–568.
Barnes, J.C., & Beaver, K.M. (2010). An empirical examination of adolescence-limited offending: a direct test of Moffitt’s maturity gap thesis. Journal of Criminal Justice, 38, 1176–1185.
Bellmore, A., Nishina, A., & Graham, S. (2011). Peer popularity in the context of ethnicity. In A.H.N. Cillessen, D. Schwartz & L. Mayeux (red.), Popularity in the peer system (pag. 193–215). New York: Guilford.
Boyce, W., Torsheim, T., Currie, C., & Zambon, A. (2006). The family affluence scale as a measure of national wealth: validation of an adolescent self-report measure. Social Indicators Research, 78, 473–487.
Brener, N.D., Kann, L., Kinchen, S.A., Grunbaum, J.A., Whalen, L., Eaton, D., & Ross, J.G. (2004). Methodology of the youth risk behavior surveillance system. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 53, 1–13.
Bruyn, E.H. de, & Cillessen, A.H. (2006). Popularity in early adolescence: prosocial and antisocial subtypes. Journal of Adolescent Research, 21, 607–627.
Caldwell, T.M., Rodgers, B., Jorm, A.F., Christensen, H., Jacomb, P.A., Korten, A.E., & Lynskey, M.T. (2002). Patterns of association between alcohol consumption and symptoms of depression and anxiety in young adults. Addiction, 97, 583–594.
Campbell, R., Starkey, F., Holliday, J., Audrey, S., Bloor, M., Parry-Langdon, N., & Moore, L. (2008). An informal school-based peer-led intervention for smoking prevention in adolescence (ASSIST): a cluster randomised trial. The Lancet, 371, 1595–1602.
Cillessen, A.H.N. (2009). Sociometric methods. In K.H. Rubin, W.M. Bukowski & B. Laursen (red.), Handbook of peer interactions, relationships, and groups (pag. 82–99). New York: Guilford Press.
Cillessen, A.H.N., & Mayeux, L. (2004). From censure to reinforcement: developmental changes in the association between aggression and social status. Child Development, 75, 147–163.
Cillessen, A.H.N., & Rose, A.J. (2005). Understanding popularity in the peer system. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14, 102–105.
Dijkstra, J.K., Lindenberg, S., Verhulst, F.C., Ormel, J., & Veenstra, R. (2009). The relation between popularity and aggressive, destructive, and norm-breaking behaviors: moderating effects of athletic abilities, physical attractiveness, and prosociality. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 19, 401–413.
Dijkstra, J.K., Cillessen, A.H.N., Lindenberg, S., & Veenstra, R. (2010). Basking in reflected glory and its limits: why adolescents hang out with popular peers. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 20, 942–958.
Dijkstra, J.K., Kretschmer, T., Pattiselanno, K., Franken, A., Harakeh, Z., Vollebergh, W., & Veenstra, R. (2015). Explaining adolescents’ delinquency and substance use: a test of the maturity gap: the SNARE study. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 52, 747–767.
Franken, A., Harakeh, Z., Veenstra, R., Vollebergh, W., & Dijkstra, J.K. (2016). Social status of adolescents with an early onset of externalizing behavior: the SNARE study. Journal of Early Adolescence, 1, 1–17.
Hanson, M.D., & Chen, E. (2007). Socioeconomic status and health behaviors in adolescence: a review of the literature. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 30, 263–285.
Harakeh, Z., De Looze, M.E., Schrijvers, C.T.M., Dorsselaer, S.A.F.M. van, & Vollebergh, W.A.M. (2012). Individual and environmental predictors of health risk behaviours among Dutch adolescents: the HBSC study. Public Health, 126, 566–573.
Hawke, S., & Rieger, E. (2013). Popularity, likeability, and risk-taking in middle adolescence. Health, 5, 41–52.
Hu, L., & Bentler, P.M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55.
Inchley, J., Currie, D., Young, T., Samdal, O., Torsheim, T., Augustson, L. et al. (2016). Growing up unequal: Gender and socioeconomic differences in young people’s health and well-being. Health Behaviour in School-aged Children (HBSC) study: international report from the 2013/2014 survey. Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office for Europe.
Kelly, J.A. (2004). Popular opinion leaders and HIV prevention peer education: resolving discrepant findings, and implications for the development of effective community programmes. AIDS Care, 16, 139–150.
Kelly, J.A., St Lawrence, J.S., Diaz, Y.E., Stevenson, L.Y., Hauth, A.C., Brasfield, T.L., & Andrew, M.E. (1991). HIV risk behavior reduction following intervention with key opinion leaders of population: an experimental analysis. American Journal of Public Health, 81, 168–171.
Kendler, K.S., Gardner, C.O., Hickman, M., Heron, J., Macleod, J., Lewis, G., & Dick, D.M. (2014). Socioeconomic status and alcohol-related behaviors in mid-to-late adolescence in the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children. Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs, 75, 541–545.
Maccoby, E.E. (1990). Gender and relationships: a developmental account. American Psychologist, 45, 513–520.
Mayeux, L., Sandstrom, M.J., & Cillessen, A.H.N. (2008). Is being popular a risky proposition? Journal of Research on Adolescence, 18, 49–74.
Meschke, L.L., Zweig, J.M., Barber, B.L., & Eccles, J.S. (2000). Demographic, biological, psychological, and social predictors of the timing of first intercourse. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 10, 315–338.
Moffitt, T.E. (1993). Adolescent-limited and life-course-persistent antisocial behavior: a developmental taxonomy. Psychological Review, 100, 674–701.
Moffitt, T.E., & Caspi, A. (2001). Childhood predictors differentiate life-course persistent and adolescence-limited antisocial pathways among males and females. Development and Psychopathology, 13, 355–375.
Muthén, L.K., & Muthén, B.O. (1998–2012). Mplus user’s guide (7e druk.). Los Angeles CA: Muthén & Muthén.
Podsakoff, P.M., MacKenzie, S.B., Lee, J.Y., & Podsakoff, N.P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 879–903.
Prinstein, M.J., Choukas-Bradley, S.C., Helms, S.W., Brechwald, W.A., & Rancourt, D. (2011). High peer popularity longitudinally predicts adolescent health risk behavior, or does it? An examination of linear and quadratic associations. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 36, 980–990.
Saewyc, E.M., Magee, L.L., & Pettingell, S.E. (2004). Teenage pregnancy and associated risk behaviors among sexually abused adolescents. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 36, 98–105.
Sandstrom, M.J., & Cillessen, A.H.N. (2006). Likeable versus popular: distinct implications for adolescent adjustment. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 30, 305–314.
Sass, D.A., Schmitt, T.A., & Marsh, H.W. (2014). Evaluating model fit with ordered categorical data within a measurement invariance framework: a comparison of estimators. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 21, 167–180.
Satorra, A., & Bentler, P.M. (2001). A scaled difference chi-square test statistic for moment structure analysis. Psychometrika, 66, 507–514.
Schmitt, N., Golubovich, J., & Leong, F.T.L. (2011). Impact of measurement invariance on construct correlations, mean differences, and relations with external correlates: an illustrative example using Big Five and RIASEC measures. Assessment, 18, 412–427.
Schoot, R. van de, Lugtig, P., & Hox, J. (2012). A checklist for testing measurement invariance. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 9, 486–492.
Sentse, M., Kiuru, N., Veenstra, R., & Salmivalli, C. (2014). A social network approach to the interplay between adolescents’ bullying and likeability over time. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 43, 1409–1420.
Smit, C.R., Leeuw, R.N. de, Bevelander, K.E., Burk, W.J., & Buijzen, M. (2016). A social network-based intervention stimulating peer influence on children’s self-reported water consumption: a randomized control trial. Appetite, 103, 294–301.
Stueve, A., & O’Donnell, L.N. (2005). Early alcohol initiation and subsequent sexual and alcohol risk behaviors among urban youths. American Journal of Public Health, 95, 887–893.
Trimbos Instituut (2014). Roken Jeugd Monitor 2013: factsheet januari 2014. Utrecht: Trimbos Instituut.
Valente, T.W., Unger, J.B., & Johnson, C.A. (2005). Do popular students smoke? The association between popularity and smoking among middle school students. Journal of Adolescent Health, 37, 323–329.
Verdurmen, J., Abraham, M., Planije, M., Monshouwer, K., Dorsselaer, S. van, Schulten, I., Bevers, J., & Vollebergh, W. (2006). Alcoholgebruik en jongeren onder de 16 jaar. Utrecht: Trimbos Instituut.
Warner, J., Weber, T.R., & Albanes, R. (1999). Girls are retarded when they’re stoned. Marijuana and the construction of gender roles among adolescent females. Sex Roles, 40, 25–43.
Willoughby, T., Chalmers, H., & Busseri, M.A. (2004). Where is the syndrome? Examining co-occurrence among multiple problem behaviors in adolescence. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 72, 1022–1037.
Dankbetuiging
Dit onderzoek maakte deel uit van een groter project ondersteund door het EFPSA Junior Researcher Programme tijdens de European Summer School van Hongarije in 2011. We bedanken Leonor Agan, Andra Costin, Peter Edelsbrunner en Ladislav Záliš voor hun bijdrage aan dit project. Daarnaast willen we graag alle deelnemende scholen en leerlingen bedanken voor hun medewerking. Ten slotte willen wij de twee anonieme reviewers bedanken voor hun waardevolle opmerkingen voor het verbeteren van het manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
About this article
Cite this article
van den Broek, N., Deutz, M.H.F., Franken, A. et al. Populariteit, maar niet geliefdheid, is gerelateerd aan risicogedrag van Nederlandse adolescenten. Kind Adolesc 38, 31–47 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12453-017-0136-9
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12453-017-0136-9