Skip to main content
Log in

SDPNAL\(+\): a majorized semismooth Newton-CG augmented Lagrangian method for semidefinite programming with nonnegative constraints

  • Full Length Paper
  • Published:
Mathematical Programming Computation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, we present a majorized semismooth Newton-CG augmented Lagrangian method, called SDPNAL\(+\), for semidefinite programming (SDP) with partial or full nonnegative constraints on the matrix variable. SDPNAL\(+\) is a much enhanced version of SDPNAL introduced by Zhao et al. (SIAM J Optim 20:1737–1765, 2010) for solving generic SDPs. SDPNAL works very efficiently for nondegenerate SDPs but may encounter numerical difficulty for degenerate ones. Here we tackle this numerical difficulty by employing a majorized semismooth Newton-CG augmented Lagrangian method coupled with a convergent 3-block alternating direction method of multipliers introduced recently by Sun et al. (SIAM J Optim, to appear). Numerical results for various large scale SDPs with or without nonnegative constraints show that the proposed method is not only fast but also robust in obtaining accurate solutions. It outperforms, by a significant margin, two other competitive publicly available first order methods based codes: (1) an alternating direction method of multipliers based solver called SDPAD by Wen et al. (Math Program Comput 2:203–230, 2010) and (2) a two-easy-block-decomposition hybrid proximal extragradient method called 2EBD-HPE by Monteiro et al. (Math Program Comput 1–48, 2014). In contrast to these two codes, we are able to solve all the 95 difficult SDP problems arising from the relaxations of quadratic assignment problems tested in SDPNAL to an accuracy of \(10^{-6}\) efficiently, while SDPAD and 2EBD-HPE successfully solve 30 and 16 problems, respectively. In addition, SDPNAL\(+\) appears to be the only viable method currently available to solve large scale SDPs arising from rank-1 tensor approximation problems constructed by Nie and Wang (SIAM J Matrix Anal Appl 35:1155–1179, 2014). The largest rank-1 tensor approximation problem we solved (in about 14.5 h) is nonsym(21,4), in which its resulting SDP problem has matrix dimension \(n = 9261\) and the number of equality constraints \(m =12{,}326{,}390\).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. http://www2.isye.gatech.edu/~cod3/CamiloOrtiz/Software_files/2EBD-HPE_v0.2/2EBD-HPE_v0.2.zip

References

  1. Arnold, V.I.: On matrices depending on parameters. Russ. Math. Surv. 26, 29–43 (1971)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bonnans, J.F., Shapiro, A.: Perturbation Analysis of Optimization Problems. Springer, Berlin (2000)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Borwein, J.M., Lewis, A.S.: Convex Analysis and Nonlinear Optimization: Theory and Examples, vol. 3. Springer, Berlin (2006)

  4. Burer, S.: On the copositive representation of binary and continuous nonconvex quadratic programs. Math. Program. 120, 479–495 (2009)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Burer, S., Monteiro, R.D., Zhang, Y.: A computational study of a gradient-based log-barrier algorithm for a class of large-scale sdps. Math. Program. 95, 359–379 (2003)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Chen, C., He, B., Ye, Y., Yuan, X.: The direct extension of admm for multi-block convex minimization problems is not necessarily convergent. Math. Program. (to appear)

  7. Eisenblätter, A., Grötschel, M., Koster, A.M.: Frequency planning and ramifications of coloring. Discuss. Math. Graph Theory 22, 51–88 (2002)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Hahn, P., Anjos, M.: QAPLIB—a quadratic assignment problem library. http://www.seas.upenn.edu/qaplib

  9. Hiriart-Urruty, J.-B., Strodiot, J.-J., Nguyen, V.H.: Generalized Hessian matrix and second-order optimality conditions for problems with \(C^{1,1}\) data. Appl. Math. Optim. 11, 43–56 (1984)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Monteiro, R., Ortiz, C., Svaiter, B.: A first-order block-decomposition method for solving two-easy-block structured semidefinite programs. Math. Program. Comput. 6, 103–150 (2014)

  11. Moreau, J.J.: Décomposition orthogonale d’un espace hilbertien selon deux cones mutuellement polaires. C. R. Acad. Sci. 255, 238–240 (1962)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Nie, J., Wang, L.: Regularization methods for SDP relaxations in large-scale polynomial optimization. SIAM J. Optim. 22, 408–428 (2012)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Nie, J., Wang, L.: Semidefinite relaxations for best rank-1 tensor approximations. SIAM J. Matrix Anal. Appl. 35, 1155–1179 (2014)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Pang, J.-S., Sun, D.-F., Sun, J.: Semismooth homeomorphisms and strong stability of semidefinite and lorentz complementarity problems. Math. Oper. Res. 28, 39–63 (2003)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Peng, J., Wei, Y.: Approximating k-means-type clustering via semidefinite programming. SIAM J. Optim. 18, 186–205 (2007)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Povh, J., Rendl, F.: Copositive and semidefinite relaxations of the quadratic assignment problem. Discret. Optim. 6, 231–241 (2009)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Rockafellar, R.T.: Conjugate duality and optimization. CBMS-NSF Regional Conf. Ser. Appl. Math. vol. 16. SIAM, Philadelphia (1974)

  18. Rockafellar, R.T.: Augmented Lagrangians and applications of the proximal point algorithm in convex programming. Math. Oper. Res. 1, 97–116 (1976)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Rockafellar, R.T.: Monotone operators and the proximal point algorithm. SIAM J. Control Optim. 14, 877–898 (1976)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Sloane, N.: Challenge problems: independent sets in graphs. http://www.research.att.com/njas/doc/graphs.html (2005)

  21. Sun, D.-F., Sun, J.: Semismooth matrix-valued functions. Math. Oper. Res. 27, 150–169 (2002)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Sun, D.-F., Toh, K.-C., Yang, L.-Q.: A convergent 3-block semi-proximal alternating direction method of multipliers for conic programming with 4-type constraints. SIAM J. Optim. (to appear)

  23. Toh, K.C.: Solving large scale semidefinite programs via an iterative solver on the augmented systems. SIAM J. Optim. 14, 670–698 (2004)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  24. Trick, M., Chvatal, V., Cook, B., Johnson, D., McGeoch, C., Tarjan, R.: The second dimacs implementation challenge—NP hard problems: maximum clique, graph coloring, and satisfiability. http://dimacs.rutgers.edu/Challenges/ (1992)

  25. Wen, Z., Goldfarb, D., Yin, W.: Alternating direction augmented Lagrangian methods for semidefinite programming. Math. Program. Comput. 2, 203–230 (2010)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  26. Zhao, X.-Y., Sun, D.-F., Toh, K.-C.: A Newton-CG augmented Lagrangian method for semidefinite programming. SIAM J. Optim. 20, 1737–1765 (2010)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Jiawang Nie and Li Wang for sharing their codes on semidefinite relaxations of rank-1 tensor approximation problems.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kim-Chuan Toh.

Additional information

D. Sun’s research was supported in part by the Academic Research Fund under Grant R-146-000-149-112. K.-C. Toh’s research supported in part by the Ministry of Education, Singapore, Academic Research Fund under Grant R-146-000-194-112.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yang, L., Sun, D. & Toh, KC. SDPNAL\(+\): a majorized semismooth Newton-CG augmented Lagrangian method for semidefinite programming with nonnegative constraints. Math. Prog. Comp. 7, 331–366 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12532-015-0082-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12532-015-0082-6

Keywords

Mathematics Subject Classification

Navigation