Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Exploring the Korean adolescent empathy using the Interpersonal Reactivity Index (IRI)

  • Published:
Asia Pacific Education Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The educational approach of empathy has been prominently mentioned as a possible solution to the dehumanization occurring as a byproduct of the rapid development of science and technology in modern society. This study aims to identify the characteristics of Korean adolescents on the empathy factor, as a core competency of twenty-first century education, and the applicability of the empathy scale. This study analyzed 688 Korean adolescents’ cognitive and affective empathy using the Interpersonal Reactivity Index (IRI). Korean adolescents showed an increase in all four factors of IRI as they got older. According to gender, females’ empathy was higher in all four factors. In terms of the validity of the scale, the difference in subscales by gender was obvious. But, the instability in subscales by age of the Perfective Taking (PT) and Personal Distress (PD) was shown. Especially, PD had an insignificant correlation with other subscales. By revealing the limitations of the IRI, this study suggested ways to improve it. Therefore, this study will contribute to the educational foundation of Korean adolescents’ empathic ability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Albiero, P., Matricardi, G., Speltri, D., & Toso, D. (2009). The assessment of empathy in adolescence: A contribution to the Italian validation of the “Basic Empathy Scale”. Journal of Adolescence,32(2), 393–408. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2008.01.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arghode, V., Yalvac, B., & Liew, J. (2013). Teacher empathy and science education: A collective case study. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education,9(2), 89–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • ATC21S. (2015). The assessment and teaching of 21st-century skills. Retrieved December 31, 2016, from https://atc21s.org

  • Austin, E. J., Evans, P., Goldwater, R., & Potter, V. (2005). A preliminary study of emotional intelligence, empathy and exam performance in first year medical students. Personality and Individual Differences, 39(8), 1395–1405. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2005.04.014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baron-Cohen, S., Knickmeyer, R. C., & Belmonte, M. K. (2005). Sex differences in the brain: Implications for explaining autism. Science,310(5749), 819–823.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Batanova, M. D., & Loukas, A. (2012). What are the unique and interacting contributions of school and family factors to early adolescents’ empathic concern and perspective taking? Journal of Youth and Adolescence,41(10), 1382–1391. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-012-9768-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlo, G., Raffaelli, M., Laible, D. J., & Meyer, K. A. (1999). Why are girls less physically aggressive than boys? Personality and parenting mediators of physical aggression. Sex Roles,40(9–10), 711–729. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018856601513.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chandler, M. J., & Greenspan, S. (1972). Ersatz egocentrism: A reply to H Broke. Developmental Psychology,7, 104–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chun, O., Yang, H., & Kang, S. J. (2018). Exploration of empathy factors in the science and development of related scales. Cogent Education,5(1), 1–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cliffordson, C. (2001). Parent’s judgments and students’ self-judgments of empathy: The structure of empathy and agreement of judgment based on the Interpersonal Reactivity Index (IRI). European Journal of Psychological Assessment,17(1), 36–47. https://doi.org/10.1027//1015-5759.17.1.36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cliffordson, C. (2002). The hierarchical structure of empathy: Dimensional organization and relations to social functioning. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology,43, 49–59. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9450.00268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coke, J. S., Batson, C. D., & McDavis, K. (1978). Empathic mediation of helping: A two-stage model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,36(7), 752.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, M. H. (1980). A multidimensional approach to individual differences in empathy. JSAS Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology,10, 85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, M. H. (1983). Measuring individual differences in empathy: Evidence for a multidimensional approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,44(1), 113. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.44.1.113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, M. H., & Franzoi, S. L. (1991). Stability and change in adolescent self-consciousness and empathy. Journal of Research in Personality,25(1), 70–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/0092-6566(91)90006-C.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Corte, K., Buysse, A., Verhofstadt, L. L., Roeyers, H., Ponnet, K., & Davis, M. H. (2007). Measuring empathic tendencies: Reliability and validity of the Dutch version of the Interpersonal Reactivity Index. Psychologica Belgica,47, 235–260. https://doi.org/10.5334/pb-47-4-235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Denham, S. E. (2006). Emotional competence. In J. L. Luby (Ed.), Handbook of preschool mental health: Development, Disorders and Treatment (pp. 23–44). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eberly-Lewis, M. B., & Coetzee, T. M. (2015). Dimensionality in adolescent prosocial tendencies: Individual differences in serving others versus serving the self. Personality and Individual Differences,82, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2015.02.032.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Egan, G. (1990). The skilled helper: A systematic approach to effective helping (4th ed.). Belmont, CA: International Thomson Publishing Services.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenberg, N., & Miller, P. A. (1987). The relation of empathy to prosocial and related behaviors. Psychological Bulletin,101(1), 91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eisenberg, N., Miller, P. A., Shell, R., McNalley, S., & Shea, C. (1991). Prosocial development in adolescence: A longitudinal study. Developmental Psychology,27(5), 849. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.27.5.849.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eisenberg, N., & Strayer, J. (1987). Critical issues in the study of empathy. In N. Eisenberg & J. Strayer (Eds.), Cambridge studies in social and emotional development. Empathy and its development (pp. 3–13). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frey, C. B., & Osborne, M. A. (2017). The future of employment: How susceptible are jobs to computerisation? Technological Forecasting and Social Change,114, 254–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gunnar, M. R., Wewerka, S., Frenn, K., Long, J. D., & Griggs, C. (2009). Developmental changes in hypothalamus–pituitary–adrenal activity over the transition to adolescence: Normative changes and associations with puberty. Development and Psychopathology,21(01), 69–85. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954579409000054.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hawk, S. T., Keijsers, L., Branje, S. J. T., Van Der Graaff, J., De Wied, M., & Meeus, W. (2013). Examining the Interpersonal Reactivity Index (IRI) among early and late adolescents and their mothers. Journal of Personality Assessment,95(1), 96–106. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2012.696080.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, M. L. (1977). Sex differences in empathy and related behaviours. Psychological Bulletin,84(4), 712.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, M. L. (1982). Development of prosocial motivation: Empathy and guilt. In Eisenberg, N. (Ed.), The development of prosocial behaviour. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, M. L. (1984). Empathy, its limitations, and its role in a comprehensive moral theory. In W. M. Kurtines & J. L. Gewirtz (Eds.), Morality, moral behavior, and moral development (pp. 283–302). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, M. L. (2000). Empathy and moral development: Implications for caring and justice. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hojat, M., Gonnella, J. S., Nasca, T. J., Mangione, S., Vergare, M., & Magee, M. (2002). Physician empathy: Definition, components, measurement and relationship to gender and speciality. American Journal of Psychiatry,159, 1563–1569. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.159.9.1563.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howe, D. (2012). Empathy: What it is and why it matters. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jolliffe, D., & Farrington, D. P. (2004). Empathy and offending: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Aggression and Violent Behavior,9(5), 441–476. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2003.03.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jolliffe, D., & Farrington, D. P. (2006). Development and validation of the Basic Empathy Scale. Journal of Adolescence,29(4), 589–611. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2005.08.010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kang, I., Kee, S., Kim, S. E., Jeong, B., Hwang, J. H., Song, J. E., et al. (2009). Reliability and validity of the Korean-Version of Interpersonal Reactivity Index. Journal of Korean Neuropsychiatric Association,48(5), 352–358.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, K. S., & Kim, H. Y. (2009). The effects of empathy education program on children's empathy ability and emotional intelligence. The Journal of Elementary Education,22(4), 257–300.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krznaric, R. (2014). Empathy: A handbook for revolution. London: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, J., You, S., & Lee, Y. (2014). A study on the development of empathy based learning model. Korean Journal of Teacher Education,30(4), 151–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lengua, L. J., & Stormshak, E. A. (2000). Gender, gender roles, and personality: Gender differences in the prediction of coping and psychological symptoms. Sex Roles,43(11–12), 787–820. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:101109660486.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Litvack-Miller, W., McDougall, D., & Romney, D. M. (1997). The structure of empathy during middle childhood and its relationship to prosocial behavior. Genetic Social and General Psychology Monographs,123, 303–324.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, R. L. (2009). The design of business: Why design thinking is the next competitive advantage. Cambridge: Harvard Business Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGinley, M., & Carlo, G. (2006). Two sides of the same coin? The relations between prosocial and physically aggressive behaviors. Journal of Youth and Adolescence,36, 337–349. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-006-9095-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McMahon, S. D., Wernsman, J., & Parnes, A. L. (2006). Understanding prosocial behavior: The impact of empathy and gender among African American adolescents. Journal of Adolescent Health,39(1), 135–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2005.10.008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miklikowska, M., Duriez, B., & Soenens, B. (2011). Family roots of empathy-related characteristics: The role of perceived maternal and paternal need support in adolescence. Developmental Psychology,47(5), 1342. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024726.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2003). The definition and selection of key competencies, executive summary. Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2016). Global competency for an inclusive world. Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Papert, S. (1980). Mindstorms: Children, computers, and powerful ideas. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Park, S. (1997). Empathy and pro-social behaviour (gong-gam-gwa chin-sa-hoehaeng-dong). Seoul: Muneumsa.

  • Park, S. (2004). Empathy: Yesterday and today (kong-kam-hak: eo-je-wa o-neul). Seoul: Hakjisa.

  • Park, J. (2010). Future education vision research (Miraegyoyungbijeonyeongu). Chungbuk: Korean Educational Development Institute.

  • Perez-Albéniz, A., De Paúl, J., Etxeberría, J., Montes, M. P., & Torres, E. (2003). Adaptacion de Interpersonal Reactivity Index (IRI) al español (Adapting the Interpersonal Reactivity Index (IRI) to Spanish). Psicothema,15, 267–272.

  • Prisecaru, P. (2016). Challenges of the fourth industrial revolution. Knowledge Horizons—Economics,8(1), 57–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pulos, S., Elison, J., & Lennon, R. (2004). The hierarchical structure of the Interpersonal Reactivity Index. Social Behaviour and Personality,32, 355–359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, D. R., Hammock, G. S., Smith, S. M., Gardner, W., & Signo, M. (1994). Empathy as a cognitive inhibitor of interpersonal aggression. Aggressive Behavior,20, 275–289. https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-2337(1994)20:4%3c275:AID-AB2480200402%3e3.0.CO;2-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, W., & Strayer, J. (1996). Empathy, emotional expressiveness, and prosocial behavior. Child Development,67(2), 449–470. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.1996.tb01745.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, R., Roberts, W. L., Strayer, J., & Koopman, R. (2007). Empathy and emotional responsiveness in delinquent and non-delinquent adolescents. Social Development,16(3), 555–579. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9507.2007.00396.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Romer, D., Gruder, C. L., & Lizzadro, T. (1986). A person–situation approach to altruistic behaviour. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,51(5), 1001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sawyer, R. K. (2007). Group genius: The creative power of collaboration. New York: Basic Books Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaffer, M., Clark, S., & Jeglic, E. L. (2009). The role of empathy and parenting style in the development of antisocial behaviors. Crime & Delinquency,55(4), 586–599. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011128708321359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwab, K. (2016a). The Fourth Industrial Revolution: what it means, how to respond. Paper presented at World Economic Forum Annual Meeting 2016.

  • Shin, K. (1994). Relations between the cognitive, affective and communicative components of the empathic process. Student Guidance Center Pusan National University,29(1), 1–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soenens, B., Duriez, B., Vansteenkiste, M., & Goossens, L. (2007). The intergenerational transmission of empathy-related responding in adolescence: The role of maternal support. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin,33(3), 299–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stotland, E., et al. (1978). Empathy, fantasy and helping. Oxford: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taggar, S. (2002). Individual creativity and group ability to utilize individual creative resources: A multilevel model. Academy of Management Journal,45(2), 315–330.

    Google Scholar 

  • Truax, C. B., & Carkhuff, R. (2007). Toward effective counseling and psychotherapy: Training and practice. Piscataway: Transaction Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wind, E. (1963). Art and anarchy. London: Faber and Faber.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yeo, L. S., Ang, R. P., Loh, S., Fu, K. J., & Karre, J. K. (2011). The role of affective and cognitive empathy in physical, verbal, and indirect aggression of a Singaporean sample of boys. The Journal of Psychology,145(4), 313–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Jihye Kim and Eun-Ji Jo for assisting the data collection.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Elementary Science Education, Korea National University of Education, 250, Taeseongtabyeon-ro, Gangnae-myeon, Heungdeok-gu, Cheongju-si, Chungcheongbuk-do, 28173, South Korea

    Heesun Yang

  2. Department of Chemistry Education, Korea National University of Education, 250, Taeseongtabyeon-ro, Gangnae-myeon, Heungdeok-gu, Cheongju-si, Chungcheongbuk-do, 28173, South Korea

    Seong-Joo Kang

Authors
  1. Heesun Yang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Seong-Joo Kang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Seong-Joo Kang.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yang, H., Kang, SJ. Exploring the Korean adolescent empathy using the Interpersonal Reactivity Index (IRI). Asia Pacific Educ. Rev. 21, 339–349 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-019-09621-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-019-09621-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation