Skip to main content
Log in

A comparison of objective physical activity, muscle strength, and depression among community-dwelling older women living in sloped versus non-sloped environments

  • Published:
The journal of nutrition, health & aging

Abstract

Objective

To examine the relationship between the living location and outcomes of physical activity level and physical and psychological functioning in older women. The specific aim was to understand the association between living in a sloped versus non-sloped environment and these outcomes.

Design

Cross-sectional study.

Setting and Participants

108 older women aged 65 years or older who resided in Nagasaki prefecture participated.

Measurements

Physical activity, lung function, muscle strength (hand grip and quadriceps force) and depressive symptoms were assessed objectively.

Results

In logistic regression, activity counts per day (OR 0.779, 95%CI 0.715-0.841, p<0.01), activity times per day (OR 0.821, 95%CI 0.801-0.913, p<0.01), hand grip force (OR 0.666, 95%CI 0.558-0.796, p<0.001), and depressed (Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale score ≥16) (OR 1.093, 95%CI 1.019-1.427, p<0.05) showed statistically significant inverse associations with living in a sloped ground.

Conclusions

Since dwelling on sloped ground was associated with negative (lower physical activity levels, lower grip strength, and more depression) outcomes, a comprehensive geriatric assessment, related to all aspects of older women, is recommended. Planning of home exercise programs for the elderly should take such environmental factors into consideration.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Table 1
Table 2
Figure 1
Table 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hallal PC, Andersen LB, Bull FC, Guthold R, Haskell W, et al. Global physical activity levels: surveillance progress, pitfalls, and prospects. Lancet 2012; 380: 247–57. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60646-1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Haskell WL, Lee IM, Pate RR, Powell KE, Blair SN, et al. Physical activity and public health: updated recommendation for adults from the American College of Sports Medicine and the American Heart Association. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2007, 39: 1423–1434.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Stuck AE, Walthert JM, Nikolaus T, Büla CJ, Hohmann C, et al. Risk factors for functional status decline in community-living elderly people: a systematic literature review. Soc Sci Med 1999, 48:445–469.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Talbot LA, Morrell CH, Metter EJ, Fleg JL. Comparison of cardiorespiratory fitness versus leisure time physical activity as predictors of coronary events in men aged < or = 65 years and > 65 years. Am J Cardiol 2002, 89:1187–1192.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Lee IM, Paffenbarger RS Jr. Physical activity and stroke incidence: the Harvard Alumni Health Study. Stroke 1998, 29: 2049–2054.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Suzuki T, Kim H, Yoshida H, Ishizaki T. Randomized controlled trial of exercise intervention for the prevention of falls in community-dwelling elderly Japanese women. J Bone Miner Metab 2004, 22:602–611.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Tremblay MS, Shephard RJ, Brawley LR, Cameron C, Craig CL, et al. Physical activity guidelines and guides for Canadians: facts and future. Can J Public Health 2007, 98 Suppl 2:S218–224.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Paterson DH1, Jones GR, Rice CL. Ageing and physical activity: evidence to develop exercise recommendations for older adults. Can J Public Health 2007, 98 Suppl 2:S69–108.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kolbe-Alexander TL1, Lambert EV, Charlton KE. Effectiveness of a community based low intensity exercise program for older adults. J Nutr Health Aging 2006, 10:21–29.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Fitzpatrick SE, Reddy S, Lommel TS, Fischer JG, Speer EM, et al. Physical activity and physical function improved following a community-based intervention in older adults in Georgia senior centers. J Nutr Elder 2008, 27:135–154.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Grazia OC, Yvonne LM. Concepts Guiding the Study of the Impact of the Built Environment on Physical Activity for Older Adults: A Review of the Literature. Am J Health Promot 2004, 18: 435–443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Sallis JF, Hovell MF, Hofstetter CR, Barrington E. Explanation of vigorous physical activity during two years using social learning variables. Soc Sci Med 1992, 34: 25–32.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Chapman NJ, Beaudet M. Environmental predictors of well-being for at-risk older adults in a mid-sized city. J Gerontol 1983, 38: 237–44.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Wilcox S, Castro C, King AC, Housemann R, Brownson R. Determinants of leisure time physical activity in rural compaired with urban older and ethnically diverse women in the United States. J Epidemiol Community Health 2000, 54: 667–672.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Ball K, Bauman A, Leslie E, Owen N. Perceived environmental aesthetics and convenience and company are associated with walking for exercise among Australian adults. Prev Med. 2001, 33: 434–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Brownson RC, Baker EA, Housemann RA, Brennan LK, Bacak SJ. Environmental and policy determinants of physical activity in the United States. Am J Public Health 2001, 91: 1995–2003.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Troped PJ1, Saunders RP, Pate RR, Reininger B, Ureda JR, et al. Associations between self-reported and objective physical environmental factors and use of a community rail-trail. Prev Med 2001, 32: 191–200.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. King AC1, Castro C, Wilcox S, Eyler AA, Sallis JF, et al. Personal and environmental factors associated with physical inactivity among different racialethnic groups of U.S. middle-aged and older-aged women. Health Psychol 2000, 19: 354–64.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Golubic R, Martin KR, Ekelund U, Hardy R, Kuh D et al. Levels of physical activity among a nationally representative sample of people in early old age: results of objective and self-reported assessments. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 2014, 3: 58. doi: 10.1186/1479-5868-11-58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Lim K, Taylor L. Factors associated with physical activity among older people—a population-based study. Prev Med 2005, 40: 33–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Stathi A, Gilbert H, Fox KR, Coulson J, Davis M, et al. Determinants of neighborhood activity of adults age 70 and over: a mixed-methods study. J Aging Phys Act 2012, 20: 148–70.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. McKee G, Kearney PM, Kenny RA. The factors associated with self-reported physical activity in older adults living in the community. Age Ageing. 2015, 11. pii: afv042.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Nagasaki Web City. The regulations, rule of city. http://www1.g-reiki.net/nagasaki/reiki_honbun/q302RG00000474.html. Accessed 7 May 2015 (in Japanese).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Togo F, Watanabe E, Park H, Yasunaga A, Park S, et al. How many days of pedometer use predict the annual activity of the elderly reliably? Med Sci Sports Exerc 2008, 40: 1058–1064.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Miller MR, Hankinson J, Brusasco V, Burgos F, Casaburi R, et al. Standardisation of spirometry. Eur Respir J 2005, 26:319–338.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Kato M, Yamasaki H, Hiiragi Y, Nakashima K. Measurements of isometric knee extension force with a hand-held dynamometer: effect of interrater reliability using a fixing-belt. Sogo Rehabilitation 2001, 29: 1047–1050.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Radloff LS. The CES-D Scale: a self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Appl. Psychol. Meas. 1977, 1: 385–401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Van Cauwenberg J, De Bourdeaudhuij I, De Meester F, Van Dyck D, Salmon J, et al. Relationship between the physical environment and physical activity in older adults: a systematic review. Health Place 2011, 17:458–469.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Li F, Harmer PA, Cardinal BJ, Bosworth M, Acock A, et al. Built environment, adiposity, and physical activity in adults aged 50-75. Am J Prev Med 2008, 35:38–46.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. King WC, Belle SH, Brach JS, Simkin-Silverman LR, Soska T, et al. Objective measures of neighborhood environment and physical activity in older women. Am J Prev Med 2005, 28:461–469.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Brownson RC, Eyler AA, King AC, Shyu YL, Brown DR et al. Reliability of information on physical activity and other chronic disease risk factors among US women aged 40 years or older. Am J Epidemiol 1999, 149: 379–391.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Kuh D, Bassey EJ, Butterworth S, Hardy R, Wadsworth ME, et al. Grip strength, postural control, and functional leg power in a representative cohort of British men and women: associations with physical activity, health status, and socioeconomic conditions. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2005, 60:224–231.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Martin HJ, Syddall HE, Dennison EM, Cooper C, Sayer AA. Relationship between customary physical activity, muscle strength and physical performance in older men and women: findings from the Hertfordshire Cohort Study. Age Ageing 2008, 37:589–593.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Vance DE, Ross LA, Ball KK, Wadley VG, Rizzo M. Correlates of individual physical activities in older adults. Act Adapt Aging 2007; 31: 1–21.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Hunter GR, McCarthy JP, Bamman MM. Effects of resistance training on older adults. Sports Med 2004, 34:329–348.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Baert V, Gorus E, Mets T, Geerts C, Bautmans I. Motivators and barriers for physical activity in the oldest old: a systematic review. Ageing Res Rev 2011, 10: 464–74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Hamidizadeh S, Ahmadi F, Aslani Y, Ete-madifar S, Salehi K, et al. Study effect of a group-based exercise program on the quality of life in older men and women in 2006-2007. Journal of Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences 2008, 16:81–86.

    Google Scholar 

  38. El-Khoury F, Cassou B, Charles MA, Dar-gent-Molina P. The effect of fall prevention exercise programmes on fall induced injuries in community dwelling older adults: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. BMJ 2013,347: f6234.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Drewe SB. Competing conception of com-petition: Implications for physical education. European Physical Education Review 1998, 4:5–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Ashford B, Biddle S, Goudas M. Participation in community sports centers: motives and predictors of enjoyment. J Sports Sci 1993, 11: 249–256.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Qhasemi S, Mousavi N. Health guideline for older people. Tehran: University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences press. 2000.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Takako Tanaka.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tanaka, T., Tanaka, K., Suyama, K. et al. A comparison of objective physical activity, muscle strength, and depression among community-dwelling older women living in sloped versus non-sloped environments. J Nutr Health Aging 20, 520–524 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12603-015-0602-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12603-015-0602-0

Key words

Navigation