Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A fire detection model based on power-aware scheduling for IoT-sensors in smart cities with partial coverage

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Fire detection techniques have received considerable critical attention over the past ten years. Regardless of the progress in the area of fire detection, questions have been raised about the cost, complexity, consumed power from a large number of sensors to analyze sensors’ data. Debate continues about the best strategies for the management of consumed power and how to accelerate the processing of real-time data in fire detection through the internet of things. This paper presents a partial coverage and a power-aware IoT-based fire detection model with different multi-functional sensors in smart cities. In the proposed model, the sleep scheduling approach used for saving sensors energy. This approach will significantly help in saving consumed energy and thus the need for any extra number of nodes required for continuously covering the target area. Moreover, fog computing is applied to process real-time data aggregated from a large number of sensors for running systems more efficiently. Validation of the proposed model was carried out via simulation and experimental testbed implementation with Arduino, sensors, and Raspberry pi. The results obtained indicate how the proposed technique can efficiently determine the sensors to meet the constraints imposed. The most striking finding to emerge from this experimental and simulation study is that the proposed technique helps in ensuring excellent performance in terms of the number of active nodes and the network lifetime, over other state-of-the-art techniques. The most striking finding of this work compared to MWSAC and PCLA, while covering the same area, is the minimization of the number of active nodes by 64.33% and 15%. It raises the network’s lifetime by 91.32% compared to MWSAC and 12% compared to PCLA, respectively.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abdul-Qawy ASH, Srinivasulu T (2019) Sees: a scalable and energy-efficient scheme for green iot-based heterogeneous wireless nodes. J Ambient Intell Humaniz Comput 10(4):1571–1596

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aksamovic A, Hebibovic M, Boskovic D (2017) Forest fire early detection system design utilising the WSN simulator. In: 2017 XXVI international conference on information, communication and automation technologies (ICAT). IEEE, pp 1–5

  • Alsuhli G, Khattab A (2019) A fog-based IoT platform for smart buildings. In: 2019 international conference on innovative trends in computer engineering (ITCE). IEEE, pp 174–179

  • Arduino (2020a) ARDUINO UNO REV3. https://store.arduino.cc/usa/arduino-uno-rev3. Online; Accessed 22 Apr 2020

  • Arduino (2020b) Xbee Shield. https://www.arduino.cc/en/Main/ArduinoXbeeShield. Online; Accessed 22 Apr 2020

  • Baucas MJ, Spachos P (2019) Using cloud and fog computing for large scale iot-based urban sound classification. Simul Model Pract Theory 101:102013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • botland (2020) Raspberry Pi Model B 512MB RAM. https://botland.com.pl/en/modules-raspberry-pi-2-b-a/972-raspberry-pi-model-b-512mb-ram.html. Online. Accessed 22 Apr 2020

  • Castillo-Cara M, Huaranga-Junco E, Quispe-Montesinos M, Orozco-Barbosa L, Antúnez EA (2018) Frog: a robust and green wireless sensor node for fog computing platforms. J Sens 2018:1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choi M, Chi S (2019) Optimal route selection model for fire evacuations based on hazard prediction data. Simul Model Pract Theory 94:321–333

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chowdary V, Gupta MK (2018) Automatic forest fire detection and monitoring techniques: a survey. In: Intelligent communication, control and devices. Springer, Singapore, pp 1111–1117

  • Components101 (2020a) 16 \(x\) 2 LCD Module. https://components101.com/16x2-lcd-pinout-datasheet. Online; Accessed 22 Apr 2020

  • Components101 (2020b) DHT11-temperature and humidity sensor. https://components101.com/dht11-temperature-sensor. Online; Accessed 22 Apr 2020

  • De Paola A, Ferraro P, Re GL, Morana M, Ortolani M (2019) A fog-based hybrid intelligent system for energy saving in smart buildings. J Ambient Intell Humaniz Comput 11:1–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Deak G, Curran K, Condell J, Asimakopoulou E, Bessis N (2013) Iots (internet of things) and dfpl (device-free passive localisation) in a disaster management scenario. Simul Model Pract Theory 35:86–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dubey V, Kumar P, Chauhan N (2019) Forest fire detection system using IoT and artificial neural network. In: International conference on innovative computing and communications. Springer, Singapore, pp 323–337

  • Dutta J, Roy S (2017) IoT-fog-cloud based architecture for smart city: prototype of a smart building. In: 2017 7th international conference on cloud computing, data science and engineering-confluence. IEEE, pp 237–242

  • Electronics (2020) F, Flame Sensor Module. http://rogerbit.com/wprb/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/Flame-sensor-arduino.pdf. Online; Accessed 22 Apr 2020

  • ELETRONICS (2020) Technical data MQ-9 GAS sensor. https://www.electronicoscaldas.com/datasheet/MQ-9_Hanwei.pdf. Accessed 22 Apr 2020

  • Farsi M, Elhosseini MA, Badawy M, Ali HA, Eldin HZ (2019) Deployment techniques in wireless sensor networks, coverage and connectivity: A survey. IEEE Access 7:28940–28954

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang M, Liu A, Zhao M, Wang T (2019) Multi working sets alternate covering scheme for continuous partial coverage in wsns. Peer Peer Netw Appl 12(3):553–567

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaur H, Sood SK (2019) Fog-assisted iot-enabled scalable network infrastructure for wildfire surveillance. J Netw Comput Appl 144:171–183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khodadadi F, Dastjerdi A, Buyya R (2016) Chapter 1: internet of things: an overview. In: Buyya R, Dastjerdi AV (eds) Internet of things. Morgan Kaufmann, Burlington, pp 3–27

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kim T, Qiao D, Choi W (2018) Energy-efficient scheduling of internet of things devices for environment monitoring applications. In: 2018 IEEE international conference on communications (ICC). IEEE, pp 1–7

  • Ko H, Lee J, Pack S (2019) CG-E2S2: consistency-guaranteed and energy-efficient sleep scheduling algorithm with data aggregation for iot. Future Gener Comput Syst 92:1093–1102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kodali RK, Yerroju S (2017) IoT based smart emergency response system for fire hazards. In: 2017 3rd international conference on applied and theoretical computing and communication technology (iCATccT). IEEE, pp 194–199

  • Kumar V, Laghari AA, Karim S, Shakir M, Brohi AA (2019) Comparison of fog computing and cloud computing. Int J Math Sci Comput (IJMSC) 5(1):31–41

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore WD (2008) Keep it covered. Electrical Contractor. https://www.ecmag.com/section/codes-standards/keep-it-covered. Accessed 16 Aug 2019

  • Mostafaei H, Montieri A, Persico V, Pescapé A (2017) A sleep scheduling approach based on learning automata for WSN partial coverage. J Netw Comput Appl 80:67–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oma R, Nakamura S, Duolikun D, Enokido T, Takizawa M (2018) An energy-efficient model for fog computing in the internet of things (iot). Internet Things 1:14–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park JH, Yen NY (2018) Advanced algorithms and applications based on iot for the smart devices. J Ambient Intell Human Comput 9:1085–1087

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park E, del Pobil A, Kwon S (2018) The role of internet of things (iot) in smart cities: Technology roadmap-oriented approaches. Sustainability 10(5):1388

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rajab H, Cinkelr T (2018) IoT based smart cities. In: 2018 international symposium on networks, computers and communications (ISNCC). IEEE, pp 1–4

  • Saeed F, Paul A, Rehman A, Hong W, Seo H (2018) Iot-based intelligent modeling of smart home environment for fire prevention and safety. J Sens Actuator Netw 7(1):11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sampaio HV, de Jesus ALC, do Nascimento Boing R, Westphall CB (2019) Autonomic IoT battery management with fog computing. In: International conference on green, pervasive, and cloud computing. Springer, Cham, pp 89–103

  • Shah AS, Nasir H, Fayaz M, Lajis A, Shah A (2019) A review on energy consumption optimization techniques in iot based smart building environments. Information 10(3):108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shahraki A, Kaffash DK, Haugen O (2018) A review on the effects of IoT and smart cities technologies on urbanism. In: 2018 South-Eastern European design automation, computer engineering, computer networks and society media conference (SEEDA_CECNSM). IEEE, pp 1–8

  • Vu C, Chen G, Zhao Y, Li Y (2009) A universal framework for partial coverage in wireless sensor networks. In: 2009 IEEE 28th international performance computing and communications conference. IEEE, pp 1–8

  • Wan R, Xiong N et al (2018) An energy-efficient sleep scheduling mechanism with similarity measure for wireless sensor networks. Hum Cent Comput Inf Sci 8(1):18

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • ZainEldin H, Badawy M, Elhosseini M et al (2020) An improved dynamic deployment technique based-on genetic algorithm (IDDT-GA) for maximizing coverage in wireless sensor networks. J Ambient Intell Human Comput. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12652-020-01698-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hanaa ZainEldin.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

El-Hosseini, M., ZainEldin, H., Arafat, H. et al. A fire detection model based on power-aware scheduling for IoT-sensors in smart cities with partial coverage. J Ambient Intell Human Comput 12, 2629–2648 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12652-020-02425-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12652-020-02425-w

Keywords

Navigation