Abstract
This paper explored the positive attributes of aerobic membrane bioreactor for recycling and reuse of domestic wastewater for irrigation. For this purpose, performances of two different full-scale treatment plants, one designed as aerobic membrane bioreactor (AMBR) equipped with a hollow fiber membrane with a nominal pore size of 0.03 μm, and the other, as a conventional nitrogen removal activated sludge plant with pre-denitrification (A2O) were evaluated and compared. The effluent of the A2O system included an average of 109 mg L−1 chemical oxygen demand (COD), 32 mg L−1 total suspended solids (TSS) and 17 mg L−1 of total nitrogen. The AMBR system was able to reduce the effluent COD level to 24 mg L−1, obviously with lower TSS and turbidity. The effluent quality of the AMBR was in compliance with irrigation water standards; its nitrogen content should be evaluated as an added nutritional value for most plants. Considering the additional profit of the recovered water, the investment and operational costs of A2O and AMBR processes were compatible. The results underlined the merit of AMBR process, especially in low populated areas also requiring resources for irrigation.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
APHA/AWWA/WEF (2005) Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater. Standard Methods
Bixio D, Cikurel H, Muston M, Miska V, Joksimovic D, Schafer AI, Ravazzini A, Aharoni A, Savic D, Thoeye C (2005) Municipal wastewater reclamation: where do we stand? An overview of treatment technology and management practice. Water Sci Technol: Water Supply 5(1):77–85
Crawford G, Thompson D, Lozier J, Daigger G, Fleischer E (2000) Membrane bioreactors—a designer’s perspective. In: Proceedings of the water environment federation technical symposia, Anaheim
Directive on Municipal Wastewater Treatment, Turkish Official Journal 26047 (2006) https://www.resmigazete.gov.tr/eskiler/2006/01/20060108-2.htm
Fenu A, Roels J, Wambecq T, de Gussem K, Thoeye C, de Gueldre G, van de Steene B (2010) Energy audit of a full scale MBR system. Desal 262(1–3):121–128
Gernaey KV, van Loosdrecht MCM, Henze M, Lind M, Jörgensen SB (2004) Activated sludge wastewater treatment plant modelling and simulation: state of the art. Environ Model Softw 19(9):763–783
Goel RK, Noguera DR (2006) Evaluation of sludge yield and phosphorus removal in a Cannibal solids reduction process. J Environ Eng 132(10):1331–1337
Güven G, Perendeci A, Özdemir K, Tanyolaç A (2012) Specific energy consumption in electrochemical treatment of food industry wastewaters. J Chem Technol Biotechnol 87(4):513–522
Güven G, Perendeci A, Tanyolaç A (2014) Reaction kinetics on treatment of food industry wastewaters by electrochemical oxidation. Desal Water Treat 52:37–39
Henze ML, Grady CP Jr, Gujer W, Marais GVR, Matsuo T (1987) A general model for single-sludge wastewater treatment systems. Water Res 21(5):505–515
Hocaoglu SM, Orhon D (2013) Particle size distribution analysis of chemical oxygen demand fractions with different biodegradation characteristics in black water and gray water. Clean: Soil, Air, Water 41(11):1044–1051
Hochstrat R, Melin T, Wintgens T, Jeffrey P (2006) Assesing the European wastewater reclamation and reuse potential—a scenario analysis. Desal 188:1–8
Insel G, Hocaoğlu SM, Cokgor E, Orhon D (2011) Modelling the effect of biomass induced oxygen transfer limitations on the nitrogen removal performance of membrane bioreactor. J Membrane Sci 368:54–63
Insel G, Cokgor E, Okutman Tas D, Sözen S, Orhon D (2015) Impact of the anoxic volume ratio on the dynamics of biological nitrogen removal under extended aeration conditions. Water Air Soil Pollut 226:405
Insel G, Sözen S, Yucel AB, Gökçekuş H, Orhon D (2019) Assessment of anoxic volume ratio based on hydrolysis kinetics for effective nitrogen removal: model evaluation. Chem Technol Biotechnol 94:1739–1751
Jenkins D, Richard MG, Daigger GT (1993) Manual on the causes and control of activated sludge bulking and foaming, 2nd edn. Chelsea, MI, Lewis Publishers
Judd SJ (2004) A review of fouling of membrane bioreactors in sewage treatment. Water Sci Technol 49(2):229–235
Kendirli B, Cakmak B, Gokalp Z (2005) Assessment of water quality management in Turkey. Water Int 30(4):446–455
Le-Clech P, Chen V, Fane TAG (2006) Fouling in membrane bioreactors used in wastewater treatment. J Membrane Sci 284:17–53
Maryam B, Buyukgungor H (2019) Wastewater reclamation and reuse trends in Turkey: opportunities and challenges. J Water Process Eng 30:100501
Muller EB, Stouthamer AH, Verseveld HW, Eikelboom DH (1995) Aerobic domestic wastewater treatment in a pilot plant with complete sludge retention by cross-flow filtration. Water Res 29(4):1179–1189
Nagaoka H, Ueda S, Miya A (1996) Influence of bacterial extracellular polymers on the membrane separation activated sludge process. Water Sci Technol 34(9):165–172
Nas B, Uyanık S, Aygün A, Dogan S, Erul G, Nas KB, Turgut S, Cop M, Dolu T (2020) Wastewater reuse in Turkey: from present status to future potential. Water Suplly 20(1):73–82
Ng HY, Hermanowicz SW (2005) Membrane bioreactor operation at short solids retention time: performance and biocharacteristics. Water Res 39:981–992
Noyan K, Allı B, Okutman Taş D, Sözen S, Orhon D (2017) Relationship between COD particle size distribution, COD fractionation and biodegradation characteristics in domestic sewage. Chem Tech Biotech 92:2142–2149
Orhon D (2015) Evolution of the activated sludge process: the first 50 years. J Chem Technol Biotechnol 90(4):608–640
Orhon D, Sozen S, Basaran ST, Alli B (2016) Super fast membrane bioreactor transition to extremely slow sludge ages for waste recycle and reuse with energy conservation. Desal Water Treat 57(45):21160–21172
Övez S, Orhon D (2005) Microbial ecology of bulking and foaming activated sludge treating tannery wastewater. J Environ Sci Health 40(2):409–422
Perendeci A, Çığgın AS, Kökdemir Ünşar E, Orhon D (2020) Optimization of alkaline hydrothermal pretreatment of biological sludge for enhanced methane generation under anaerobic conditions. Waste Manage 107:9–19
Richard MG (1989) Activated sludge microbiology. Water Pollution Control Federation, Alexandria
Salgot M (2008) Water reclamation, recycling and reuse: implementation issues. Desal 218(1):190–197
Sözen S, Pala-Ozkok I, Aysel M, Teksoy-Basaran S, Akarsubasi A, Ergal I, Kurt H, Ubay-Cokgor E, Orhon D (2015) Performace and microbial behavior of submerged membrane bioreactor at extremely low sludge ages. Desal Water Treat 56(4):862–874
Sözen S, Teksoy-Basaran S, Ergal I, Karaca C, Alli B, Razbonyali C, Ubay-Cokgor E, Orhon D (2018) A novel process maximizing energy conservation potential of biologicak treatment: super fast membrane bioreactor. J Membrane Sci 545:337–347
Sumner ME (1993) Sodic soils: new perspectives. Aust J Soil Res 31:683–750
Tas DO, Karahan Ö, Insel G, Orhon D, Spanjers H (2009) Biodegradability and denitrification potential of settleable chemical oxygen demand in domestic wastewater. Water Environ Res 81(7):715–727
Technical Directive on Wastewater Treatment Plants, Turkish Official Journal 27527 (2010) https://www.resmigazete.gov.tr/eskiler/2010/03/20100320-7.htm
Trussell RS, Merlo RP, Hermanowicz SW, Jenkins D (2007) Influence of mixed liquor properties and aeration intensity on membrane fouling in a submerged membrane bioreactor at high mixed liquor suspended solids concentrations. Water Res 41:947–958
US EPA (2004) Guidelines for Water Reuse. Municipal Support Division Office of Wastewater Management and Office of Water, Washington, DC. 625/R-04/108. 08.
Acknowledgements
This study has been supported by the Antalya City Water and Wastewater Administration Directorate, Turkey. The authors would like to express their gratitude to Antalya City Water and Wastewater Administration Directorate for financial support and permission to use the plant data in this study.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
This article is a part of the Topical collection in Environmental Earth Sciences on “Water Problems in E. Mediterranean Countries” guest edited by H. Gökçeku#, D. Orhon, V. Nourania, and S. Sozen.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Yılmaz, F., Otuzaltı, M.M., Perendeci, N.A. et al. Potential of aerobic membrane bioreactor for recycling and reuse of domestic wastewater for irrigation. Environ Earth Sci 79, 260 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-020-09006-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-020-09006-2